-
The XMM Cluster Survey: Automating the estimation of hydrostatic mass for large samples of galaxy clusters I -- Methodology, Validation, & Application to the SDSSRM-XCS sample
Authors:
D. J. Turner,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
J. Pilling,
T. K. Lingard,
R. Wilkinson,
M. Hilton,
E. W. Upsdell,
R. Al-Serkal,
T. Cheng,
R. Eappen,
P. J. Rooney,
S. Bhargava,
C. A. Collins,
J. Mayers,
C. Miller,
R. C. Nichol,
M. Sahén,
P. T. P. Viana
Abstract:
We describe features of the X-ray: Generate and Analyse (XGA) open-source software package that have been developed to facilitate automated hydrostatic mass ($M_{\rm hydro}$) measurements from XMM X-ray observations of clusters of galaxies. This includes describing how XGA measures global, and radial, X-ray properties of galaxy clusters. We then demonstrate the reliability of XGA by comparing simp…
▽ More
We describe features of the X-ray: Generate and Analyse (XGA) open-source software package that have been developed to facilitate automated hydrostatic mass ($M_{\rm hydro}$) measurements from XMM X-ray observations of clusters of galaxies. This includes describing how XGA measures global, and radial, X-ray properties of galaxy clusters. We then demonstrate the reliability of XGA by comparing simple X-ray properties, namely the X-ray temperature and gas mass, with published values presented by the XMM Cluster Survey (XCS), the Ultimate XMM eXtragaLactic survey project (XXL), and the Local Cluster Substructure Survey (LoCuSS). XGA measured values for temperature are, on average, within 1% of the values reported in the literature for each sample. XGA gas masses for XXL clusters are shown to be ${\sim}$10% lower than previous measurements (though the difference is only significant at the $\sim$1.8$σ$ level), LoCuSS $R_{2500}$ and $R_{500}$ gas mass re-measurements are 3% and 7% lower respectively (representing a 1.5$σ$ and 3.5$σ$ difference). Like-for-like comparisons of hydrostatic mass are made to LoCuSS results, which show that our measurements are $10{\pm}3%$ ($19{\pm}7%$) higher for $R_{2500}$ ($R_{500}$). The comparison between $R_{500}$ masses shows significant scatter. Finally, we present new $M_{\rm hydro}$ measurements for 104 clusters from the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer XCS sample (SDSSRM-XCS). Our SDSSRM-XCS hydrostatic mass measurements are in good agreement with multiple literature estimates, and represent one of the largest samples of consistently measured hydrostatic masses. We have demonstrated that XGA is a powerful tool for X-ray analysis of clusters; it will render complex-to-measure X-ray properties accessible to non-specialists.
△ Less
Submitted 12 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Mis-centering calibration and X-ray-richness scaling relations in redMaPPer clusters
Authors:
P. Kelly,
J. Jobel,
O. Eiger,
A. Abd,
T. E. Jeltema,
P. Giles,
D. L. Hollowood,
R. D. Wilkinson,
D. J. Turner,
S. Bhargava,
S. Everett,
A. Farahi,
A. K. Romer,
E. S. Rykoff,
F. Wang,
S. Bocquet,
D. Cross,
R. Faridjoo,
J. Franco,
G. Gardner,
M. Kwiecien,
D. Laubner,
A. McDaniel,
J. H. O'Donnell,
L. Sanchez
, et al. (54 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival X-ray data from XMM-Newton and Chandra to assess the centering performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. In terms of centering, we find that 10-20% of redMaPPer clusters are miscentered with no significant difference in bins of low versus high richness ($20<λ<40$ and $λ>40$)…
▽ More
We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival X-ray data from XMM-Newton and Chandra to assess the centering performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. In terms of centering, we find that 10-20% of redMaPPer clusters are miscentered with no significant difference in bins of low versus high richness ($20<λ<40$ and $λ>40$) or redshift ($0.2<z<0.4$ and $0.4 <z < 0.65$). We also investigate the richness bias induced by miscentering. The dominant reasons for miscentering include masked or missing data and the presence of other bright galaxies in the cluster; for half of the miscentered clusters the correct central was one of the other possible centrals identified by redMaPPer, while for $\sim 40$% of miscentered clusters the correct central is not a redMaPPer member with most of these cases due to masking. In addition, we fit the scaling relations between X-ray temperature and richness and between X-ray luminosity and richness. We find a T$_X$-$λ$ scatter of $0.21 \pm 0.01$. While the scatter in T$_X$-$λ$ is consistent in bins of redshift, we do find modestly different slopes with high-redshift clusters displaying a somewhat shallower relation. Splitting based on richness, we find a marginally larger scatter for our lowest richness bin, $20 < λ< 40$. The X-ray properties of detected, serendipitous clusters are generally consistent with those for targeted clusters, but the depth of the X-ray data for undetected clusters is insufficient to judge whether they are X-ray underluminous in all but one case.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey: Exploring scaling relations and completeness of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 redMaPPer cluster catalogue
Authors:
E. W. Upsdell,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
R. Wilkinson,
D. J. Turner,
M. Hilton,
E. Rykoff,
A. Farahi,
S. Bhargava,
T. Jeltema,
M. Klein,
A. Bermeo,
C. A. Collins,
L. Ebrahimpour,
D. Hollowood,
R. G. Mann,
M. Manolopoulou,
C. J. Miller,
P. J. Rooney,
Martin Sahlén,
J. P. Stott,
P. T. P. Viana,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
D. Bacon
, et al. (45 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We cross-match and compare characteristics of galaxy clusters identified in observations from two sky surveys using two completely different techniques. One sample is optically selected from the analysis of three years of Dark Energy Survey observations using the redMaPPer cluster detection algorithm. The second is X-ray selected from XMM observations analysed by the XMM Cluster Survey. The sample…
▽ More
We cross-match and compare characteristics of galaxy clusters identified in observations from two sky surveys using two completely different techniques. One sample is optically selected from the analysis of three years of Dark Energy Survey observations using the redMaPPer cluster detection algorithm. The second is X-ray selected from XMM observations analysed by the XMM Cluster Survey. The samples comprise a total area of 57.4 deg$^2$, bounded by the area of 4 contiguous XMM survey regions that overlap the DES footprint. We find that the X-ray selected sample is fully matched with entries in the redMaPPer catalogue, above $λ>$20 and within 0.1$< z <$0.9. Conversely, only 38\% of the redMaPPer catalogue is matched to an X-ray extended source. Next, using 120 optically clusters and 184 X-ray selected clusters, we investigate the form of the X-ray luminosity-temperature ($L_{X}-T_{X}$), luminosity-richness ($L_{X}-λ$) and temperature-richness ($T_{X}-λ$) scaling relations. We find that the fitted forms of the $L_{X}-T_{X}$ relations are consistent between the two selection methods and also with other studies in the literature. However, we find tentative evidence for a steepening of the slope of the relation for low richness systems in the X-ray selected sample. When considering the scaling of richness with X-ray properties, we again find consistency in the relations (i.e., $L_{X}-λ$ and $T_{X}-λ$) between the optical and X-ray selected samples. This is contrary to previous similar works that find a significant increase in the scatter of the luminosity scaling relation for X-ray selected samples compared to optically selected samples.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
COWS all tHE way Down (COWSHED) I: Could cow based planetoids support methane atmospheres?
Authors:
William J. Roper,
Todd L. Cook,
Violetta Korbina,
Jussi K. Kuusisto,
Roisin O'Connor,
Stephen D. Riggs,
David J. Turner,
Reese Wilkinson
Abstract:
More often than not a lunch time conversation will veer off into bizarre and uncharted territories. In rare instances these frontiers of conversation can lead to deep insights about the Universe we inhabit. This paper details the fruits of one such conversation. In this paper we will answer the question: How many cows do you need to form a planetoid entirely comprised of cows, which will support a…
▽ More
More often than not a lunch time conversation will veer off into bizarre and uncharted territories. In rare instances these frontiers of conversation can lead to deep insights about the Universe we inhabit. This paper details the fruits of one such conversation. In this paper we will answer the question: How many cows do you need to form a planetoid entirely comprised of cows, which will support a methane atmoosphere produced by the planetary herd? We will not only present the necessary assumptions and theory underpinning the cow-culations, but also present a thorough (and rather robust) discussion of the viability of, and implications for accomplishing, such a feat.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey analysis of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer Catalogue: Implications for scatter, selection bias, and isotropy in cluster scaling relations
Authors:
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
R. Wilkinson,
A. Bermeo,
D. J. Turner,
M. Hilton,
E. W. Upsdell,
P. J. Rooney,
S. Bhargava,
L. Ebrahimpour,
A. Farahi,
R. G. Mann,
M. Manolopoulou,
J. Mayers,
C. Vergara,
P. T. P. Viana,
C. A. Collins,
D. Hollowood,
T. Jeltema,
C. J. Miller,
R. C. Nichol,
R. Noorali,
M. Splettstoesser,
J. P. Stott
Abstract:
In this paper we present the X-ray analysis of SDSS DR8 redMaPPer (SDSSRM) clusters using data products from the $XMM$ Cluster Survey (XCS). In total, 1189 SDSSRM clusters fall within the $XMM$-Newton footprint. This has yielded 456 confirmed detections accompanied by X-ray luminosity ($L_{X}$) measurements. Of the detected clusters, 382 have an associated X-ray temperature measurement ($T_{X}$).…
▽ More
In this paper we present the X-ray analysis of SDSS DR8 redMaPPer (SDSSRM) clusters using data products from the $XMM$ Cluster Survey (XCS). In total, 1189 SDSSRM clusters fall within the $XMM$-Newton footprint. This has yielded 456 confirmed detections accompanied by X-ray luminosity ($L_{X}$) measurements. Of the detected clusters, 382 have an associated X-ray temperature measurement ($T_{X}$). This represents one of the largest samples of coherently derived cluster $T_{X}$ values to date. Our analysis of the X-ray observable to richness ($λ$) scaling relations has demonstrated that scatter in the $T_{X}-λ$ relation is roughly a third of that in the $L_{X}-λ$ relation, and that the $L_{X}-λ$ scatter is intrinsic, i.e. will not be significantly reduced with larger sample sizes. Our analysis of the scaling relation between $L_{X}$ and $T_{X}$ has shown that the fits are sensitive to the selection method of the sample, i.e. whether the sample is made up of clusters detected "serendipitously" compared to those deliberately targeted by $XMM$. These differences are also seen in the $L_{X}-λ$ relation and, to a lesser extent, in the $T_{X}-λ$ relation. Exclusion of the emission from the cluster core does not make a significant impact to the findings. A combination of selection biases is a likely, but as yet unproven, reason for these differences. Finally, we have also used our data to probe recent claims of anisotropy in the $L_{X}-T_{X}$ relation across the sky. We find no evidence of anistropy, but stress that this may be masked in our analysis by the incomplete declination coverage of the SDSS DR8 sample.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2022; v1 submitted 22 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
XGA: A module for the large-scale scientific exploitation of archival X-ray astronomy data
Authors:
D. J. Turner,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
V. Korbina
Abstract:
The XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) have developed a new Python module, X-ray: Generate and Analyse (XGA) to provide interactive and automated analyses of X-ray emitting sources observed by the XMM-Newton space telescope. XGA only requires that a set of cleaned, processed, event lists has been created, and (optionally) that a source detector has generated region lists for the observations. XGA is centere…
▽ More
The XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) have developed a new Python module, X-ray: Generate and Analyse (XGA) to provide interactive and automated analyses of X-ray emitting sources observed by the XMM-Newton space telescope. XGA only requires that a set of cleaned, processed, event lists has been created, and (optionally) that a source detector has generated region lists for the observations. XGA is centered around the concept of making all available data easily accessible and analysable. The user provides information (e.g. RA, Dec, redshift) on the source they wish to investigate, and XGA locates relevant observations and generates required data products. This allows the user to quickly and easily complete common analyses using all relevant observations, thus being left free to focus on extracting the maximum scientific gain. XGA is centered around source and sample classes, which represent different types of X-ray emitting astrophysical objects and have different properties and methods relevant to that type of object. XGA also contains product classes, which provide interfaces to X-ray data products or information (such as radial profiles) that have been derived from them, with built-in methods for fitting, analysis, and visualisation. XGA can fit models to spectra (both global and annular) with XSPEC, measuring spectral properties such as temperature, photon index, and luminosity. XGA can also measure radial profiles of density and temperature for galaxy clusters, allowing the measurement of gas and total mass profiles of galaxy clusters. In the future, we will add support for X-ray telescopes other than XMM (e.g. Chandra, eROSITA), as well as the ability to perform multi-mission joint analyses. With the advent of new X-ray observatories such as eROSITA, XRISM, ATHENA, and Lynx, it is the perfect time for a new, open-source, software package that is open for anyone to use and scrutinise.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2022; v1 submitted 2 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
A Multiwavelength Dynamical State Analysis of ACT-CL J0019.6+0336
Authors:
Denisha S. Pillay,
David J. Turner,
Matt Hilton,
Kenda Knowles,
Kabelo C. Kesebonye,
Kavilan Moodley,
Tony Mroczkowski,
Nadeem Oozeer,
Christoph Pfrommer,
Sinenhlanhla P. Sikhosana,
Edward J. Wollack
Abstract:
In our study, we show a multiwavelength view of ACT-CL J0019.6+0336 (which hosts a radio halo), to investigate the cluster dynamics, morphology, and ICM. We use a combination of XMM-Newton images, Dark Energy Survey (DES) imaging and photometry, SDSS spectroscopic information, and 1.16 GHz MeerKAT data to study the cluster properties. Various X-ray and optical morphology parameters are calculated…
▽ More
In our study, we show a multiwavelength view of ACT-CL J0019.6+0336 (which hosts a radio halo), to investigate the cluster dynamics, morphology, and ICM. We use a combination of XMM-Newton images, Dark Energy Survey (DES) imaging and photometry, SDSS spectroscopic information, and 1.16 GHz MeerKAT data to study the cluster properties. Various X-ray and optical morphology parameters are calculated to investigate the level of disturbance. We find disturbances in two X-ray parameters and the optical density map shows elongated and axisymmetric structures with the main cluster component southeast of the cluster centre and another component northwest of the cluster centre. We also find a BCG offset of $\sim$950 km/s from the mean velocity of the cluster, and a discrepancy between the SZ mass, X-ray mass, and dynamical mass ($M_{X,500}$ and $M_{SZ,500}$ lies >3 $σ$ away from $M_{\rm{dyn},500}$), showing that J0019 is a merging cluster and probably in a post-merging phase.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Dwarf AGNs from Optical Variability for the Origins of Seeds (DAVOS): Insights from the Dark Energy Survey Deep Fields
Authors:
Colin J. Burke,
Xin Liu,
Yue Shen,
Kedar A. Phadke,
Qian Yang,
Will G. Hartley,
Ian Harrison,
Antonella Palmese,
Hengxiao Guo,
Kaiwen Zhang,
Richard Kron,
David J. Turner,
Paul A. Giles,
Christopher Lidman,
Yu-Ching Chen,
Robert A. Gruendl,
Ami Choi,
Alexandra Amon,
Erin Sheldon,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
D. Bacon,
E. Bertin,
D. Brooks
, et al. (47 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a sample of 706, $z < 1.5$ active galactic nuclei (AGNs) selected from optical photometric variability in three of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) deep fields (E2, C3, and X3) over an area of 4.64 deg$^2$. We construct light curves using difference imaging aperture photometry for resolved sources and non-difference imaging PSF photometry for unresolved sources, respectively, and characteri…
▽ More
We present a sample of 706, $z < 1.5$ active galactic nuclei (AGNs) selected from optical photometric variability in three of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) deep fields (E2, C3, and X3) over an area of 4.64 deg$^2$. We construct light curves using difference imaging aperture photometry for resolved sources and non-difference imaging PSF photometry for unresolved sources, respectively, and characterize the variability significance. Our DES light curves have a mean cadence of 7 days, a 6 year baseline, and a single-epoch imaging depth of up to $g \sim 24.5$. Using spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting, we find 26 out of total 706 variable galaxies are consistent with dwarf galaxies with a reliable stellar mass estimate ($M_{\ast}<10^{9.5}\ M_\odot$; median photometric redshift of 0.9). We were able to constrain rapid characteristic variability timescales ($\sim$ weeks) using the DES light curves in 15 dwarf AGN candidates (a subset of our variable AGN candidates) at a median photometric redshift of 0.4. This rapid variability is consistent with their low black hole masses. We confirm the low-mass AGN nature of one source with a high S/N optical spectrum. We publish our catalog, optical light curves, and supplementary data, such as X-ray properties and optical spectra, when available. We measure a variable AGN fraction versus stellar mass and compare to results from a forward model. This work demonstrates the feasibility of optical variability to identify AGNs with lower black hole masses in deep fields, which may be more "pristine" analogs of supermassive black hole seeds.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2022; v1 submitted 4 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey: An independent demonstration of the fidelity of the eFEDS galaxy cluster data products and implications for future studies
Authors:
D. J. Turner,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
R. Wilkinson,
E. W. Upsdell,
M. Klein,
P. T. P. Viana,
M. Hilton,
S. Bhargava,
C. A. Collins,
R. G. Mann,
M. Sahlén,
J. P. Stott
Abstract:
We present the first comparison between properties of clusters of galaxies detected by the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS) and the XMM Cluster Survey (XCS). We have compared, in an ensemble fashion, properties from the eFEDS X-ray cluster catalogue with those from the Ultimate XMM eXtragaLactic (XXL) survey project (XXL-100-GC). We find the distributions of redshift and X-ray tempera…
▽ More
We present the first comparison between properties of clusters of galaxies detected by the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS) and the XMM Cluster Survey (XCS). We have compared, in an ensemble fashion, properties from the eFEDS X-ray cluster catalogue with those from the Ultimate XMM eXtragaLactic (XXL) survey project (XXL-100-GC). We find the distributions of redshift and X-ray temperature ($T_{\rm X}$) to be broadly similar between the two surveys, with a larger proportion of clusters above 4 keV in the XXL-100-GC sample. We find 62 eFEDS cluster candidates with XMM data (eFEDS-XMM sample); 10 do not have good enough XMM data to confirm or deny, 11 are classed as sample contaminants, and 4 have their X-ray flux contaminated by another source. The majority of eFEDS-XMM sources have a longer exposure in XMM than eFEDS, and the majority of eFEDS positions are within 100 kpc of XCS positions. Our eFEDS-XCS sample of 37 clusters is used to calculate minimum sample contamination fractions of ${\sim}$18% and ${\sim}$9% in the eFEDS X-ray and optically confirmed samples respectively, in general agreement with eFEDS findings. We compare 29 X-ray luminosities ($L_{\rm X}$) measured by eFEDS and XCS, which are in excellent agreement. Eight clusters have a $T_{\rm X}$ measured by XMM and eROSITA, and we find that XMM temperatures are 25$\pm$9% larger than their eROSITA counterparts. Finally, we construct $L_{\rm X}$ - $T_{\rm X}$ scaling relations based on eFEDS and XCS measurements, which are in tension; the tension is decreased when we measure a third scaling relation with calibrated XCS temperatures.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2021; v1 submitted 24 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Velocity Dispersions of Clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Y3 redMaPPer Catalog
Authors:
V. Wetzell,
T. E. Jeltema,
B. Hegland,
S. Everett,
P. A. Giles,
R. Wilkinson,
A. Farahi,
M. Costanzi,
D. L. Hollowood,
E. Upsdell,
A. Saro,
J. Myles,
A. Bermeo,
S. Bhargava,
C. A. Collins,
D. Cross,
O. Eiger,
G. Gardner,
M. Hilton,
J. Jobel,
P. Kelly,
D. Laubner,
A. R. Liddle,
R. G. Mann,
V. Martinez
, et al. (74 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We measure the velocity dispersions of clusters of galaxies selected by the redMaPPer algorithm in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), allowing us to probe cluster selection and richness estimation, $λ$, in light of cluster dynamics. Our sample consists of 126 clusters with sufficient spectroscopy for individual velocity dispersion estimates. We examine the correlation…
▽ More
We measure the velocity dispersions of clusters of galaxies selected by the redMaPPer algorithm in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), allowing us to probe cluster selection and richness estimation, $λ$, in light of cluster dynamics. Our sample consists of 126 clusters with sufficient spectroscopy for individual velocity dispersion estimates. We examine the correlations between cluster velocity dispersion, richness, X-ray temperature and luminosity as well as central galaxy velocity offsets. The velocity dispersion-richness relation exhibits a bimodal distribution. The majority of clusters follow scaling relations between velocity dispersion, richness, and X-ray properties similar to those found for previous samples; however, there is a significant population of clusters with velocity dispersions which are high for their richness. These clusters account for roughly 22\% of the $λ< 70$ systems in our sample, but more than half (55\%) of $λ< 70$ clusters at $z>0.5$. A couple of these systems are hot and X-ray bright as expected for massive clusters with richnesses that appear to have been underestimated, but most appear to have high velocity dispersions for their X-ray properties likely due to line-of-sight structure. These results suggest that projection effects contribute significantly to redMaPPer selection, particularly at higher redshifts and lower richnesses. The redMaPPer determined richnesses for the velocity dispersion outliers are consistent with their X-ray properties, but several are X-ray undetected and deeper data is needed to understand their nature.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2022; v1 submitted 15 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 2
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Adamow,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam,
A. Amon,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
M. Banerji,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
S. Bhargava,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
A. Choi
, et al. (110 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the second public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR2, based on optical/near-infrared imaging by the Dark Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. DES DR2 consists of reduced single-epoch and coadded images, a source catalog derived from coadded images, and associated data products assembled from 6 years of DES sc…
▽ More
We present the second public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR2, based on optical/near-infrared imaging by the Dark Energy Camera mounted on the 4-m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. DES DR2 consists of reduced single-epoch and coadded images, a source catalog derived from coadded images, and associated data products assembled from 6 years of DES science operations. This release includes data from the DES wide-area survey covering ~5000 deg2 of the southern Galactic cap in five broad photometric bands, grizY. DES DR2 has a median delivered point-spread function full-width at half maximum of g= 1.11, r= 0.95, i= 0.88, z= 0.83, and Y= 0.90 arcsec photometric uniformity with a standard deviation of < 3 mmag with respect to Gaia DR2 G-band, a photometric accuracy of ~10 mmag, and a median internal astrometric precision of ~27 mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95 arcsec diameter aperture at S/N= 10 is g= 24.7, r= 24.4, i= 23.8, z= 23.1 and Y= 21.7 mag. DES DR2 includes ~691 million distinct astronomical objects detected in 10,169 coadded image tiles of size 0.534 deg2 produced from 76,217 single-epoch images. After a basic quality selection, benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain 543 million and 145 million objects, respectively. These data are accessible through several interfaces, including interactive image visualization tools, web-based query clients, image cutout servers and Jupyter notebooks. DES DR2 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the achieved depth and photometric precision.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2021; v1 submitted 14 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
