-
Individual, Model-Independent Masses of the Closest Known Brown Dwarf Binary to the Sun
Authors:
E. Victor Garcia,
S. Mark Ammons,
Maissa Salama,
Ian Crossfield,
Eduardo Bendek,
Jeffrey Chilcote,
Vincent Garrel,
James R. Graham,
Paul Kalas,
Quinn Konopacky,
Jessica R. Lu,
Bruce Macintosh,
Eduardo Marin,
Christian Marois,
Eric Nielsen,
Benoît Neichel,
Don Pham,
Robert J. De Rosa,
Dominic M. Ryan,
Maxwell Service,
Gaetano Sivo
Abstract:
At a distance of 2~pc, our nearest brown dwarf neighbor, Luhman 16 AB, has been extensively studied since its discovery 3 years ago, yet its most fundamental parameter -- the masses of the individual dwarfs -- has not been constrained with precision. In this work we present the full astrometric orbit and barycentric motion of Luhman 16 AB and the first precision measurements of the individual comp…
▽ More
At a distance of 2~pc, our nearest brown dwarf neighbor, Luhman 16 AB, has been extensively studied since its discovery 3 years ago, yet its most fundamental parameter -- the masses of the individual dwarfs -- has not been constrained with precision. In this work we present the full astrometric orbit and barycentric motion of Luhman 16 AB and the first precision measurements of the individual component masses. We draw upon archival observations spanning 31 years from the European Southern Observatory (ESO) Schmidt Telescope, the Deep Near-Infrared Survey of the Southern Sky (DENIS), public FORS2 data on the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and new astrometry from the Gemini South Multiconjugate Adaptive Optics System (GeMS). Finally, we include three radial velocity measurements of the two components from VLT/CRIRES, spanning one year. With this new data sampling a full period of the orbit, we use a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm to fit a 16-parameter model incorporating mutual orbit and barycentric motion parameters and constrain the individual masses to be~$27.9^{+1.1}_{-1.0}$~$M_{J}$ for the T dwarf and~$34.2^{+1.3}_{-1.1}$~$M_{J}$ for the L dwarf. Our measurements of Luhman 16 AB's mass ratio and barycentric motion parameters are consistent with previous estimates in the literature utilizing recent astrometry only. The GeMS-derived measurements of the Luhman 16 AB separation in 2014-2015 agree closely with Hubble Space Telescope (HST) measurements made during the same epoch Bedin et al. 2017, and the derived mutual orbit agrees with those measurements to within the HST uncertainties of $0.3 - 0.4$ milliarcseconds.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2017; v1 submitted 9 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Modeling the afterglow of the possible Fermi-GBM event associated with GW150914
Authors:
Brian J. Morsony,
Jared C. Workman,
Dominic M. Ryan
Abstract:
We model the possible afterglow of the Fermi GBM event associated with LIGO detection GW150914, under the assumption that the gamma-ray are produced by a short GRB-like relativistic outflow. We model GW150914-GBM as both a weak, on-axis short GRB and normal short GRB seen far off axis. Given the large uncertainty in the position of GW150914, we determine that the best chance of finding the aftergl…
▽ More
We model the possible afterglow of the Fermi GBM event associated with LIGO detection GW150914, under the assumption that the gamma-ray are produced by a short GRB-like relativistic outflow. We model GW150914-GBM as both a weak, on-axis short GRB and normal short GRB seen far off axis. Given the large uncertainty in the position of GW150914, we determine that the best chance of finding the afterglow is with ASKAP or possibly the MWA, with the flux from an off-axis short GRB reaching 0.2 - 4 mJy (0.12 - 16 mJy) at 150 MHz (863.5 MHz) by 1 - 12 months after the initial event. At low frequencies, the source would evolve from a hard to soft spectrum over several months. The radio afterglow would be detectable for several months to years after it peaks, meaning the afterglow may still be detectable and increasing in brightness NOW (mid-July 2016). With a localization from the MWA or ASKAP, the afterglow would be detectable at higher radio frequencies with the ATCA and in X-rays with Chandra or XMM.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2016; v1 submitted 17 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Astrometric Confirmation and Preliminary Orbital Parameters of the Young Exoplanet 51 Eridani b with the Gemini Planet Imager
Authors:
Robert J. De Rosa,
Eric L. Nielsen,
Sarah C. Blunt,
James R. Graham,
Quinn M. Konopacky,
Christian Marois,
Laurent Pueyo,
Julien Rameau,
Dominic M. Ryan,
Jason J. Wang,
Vanessa Bailey,
Ashley Chontos,
Daniel C. Fabrycky,
Katherine B. Follette,
Bruce Macintosh,
Franck Marchis,
S. Mark Ammons,
Pauline Arriaga,
Jeffrey K. Chilcote,
Tara H. Cotten,
René Doyon,
Gaspard Duchêne,
Thomas M. Esposito,
Michael P. Fitzgerald,
Benjamin Gerard
, et al. (25 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present new Gemini Planet Imager observations of the young exoplanet 51 Eridani b which provide further evidence that the companion is physically associated with 51 Eridani. Combining this new astrometric measurement with those reported in the literature, we significantly reduce the posterior probability that 51 Eridani b is an unbound foreground or background T-dwarf in a chance alignment with…
▽ More
We present new Gemini Planet Imager observations of the young exoplanet 51 Eridani b which provide further evidence that the companion is physically associated with 51 Eridani. Combining this new astrometric measurement with those reported in the literature, we significantly reduce the posterior probability that 51 Eridani b is an unbound foreground or background T-dwarf in a chance alignment with 51 Eridani to $2\times10^{-7}$, an order of magnitude lower than previously reported. If 51 Eridani b is indeed a bound object, then we have detected orbital motion of the planet between the discovery epoch and the latest epoch. By implementing a computationally efficient Monte Carlo technique, preliminary constraints are placed on the orbital parameters of the system. The current set of astrometric measurements suggest an orbital semimajor axis of $14^{+7}_{-3}$ AU, corresponding to a period of $41^{+35}_{-12}$ years (assuming a mass of $1.75$ $M_{\odot}$ for the central star), and an inclination of $138^{+15}_{-13}$ deg. The remaining orbital elements are only marginally constrained by the current measurements. These preliminary values suggest an orbit which does not share the same inclination as the orbit of the distant M-dwarf binary, GJ 3305, which is a wide physically bound companion to 51 Eridani.
△ Less
Submitted 10 November, 2015; v1 submitted 24 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
