Developments and applications of the OPTIMADE API for materials discovery, design, and data exchange
Authors:
Matthew L. Evans,
Johan Bergsma,
Andrius Merkys,
Casper W. Andersen,
Oskar B. Andersson,
Daniel Beltrán,
Evgeny Blokhin,
Tara M. Boland,
Rubén Castañeda Balderas,
Kamal Choudhary,
Alberto Díaz Díaz,
Rodrigo Domínguez García,
Hagen Eckert,
Kristjan Eimre,
María Elena Fuentes Montero,
Adam M. Krajewski,
Jens Jørgen Mortensen,
José Manuel Nápoles Duarte,
Jacob Pietryga,
Ji Qi,
Felipe de Jesús Trejo Carrillo,
Antanas Vaitkus,
Jusong Yu,
Adam Zettel,
Pedro Baptista de Castro
, et al. (34 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Open Databases Integration for Materials Design (OPTIMADE) application programming interface (API) empowers users with holistic access to a growing federation of databases, enhancing the accessibility and discoverability of materials and chemical data. Since the first release of the OPTIMADE specification (v1.0), the API has undergone significant development, leading to the upcoming v1.2 relea…
▽ More
The Open Databases Integration for Materials Design (OPTIMADE) application programming interface (API) empowers users with holistic access to a growing federation of databases, enhancing the accessibility and discoverability of materials and chemical data. Since the first release of the OPTIMADE specification (v1.0), the API has undergone significant development, leading to the upcoming v1.2 release, and has underpinned multiple scientific studies. In this work, we highlight the latest features of the API format, accompanying software tools, and provide an update on the implementation of OPTIMADE in contributing materials databases. We end by providing several use cases that demonstrate the utility of the OPTIMADE API in materials research that continue to drive its ongoing development.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2024; v1 submitted 1 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
The human factor: results of a small-angle scattering data analysis Round Robin
Authors:
Brian R. Pauw,
Glen J. Smales,
Andy S. Anker,
Daniel M. Balazs,
Frederick L. Beyer,
Ralf Bienert,
Wim G. Bouwman,
Ingo Breßler,
Joachim Breternitz,
Erik S Brok,
Gary Bryant,
Andrew J. Clulow,
Erin R. Crater,
Frédéric De Geuser,
Alessandra Del Giudice,
Jérôme Deumer,
Sabrina Disch,
Shankar Dutt,
Kilian Frank,
Emiliano Fratini,
Elliot P. Gilbert,
Marc Benjamin Hahn,
James Hallett,
Max Hohenschutz,
Martin Hollamby
, et al. (24 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A Round Robin study has been carried out to estimate the impact of the human element in small-angle scattering data analysis. Four corrected datasets were provided to participants ready for analysis. All datasets were measured on samples containing spherical scatterers, with two datasets in dilute dispersions, and two from powders. Most of the 46 participants correctly identified the number of pop…
▽ More
A Round Robin study has been carried out to estimate the impact of the human element in small-angle scattering data analysis. Four corrected datasets were provided to participants ready for analysis. All datasets were measured on samples containing spherical scatterers, with two datasets in dilute dispersions, and two from powders. Most of the 46 participants correctly identified the number of populations in the dilute dispersions, with half of the population mean entries within 1.5% and half of the population width entries within 40%, respectively. Due to the added complexity of the structure factor, much fewer people submitted answers on the powder datasets. For those that did, half of the entries for the means and widths were within 44% and 86% respectively. This Round Robin experiment highlights several causes for the discrepancies, for which solutions are proposed.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.