-
A new subclass of gamma-ray burst originating from compact binary merger
Authors:
Chen-Wei Wang,
Wen-Jun Tan,
Shao-Lin Xiong,
Shu-Xu Yi,
Rahim Moradi,
Bing Li,
Zhen Zhang,
Yu Wang,
Yan-Zhi Meng,
Jia-Cong Liu,
Yue Wang,
Sheng-Lun Xie,
Wang-Chen Xue,
Zheng-Hang Yu,
Peng Zhang,
Wen-Long Zhang,
Yan-Qiu Zhang,
Chao Zheng
Abstract:
Type I gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are believed to originate from compact binary merger usually with duration less than 2 seconds for the main emission. However, recent observations of GRB 211211A and GRB 230307A indicate that some merger-origin GRBs could last much longer. Since they show strikingly similar properties (indicating a common mechanism) which are different from the classic "long"-short b…
▽ More
Type I gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are believed to originate from compact binary merger usually with duration less than 2 seconds for the main emission. However, recent observations of GRB 211211A and GRB 230307A indicate that some merger-origin GRBs could last much longer. Since they show strikingly similar properties (indicating a common mechanism) which are different from the classic "long"-short burst (e.g. GRB 060614), forming an interesting subclass of type I GRBs, we suggest to name them as type IL GRBs. By identifying the first peak of GRB 230307A as a quasi-thermal precursor, we find that the prompt emission of type IL GRB is composed of three episodes: (1) a precursor followed by a short quiescent (or weak emission) period, (2) a long-duration main emission, and (3) an extended emission. With this burst pattern, a good candidate, GRB 170228A, was found in the Fermi/GBM archive data, and subsequent temporal and spectral analyses indeed show that GRB 170228A falls in the same cluster with GRB 211211A and GRB 230307A in many diagnostic figures. Thus this burst pattern could be a good reference for rapidly identifying type IL GRB and conducting low-latency follow-up observation. We estimated the occurrence rate and discussed the physical origins and implications for the three emission episodes of type IL GRBs. Our analysis suggests the pre-merger precursor model, especially the super flare model, is more favored for type IL GRBs.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Finding the Particularity of the Active Episode of SGR J1935+2154 during Which FRB 20200428 Occurred: Implication from Statistics of Fermi/GBM X-Ray Bursts
Authors:
Sheng-Lun Xie,
Yun-Wei Yu,
Shao-Lin Xiong,
Lin Lin,
** Wang,
Yi Zhao,
Yue Wang,
Wen-Long Zhang
Abstract:
By using the Fermi/Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of the X-ray bursts (XRBs) of SGR J1935+2154, we investigate the temporal clustering of the bursts and the cumulative distribution of the waiting time and fluence/flux. It is found that the bursts occurring in the episode hosting FRB 20200428 have obviously shorter waiting times than those in the other episodes. The general statistical properties of…
▽ More
By using the Fermi/Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of the X-ray bursts (XRBs) of SGR J1935+2154, we investigate the temporal clustering of the bursts and the cumulative distribution of the waiting time and fluence/flux. It is found that the bursts occurring in the episode hosting FRB 20200428 have obviously shorter waiting times than those in the other episodes. The general statistical properties of the XRBs further indicate they could belong to a self-organized critical (SOC) system (e.g., starquakes), making them very similar to the earthquake phenomena. Then, according to a unified scaling law between the waiting time and energy of the earthquakes as well as their aftershocks, we implement an analogy analysis on the XRBs and find that the FRB episode owns more dependent burst events than the other episodes. It is indicated that the fast radio burst (FRB) emission could be produced by the interaction between different burst events, which could correspond to a collision between different seismic/Alfven waves or different explosion outflows. Such a situation could appear when the magnetar enters into a global intensive activity period.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2024; v1 submitted 17 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Memory in the Burst Occurrence of Repeating FRBs
Authors:
** Wang,
Li-Ming Song,
Shao-Lin Xiong,
Xiao-Yun Zhao,
** Wang,
Shu-Min Zhao,
Shuo Xiao,
Ce Cai,
Sheng-Lun Xie,
Wang-Chen Xue,
Chen-Wei Wang,
Yue Wang,
Wen-Long Zhang
Abstract:
Understanding the nature of repeating FRBs is crucial to probe the physics of FRBs. In this work, we analyze the statistics of waiting time between bursts of three repeating FRBs from four data sets. We find a universally pronounced dependency of the waiting times on the previous time interval (denoted as $λ_0$). We observe a temporal clustering where short waiting times tend to be followed by sho…
▽ More
Understanding the nature of repeating FRBs is crucial to probe the physics of FRBs. In this work, we analyze the statistics of waiting time between bursts of three repeating FRBs from four data sets. We find a universally pronounced dependency of the waiting times on the previous time interval (denoted as $λ_0$). We observe a temporal clustering where short waiting times tend to be followed by short ones, and long by long. This memory dependency is manifested in the conditional mean waiting time as well as in the conditional mean residual time to the next burst, both of which increase in direct proportion to $λ_0$. Consequently, the likelihood of experiencing a subsequent FRB burst within a given time window after the preceding burst is significantly influenced by the burst history. We reveal that, for the first time, these memory effects are present in the scale-invariant preconditioned waiting time distribution. We show that the memory effect provides a unified description of waiting times which may account for both the repeating FRBs and the apparent non-repeating FRBs (i.e. only observed one time). These results shed new light on the mechanism of FRBs.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
The 2021 X-ray outburst of magnetar SGR J1935+2154 -- I. Spectral properties
Authors:
Sheng-Lun Xie,
Yi Zhao,
Wang-Chen Xue,
Yun-Wei Yu,
Shao-Lin Xiong,
Heng Yu,
Ce Cai,
Shuang-Nan Zhang
Abstract:
Over a period of multiple active episodes between January 2021 and January 2022, the magnetar SGR J1935+2154 emitted a total of 82 bursts observed by GECAM-B. Temporal and spectral analyses reveal that the bursts have an average duration of $\sim$145 ms and a fluence ranging from $1.2 \times 10^{-8} \ \mathrm{erg \cdot cm^{-2}}$ to $3.7 \times 10^{-5} \ \mathrm{erg \cdot cm^{-2}}$ (30 - 200 keV).…
▽ More
Over a period of multiple active episodes between January 2021 and January 2022, the magnetar SGR J1935+2154 emitted a total of 82 bursts observed by GECAM-B. Temporal and spectral analyses reveal that the bursts have an average duration of $\sim$145 ms and a fluence ranging from $1.2 \times 10^{-8} \ \mathrm{erg \cdot cm^{-2}}$ to $3.7 \times 10^{-5} \ \mathrm{erg \cdot cm^{-2}}$ (30 - 200 keV). The spectral properties of these bursts are similar to those of earlier active episodes. Specifically, we find that the emission area of the Double Black Body (BB2) model shows a Log-Linear correlation to its temperature, and there is a weak relation between fluence and $E_{\mathrm{peak}}$ (or $α$) in the Cut-Off Power Law (CPL) model. However, we note that the temperature distributions of BB2/BB models in GECAM-B samples are different from those in GBM-GECAM samples, due to differences in the energy range used for fitting. To understand this difference, we propose a Multi-Temperature Black Body (MBB) model, assuming that the BB temperatures follow a power law distribution. Our analysis shows that the minimum temperature $kT_{\mathrm{min}} \sim 5$ keV of the MBB model, which is consistent between GECAM-B and GBM-GECAM. This indicates that both samples originated from similar magnetar bursts. We also reveal the spectra of magnetar bursts tend to be soft. It indicates that magnetar bursts may be composed of multiple low BB temperatures and the majority of the BB temperatures are concentrated around the minimum temperature.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2023; v1 submitted 3 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
The First GECAM Observation Results on Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes and Terrestrial Electron Beams
Authors:
Y. Zhao,
J. C. Liu,
S. L. Xiong,
W. C. Xue,
Q. B. Yi,
G. P. Lu,
W. Xu,
F. C. Lyu,
J. C. Sun,
W. X. Peng,
C. Zheng,
Y. Q. Zhang,
C. Cai,
S. Xiao,
S. L. Xie,
C. W. Wang,
W. J. Tan,
Z. H. An,
G. Chen,
Y. Q. Du,
Y. Huang,
M. Gao,
K. Gong,
D. Y. Guo,
J. J. He
, et al. (37 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gravitational-wave high-energy Electromagnetic Counterpart All-sky Monitor (GECAM) is a space-borne instrument dedicated to monitoring high-energy transients, including Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes (TGFs) and Terrestrial Electron Beams (TEBs). We implemented a TGF/TEB search algorithm for GECAM, with which 147 bright TGFs, 2 typical TEBs and 2 special TEB-like events are identified during an effe…
▽ More
Gravitational-wave high-energy Electromagnetic Counterpart All-sky Monitor (GECAM) is a space-borne instrument dedicated to monitoring high-energy transients, including Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes (TGFs) and Terrestrial Electron Beams (TEBs). We implemented a TGF/TEB search algorithm for GECAM, with which 147 bright TGFs, 2 typical TEBs and 2 special TEB-like events are identified during an effective observation time of $\sim$9 months. We show that, with gamma-ray and charged particle detectors, GECAM can effectively identify and distinguish TGFs and TEBs, and measure their temporal and spectral properties in detail. A very high TGF-lightning association rate of $\sim$80\% is obtained between GECAM and GLD360 in east Asia region.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Insight-HXMT and GECAM-C observations of the brightest-of-all-time GRB 221009A
Authors:
Zheng-Hua An,
S. Antier,
Xing-Zi Bi,
Qing-Cui Bu,
Ce Cai,
Xue-Lei Cao,
Anna-Elisa Camisasca,
Zhi Chang,
Gang Chen,
Li Chen,
Tian-Xiang Chen,
Wen Chen,
Yi-Bao Chen,
Yong Chen,
Yu-Peng Chen,
Michael W. Coughlin,
Wei-Wei Cui,
Zi-Gao Dai,
T. Hussenot-Desenonges,
Yan-Qi Du,
Yuan-Yuan Du,
Yun-Fei Du,
Cheng-Cheng Fan,
Filippo Frontera,
He Gao
, et al. (153 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
GRB 221009A is the brightest gamma-ray burst ever detected since the discovery of this kind of energetic explosions. However, an accurate measurement of the prompt emission properties of this burst is very challenging due to its exceptional brightness. With joint observations of \textit{Insight}-HXMT and GECAM-C, we made an unprecedentedly accurate measurement of the emission during the first…
▽ More
GRB 221009A is the brightest gamma-ray burst ever detected since the discovery of this kind of energetic explosions. However, an accurate measurement of the prompt emission properties of this burst is very challenging due to its exceptional brightness. With joint observations of \textit{Insight}-HXMT and GECAM-C, we made an unprecedentedly accurate measurement of the emission during the first $\sim$1800 s of GRB 221009A, including its precursor, main emission (ME, which dominates the burst in flux), flaring emission and early afterglow, in the hard X-ray to soft gamma-ray band from $\sim$ 10 keV to $\sim$ 6 MeV. Based on the GECAM-C unsaturated data of the ME, we measure a record-breaking isotropic equivalent energy ($E_{\rm iso}$) of $\bf \sim 1.5 \times 10^{55}$ erg, which is about eight times the total rest-mass energy of the Sun. The early afterglow data require a significant jet break between 650 s and 1100 s, most likely at $\sim950$ s from the afterglow starting time $T_{AG}$, which corresponds to a jet opening angle of $\sim {0.7^\circ} \ (η_γn)^{1/8}$, where $n$ is the ambient medium density in units of $\rm cm^{-3}$ and $η_γ$ is the ratio between $γ$-ray energy and afterglow kinetic energy. The beaming-corrected total $γ$-ray energy $E_γ$ is $\sim 1.15 \times10^{51} \ (η_γn)^{1/4}$ erg, which is typical for long GRBs. These results suggest that this GRB may have a special central engine, which could launch and collimate a very narrowly beamed jet with an ordinary energy budget, leading to exceptionally luminous gamma-ray radiation per unit solid angle. Alternatively, more GRBs might have such a narrow and bright beam, which are missed by an unfavorable viewing angle or have been detected without distance measurement.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2023; v1 submitted 2 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Cross calibration of gamma-ray detectors (GRD) of GECAM-C
Authors:
Yan-Qiu Zhang,
Shao-Lin Xiong,
Rui Qiao,
Dong-Ya Guo,
Wen-Xi Peng,
Xin-Qiao Li,
Wang-Chen Xue,
Chao Zheng,
Jia-Cong Liu,
Wen-Jun Tan,
Chen-Wei Wang,
Peng Zhang,
** Wang,
Ce Cai,
Shuo Xiao,
Yue Huang,
Pei-Yi Feng,
Xiao-Bo Li,
Li-Ming Song,
Qi-Bin Yi,
Yi Zhao,
Zhi-Wei Guo,
Jian-Jian He,
Chao-Yang Li,
Ya-Qing Liu
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The gamma-ray detectors (GRDs) of GECAM-C onborad SATech-01 satellite is designed to monitor gamma-ray transients all over the sky from 6 keV to 6 MeV. The energy response matrix is the key to do spectral measurements of bursts, which is usually generated from GEANT4 simulation and partially verified by the ground calibration. In this work, energy response matrix of GECAM-C GRD is cross-calibrated…
▽ More
The gamma-ray detectors (GRDs) of GECAM-C onborad SATech-01 satellite is designed to monitor gamma-ray transients all over the sky from 6 keV to 6 MeV. The energy response matrix is the key to do spectral measurements of bursts, which is usually generated from GEANT4 simulation and partially verified by the ground calibration. In this work, energy response matrix of GECAM-C GRD is cross-calibrated with Fermi/GBM and Swift/BAT using a sample of Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters (SGRs). The calibration results show there is a good agreement between GECAM-C and other reasonably well calibrated instrument (i.e. Fermi/GBM and Swift/BAT). We also find that different GRD detectors of GECAM-C also show consistency with each other. All these results indicate that GECAM-C GRD can provide reliable spectral measurements.
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Burst search method based on likelihood ratio in Poisson Statistics
Authors:
Ce Cai,
Shao-Lin Xiong,
Wang-Chen Xue,
Yi Zhao,
Shuo Xiao,
Qi-Bin Yi,
Zhi-Wei Guo,
Jia-Cong Liu,
Yan-Qiu Zhang,
Chao Zheng,
Sheng-Lun Xie,
Yan-Qi Du,
Xiao-Yun Zhao,
Cheng-Kui Li,
** Wang,
Wen-Xi Peng,
Shi-Jie Zheng,
Li-Ming Song,
Xin-Qiao Li,
Xiang-Yang Wen,
Fan Zhang
Abstract:
Searching for X-ray and gamma-ray bursts, including Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters (SGRs) and high energy transients associated with Gravitational wave (GW) events or Fast radio bursts (FRBs), is of great importance in the multi-messenger and multi-wavelength era. Although a coherent search based on the likelihood ratio and Gaussian statistics has been established and utilized i…
▽ More
Searching for X-ray and gamma-ray bursts, including Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters (SGRs) and high energy transients associated with Gravitational wave (GW) events or Fast radio bursts (FRBs), is of great importance in the multi-messenger and multi-wavelength era. Although a coherent search based on the likelihood ratio and Gaussian statistics has been established and utilized in many studies, this Gaussian-based method could be problematic for weak and short bursts which usually have very few counts. To deal with all bursts including weak ones, here we propose the coherent search in Poisson statistics. We studied the difference between Poisson-based and Gaussian-based search methods by Monte Carlo simulations, and find that the Poisson-based search method has advantages compared to the Gaussian case especially for weak bursts. Our results show that, for very weak bursts with very low number of counts, the Poisson-based search can provide higher significance than the Gaussian-based search, and its likelihood ratio (for background fluctuation) still generally follows the chi2 distribution, making the significance estimation of searched bursts very convenient. Thus, we suggest that the coherent search based on Poisson likelihood ratio is more appropriate in the search for generic transients including very weak ones.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Burst phase distribution of SGR J1935+2154 based on Insight-HXMT
Authors:
Xuefeng Lu,
Liming Song,
Mingyu Ge,
Youli Tuo,
Shuang-Nan Zhang,
**lu Qu,
Ce Cai,
Shenglun Xie,
Congzhan Liu,
Chengkui Li,
Yucong Fu,
Yingchen Xu,
Tianming Li
Abstract:
On April 27, 2020, the soft gamma ray repeater SGR J1935+2154 entered its intense outburst episode again. Insight-HXMT carried out about one month observation of the source. A total number of 75 bursts were detected during this activity episode by Insight-HXMT, and persistent emission data were also accumulated. We report on the spin period search result and the phase distribution of burst start t…
▽ More
On April 27, 2020, the soft gamma ray repeater SGR J1935+2154 entered its intense outburst episode again. Insight-HXMT carried out about one month observation of the source. A total number of 75 bursts were detected during this activity episode by Insight-HXMT, and persistent emission data were also accumulated. We report on the spin period search result and the phase distribution of burst start times and burst photon arrival times of the Insight-HXMT high energy detectors and Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM). We find that the distribution of burst start times is uniform within its spin phase for both Insight-HXMT and Fermi-GBM observations, whereas the phase distribution of burst photons is related to the type of a burst's energy spectrum. The bursts with the same spectrum have different distribution characteristics in the initial and decay episodes for the activity of magnetar SGR J1935+2154.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
GECAM Localization of High Energy Transients and the Systematic Error
Authors:
Yi Zhao,
Wang-Chen Xue,
Shao-Lin Xiong,
Yuan-Hao Wang,
Jia-Cong Liu,
Qi Liuo,
Yan-Qiu Zhang,
Jian-Chao Sun,
Xiao-Yun Zhao,
Ce Cai,
Shuo Xiao,
Yue Huang,
Xiao-Bo Li,
Zhen Zhang,
**-Yuan Liao,
Sheng Yang,
Rui Qiao,
Dong-Ya Guo,
Chao Zheng,
Qi-Bin Yi,
Sheng-Lun Xie,
Zhi-Wei Guo,
Chao-Yang Li,
Chen-Wei Wang,
Wen-Jun Tan
, et al. (41 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gravitational wave high-energy Electromagnetic Counterpart All-sky Monitor (GECAM) is a pair of microsatellites (i.e. GECAM-A and GECAM-B) dedicated to monitoring gamma-ray transients including gravitational waves high-energy electromagnetic counterparts, Gamma-ray Bursts, Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters, Solar Flares and Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes. Since launch in December 2020, GECAM-B has detected…
▽ More
Gravitational wave high-energy Electromagnetic Counterpart All-sky Monitor (GECAM) is a pair of microsatellites (i.e. GECAM-A and GECAM-B) dedicated to monitoring gamma-ray transients including gravitational waves high-energy electromagnetic counterparts, Gamma-ray Bursts, Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters, Solar Flares and Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes. Since launch in December 2020, GECAM-B has detected hundreds of astronomical and terrestrial events. For these bursts, localization is the key for burst identification and classification as well as follow-up observations in multi-wavelength. Here, we propose a Bayesian localization method with Poisson data with Gaussian background profile likelihood to localize GECAM bursts based on the burst counts distribution in detectors with different orientations. We demonstrate that this method can work well for all kinds of bursts, especially for extremely short ones. In addition, we propose a new method to estimate the systematic error of localization based on a confidence level test, which can overcome some problems of the existing method in literature. We validate this method by Monte Carlo simulations, and then apply it to a burst sample with accurate location and find that the mean value of the systematic error of GECAM-B localization is $\sim 2.5^{\circ}$. By considering this systematic error, we can obtain a reliable localization probability map for GECAM bursts. Our methods can be applied to other gamma-ray monitors.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2022; v1 submitted 28 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
A Localization Method of High Energy Transients for All-Sky Gamma-Ray Monitor
Authors:
Yi Zhao,
Wangchen Xue,
Shaolin Xiong,
Qi Luo,
Yuanhao Wang,
Jiacong Liu,
Heng Yu,
Xiaoyun Zhao,
Yue Huang,
**yuan Liao,
Jianchao Sun,
Xiaobo Li,
Qibin Yi,
Ce Cai,
Shuo Xiao,
Shenglun Xie,
Chao Zheng,
Yanqiu Zhang,
Chenwei Wang,
Wenjun Tan,
Zhiwei Guo,
Chaoyang Li,
Zhenghua An,
Gang Chen,
Yanqi Du
, et al. (40 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Fast and reliable localization of high-energy transients is crucial for characterizing the burst properties and guiding the follow-up observations. Localization based on the relative counts of different detectors has been widely used for all-sky gamma-ray monitors. There are two major methods for this counts distribution localization: $χ^{2}$ minimization method and the Bayesian method. Here we pr…
▽ More
Fast and reliable localization of high-energy transients is crucial for characterizing the burst properties and guiding the follow-up observations. Localization based on the relative counts of different detectors has been widely used for all-sky gamma-ray monitors. There are two major methods for this counts distribution localization: $χ^{2}$ minimization method and the Bayesian method. Here we propose a modified Bayesian method that could take advantage of both the accuracy of the Bayesian method and the simplicity of the $χ^{2}$ method. With comprehensive simulations, we find that our Bayesian method with Poisson likelihood is generally more applicable for various bursts than $χ^{2}$ method, especially for weak bursts. We further proposed a location-spectrum iteration approach based on the Bayesian inference, which could alleviate the problems caused by the spectral difference between the burst and location templates. Our method is very suitable for scenarios with limited computation resources or time-sensitive applications, such as in-flight localization software, and low-latency localization for rapid follow-up observations.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2023; v1 submitted 26 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Revisit the periodicity of SGR J1935+2154 bursts with updated sample
Authors:
Sheng-Lun Xie,
Ce Cai,
Shao-Lin Xiong,
Yun-Wei Yu,
Yan-Qiu Zhang,
Lin Lin,
Zhen Zhang,
Wang-Chen Xue,
Jia-Cong Liu,
Yi Zhao,
Shuo Xiao,
Chao Zheng,
Qi-Bin Yi,
Peng Zhang,
** Wang,
Rui Qiao,
Wen-Xi Peng,
Yue Huang,
Xiang Ma,
Xiao-Yun Zhao,
Xiao-Bo Li,
Shi-Jie Zheng,
Ming-Yu Ge,
Cheng-Kui Li,
Xin-Qiao Li
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Since FRB 200428 has been found to be associated with an X-ray burst from the Galactic magnetar SGR J1935+2154, it is interesting to explore whether the magnetar bursts also follow the similar active periodic behavior as some repeating FRBs. Previous studies show that there is possible period about 230 day in SGR J1935+2154 bursts. Here, we collected an updated burst sample from SGR J1935+2154, in…
▽ More
Since FRB 200428 has been found to be associated with an X-ray burst from the Galactic magnetar SGR J1935+2154, it is interesting to explore whether the magnetar bursts also follow the similar active periodic behavior as some repeating FRBs. Previous studies show that there is possible period about 230 day in SGR J1935+2154 bursts. Here, we collected an updated burst sample from SGR J1935+2154, including all bursts reported by Fermi/GBM and GECAM till 2022 January. We also developed a targeted search pipeline to reveal more bursts from SGR J1935+2154 in the Fermi/GBM data from 2008 August to 2014 December (i.e. before the first burst detected by Swift/BAT). With this burst sample, we re-analyzed the possible periodicity of SGR J1935+2154 bursts using the Period Folding and Lomb-Scargle Periodogram methods. Our results show that the periodicity $\sim$238 day reported in literature is probably fake and the observation effects may introduce false periods (i.e. 55 day) according to simulation tests. We find that, for the current burst sample, the most probable period is 126.88$\pm$2.05 day, which could be interpreted as the precession of the magnetar. However, we note that the whole burst history is very complicated and difficult to be perfectly accommodated with any period reported thus far, therefore more monitoring observations of SGR J1935+2154 are required to test any periodicity hypothesis.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2022; v1 submitted 16 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
The quasi-periodically oscillating precursor of a long gamma-ray burst from a binary neutron star merger
Authors:
Shuo Xiao,
Yan-Qiu Zhang,
Zi-Pei Zhu,
Shao-Lin Xiong,
He Gao,
Dong Xu,
Shuang-Nan Zhang,
Wen-Xi Peng,
Xiao-Bo Li,
Peng Zhang,
Fang-Jun Lu,
Lin Lin,
Liang-Duan Liu,
Zhen Zhang,
Ming-Yu Ge,
You-Li Tuo,
Wang-Chen Xue,
Shao-Yu Fu,
Xing Liu,
An Li,
Tian-Cong Wang,
Chao Zheng,
Yue Wang,
Shuai-Qing Jiang,
**-Da Li
, et al. (16 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The milestone of GW 170817-GRB 170817A-AT 2017gfo has shown that gravitational wave (GW) is produced during the merger of neutron star-neutron star/black hole and that in electromagnetic (EM) wave a gamma-ray burst (GRB) and a kilonovae (KN) are generated in sequence after the merger. Observationally, however, EM property during a merger is still unclear. Here we report a peculiar precursor in a K…
▽ More
The milestone of GW 170817-GRB 170817A-AT 2017gfo has shown that gravitational wave (GW) is produced during the merger of neutron star-neutron star/black hole and that in electromagnetic (EM) wave a gamma-ray burst (GRB) and a kilonovae (KN) are generated in sequence after the merger. Observationally, however, EM property during a merger is still unclear. Here we report a peculiar precursor in a KN-associated long GRB 211211A. The duration of the precursor is $\sim$ 0.2 s, and the waiting time between the precursor and the main emission (ME) of the burst is $\sim$ 1 s, which is about the same as the time interval between GW 170817 and GRB 170817A. Quasi-Periodic Oscillations (QPO) with frequency $\sim$22 Hz (at $>5σ$ significance) are found throughout the precursor, the first detection of periodic signals from any {\it bona fide} GRBs. This indicates most likely that a magnetar participated in the merger, and the precursor might be produced due to a catastrophic flare accompanying with torsional or crustal oscillations of the magnetar. The strong seed magnetic field of $\sim 10^{14-15}$ G at the surface of the magnetar may also account for the prolonged duration of GRB 211211A. However, it is a challenge to reconcile the rather short lifetime of a magnetar \cite{kaspi2017magnetars} with the rather long spiraling time of a binary neutron star system only by gravitational wave radiation before merger.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Insight-HXMT dedicated 33-day observation of SGR J1935+2154 II. Burst Spectral Catalog
Authors:
Ce Cai,
Shaolin Xiong,
Lin Lin,
Chengkui Li,
Shuangnan Zhang,
Wangchen Xue,
Youli Tuo,
Xiaobo Li,
Mingyu Ge,
Haisheng Zhao,
Liming Song,
Fangjun Lu,
Shu Zhang,
Qingxin Li,
Shuo Xiao,
Zhiwei Guo,
Shenglun Xie,
Yanqiu Zhang,
Qibin Yi,
Yi Zhao,
Zhen Zhang,
Jiacong Liu,
Chao Zheng,
** Wang
Abstract:
Since April 28, 2020, Insight-HXMT has implemented a dedicated observation on the magnetar SGR J1935+2154. Thanks to the wide energy band (1-250 keV) and high sensitivity of Insight-HXMT, we obtained 75 bursts from SGR J1935+2154 during a month-long activity episode after the emission of FRB 200428. Here, we report the detailed time-integrated spectral analysis of these bursts and the statistical…
▽ More
Since April 28, 2020, Insight-HXMT has implemented a dedicated observation on the magnetar SGR J1935+2154. Thanks to the wide energy band (1-250 keV) and high sensitivity of Insight-HXMT, we obtained 75 bursts from SGR J1935+2154 during a month-long activity episode after the emission of FRB 200428. Here, we report the detailed time-integrated spectral analysis of these bursts and the statistical distribution of the spectral parameters. We find that for 15%(11/75) of SGR J1935+2154 bursts, the CPL model is preferred, and most of them occurred in the latter part of this active epoch. In the cumulative fluence distribution, we find that the fluence of bursts in our sample is about an order of magnitude weaker than that of Fermi/GBM, but follows the same power law distribution. Finally, we find a burst with similar peak energy to the time-integrated spectrum of the X-ray burst associated with FRB 200428 (FRB 200428-Associated Burst), but the low energy index is harder.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Insight-HXMT dedicated 33-day observation of SGR J1935+2154 I. Burst Catalog
Authors:
Ce Cai,
Wangchen Xue,
Chengkui Li,
Shaolin Xiong,
Shuangnan Zhang,
Lin Lin,
Xiaobo Li,
Mingyu Ge,
Haisheng Zhao,
Liming Song,
Fangjun Lu,
Shu Zhang,
Yanqiu Zhang,
Shuo Xiao,
Youli Tuo,
Qibin Yi,
Zhiwei Guo,
Shenglun Xie,
Yi Zhao,
Zhen Zhang,
Qingxin Li,
Jiacong Liu,
Chao Zheng,
** Wang
Abstract:
Magnetars are neutron stars with extreme magnetic field and sometimes manifest as soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs). SGR J1935+2154 is one of the most prolific bursters and the first confirmed source of fast radio burst (i.e. FRB 200428). Encouraged by the discovery of the first X-ray counterpart of FRB, Insight-Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (Insight-HXMT) implemented a dedicated 33-day long ToO o…
▽ More
Magnetars are neutron stars with extreme magnetic field and sometimes manifest as soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs). SGR J1935+2154 is one of the most prolific bursters and the first confirmed source of fast radio burst (i.e. FRB 200428). Encouraged by the discovery of the first X-ray counterpart of FRB, Insight-Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (Insight-HXMT) implemented a dedicated 33-day long ToO observation of SGR J1935+2154 since April 28, 2020. With the HE, ME, and LE telescopes, Insight-HXMT provides a thorough monitoring of burst activity evolution of SGR J1935+2154, in a very broad energy range (1-250 keV) with high temporal resolution and high sensitivity, resulting in a unique valuable data set for detailed studies of SGR J1935+2154. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of this observation including detailed burst search, identification and temporal analyses. After carefully removing false triggers, we find a total of 75 bursts from SGR J1935+2154, out of which 70 are single-pulsed. The maximum burst rate is about 56 bursts/day. Both the burst duration and the waiting time between two successive bursts follow log-normal distributions, consistent with previous studies. We also find that bursts with longer duration (some are multi-pulsed) tend to occur during the period with relatively high burst rate. There is no correlation between the waiting time and the fluence or duration of either the former or latter burst. It also seems that there is no correlation between burst duration and hardness ratio, in contrast to some previous reports. In addition, we do not find any X-ray burst associated with any reported radio bursts except for FRB 200428.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
GECAM detection of a bright type-I X-ray burst from 4U 0614+09: confirmation its spin frequency at 413 Hz
Authors:
Y. P. Chen,
J. Li,
S. L. Xiong,
L. Ji,
S. Zhang,
W. X. Peng,
R. Qiao,
X. Q. Li,
X. Y. Wen,
L. M. Song,
S. J. Zheng,
X. Y. Song,
X. Y. Zhao,
Y. Huang,
F. J. Lu,
S. N. Zhang,
S. Xiao,
C. Cai,
B. X. Zhang,
Z. H. An,
C. Chen,
G. Chen,
W. Chen,
G. Q. Dai,
Y. Q. Du
, et al. (65 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
One month after launching Gravitational wave high-energy Electromagnetic Counterpart All-sky Monitor (GECAM), a bright thermonuclear X-ray burst from 4U~0614+09, was observed on January 24, 2021. We report the time-resolved spectroscopy of the burst and a burst oscillation detection at 413 Hz with a fractional amplitude 3.4\% (rms). This coincides with the burst oscillation previously discovered w…
▽ More
One month after launching Gravitational wave high-energy Electromagnetic Counterpart All-sky Monitor (GECAM), a bright thermonuclear X-ray burst from 4U~0614+09, was observed on January 24, 2021. We report the time-resolved spectroscopy of the burst and a burst oscillation detection at 413 Hz with a fractional amplitude 3.4\% (rms). This coincides with the burst oscillation previously discovered with \textit{Swift}/BAT \citep{Strohmayer2008}, and therefore confirms the spin frequency of this source. This burst is the brightest one in the normal bursts (except the superburst) ever detected from 4U~0614+09, which leads to an upper limit of distance estimation as 3.1 kpc. The folded light curve during the burst oscillation shows a multi-peak structure, which is the first case observed during a single burst oscillation in nonpulsating sources. The multi-peak profile could be due to additional harmonics of the burst oscillation, which is corresponding to several brighter/fainter spots at the stellar surface.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Integrated Arbitrary Filter with Spiral Gratings: Design and Characterization
Authors:
Yi-Wen Hu,
Shengjie Xie,
Jiahao Zhan,
Yang Zhang,
Sylvain Veilleux,
Mario Dagenais
Abstract:
We report the design and characterization of a high performance integrated arbitrary filter from 1450 nm to 1640 nm. The filter's target spectrum is chosen to suppress the night-sky OH emission lines, which is critical for ground-based astronomical telescopes. This type of filter is featured by its large spectral range, high rejection ratio and narrow notch width. Traditionally it is only successf…
▽ More
We report the design and characterization of a high performance integrated arbitrary filter from 1450 nm to 1640 nm. The filter's target spectrum is chosen to suppress the night-sky OH emission lines, which is critical for ground-based astronomical telescopes. This type of filter is featured by its large spectral range, high rejection ratio and narrow notch width. Traditionally it is only successfully accomplished with fiber Bragg gratings. The technique we demonstrate here is proven to be very efficient for on-chip platforms, which can bring many benefits for device footprint, performance and cost. For the design part, two inverse scattering algorithms are compared, the frequency domain discrete layer-peeling (f-DLP) and the time domain discrete layer-peeling (t-DLP). f-DLP is found to be superior for the grating reconstruction in terms of accuracy and robustness. A method is proposed to resolve the non-uniformity issue caused by the non-zero layer size in the DLP algorithm. The designed 55-notch filter is 50-mm-long and implemented on a compact Si3N4/SiO2 spiral waveguide with a total length of 63 mm. Experimentally, we demonstrate that the device has a insertion loss as low as 2.5 dB, and that the waveguide propagation loss is as low as 0.10 dB/cm. We are also able to achieve uniform notch depths and 3-dB widths of about 28 dB and 0.22 nm, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Searches for continuous gravitational waves from nine young supernova remnants
Authors:
J. Aasi,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
A. Alemic,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
D. Amariutei,
S. B. Anderson
, et al. (871 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe directed searches for continuous gravitational waves in data from the sixth LIGO science data run. The targets were nine young supernova remnants not associated with pulsars; eight of the remnants are associated with non-pulsing suspected neutron stars. One target's parameters are uncertain enough to warrant two searches, for a total of ten. Each search covered a broad band of frequenc…
▽ More
We describe directed searches for continuous gravitational waves in data from the sixth LIGO science data run. The targets were nine young supernova remnants not associated with pulsars; eight of the remnants are associated with non-pulsing suspected neutron stars. One target's parameters are uncertain enough to warrant two searches, for a total of ten. Each search covered a broad band of frequencies and first and second frequency derivatives for a fixed sky direction. The searches coherently integrated data from the two LIGO interferometers over time spans from 5.3-25.3 days using the matched-filtering F-statistic. We found no credible gravitational-wave signals. We set 95% confidence upper limits as strong (low) as $4\times10^{-25}$ on intrinsic strain, $2\times10^{-7}$ on fiducial ellipticity, and $3\times10^{-6}$ on r-mode amplitude. These beat the indirect limits from energy conservation and are within the range of theoretical predictions for neutron-star ellipticities and r-mode amplitudes.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2021; v1 submitted 18 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
A directed search for gravitational waves from Scorpius X-1 with initial LIGO
Authors:
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration,
the Virgo Collaboration,
J. Aasi,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
A. Alemic,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca
, et al. (875 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present results of a search for continuously-emitted gravitational radiation, directed at the brightest low-mass X-ray binary, Scorpius X-1. Our semi-coherent analysis covers 10 days of LIGO S5 data ranging from 50-550 Hz, and performs an incoherent sum of coherent $\mathcal{F}$-statistic power distributed amongst frequency-modulated orbital sidebands. All candidates not removed at the veto sta…
▽ More
We present results of a search for continuously-emitted gravitational radiation, directed at the brightest low-mass X-ray binary, Scorpius X-1. Our semi-coherent analysis covers 10 days of LIGO S5 data ranging from 50-550 Hz, and performs an incoherent sum of coherent $\mathcal{F}$-statistic power distributed amongst frequency-modulated orbital sidebands. All candidates not removed at the veto stage were found to be consistent with noise at a 1% false alarm rate. We present Bayesian 95% confidence upper limits on gravitational-wave strain amplitude using two different prior distributions: a standard one, with no a priori assumptions about the orientation of Scorpius X-1; and an angle-restricted one, using a prior derived from electromagnetic observations. Median strain upper limits of 1.3e-24 and 8e-25 are reported at 150 Hz for the standard and angle-restricted searches respectively. This proof of principle analysis was limited to a short observation time by unknown effects of accretion on the intrinsic spin frequency of the neutron star, but improves upon previous upper limits by factors of ~1.4 for the standard, and 2.3 for the angle-restricted search at the sensitive region of the detector.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Narrow-band search of continuous gravitational-wave signals from Crab and Vela pulsars in Virgo VSR4 data
Authors:
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration,
the Virgo Collaboration,
J. Aasi,
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
A. Alemic,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca
, et al. (878 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we present the results of a coherent narrow-band search for continuous gravitational-wave signals from the Crab and Vela pulsars conducted on Virgo VSR4 data. In order to take into account a possible small mismatch between the gravitational wave frequency and two times the star rotation frequency, inferred from measurement of the electromagnetic pulse rate, a range of 0.02 Hz around…
▽ More
In this paper we present the results of a coherent narrow-band search for continuous gravitational-wave signals from the Crab and Vela pulsars conducted on Virgo VSR4 data. In order to take into account a possible small mismatch between the gravitational wave frequency and two times the star rotation frequency, inferred from measurement of the electromagnetic pulse rate, a range of 0.02 Hz around two times the star rotational frequency has been searched for both the pulsars. No evidence for a signal has been found and 95$\%$ confidence level upper limits have been computed both assuming polarization parameters are completely unknown and that they are known with some uncertainty, as derived from X-ray observations of the pulsar wind torii. For Vela the upper limits are comparable to the spin-down limit, computed assuming that all the observed spin-down is due to the emission of gravitational waves. For Crab the upper limits are about a factor of two below the spin-down limit, and represent a significant improvement with respect to past analysis. This is the first time the spin-down limit is significantly overcome in a narrow-band search.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.