Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Zheng, Z J

Precision premium transformation -- a high-precision astrometric solution based on the precision premium curve

Authors: Z. J. Zheng, Q. Y. Peng, F. R. Lin, D. Li, Y. Zheng

Abstract: Context. In Gaia era, atmospheric turbulence, which causes stochastic wander of a star image, is a fundamental limitation to the astrometric accuracy of ground-based optical imaging. However, the positional bias caused by turbulence (called turbulence error here) can be effectively reduced by measuring a target relative to another reference (a star or a fast-moving target) which locates in the ran… ▽ More Context. In Gaia era, atmospheric turbulence, which causes stochastic wander of a star image, is a fundamental limitation to the astrometric accuracy of ground-based optical imaging. However, the positional bias caused by turbulence (called turbulence error here) can be effectively reduced by measuring a target relative to another reference (a star or a fast-moving target) which locates in the range of only several tens of arcsec, since they suffer from similar turbulence errors. This phenomenon is called the precision premium and has been effectively applied to the astrometry of solar system. Further investigation for the precision premium shows that, the precision premium works at less than about 100 arcsec for two specific objects and the relative positional precision as a function of their angular seperation can be well fitted by a sigmoidal function, called the precision premium curve (PPC). Aims. We want to reduce the turbulence error of a target if it is imaged in an area of high stellar density of a ground-based observation by taking advantage of more Gaia reference stars. Methods. Based on the PPC, we proposed a high-precision astrometric solution called precision premium transformation (PPT) in this paper, which takes advantage of high similarity of turbulence errors in a small region and the dense Gaia reference stars in the region to reduce the turbulence errors on the observation, through a weighted solution. Results. Through systematic analysis, the PPT method exhibits significant advantages in terms of not only precision but also applicability when a target is imaged in an area of high stellar density. The PPT method is also applied to the determination of the proper motion of an open cluster, and the results demonstrate and quantify benefits that the PPT method bestows on ground-based astrometry. △ Less

Submitted 9 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

An effective geometric distortion solution and its implementation

Authors: F. R. Lin, Q. Y. Peng, Z. J. Zheng, B. F. Guo

Abstract: Geometric distortion (GD) critically constrains the precision of astrometry. Its correction required GD calibration observations, which can only be obtained using a special dithering strategy during the observation period. Some telescopes lack GD calibration observations, making it impossible to accurately determine the GD effect using well-established methods. This limits the value of the telesco… ▽ More Geometric distortion (GD) critically constrains the precision of astrometry. Its correction required GD calibration observations, which can only be obtained using a special dithering strategy during the observation period. Some telescopes lack GD calibration observations, making it impossible to accurately determine the GD effect using well-established methods. This limits the value of the telescope observations in certain astrometric scenarios, such as using historical observations of moving targets in the solar system to improve their orbit. We investigated a method for handling GD that does not rely on the calibration observations. With this advantage, it can be used to solve the GD models of telescopes which were intractable in the past. Consequently, astrometric results of the historical observations obtained from these telescopes can be significantly improved. We used the weighted average of the plate constants to derive the GD model. The method was implemented in Python and released on GitHub. It was then applied to solve GD in the observations taken with the 1-m and 2.4-m telescopes at Yunnan Observatory. The resulting GD models were compared with those obtained using well-established methods to demonstrate the accuracy. Furthermore, the method was applied in the reduction of observations for two targets, the moon of Jupiter (Himalia) and the binary GSC2038-0293, to show its effectiveness. The GD of the 60-cm telescope at Yunnan Observatory without calibration observations was accurately solved by our method. After GD correction, the astrometric results for both targets show improvements. Notably, the mean residual between observed and computed position ($O-C$) for the binary GSC2038-0293 decreased from 36 mas to 5 mas. △ Less

Submitted 13 February, 2024; v1 submitted 22 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Using Gaia DR2 to make a systematic comparison between two geometric distortion solutions

Authors: Z. J. Zheng, Q. Y. Peng, F. R. Lin

Abstract: Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) provides high accuracy and precision astrometric parameters (position, parallax, and proper motion) for more than 1 billion sources and is revolutionizing astrometry. For a fast-moving target such as an asteroid, with many stars in the field of view that are brighter than the faint limit magnitude of Gaia (21 Gmag), its measurement accuracy and precision can be great… ▽ More Gaia Data Release 2 (Gaia DR2) provides high accuracy and precision astrometric parameters (position, parallax, and proper motion) for more than 1 billion sources and is revolutionizing astrometry. For a fast-moving target such as an asteroid, with many stars in the field of view that are brighter than the faint limit magnitude of Gaia (21 Gmag), its measurement accuracy and precision can be greatly improved by taking advantage of Gaia reference stars. However, if we want to study the relative motions of cluster members, we could cross-match them in different epochs based on pixel positions. For both types of targets, the determination of optical field-angle distortion or called geometric distortion (GD) in this paper is important for image calibration especially when there are few reference stars to build a high-order plate model. For the former, the GD solution can be derived based on the astrometric catalogue's position, while for the latter, a reference system called 'master frame' is constructed from these observations in pixel coordinates, and then the GD solution is derived. But, are the two GD solutions in agreement with each other? In this paper, two types of GD solutions, which are derived either from the Gaia DR2 catalogue or from the self-constructed master frame, are applied respectively for the observations taken by 1-m telescope at Yunnan Observatory. It is found that two GD solutions enable the precision to achieve a comparable level (~10 mas) but their GD patterns are different. Synthetic distorted positions are generated for further investigation into the discrepancy between the two GD solutions. We aim to find the correlation and distinction between the two types of GD solutions and their applicability in high precision astrometry. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Journal ref: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 502, Issue 4, April 2021, Pages 6216-6224

A Deeper Solution to the Actual Geometry of CCD Mosaic Chips

Authors: Z. J. Zheng, Q. Y. Peng, A. Vienne, F. R. Lin, B. F. Guo

Abstract: We present a solution to determine the actual or physical relative positions between CCD chips. Due to the limited depth of the Gaia catalogue, there may be few stars identified from the Gaia catalogue for astrometric calibration on the deep observation of a large, ground-based or space-based telescope, such as the planned two-metre Chinese Space Station Telescope (CSST). For this reason, we refer… ▽ More We present a solution to determine the actual or physical relative positions between CCD chips. Due to the limited depth of the Gaia catalogue, there may be few stars identified from the Gaia catalogue for astrometric calibration on the deep observation of a large, ground-based or space-based telescope, such as the planned two-metre Chinese Space Station Telescope (CSST). For this reason, we referred to the idea from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) astrometry to only use stars' pixel positions to derive the relative positions between chips. We refer to the practice as differential astrometry in this paper. In order to ensure the results are reliable, we took advantage of Gaia EDR3 to derive the relative positions between chips, to provide a close comparison. We refer to the practice as photographic astrometry. We implemented the technique for the CCD mosaic chips of the Bok 2.3-m telescope based on two epochs of observations (Jan 17,2016 and Mar 5,2017). There is a good agreement between the two types of astrometry for the relative positions between chips. For the two epochs of observations, the averages of the gaps derived from photographic astrometry and differential astrometry differ to about 0.046 pixels (~0.021 arcsec) and 0.001 pixels (~0.001 arcsec), respectively, while the average precisions of the gaps are about 0.018 pixel (~0.008 arcsec) and 0.028 pixels (<0.013 arcsec), respectively. The results provide us with more confidence in applying this solution for the CCD mosaic chips of the CSST by means of differential astrometry. Compared with the solution described by Anderson & King, which has been used to determine the interchip offset of Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) chips and Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) chips at the HST, the solution proposed in this paper shows at least a factor of two improvement in precision, on average. △ Less

Submitted 23 February, 2022; v1 submitted 27 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Journal ref: A&A 661, A75 (2022)

Using Gaia DR2 to solve differential color refraction and charge transfer efficiency issues

Authors: F. R. Lin, Q. Y. Peng, Z. J. Zheng

Abstract: The Gaia DR2 catalog released in 2018 gives information about more than one billion stars, including their extremely precise positions that are not affected by the atmosphere, as well as the magnitudes in the G, RP, and BP passbands. This information provides great potential for the improvement of the ground-based astrometry. Based on Gaia DR2, we present a convenient method to calibrate the diffe… ▽ More The Gaia DR2 catalog released in 2018 gives information about more than one billion stars, including their extremely precise positions that are not affected by the atmosphere, as well as the magnitudes in the G, RP, and BP passbands. This information provides great potential for the improvement of the ground-based astrometry. Based on Gaia DR2, we present a convenient method to calibrate the differential color refraction (DCR). This method only requires observations with dozens of stars taken through a selected filter. Applying this method to the reduction of observations captured through different filters by the 1-m and 2.4-m telescopes at Yunnan Observatory, the results show that the mean of the residuals between observed and computed positions (O-C) after DCR correction is significantly reduced. For our observations taken through an N (null) filter, the median of the mean (O-C) for well-exposed stars (about 15 G-mag) decreases from 19 mas to 3 mas, thus achieving better accuracy, i.e. mean (O-C). Another issue correlated is a systematic error caused by the poor charge transfer efficiency (CTE) when a CCD frame is read out. This systematic error is significant for some of the observations captured by the 1-m telescope at Yunnan Observatory. Using a sigmoidal function to fit and correct the mean (O-C), a systematic error up to 30 mas can be eliminated. △ Less

Submitted 8 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Investigation and Application of Fitting Models for Centering Algorithms in Astrometry

Authors: F. R. Lin, Q. Y. Peng, Z. J. Zheng, B. F. Guo, Y. J. Shang

Abstract: To determine the precise positions of stars in CCD frames, various centering algorithms have been proposed for astrometry. The effective point spread function (ePSF) and the Gaussian centering algorithms are two representative centering algorithms. This paper compares in detail and investigates these two centering algorithms in performing data reduction. Specifically, synthetic star images in diff… ▽ More To determine the precise positions of stars in CCD frames, various centering algorithms have been proposed for astrometry. The effective point spread function (ePSF) and the Gaussian centering algorithms are two representative centering algorithms. This paper compares in detail and investigates these two centering algorithms in performing data reduction. Specifically, synthetic star images in different conditions (i.e. profiles, fluxes, backgrounds and full width at half maximums) are generated and processed. We find that the difference in precision between the two algorithms is related to the profiles of the star images. Therefore, the precision comparison results using an ideal Gaussian-profile star image cannot be extended to other more specific experimental scenarios. Based on the simulation results, the most appropriate algorithm can be selected according to the image characteristics of observations, and the loss of precision of other algorithms can be estimated. The conclusions are verified using observations captured by the 1-m and 2.4-m telescopes at Yunnan Observatory. △ Less

Submitted 24 December, 2021; v1 submitted 13 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Characterization of precision premium in astrometry

Authors: F. R. Lin, J. H. Peng, Z. J. Zheng, Q. Y. Peng

Abstract: Precision premium, a concept in astrometry that was firstly presented by Pascu in 1994, initially means that the relative positional measurement of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter would be more accurate when their separations are small. Correspondingly, many observations have been obtained of these Galilean satellites since then. However, the exact range of the separation in which precision pre… ▽ More Precision premium, a concept in astrometry that was firstly presented by Pascu in 1994, initially means that the relative positional measurement of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter would be more accurate when their separations are small. Correspondingly, many observations have been obtained of these Galilean satellites since then. However, the exact range of the separation in which precision premium takes effect is not clear yet, not to say the variation of the precision with the separation. In this paper, the observations of open cluster M35 are used to study precision premium and the newest star catalogue Gaia DR2 is used in the data reduction. Our results show that precision premium does work in about less than 100 arcsecs for two concerned objects, and the relative positional precision can be well fitted by a sigmoidal function. Observations of Uranian satellites are also reduced as an example of precision premium. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Journal ref: 2019MNRAS.490.4382

Fringes' Impacts to Astrometry and Photometry of Stars

Authors: Z. J. Zheng, Q. Y. Peng

Abstract: Fringes often appear in a CCD frame, especially when a thin CCD chip and a R or I filter is used. 88 CCD frames of the two open clusters NGC 2324 and NGC 1664 with a Johnson I filter taken from the 2.4-m telescope at Yunnan Observatory are used to study the fringes' impacts to the astrometry and photometry of stars. A novel technique proposed by Snodgrass & Carry is applied to remove the fringes i… ▽ More Fringes often appear in a CCD frame, especially when a thin CCD chip and a R or I filter is used. 88 CCD frames of the two open clusters NGC 2324 and NGC 1664 with a Johnson I filter taken from the 2.4-m telescope at Yunnan Observatory are used to study the fringes' impacts to the astrometry and photometry of stars. A novel technique proposed by Snodgrass & Carry is applied to remove the fringes in each CCD frame. And an appraisal of this technique is performed to estimate fringes' effects on astrometry and photometry of stars. Our results show that the astrometric and photometric precisions of stars can be improved effectively after the removal of fringes, especially for faint stars. △ Less

Submitted 28 March, 2017; v1 submitted 27 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.