-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing in harmonic space
Authors:
L. Faga,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
H. Camacho,
R. Rosenfeld,
M. Lima,
C. Doux,
X. Fang,
J. Prat,
A. Porredon,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. Bocquet,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind
, et al. (78 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the joint tomographic analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering in harmonic space, using galaxy catalogues from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). We utilise the redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues as lens galaxies and the METACALIBRATION catalogue as source galaxies. The measurements of angular power spectra are performed using the pseudo…
▽ More
We present the joint tomographic analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering in harmonic space, using galaxy catalogues from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). We utilise the redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues as lens galaxies and the METACALIBRATION catalogue as source galaxies. The measurements of angular power spectra are performed using the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method, and our theoretical modelling follows the fiducial analyses performed by DES Y3 in configuration space, accounting for galaxy bias, intrinsic alignments, magnification bias, shear magnification bias and photometric redshift uncertainties. We explore different approaches for scale cuts based on non-linear galaxy bias and baryonic effects contamination. Our fiducial covariance matrix is computed analytically, accounting for mask geometry in the Gaussian term, and including non-Gaussian contributions and super-sample covariance terms. To validate our harmonic space pipelines and covariance matrix, we used a suite of 1800 log-normal simulations. We also perform a series of stress tests to gauge the robustness of our harmonic space analysis. In the $Λ$CDM model, the clustering amplitude $S_8 =σ_8(Ω_m/0.3)^{0.5}$ is constrained to $S_8 = 0.704\pm 0.029$ and $S_8 = 0.753\pm 0.024$ ($68\%$ C.L.) for the redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues, respectively. For the $w$CDM, the dark energy equation of state is constrained to $w = -1.28 \pm 0.29$ and $w = -1.26^{+0.34}_{-0.27}$, for redMaGiC and MagLim catalogues, respectively. These results are compatible with the corresponding DES Y3 results in configuration space and pave the way for harmonic space analyses using the DES Y6 data.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Dark Energy Survey: Galaxy Sample for the Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation Measurement from the Final Dataset
Authors:
J. Mena-Fernández,
M. Rodríguez-Monroy,
S. Avila,
A. Porredon,
K. C. Chan,
H. Camacho,
N. Weaverdyck,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
E. Sanchez,
L. Toribio San Cipriano,
J. De Vicente,
I. Ferrero,
R. Cawthon,
A. Carnero Rosell,
J. Elvin-Poole,
G. Giannini,
M. Adamow,
K. Bechtol,
A. Drlica-Wagner,
R. A. Gruendl,
W. G. Hartley,
A. Pieres,
A. J. Ross,
E. S. Rykoff,
E. Sheldon
, et al. (63 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we present and validate the galaxy sample used for the analysis of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y6 data. The definition is based on a color and redshift-dependent magnitude cut optimized to select galaxies at redshifts higher than 0.6, while ensuring a high-quality photo-$z$ determination. The optimization is performed using a Fisher fo…
▽ More
In this paper we present and validate the galaxy sample used for the analysis of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) signal in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y6 data. The definition is based on a color and redshift-dependent magnitude cut optimized to select galaxies at redshifts higher than 0.6, while ensuring a high-quality photo-$z$ determination. The optimization is performed using a Fisher forecast algorithm, finding the optimal $i$-magnitude cut to be given by $i$<19.64+2.894$z_{\rm ph}$. For the optimal sample, we forecast an increase in precision in the BAO measurement of $\sim$25% with respect to the Y3 analysis. Our BAO sample has a total of 15,937,556 galaxies in the redshift range 0.6<$z_{\rm ph}$<1.2, and its angular mask covers 4,273.42 deg${}^2$ to a depth of $i$=22.5. We validate its redshift distributions with three different methods: directional neighborhood fitting algorithm (DNF), which is our primary photo-$z$ estimation; direct calibration with spectroscopic redshifts from VIPERS; and clustering redshift using SDSS galaxies. The fiducial redshift distribution is a combination of these three techniques performed by modifying the mean and width of the DNF distributions to match those of VIPERS and clustering redshift. In this paper we also describe the methodology used to mitigate the effect of observational systematics, which is analogous to the one used in the Y3 analysis. This paper is one of the two dedicated to the analysis of the BAO signal in DES Y6. In its companion paper, we present the angular diameter distance constraints obtained through the fitting to the BAO scale.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Dark Energy Survey: A 2.1% measurement of the angular Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation scale at redshift $z_{\rm eff}$=0.85 from the final dataset
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Adamow,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Asorey,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
S. Bocquet,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Carnero Rosell,
D. Carollo,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
R. Cawthon,
K. C. Chan
, et al. (83 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the angular diameter distance measurement obtained with the Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation feature from galaxy clustering in the completed Dark Energy Survey, consisting of six years (Y6) of observations. We use the Y6 BAO galaxy sample, optimized for BAO science in the redshift range 0.6<$z$<1.2, with an effective redshift at $z_{\rm eff}$=0.85 and split into six tomographic bins. The s…
▽ More
We present the angular diameter distance measurement obtained with the Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation feature from galaxy clustering in the completed Dark Energy Survey, consisting of six years (Y6) of observations. We use the Y6 BAO galaxy sample, optimized for BAO science in the redshift range 0.6<$z$<1.2, with an effective redshift at $z_{\rm eff}$=0.85 and split into six tomographic bins. The sample has nearly 16 million galaxies over 4,273 square degrees. Our consensus measurement constrains the ratio of the angular distance to sound horizon scale to $D_M(z_{\rm eff})/r_d$ = 19.51$\pm$0.41 (at 68.3% confidence interval), resulting from comparing the BAO position in our data to that predicted by Planck $Λ$CDM via the BAO shift parameter $α=(D_M/r_d)/(D_M/r_d)_{\rm Planck}$. To achieve this, the BAO shift is measured with three different methods, Angular Correlation Function (ACF), Angular Power Spectrum (APS), and Projected Correlation Function (PCF) obtaining $α=$ 0.952$\pm$0.023, 0.962$\pm$0.022, and 0.955$\pm$0.020, respectively, which we combine to $α=$ 0.957$\pm$0.020, including systematic errors. When compared with the $Λ$CDM model that best fits Planck data, this measurement is found to be 4.3% and 2.1$σ$ below the angular BAO scale predicted. To date, it represents the most precise angular BAO measurement at $z$>0.75 from any survey and the most precise measurement at any redshift from photometric surveys. The analysis was performed blinded to the BAO position and it is shown to be robust against analysis choices, data removal, redshift calibrations and observational systematics.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Early dark energy constraints with late-time expansion marginalization
Authors:
João Rebouças,
Jonathan Gordon,
Diogo H. F. de Souza,
Kunhao Zhong,
Vivian Miranda,
Rogerio Rosenfeld,
Tim Eifler,
Elisabeth Krause
Abstract:
Early dark energy (EDE) is an extension to the $Λ$CDM model, proposed to reduce the tension between the measurements of the Hubble constant $H_0$ from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and from the local cosmic distance ladder. However, this model increases the $S_8$ tension between CMB and large scale structure measurements. Analyses of galaxy clustering and lensing correlation functions repo…
▽ More
Early dark energy (EDE) is an extension to the $Λ$CDM model, proposed to reduce the tension between the measurements of the Hubble constant $H_0$ from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and from the local cosmic distance ladder. However, this model increases the $S_8$ tension between CMB and large scale structure measurements. Analyses of galaxy clustering and lensing correlation functions report a decreased preference for EDE and its effect on the Hubble tension. Smooth dark energy models affect growth of structure through the background expansion. In this work, we study the inclusion of a general, smooth late-time dark energy modification in combination with EDE and obtain constraints on EDE marginalized over the late-time expansion. We assess the impact on the $S_8$ and Hubble tensions. In order to generalize the late expansion, we use a late dark energy fluid model with a piecewise constant equation of state $w(z)$ over 3, 5 and 10 redshift bins in the window $z \in [0,3]$. We show that, when analyzing ACT and Planck CMB data combined with Pantheon supernovae, BAO from 6dF, SDSS and BOSS, Planck 2018 CMB lensing and Dark Energy Survey cosmic shear and clustering data, the inclusion of a general smooth dark energy modification at late times has no significant effect on $S_8$ and EDE parameter constraints. Using the aforementioned datasets, the EDE fraction constraint with late-time expansion marginalization is $f_\mathrm{EDE} = 0.067^{+0.019}_{-0.027}$ using 3 redshift bins, with similar results for 5 and 10 redshift bins. This work shows that in order to solve simultaneously the Hubble and $S_8$ tensions, one needs a mechanism for increasing the clustering of matter at late times different from a simple change in the background evolution of late dark energy. [Abridged]
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2024; v1 submitted 14 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Can neutrino-assisted early dark energy models ameliorate the $H_0$ tension in a natural way?
Authors:
Diogo H. F. de Souza,
Rogerio Rosenfeld
Abstract:
The idea of neutrino-assisted early dark energy ($ν$EDE), where a coupling between neutrinos and the scalar field that models early dark energy (EDE) is considered, was introduced with the aim of reducing some of the fine-tuning and coincidence problems that appear in usual EDE models. In order to be relevant in ameliorating the $H_0$ tension, the contribution of EDE to the total energy density (…
▽ More
The idea of neutrino-assisted early dark energy ($ν$EDE), where a coupling between neutrinos and the scalar field that models early dark energy (EDE) is considered, was introduced with the aim of reducing some of the fine-tuning and coincidence problems that appear in usual EDE models. In order to be relevant in ameliorating the $H_0$ tension, the contribution of EDE to the total energy density ($f_\text{EDE}$) should be around 10\% near the redshift of matter-radiation equality. We verify under which conditions $ν$EDE models can fulfill these requirements for a model with a quartic self-coupling of the EDE field and an exponential coupling to neutrinos. We find that in the situation where the EDE field is frozen initially, the contribution to $f_\text{EDE}$ can be significant but it is not sensitive to the neutrino-EDE coupling and does not address the EDE coincidence problem. On the other hand, if the EDE field starts already dynamical at the minimum of the effective potential, it tracks this time-dependent minimum that presents a feature triggered by the neutrino transition from relativistic to nonrelativistic particles. This feature generates $f_\text{EDE}$ in a natural way at around this transition epoch, that roughly coincides with the matter-radiation equality redshift. For the set of parameters that we considered we did not find values that satisfy the requirements on the background cosmological evolution to mitigate the Hubble tension in a natural way in this particular $ν$EDE model.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2023; v1 submitted 9 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Non-local contribution from small scales in galaxy-galaxy lensing: Comparison of mitigation schemes
Authors:
J. Prat,
G. Zacharegkas,
Y. Park,
N. MacCrann,
E. R. Switzer,
S. Pandey,
C. Chang,
J. Blazek,
R. Miquel,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
J. Cordero,
M. Crocce
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3$\times$2pt, had to discard a lot of signal-to-noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy-galaxy lensing, or the position-shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functi…
▽ More
Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3$\times$2pt, had to discard a lot of signal-to-noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy-galaxy lensing, or the position-shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functions that are included in such analyses, usually estimated with the mean tangential shear. However, tangential shear measurements at a given angular scale $θ$ or physical scale $R$ carry information from all scales below that, forcing the scale cuts applied in real data to be significantly larger than the scale at which theoretical uncertainties become problematic. Recently there have been a few independent efforts that aim to mitigate the non-locality of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal. Here we perform a comparison of the different methods, including the Y-transformation, the Point-Mass marginalization methodology and the Annular Differential Surface Density statistic. We do the comparison at the cosmological constraints level in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. We find that all the estimators yield equivalent cosmological results assuming a simulated Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Year 1 like setup and also when applied to DES Y3 data. With the LSST Y1 setup, we find that the mitigation schemes yield $\sim$1.3 times more constraining $S_8$ results than applying larger scale cuts without using any mitigation scheme.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2023; v1 submitted 7 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Magnification modeling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
Authors:
J. Elvin-Poole,
N. MacCrann,
S. Everett,
J. Prat,
E. S. Rykoff,
J. De Vicente,
B. Yanny,
K. Herner,
A. Ferté,
E. Di Valentino,
A. Choi,
D. L. Burke,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell
, et al. (71 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of Luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects usin…
▽ More
We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of Luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects using the Balrog image simulations. We estimate the impact of magnification on the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology analysis, finding it to be a significant systematic for the MagLim sample. We show cosmological constraints from the galaxy clustering auto-correlation and galaxy-galaxy lensing signal with different magnifications priors, finding broad consistency in cosmological parameters in $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM. However, when magnification bias amplitude is allowed to be free, we find the two-point correlations functions prefer a different amplitude to the fiducial input derived from the image simulations. We validate the magnification analysis by comparing the cross-clustering between lens bins with the prediction from the baseline analysis, which uses only the auto-correlation of the lens bins, indicating systematics other than magnification may be the cause of the discrepancy. We show adding the cross-clustering between lens redshift bins to the fit significantly improves the constraints on lens magnification parameters and allows uninformative priors to be used on magnification coefficients, without any loss of constraining power or prior volume concerns.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2023; v1 submitted 20 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Primordial non-Gaussianity with Angular correlation function: Integral constraint and validation for DES
Authors:
Walter Riquelme,
Santiago Avila,
Juan Garcia-Bellido,
Anna Porredon,
Ismael Ferrero,
Kwan Chuen Chan,
Rogerio Rosenfeld,
Hugo Camacho,
Adrian G. Adame,
Aurelio Carnero Rosell,
Martin Crocce,
Juan De Vicente,
Tim Eifler,
Jack Elvin-Poole,
Xiao Fang,
Elisabeth Krause,
Martin Rodriguez Monroy,
Ashley J. Ross,
Eusebio Sanchez,
Ignacio Sevilla
Abstract:
Local primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) is a promising observable of the underlying physics of inflation, characterised by $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm loc}$. We present the methodology to measure $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm loc}$ from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) data using the 2-point angular correlation function (ACF) with scale-dependent bias. One of the focuses of the work is the integral constraint. This condition…
▽ More
Local primordial non-Gaussianity (PNG) is a promising observable of the underlying physics of inflation, characterised by $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm loc}$. We present the methodology to measure $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm loc}$ from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) data using the 2-point angular correlation function (ACF) with scale-dependent bias. One of the focuses of the work is the integral constraint. This condition appears when estimating the mean number density of galaxies from the data and is key in obtaining unbiased $f_{\rm NL}^{\rm loc}$ constraints. The methods are analysed for two types of simulations: $\sim 246$ GOLIAT-PNG N-body small area simulations with $f_{\rm NL}$ equal to -100 and 100, and 1952 Gaussian ICE-COLA mocks with $f_{\rm NL}=0$ that follow the DES angular and redshift distribution. We use the ensemble of GOLIAT-PNG mocks to show the importance of the integral constraint when measuring PNG, where we recover the fiducial values of $f_{\rm NL}$ within the $1σ$ when including the integral constraint. In contrast, we found a bias of $Δf_{\rm NL}\sim 100$ when not including it. For a DES-like scenario, we forecast a bias of $Δf_{\rm NL} \sim 23$, equivalent to $1.8σ$, when not using the IC for a fiducial value of $f_{\rm NL}=100$. We use the ICE-COLA mocks to validate our analysis in a realistic DES-like setup finding it robust to different analysis choices: best-fit estimator, the effect of IC, BAO dam**, covariance, and scale choices. We forecast a measurement of $f_{\rm NL}$ within $σ(f_{\rm NL})=31$ when using the DES-Y3 BAO sample, with the ACF in the $1\ {\rm deg}<θ<20\ {\rm deg}$ range.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2023; v1 submitted 15 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Constraints on extensions to $Λ$CDM with weak lensing and galaxy clustering
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. Birrer,
J. Blazek,
S. Bocquet,
A. Brandao-Souza,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero
, et al. (137 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We constrain extensions to the $Λ$CDM model using measurements from the Dark Energy Survey's first three years of observations and external data. The DES data are the two-point correlation functions of weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation. We use simulated data and blind analyses of real data to validate the robustness of our results. In many cases, constraini…
▽ More
We constrain extensions to the $Λ$CDM model using measurements from the Dark Energy Survey's first three years of observations and external data. The DES data are the two-point correlation functions of weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation. We use simulated data and blind analyses of real data to validate the robustness of our results. In many cases, constraining power is limited by the absence of nonlinear predictions that are reliable at our required precision. The models are: dark energy with a time-dependent equation of state, non-zero spatial curvature, sterile neutrinos, modifications of gravitational physics, and a binned $σ_8(z)$ model which serves as a probe of structure growth. For the time-varying dark energy equation of state evaluated at the pivot redshift we find $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-0.99^{+0.28}_{-0.17},-0.9\pm 1.2)$ at 68% confidence with $z_{\rm p}=0.24$ from the DES measurements alone, and $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-1.03^{+0.04}_{-0.03},-0.4^{+0.4}_{-0.3})$ with $z_{\rm p}=0.21$ for the combination of all data considered. Curvature constraints of $Ω_k=0.0009\pm 0.0017$ and effective relativistic species $N_{\rm eff}=3.10^{+0.15}_{-0.16}$ are dominated by external data. For massive sterile neutrinos, we improve the upper bound on the mass $m_{\rm eff}$ by a factor of three compared to previous analyses, giving 95% limits of $(ΔN_{\rm eff},m_{\rm eff})\leq (0.28, 0.20\, {\rm eV})$. We also constrain changes to the lensing and Poisson equations controlled by functions $Σ(k,z) = Σ_0 Ω_Λ(z)/Ω_{Λ,0}$ and $μ(k,z)=μ_0 Ω_Λ(z)/Ω_{Λ,0}$ respectively to $Σ_0=0.6^{+0.4}_{-0.5}$ from DES alone and $(Σ_0,μ_0)=(0.04\pm 0.05,0.08^{+0.21}_{-0.19})$ for the combination of all data. Overall, we find no significant evidence for physics beyond $Λ$CDM.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2023; v1 submitted 12 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck III: Combined cosmological constraints
Authors:
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Annis,
B. Ansarinejad,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. J. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
B. A. Benson,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
L. E. Bleem,
S. Bocquet,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
J. E. Carlstrom
, et al. (146 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of two-point correlation functions between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. When jointly analyzing the DES-only two-point functions and the DES cross-correlations with SPT+Planck CMB l…
▽ More
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of two-point correlation functions between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. When jointly analyzing the DES-only two-point functions and the DES cross-correlations with SPT+Planck CMB lensing, we find $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.344\pm 0.030$ and $S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.773\pm 0.016$, assuming $Λ$CDM. When additionally combining with measurements of the CMB lensing autospectrum, we find $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.306^{+0.018}_{-0.021}$ and $S_8 = 0.792\pm 0.012$. The high signal-to-noise of the CMB lensing cross-correlations enables several powerful consistency tests of these results, including comparisons with constraints derived from cross-correlations only, and comparisons designed to test the robustness of the galaxy lensing and clustering measurements from DES. Applying these tests to our measurements, we find no evidence of significant biases in the baseline cosmological constraints from the DES-only analyses or from the joint analyses with CMB lensing cross-correlations. However, the CMB lensing cross-correlations suggest possible problems with the correlation function measurements using alternative lens galaxy samples, in particular the redMaGiC galaxies and high-redshift MagLim galaxies, consistent with the findings of previous studies. We use the CMB lensing cross-correlations to identify directions for further investigating these problems.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Constraining the Baryonic Feedback with Cosmic Shear Using the DES Year-3 Small-Scale Measurements
Authors:
A. Chen,
G. Aricò,
D. Huterer,
R. Angulo,
N. Weaverdyck,
O. Friedrich,
L. F. Secco,
C. Hernández-Monteagudo,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
A. Brandao-Souza,
S. L. Bridle,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang
, et al. (117 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We use the small scales of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-3 cosmic shear measurements, which are excluded from the DES Year-3 cosmological analysis, to constrain the baryonic feedback. To model the baryonic feedback, we adopt a baryonic correction model and use the numerical package \texttt{Baccoemu} to accelerate the evaluation of the baryonic nonlinear matter power spectrum. We design our ana…
▽ More
We use the small scales of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-3 cosmic shear measurements, which are excluded from the DES Year-3 cosmological analysis, to constrain the baryonic feedback. To model the baryonic feedback, we adopt a baryonic correction model and use the numerical package \texttt{Baccoemu} to accelerate the evaluation of the baryonic nonlinear matter power spectrum. We design our analysis pipeline to focus on the constraints of the baryonic suppression effects, utilizing the implication given by a principal component analysis on the Fisher forecasts. Our constraint on the baryonic effects can then be used to better model and ameliorate the effects of baryons in producing cosmological constraints from the next generation large-scale structure surveys. We detect the baryonic suppression on the cosmic shear measurements with a $\sim 2 σ$ significance. The characteristic halo mass for which half of the gas is ejected by baryonic feedback is constrained to be $M_c > 10^{13.2} h^{-1} M_{\odot}$ (95\% C.L.). The best-fit baryonic suppression is $\sim 5\%$ at $k=1.0 {\rm Mpc}\ h^{-1}$ and $\sim 15\%$ at $k=5.0 {\rm Mpc} \ h^{-1}$. Our findings are robust with respect to the assumptions about the cosmological parameters, specifics of the baryonic model, and intrinsic alignments.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck II: Cross-correlation measurements and cosmological constraints
Authors:
C. Chang,
Y. Omori,
E. J. Baxter,
C. Doux,
A. Choi,
S. Pandey,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
F. Bianchini,
J. Blazek,
L. E. Bleem,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
R. Chen,
J. Cordero,
T. M. Crawford,
M. Crocce
, et al. (141 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Cross-correlations of galaxy positions and galaxy shears with maps of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to the distribution of large-scale structure in the Universe. Such cross-correlations are also expected to be immune to some of the systematic effects that complicate correlation measurements internal to galaxy surveys. We present measurements and model…
▽ More
Cross-correlations of galaxy positions and galaxy shears with maps of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to the distribution of large-scale structure in the Universe. Such cross-correlations are also expected to be immune to some of the systematic effects that complicate correlation measurements internal to galaxy surveys. We present measurements and modeling of the cross-correlations between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey with CMB lensing maps derived from a combination of data from the 2500 deg$^2$ SPT-SZ survey conducted with the South Pole Telescope and full-sky data from the Planck satellite. The CMB lensing maps used in this analysis have been constructed in a way that minimizes biases from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, making them well suited for cross-correlation studies. The total signal-to-noise of the cross-correlation measurements is 23.9 (25.7) when using a choice of angular scales optimized for a linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias model. We use the cross-correlation measurements to obtain constraints on cosmological parameters. For our fiducial galaxy sample, which consist of four bins of magnitude-selected galaxies, we find constraints of $Ω_{m} = 0.272^{+0.032}_{-0.052}$ and $S_{8} \equiv σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{m}/0.3}= 0.736^{+0.032}_{-0.028}$ ($Ω_{m} = 0.245^{+0.026}_{-0.044}$ and $S_{8} = 0.734^{+0.035}_{-0.028}$) when assuming linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias in our modeling. Considering only the cross-correlation of galaxy shear with CMB lensing, we find $Ω_{m} = 0.270^{+0.043}_{-0.061}$ and $S_{8} = 0.740^{+0.034}_{-0.029}$. Our constraints on $S_8$ are consistent with recent cosmic shear measurements, but lower than the values preferred by primary CMB measurements from Planck.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2022; v1 submitted 23 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck I: Construction of CMB Lensing Maps and Modeling Choices
Authors:
Y. Omori,
E. J. Baxter,
C. Chang,
O. Friedrich,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
L. E. Bleem,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
J. Cordero,
T. M. Crawford,
M. Crocce,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose
, et al. (138 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Joint analyses of cross-correlations between measurements of galaxy positions, galaxy lensing, and lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) offer powerful constraints on the large-scale structure of the Universe. In a forthcoming analysis, we will present cosmological constraints from the analysis of such cross-correlations measured using Year 3 data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and…
▽ More
Joint analyses of cross-correlations between measurements of galaxy positions, galaxy lensing, and lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) offer powerful constraints on the large-scale structure of the Universe. In a forthcoming analysis, we will present cosmological constraints from the analysis of such cross-correlations measured using Year 3 data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and CMB data from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Here we present two key ingredients of this analysis: (1) an improved CMB lensing map in the SPT-SZ survey footprint, and (2) the analysis methodology that will be used to extract cosmological information from the cross-correlation measurements. Relative to previous lensing maps made from the same CMB observations, we have implemented techniques to remove contamination from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, enabling the extraction of cosmological information from smaller angular scales of the cross-correlation measurements than in previous analyses with DES Year 1 data. We describe our model for the cross-correlations between these maps and DES data, and validate our modeling choices to demonstrate the robustness of our analysis. We then forecast the expected cosmological constraints from the galaxy survey-CMB lensing auto and cross-correlations. We find that the galaxy-CMB lensing and galaxy shear-CMB lensing correlations will on their own provide a constraint on $S_8=σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}$ at the few percent level, providing a powerful consistency check for the DES-only constraints. We explore scenarios where external priors on shear calibration are removed, finding that the joint analysis of CMB lensing cross-correlations can provide constraints on the shear calibration amplitude at the 5 to 10% level.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space
Authors:
C. Doux,
B. Jain,
D. Zeurcher,
J. Lee,
X. Fang,
R. Rosenfeld,
A. Amon,
H. Camacho,
A. Choi,
L. F. Secco,
J. Blazek,
C. Chang,
M. Gatti,
E. Gaztanaga,
N. Jeffrey,
M. Raveri,
S. Samuroff,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos
, et al. (113 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method and offer a view complementary to that of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Ga…
▽ More
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method and offer a view complementary to that of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Gaussian information in different ways, due to scale cuts. They may also be differently affected by systematic effects and theoretical uncertainties, such as baryons and intrinsic alignments (IA), making this analysis an important cross-check. In the context of $Λ$CDM, and using the same fiducial model as in the DES Y3 real space analysis, we find ${S_8 \equiv σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.793^{+0.038}_{-0.025}}$, which further improves to ${S_8 = 0.784\pm 0.026 }$ when including shear ratios. This constraint is within expected statistical fluctuations from the real space analysis, and in agreement with DES~Y3 analyses of non-Gaussian statistics, but favors a slightly higher value of $S_8$, which reduces the tension with the Planck cosmic microwave background 2018 results from $2.3σ$ in the real space analysis to $1.5σ$ in this work. We explore less conservative IA models than the one adopted in our fiducial analysis, finding no clear preference for a more complex model. We also include small scales, using an increased Fourier mode cut-off up to $k_{\rm max}={5}{h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}}$, which allows to constrain baryonic feedback while leaving cosmological constraints essentially unchanged. Finally, we present an approximate reconstruction of the linear matter power spectrum at present time, which is found to be about 20\% lower than predicted by Planck 2018, as reflected by the $1.5σ$ lower $S_8$ value.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Cosmic Shear in Harmonic Space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: Compatibility with Configuration Space Results
Authors:
H. Camacho,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
A. Troja,
R. Rosenfeld,
L. Faga,
R. Gomes,
C. Doux,
X. Fang,
M. Lima,
V. Miranda,
T. F. Eifler,
O. Friedrich,
M. Gatti,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
S. L. Bridle,
A. Choi,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose,
E. Gaztanaga,
D. Gruen,
W. G. Hartley,
B. Hoyle,
M. Jarvis,
N. MacCrann
, et al. (74 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We perform a cosmic shear analysis in harmonic space using the first year of data collected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES-Y1). We measure the cosmic weak lensing shear power spectra using the Metacalibration catalogue and perform a likelihood analysis within the framework of CosmoSIS. We set scale cuts based on baryonic effects contamination and model redshift and shear calibration uncertainties…
▽ More
We perform a cosmic shear analysis in harmonic space using the first year of data collected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES-Y1). We measure the cosmic weak lensing shear power spectra using the Metacalibration catalogue and perform a likelihood analysis within the framework of CosmoSIS. We set scale cuts based on baryonic effects contamination and model redshift and shear calibration uncertainties as well as intrinsic alignments. We adopt as fiducial covariance matrix an analytical computation accounting for the mask geometry in the Gaussian term, including non-Gaussian contributions. A suite of 1200 lognormal simulations is used to validate the harmonic space pipeline and the covariance matrix. We perform a series of stress tests to gauge the robustness of the harmonic space analysis. Finally, we use the DES-Y1 pipeline in configuration space to perform a similar likelihood analysis and compare both results, demonstrating their compatibility in estimating the cosmological parameters $S_8$, $σ_8$ and $Ω_m$. The methods implemented and validated in this paper will allow us to perform a consistent harmonic space analysis in the upcoming DES data.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2022; v1 submitted 13 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Marginalisation over redshift distribution uncertainties using ranking of discrete realisations
Authors:
Juan P. Cordero,
Ian Harrison,
Richard P. Rollins,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. L. Bridle,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Choi,
J. DeRose,
S. Dodelson,
K. Eckert,
T. F. Eifler,
S. Everett,
X. Fang,
O. Friedrich,
D. Gruen,
R. A. Gruendl,
W. G. Hartley,
E. M. Huff,
E. Krause,
N. Kuropatkin
, et al. (70 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Cosmological information from weak lensing surveys is maximised by dividing source galaxies into tomographic sub-samples for which the redshift distributions are estimated. Uncertainties on these redshift distributions must be correctly propagated into the cosmological results. We present hyperrank, a new method for marginalising over redshift distribution uncertainties in cosmological analyses, u…
▽ More
Cosmological information from weak lensing surveys is maximised by dividing source galaxies into tomographic sub-samples for which the redshift distributions are estimated. Uncertainties on these redshift distributions must be correctly propagated into the cosmological results. We present hyperrank, a new method for marginalising over redshift distribution uncertainties in cosmological analyses, using discrete samples from the space of all possible redshift distributions. This is demonstrated in contrast to previous highly simplified parametric models of the redshift distribution uncertainty. In hyperrank the set of proposed redshift distributions is ranked according to a small (in this work between one and four) number of summary values, which are then sampled along with other nuisance parameters and cosmological parameters in the Monte Carlo chain used for inference. This can be regarded as a general method for marginalising over discrete realisations of data vector variation with nuisance parameters, which can consequently be sampled separately to the main parameters of interest, allowing for increased computational efficiency. We focus on the case of weak lensing cosmic shear analyses and demonstrate our method using simulations made for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We show the method can correctly and efficiently marginalise over a range of models for the redshift distribution uncertainty. Finally, we compare hyperrank to the common mean-shifting method of marginalising over redshift uncertainty, validating that this simpler model is sufficient for use in the DES Year 3 cosmology results presented in companion papers.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2022; v1 submitted 20 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Galaxy Sample for BAO Measurement
Authors:
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Rodriguez-Monroy,
M. Crocce,
J. Elvin-Poole,
A. Porredon,
I. Ferrero,
J. Mena-Fernandez,
R. Cawthon,
J. De Vicente,
E. Gaztanaga,
A. J. Ross,
E. Sanchez,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Asorey,
S. Avila,
A. Brandao-Souza,
H. Camacho,
K. C. Chan,
A. Ferte,
J. Muir,
W. Riquelme,
R. Rosenfeld,
D. Sanchez Cid
, et al. (84 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we present and validate the galaxy sample used for the analysis of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation signal (BAO) in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y3 data. The definition is based on a colour and redshift-dependent magnitude cut optimized to select galaxies at redshifts higher than 0.5, while ensuring a high quality photometric redshift determination. The sample covers $\approx 4100$ sq…
▽ More
In this paper we present and validate the galaxy sample used for the analysis of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation signal (BAO) in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y3 data. The definition is based on a colour and redshift-dependent magnitude cut optimized to select galaxies at redshifts higher than 0.5, while ensuring a high quality photometric redshift determination. The sample covers $\approx 4100$ square degrees to a depth of $i = 22.3 \ (AB)$ at $10σ$. It contains 7,031,993 galaxies in the redshift range from $z$= 0.6 to 1.1, with a mean effective redshift of 0.835. Photometric redshifts are estimated with the machine learning algorithm DNF, and are validated using the VIPERS PDR2 sample. We find a mean redshift bias of $z_{\mathrm{bias}} \approx 0.01$ and a mean uncertainty, in units of $1+z$, of $σ_{68} \approx 0.03$. We evaluate the galaxy population of the sample, showing it is mostly built upon Elliptical to Sbc types. Furthermore, we find a low level of stellar contamination of $\lesssim 4\%$. We present the method used to mitigate the effect of spurious clustering coming from observing conditions and other large-scale systematics. We apply it to the DES Y3 BAO sample and calculate sample weights that are used to get a robust estimate of the galaxy clustering signal. This paper is one of a series dedicated to the analysis of the BAO signal in the DES Y3 data. In the companion papers, Ferrero et al. (2021) and DES Collaboration (2021), we present the galaxy mock catalogues used to calibrate the analysis and the angular diameter distance constraints obtained through the fitting to the BAO scale, respectively. The galaxy sample, masks and additional material will be released in the public DES data repository upon acceptance.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2021; v1 submitted 12 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: A 2.7% measurement of Baryon Acoustic Oscillation distance scale at redshift 0.835
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Asorey,
S. Avila,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
A. Brandao-Souza,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
J. Calcino,
H. Camacho,
A. Carnero Rosell,
D. Carollo,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
R. Cawthon,
K. C. Chan,
A. Choi,
C. Conselice,
M. Costanzi,
M. Crocce
, et al. (86 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present angular diameter measurements obtained by measuring the position of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) in an optimised sample of galaxies from the first three years of Dark Energy Survey data (DES Y3). The sample consists of 7 million galaxies distributed over a footprint of 4100 deg$^2$ with $0.6 < z_{\rm photo} < 1.1$ and a typical redshift uncertainty of $0.03(1+z)$. The sample selec…
▽ More
We present angular diameter measurements obtained by measuring the position of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) in an optimised sample of galaxies from the first three years of Dark Energy Survey data (DES Y3). The sample consists of 7 million galaxies distributed over a footprint of 4100 deg$^2$ with $0.6 < z_{\rm photo} < 1.1$ and a typical redshift uncertainty of $0.03(1+z)$. The sample selection is the same as in the BAO measurement with the first year of DES data, but the analysis presented here uses three times the area, extends to higher redshift and makes a number of improvements, including a fully analytical BAO template, the use of covariances from both theory and simulations, and an extensive pre-unblinding protocol. We used two different statistics: angular correlation function and power spectrum, and validate our pipeline with an ensemble of over 1500 realistic simulations. Both statistics yield compatible results. We combine the likelihoods derived from angular correlations and spherical harmonics to constrain the ratio of comoving angular diameter distance $D_M$ at the effective redshift of our sample to the sound horizon scale at the drag epoch. We obtain $D_M(z_{\rm eff}=0.835)/r_{\rm d} = 18.92 \pm 0.51$, which is consistent with, but smaller than, the Planck prediction assuming flat \lcdm, at the level of $2.3 σ$. The analysis was performed blind and is robust to changes in a number of analysis choices. It represents the most precise BAO distance measurement from imaging data to date, and is competitive with the latest transverse ones from spectroscopic samples at $z>0.75$. When combined with DES 3x2pt + SNIa, they lead to improvements in $H_0$ and $Ω_m$ constraints by $\sim 20\%$
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2022; v1 submitted 9 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Galaxy mock catalogs for BAO analysis
Authors:
I. Ferrero,
M. Crocce,
I. Tutusaus,
A. Porredon,
L. Blot,
P. Fosalba,
A. Carnero Rosell,
S. Avila,
A. Izard,
J. Elvin-Poole,
K. C. Chan,
H. Camacho,
R. Rosenfeld,
E. Sanchez,
P. Tallada-Crespí,
J. Carretero,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
E. Gaztanaga,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. De Vicente,
J. Mena-Fernández,
A. J. Ross,
D. Sanchez Cid,
A. Ferté,
A. Brandao-Souza
, et al. (61 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The calibration and validation of scientific analysis in simulations is a fundamental tool to ensure unbiased and robust results in observational cosmology. In particular, mock galaxy catalogs are a crucial resource to achieve these goals in the measurement of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) in the clustering of galaxies. Here we present a set of 1952 galaxy mock catalogs designed to mimic the D…
▽ More
The calibration and validation of scientific analysis in simulations is a fundamental tool to ensure unbiased and robust results in observational cosmology. In particular, mock galaxy catalogs are a crucial resource to achieve these goals in the measurement of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) in the clustering of galaxies. Here we present a set of 1952 galaxy mock catalogs designed to mimic the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 BAO sample over its full photometric redshift range $0.6<z_{\rm photo}<1.1$. The mocks are based upon 488 ICE-COLA fast $N$-body simulations of full-sky light cones and were created by populating halos with galaxies, using a hybrid halo occupation distribution - halo abundance matching model. This model has ten free parameters, which were determined, for the first time, using an automatic likelihood minimization procedure. We also introduced a novel technique to assign photometric redshift for simulated galaxies, following a two-dimensional probability distribution with VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS) data. The calibration was designed to match the observed abundance of galaxies as a function of photometric redshift, the distribution of photometric redshift errors, and the clustering amplitude on scales smaller than those used for BAO measurements. An exhaustive analysis was done to ensure that the mocks reproduce the input properties. Finally, mocks were tested by comparing the angular correlation function $w(θ)$, angular power spectrum $C_\ell$, and projected clustering $ξ_p(r_\perp)$ to theoretical predictions and data. The impact of volume replication in the estimate of the covariance is also investigated. The success in accurately reproducing the photometric redshift uncertainties and the galaxy clustering as a function of redshift render this mock creation pipeline as a benchmark for future analyses of photometric galaxy surveys.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2021; v1 submitted 9 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. Bhargava,
S. Birrer,
J. Blazek,
A. Brandao-Souza,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos
, et al. (146 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to miti…
▽ More
We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results. We model the data within the flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM cosmological models. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude $S_8=0.776^{+0.017}_{-0.017}$ and matter density $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.339^{+0.032}_{-0.031}$ in $Λ$CDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; $S_8=0.775^{+0.026}_{-0.024}$, $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.352^{+0.035}_{-0.041}$, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter $w=-0.98^{+0.32}_{-0.20}$ in $w$CDM. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed $p=0.13$ to $0.48$. When combining DES 3$\times$2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find $p=0.34$. Combining all of these data sets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.306^{+0.004}_{-0.005}$, $h=0.680^{+0.004}_{-0.003}$, and $\sum m_ν<0.13 \;\mathrm{eV\; (95\% \;CL)}$ in $Λ$CDM; $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.302^{+0.006}_{-0.006}$, $h=0.687^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$, and $w=-1.031^{+0.030}_{-0.027}$ in $w$CDM. (abridged)
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation
Authors:
E. Krause,
X. Fang,
S. Pandey,
L. F. Secco,
O. Alves,
H. Huang,
J. Blazek,
J. Prat,
J. Zuntz,
T. F. Eifler,
N. MacCrann,
J. DeRose,
M. Crocce,
A. Porredon,
B. Jain,
M. A. Troxel,
S. Dodelson,
D. Huterer,
A. R. Liddle,
C. D. Leonard,
A. Amon,
A. Chen,
J. Elvin-Poole,
A. Ferté,
J. Muir
, et al. (99 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper details the modeling pipeline and validates the baseline analysis choices of the DES Year 3 joint analysis of galaxy clustering and weak lensing (a so-called "3$\times$2pt" analysis). These analysis choices include the specific combination of cosmological probes, priors on cosmological and systematics parameters, model parameterizations for systematic effects and related approximations,…
▽ More
This paper details the modeling pipeline and validates the baseline analysis choices of the DES Year 3 joint analysis of galaxy clustering and weak lensing (a so-called "3$\times$2pt" analysis). These analysis choices include the specific combination of cosmological probes, priors on cosmological and systematics parameters, model parameterizations for systematic effects and related approximations, and angular scales where the model assumptions are validated. We run a large number of simulated likelihood analyses using synthetic data vectors to test the robustness of our baseline analysis. We demonstrate that the DES Year 3 modeling pipeline, including the calibrated scale cuts, is sufficiently accurate relative to the constraining power of the DES Year 3 analyses. Our systematics mitigation strategy accounts for astrophysical systematics, such as galaxy bias, intrinsic alignments, source and lens magnification, baryonic effects, and source clustering, as well as for uncertainties in modeling the matter power spectrum, reduced shear, and estimator effects. We further demonstrate excellent agreement between two independently-developed modeling pipelines, and thus rule out any residual uncertainties due to the numerical implementation.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology from combined galaxy clustering and lensing -- validation on cosmological simulations
Authors:
J. DeRose,
R. H. Wechsler,
M. R. Becker,
E. S. Rykoff,
S. Pandey,
N. MacCrann,
A. Amon,
J. Myles,
E. Krause,
D. Gruen,
B. Jain,
M. A. Troxel,
J. Prat,
A. Alarcon,
C. Sánchez,
J. Blazek,
M. Crocce,
G. Giannini,
M. Gatti,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Zuntz,
S. Dodelson,
X. Fang,
O. Friedrich,
L. F. Secco
, et al. (92 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) $3\times2$-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard v2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak lensing analyses. We show that the Buzzard v2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photom…
▽ More
We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) $3\times2$-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard v2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak lensing analyses. We show that the Buzzard v2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photometric redshift and magnitude distributions, and the relevant set of two-point clustering and weak lensing statistics. We then show that our model for the $3\times2$-point data vector is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys assuming the true redshift distributions for our source and lens samples, demonstrating robustness to uncertainties in the modeling of the non-linear matter power spectrum, non-linear galaxy bias and higher-order lensing corrections. Additionally, we demonstrate for the first time that our photometric redshift calibration methodology, including information from photometry, spectroscopy, clustering cross-correlations, and galaxy-galaxy lensing ratios, is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys in the presence of realistic photometric redshift uncertainties.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MagLim lens sample
Authors:
A. Porredon,
M. Crocce,
J. Elvin-Poole,
R. Cawthon,
G. Giannini,
J. De Vicente,
A. Carnero Rosell,
I. Ferrero,
E. Krause,
X. Fang,
J. Prat,
M. Rodriguez-Monroy,
S. Pandey,
A. Pocino,
F. J. Castander,
A. Choi,
A. Amon,
I. Tutusaus,
S. Dodelson,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
P. Fosalba,
E. Gaztanaga,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira
, et al. (119 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Two of the most sensitive probes of the large scale structure of the universe are the clustering of galaxies and the tangential shear of background galaxy shapes produced by those foreground galaxies, so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing. Combining the measurements of these two two-point functions leads to cosmological constraints that are independent of the galaxy bias factor. The optimal choice of fo…
▽ More
Two of the most sensitive probes of the large scale structure of the universe are the clustering of galaxies and the tangential shear of background galaxy shapes produced by those foreground galaxies, so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing. Combining the measurements of these two two-point functions leads to cosmological constraints that are independent of the galaxy bias factor. The optimal choice of foreground, or lens, galaxies is governed by the joint, but conflicting requirements to obtain accurate redshift information and large statistics. We present cosmological results from the full 5000 sq. deg. of the Dark Energy Survey first three years of observations (Y3) combining those two-point functions, using for the first time a magnitude-limited lens sample (MagLim) of 11 million galaxies especially selected to optimize such combination, and 100 million background shapes. We consider two cosmological models, flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM. In $Λ$CDM we obtain for the matter density $Ω_m = 0.320^{+0.041}_{-0.034}$ and for the clustering amplitude $S_8 = 0.778^{+0.037}_{-0.031}$, at 68% C.L. The latter is only 1$σ$ smaller than the prediction in this model informed by measurements of the cosmic microwave background by the Planck satellite. In $w$CDM we find $Ω_m = 0.32^{+0.044}_{-0.046}$, $S_8=0.777^{+0.049}_{-0.051}$, and dark energy equation of state $w=-1.031^{+0.218}_{-0.379}$. We find that including smaller scales while marginalizing over non-linear galaxy bias improves the constraining power in the $Ω_m-S_8$ plane by $31$% and in the $Ω_m-w$ plane by $41$% while yielding consistent cosmological parameters from those in the linear bias case. These results are combined with those from cosmic shear in a companion paper to present full DES-Y3 constraints from the three two-point functions (3x2pt).
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Constraints on cosmological parameters and galaxy bias models from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the redMaGiC sample
Authors:
S. Pandey,
E. Krause,
J. DeRose,
N. MacCrann,
B. Jain,
M. Crocce,
J. Blazek,
A. Choi,
H. Huang,
C. To,
X. Fang,
J. Elvin-Poole,
J. Prat,
A. Porredon,
L. F. Secco,
M. Rodriguez-Monroy,
N. Weaverdyck,
Y. Park,
M. Raveri,
E. Rozo,
E. S. Rykoff,
G. M. Bernstein,
C. Sánchez,
M. Jarvis,
M. A. Troxel
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We constrain cosmological and galaxy-bias parameters using the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year-3 data. We describe our modeling framework, and choice of scales analyzed, validating their robustness to theoretical uncertainties in small-scale clustering by analyzing simulated data. Using a linear galaxy bias model and redMaGiC…
▽ More
We constrain cosmological and galaxy-bias parameters using the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year-3 data. We describe our modeling framework, and choice of scales analyzed, validating their robustness to theoretical uncertainties in small-scale clustering by analyzing simulated data. Using a linear galaxy bias model and redMaGiC galaxy sample, we obtain constraints on the matter density to be $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.325^{+0.033}_{-0.034}$. We also implement a non-linear galaxy bias model to probe smaller scales that includes parameterization based on hybrid perturbation theory and find that it leads to a 17% gain in cosmological constraining power. We perform robustness tests of our methodology pipeline and demonstrate the stability of the constraints to changes in the theoretical model. Using the redMaGiC galaxy sample as foreground lens galaxies, we find the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements to exhibit significant signals akin to de-correlation between galaxies and mass on large scales, which is not expected in any current models. This likely systematic measurement error biases our constraints on galaxy bias and the $S_8$ parameter. We find that a scale-, redshift- and sky-area-independent phenomenological de-correlation parameter can effectively capture the impact of this systematic error. We trace the source of this de-correlation to a color-dependent photometric issue and minimize its impact on our result by changing the selection criteria of redMaGiC galaxies. Using this new sample, our constraints on the $S_8$ parameter are consistent with previous studies, and we find a small shift in the $Ω_{\rm m}$ constraints compared to the fiducial redMaGiC sample. We constrain the mean host halo mass of the redMaGiC galaxies in this new sample to be approximately $1.6 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}/h$.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Modeling Uncertainty
Authors:
L. F. Secco,
S. Samuroff,
E. Krause,
B. Jain,
J. Blazek,
M. Raveri,
A. Campos,
A. Amon,
A. Chen,
C. Doux,
A. Choi,
D. Gruen,
G. M. Bernstein,
C. Chang,
J. DeRose,
J. Myles,
A. Ferté,
P. Lemos,
D. Huterer,
J. Prat,
M. A. Troxel,
N. MacCrann,
A. R. Liddle,
T. Kacprzak,
X. Fang
, et al. (129 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. (2021), present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter $S_8\equivσ_8\sqrt{Ω_\textrm{m}/0.3}$ at the 3% level in $Λ$CDM: $S_8=0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angu…
▽ More
This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. (2021), present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter $S_8\equivσ_8\sqrt{Ω_\textrm{m}/0.3}$ at the 3% level in $Λ$CDM: $S_8=0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the $Λ$CDM analysis: $S_8=0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak-lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We additionally quantify the agreement between our data and external constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our DES Y3 result under the assumption of $Λ$CDM is found to be in statistical agreement with Planck 2018, although favors a lower $S_8$ than the CMB-inferred value by $2.3σ$ (a $p$-value of 0.02). This paper explores the robustness of these cosmic shear results to modeling of intrinsic alignments, the matter power spectrum and baryonic physics. We additionally explore the statistical preference of our data for intrinsic alignment models of different complexity. The fiducial cosmic shear model is tested using synthetic data, and we report no biases greater than 0.3$σ$ in the plane of $S_8\timesΩ_\textrm{m}$ caused by uncertainties in the theoretical models.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration
Authors:
A. Amon,
D. Gruen,
M. A. Troxel,
N. MacCrann,
S. Dodelson,
A. Choi,
C. Doux,
L. F. Secco,
S. Samuroff,
E. Krause,
J. Cordero,
J. Myles,
J. DeRose,
R. H. Wechsler,
M. Gatti,
A. Navarro-Alsina,
G. M. Bernstein,
B. Jain,
J. Blazek,
A. Alarcon,
A. Ferté,
M. Raveri,
P. Lemos,
A. Campos,
J. Prat
, et al. (123 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work, together with its companion paper, Secco and Samuroff et al. (2021), presents the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints based on an analysis of over 100 million source galaxies. With the data spanning 4143 deg$^2$ on the sky, divided into four redshift bins, we produce the highest significance measurement of cosmic shear to date, with a signal-…
▽ More
This work, together with its companion paper, Secco and Samuroff et al. (2021), presents the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints based on an analysis of over 100 million source galaxies. With the data spanning 4143 deg$^2$ on the sky, divided into four redshift bins, we produce the highest significance measurement of cosmic shear to date, with a signal-to-noise of 40. We conduct a blind analysis in the context of the $Λ$CDM model and find a 3% constraint of the clustering amplitude, $S_8\equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$. A $Λ$CDM-Optimized analysis, which safely includes smaller scale information, yields a 2% precision measurement of $S_8= 0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ that is consistent with the fiducial case. The two low-redshift measurements are statistically consistent with the Planck Cosmic Microwave Background result, however, both recovered $S_8$ values are lower than the high-redshift prediction by $2.3σ$ and $2.1σ$ ($p$-values of 0.02 and 0.05), respectively. The measurements are shown to be internally consistent across redshift bins, angular scales and correlation functions. The analysis is demonstrated to be robust to calibration systematics, with the $S_8$ posterior consistent when varying the choice of redshift calibration sample, the modeling of redshift uncertainty and methodology. Similarly, we find that the corrections included to account for the blending of galaxies shifts our best-fit $S_8$ by $0.5σ$ without incurring a substantial increase in uncertainty. We examine the limiting factors for the precision of the cosmological constraints and find observational systematics to be subdominant to the modeling of astrophysics. Specifically, we identify the uncertainties in modeling baryonic effects and intrinsic alignments as the limiting systematics.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Exploiting small-scale information with lensing shear ratios
Authors:
C. Sánchez,
J. Prat,
G. Zacharegkas,
S. Pandey,
E. Baxter,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
E. Krause,
P. Lemos,
Y. Park,
M. Raveri,
J. Sanchez,
M. A. Troxel,
A. Amon,
X. Fang,
O. Friedrich,
D. Gruen,
A. Porredon,
L. F. Secco,
S. Samuroff,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey, we use ratios of small-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements around the same lens sample to constrain source redshift uncertainties, intrinsic alignments and other nuisance parameters of our model. Instead of using a simple geometric approach for the ratios, we use the full modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, inclu…
▽ More
Using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey, we use ratios of small-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements around the same lens sample to constrain source redshift uncertainties, intrinsic alignments and other nuisance parameters of our model. Instead of using a simple geometric approach for the ratios, we use the full modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, including the corresponding integration over the power spectrum and the contributions from intrinsic alignments and lens magnification. We perform extensive testing of the small-scale shear ratio (SR) modeling by studying the impact of different effects such as the inclusion of baryonic physics, non-linear biasing, halo occupation distribution descriptions and lens magnification, among others, and using realistic $N$-body simulations. We validate the robustness of our constraints in the data by using two independent lens samples, and by deriving constraints using the corresponding large-scale ratios for which the modeling is simpler. The DES Y3 results demonstrate how the ratios provide significant improvements in constraining power for several nuisance parameters in our model, especially on source redshift calibration and intrinsic alignments (IA). For source redshifts, SR improves the constraints from the prior by up to 38\% in some redshift bins. Such improvements, and especially the constraints it provides on IA, translate to tighter cosmological constraints when SR is combined with cosmic shear and other 2pt functions. In particular, for the DES Y3 data, SR improves $S_8$ constraints from cosmic shear by up to 31\%, and for the full combination of probes (3$\times$2pt) by up to 10\%. The shear ratios presented in this work are used as an additional likelihood for cosmic shear, 2$\times$2pt and the full 3$\times$2pt in the fiducial DES Y3 cosmological analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: High-precision measurement and modeling of galaxy-galaxy lensing
Authors:
J. Prat,
J. Blazek,
C. Sánchez,
I. Tutusaus,
S. Pandey,
J. Elvin-Poole,
E. Krause,
M. A. Troxel,
L. F. Secco,
A. Amon,
J. DeRose,
G. Zacharegkas,
C. Chang,
B. Jain,
N. MacCrann,
Y. Park,
E. Sheldon,
G. Giannini,
S. Bocquet,
C. To,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present and characterize the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal measured using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) covering 4132 deg$^2$. These galaxy-galaxy measurements are used in the DES Y3 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis, which combines weak lensing and galaxy clustering information. We use two lens samples: a magnitude-limited sample and the redMaGic sample, wh…
▽ More
We present and characterize the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal measured using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) covering 4132 deg$^2$. These galaxy-galaxy measurements are used in the DES Y3 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis, which combines weak lensing and galaxy clustering information. We use two lens samples: a magnitude-limited sample and the redMaGic sample, which span the redshift range $\sim 0.2-1$ with 10.7 M and 2.6 M galaxies respectively. For the source catalog, we use the Metacalibration shape sample, consisting of $\simeq$100 M galaxies separated into 4 tomographic bins. Our galaxy-galaxy lensing estimator is the mean tangential shear, for which we obtain a total S/N of $\sim$148 for MagLim ($\sim$120 for redMaGic), and $\sim$67 ($\sim$55) after applying the scale cuts of 6 Mpc/$h$. Thus we reach percent-level statistical precision, which requires that our modeling and systematic-error control be of comparable accuracy. The tangential shear model used in the 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis includes lens magnification, a five-parameter intrinsic alignment model (TATT), marginalization over a point-mass to remove information from small scales and a linear galaxy bias model validated with higher-order terms. We explore the impact of these choices on the tangential shear observable and study the significance of effects not included in our model, such as reduced shear, source magnification and source clustering. We also test the robustness of our measurements to various observational and systematics effects, such as the impact of observing conditions, lens-source clustering, random-point subtraction, scale-dependent Metacalibration responses, PSF residuals, and B-modes.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Galaxy clustering and systematics treatment for lens galaxy samples
Authors:
M. Rodríguez-Monroy,
N. Weaverdyck,
J. Elvin-Poole,
M. Crocce,
A. Carnero Rosell,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
S. Avila,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
H. Camacho,
R. Cawthon,
J. De Vicente,
J. DeRose,
S. Dodelson,
S. Everett,
X. Fang,
I. Ferrero,
A. Ferté,
O. Friedrich,
E. Gaztanaga,
G. Giannini,
R. A. Gruendl,
W. G. Hartley,
K. Herner
, et al. (80 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this work we present the galaxy clustering measurements of the two DES lens galaxy samples: a magnitude-limited sample optimized for the measurement of cosmological parameters, MagLim, and a sample of luminous red galaxies selected with the redMaGiC algorithm. MagLim / redMaGiC sample contains over 10 million / 2.5 million galaxies and is divided into six / five photometric redshift bins spanni…
▽ More
In this work we present the galaxy clustering measurements of the two DES lens galaxy samples: a magnitude-limited sample optimized for the measurement of cosmological parameters, MagLim, and a sample of luminous red galaxies selected with the redMaGiC algorithm. MagLim / redMaGiC sample contains over 10 million / 2.5 million galaxies and is divided into six / five photometric redshift bins spanning the range $z\in[0.20,1.05]$ / $z\in[0.15,0.90]$. Both samples cover 4143 deg$^2$ over which we perform our analysis blind, measuring the angular correlation function with a S/N $\sim 63$ for both samples. In a companion paper (DES Collaboration et al. 2021)), these measurements of galaxy clustering are combined with the correlation functions of cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing of each sample to place cosmological constraints with a 3$\times$2pt analysis. We conduct a thorough study of the mitigation of systematic effects caused by the spatially varying survey properties and we correct the measurements to remove artificial clustering signals. We employ several decontamination methods with different configurations to ensure the robustness of our corrections and to determine the systematic uncertainty that needs to be considered for the final cosmology analyses. We validate our fiducial methodology using log-normal mocks, showing that our decontamination procedure induces biases no greater than $0.5σ$ in the $(Ω_m, b)$ plane, where $b$ is galaxy bias. We demonstrate that failure to remove the artificial clustering would introduce strong biases up to $\sim 7 σ$ in $Ω_m$ and of more than $4 σ$ in galaxy bias.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Latin American HECAP Physics Briefing Book
Authors:
H. Aihara,
A. Aranda,
R. Camacho Toro,
M. Cambiaso,
M. Carena,
E. Carrera,
J. C. D'Olivo,
A. Gago,
T. Goncalves,
G. Herrera,
D. Lopez Nacir,
M. Losada,
J. Molina,
M. Mulders,
D. Restrepo,
R. Rosenfeld,
A. Sanchez,
F. Sanchez,
M. Soares-Santos,
M. Subieta,
H. Wahlberg,
H. Yepes Ramirez,
A. Zerwekh
Abstract:
For the first time the scientific community in Latin America working at the forefront of research in high energy, cosmology and astroparticle physics (HECAP) have come together to discuss and provide scientific input towards the development of a regional strategy.
The present document, the Latin American HECAP Physics Briefing Book, is the result of this ambitious bottom-up effort. This report c…
▽ More
For the first time the scientific community in Latin America working at the forefront of research in high energy, cosmology and astroparticle physics (HECAP) have come together to discuss and provide scientific input towards the development of a regional strategy.
The present document, the Latin American HECAP Physics Briefing Book, is the result of this ambitious bottom-up effort. This report contains the work performed by the Preparatory Group to synthesize the main contributions and discussions for each of the topical working groups. This briefing book discusses the relevant emerging projects develo** in the region and considers potentially impactful future initiatives and participation of the Latin American HECAP community in international flagship projects to provide the essential input for the creation of a long-term HECAP strategy in the region.
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Mitigating baryonic effects with a theoretical error covariance
Authors:
Maria G. Moreira,
Felipe Andrade-Oliveira,
Xiao Fang,
Hung-** Huang,
Elisabeth Krause,
Vivian Miranda,
Rogerio Rosenfeld,
Marko Simonović
Abstract:
One of the primary sources of uncertainties in modeling the cosmic-shear power spectrum on small scales is the effect of baryonic physics. Accurate cosmology for Stage-IV surveys requires knowledge of the matter power spectrum deep in the nonlinear regime at the percent level. Therefore, it is important to develop reliable mitigation techniques to take into account baryonic uncertainties if inform…
▽ More
One of the primary sources of uncertainties in modeling the cosmic-shear power spectrum on small scales is the effect of baryonic physics. Accurate cosmology for Stage-IV surveys requires knowledge of the matter power spectrum deep in the nonlinear regime at the percent level. Therefore, it is important to develop reliable mitigation techniques to take into account baryonic uncertainties if information from small scales is to be considered in the cosmological analysis. In this work, we develop a new mitigation method for dealing with baryonic physics for the case of the shear angular power spectrum. The method is based on an extended covariance matrix that incorporates baryonic uncertainties informed by hydrodynamical simulations. We use the results from 13 hydrodynamical simulations and the residual errors arising from a fit to a $Λ$CDM model using the extended halo model code {\tt HMCode} to account for baryonic physics. These residual errors are used to model a so-called theoretical error covariance matrix that is added to the original covariance matrix. In order to assess the performance of the method, we use the 2D tomographic shear from four hydrodynamical simulations that have different extremes of baryonic parameters as mock data and run a likelihood analysis comparing the residual bias on $Ω_m$ and $σ_8$ of our method and the HMCode for an LSST-like survey. We use different modelling of the theoretical error covariance matrix to test the robustness of the method. We show that it is possible to reduce the bias in the determination of the tested cosmological parameters at the price of a modest decrease in the precision.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Galaxy Clustering in Harmonic Space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: Compatibility with Real-Space Results
Authors:
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
H. Camacho,
L. Faga,
R. Gomes,
R. Rosenfeld,
A. Troja,
O. Alves,
C. Doux,
J. Elvin-Poole,
X. Fang,
N. Kokron,
M. Lima,
V. Miranda,
S. Pandey,
A. Porredon,
J. Sanchez,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
E. Bertin,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero
, et al. (48 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We perform an analysis in harmonic space of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data (DES-Y1) galaxy clustering data using products obtained for the real-space analysis. We test our pipeline with a suite of lognormal simulations, which are used to validate scale cuts in harmonic space as well as to provide a covariance matrix that takes into account the DES-Y1 mask. We then apply this pipeline to DES-Y1…
▽ More
We perform an analysis in harmonic space of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data (DES-Y1) galaxy clustering data using products obtained for the real-space analysis. We test our pipeline with a suite of lognormal simulations, which are used to validate scale cuts in harmonic space as well as to provide a covariance matrix that takes into account the DES-Y1 mask. We then apply this pipeline to DES-Y1 data taking into account survey property maps derived for the real-space analysis. We compare with real-space DES-Y1 results obtained from a similar pipeline. We show that the harmonic space analysis we develop yields results that are compatible with the real-space analysis for the bias parameters. This verification paves the way to performing a harmonic space analysis for the upcoming DES-Y3 data.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2021; v1 submitted 25 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit
Authors:
O. Friedrich,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
H. Camacho,
O. Alves,
R. Rosenfeld,
J. Sanchez,
X. Fang,
T. F. Eifler,
E. Krause,
C. Chang,
Y. Omori,
A. Amon,
E. Baxter,
J. Elvin-Poole,
D. Huterer,
A. Porredon,
J. Prat,
V. Terra,
A. Troja,
A. Alarcon,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
R. Buchs,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell
, et al. (87 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined 2-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) dataset. Using a variety of new ansatzes for covariance modelling and testing we validate the assumptions and approximations of this model. These include the assumption of a Gaussian likelihood, the trispectrum contribution to the covariance, the impact of…
▽ More
We describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined 2-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) dataset. Using a variety of new ansatzes for covariance modelling and testing we validate the assumptions and approximations of this model. These include the assumption of a Gaussian likelihood, the trispectrum contribution to the covariance, the impact of evaluating the model at a wrong set of parameters, the impact of masking and survey geometry, deviations from Poissonian shot-noise, galaxy weighting schemes and other, sub-dominant effects. We find that our covariance model is robust and that its approximations have little impact on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimation. The largest impact on best-fit figure-of-merit arises from the so-called $f_{\mathrm{sky}}$ approximation for dealing with finite survey area, which on average increases the $χ^2$ between maximum posterior model and measurement by $3.7\%$ ($Δχ^2 \approx 18.9$). Standard methods to go beyond this approximation fail for DES-Y3, but we derive an approximate scheme to deal with these features. For parameter estimation, our ignorance of the exact parameters at which to evaluate our covariance model causes the dominant effect. We find that it increases the scatter of maximum posterior values for $Ω_m$ and $σ_8$ by about $3\%$ and for the dark energy equation of state parameter by about $5\%$.
△ Less
Submitted 30 July, 2021; v1 submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Brazilian Community Report on Dark Matter
Authors:
E. Abdalla,
I. F. M. Albuquerque,
A. Alves,
L. Barosi,
M. C. Q. Bazetto,
R. C. Batista,
C. A. Bernardes,
C. Bonifazi,
H. A. Borges,
F. A. Brito,
T. R. P. Caramês,
L. Casarini,
D. Cogollo,
A. G. Dias,
A. Esmaili,
M. M. Ferreira,
G. Gil da Silveira,
M. M. Guzzo,
D. Hadjimichef,
P. C. de Holanda,
E. Kemp,
A. Lessa,
G. Lichtenstein,
A. A. Machado,
M. Makler
, et al. (30 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This white paper summarizes the activities of the Brazilian community concerning dark matter physics and highlights the importance of financial support to Brazilian groups that are deeply involved in experimental endeavours. The flagships of the Brazilian dark matter program are the Cherenkov Telescope Array, DARKSIDE, SBN and LHC experiments, but we emphasize that smaller experiments such as DAMI…
▽ More
This white paper summarizes the activities of the Brazilian community concerning dark matter physics and highlights the importance of financial support to Brazilian groups that are deeply involved in experimental endeavours. The flagships of the Brazilian dark matter program are the Cherenkov Telescope Array, DARKSIDE, SBN and LHC experiments, but we emphasize that smaller experiments such as DAMIC and CONNIE constitute important probes to dark sectors as well and should receive special attention. Small experimental projects showing the potential to probe new regions of parameter space of dark matter models are encouraged. On the theoretical and phenomenological side, some groups are devoted to astrophysical aspects such as the dark matter density profile while others explore the signature of dark matter models at colliders, direct and indirect detection experiments. In summary, the Brazilian dark matter community that was born not long ago has grown tremendously in the past years and now plays an important role in the hunt for a dark matter particle.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Observing the dark sector
Authors:
Valerio Marra,
Rogerio Rosenfeld,
Riccardo Sturani
Abstract:
Despite the observational success of the standard model of cosmology, present-day observations do not tightly constrain the nature of dark matter and dark energy and modifications to the theory of general relativity. Here, we will discuss some of the ongoing and upcoming surveys that will revolutionize our understanding of the dark sector.
Despite the observational success of the standard model of cosmology, present-day observations do not tightly constrain the nature of dark matter and dark energy and modifications to the theory of general relativity. Here, we will discuss some of the ongoing and upcoming surveys that will revolutionize our understanding of the dark sector.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2019; v1 submitted 1 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Dark Matter Science in the Era of LSST
Authors:
Keith Bechtol,
Alex Drlica-Wagner,
Kevork N. Abazajian,
Muntazir Abidi,
Susmita Adhikari,
Yacine Ali-Haïmoud,
James Annis,
Behzad Ansarinejad,
Robert Armstrong,
Jacobo Asorey,
Carlo Baccigalupi,
Arka Banerjee,
Nilanjan Banik,
Charles Bennett,
Florian Beutler,
Simeon Bird,
Simon Birrer,
Rahul Biswas,
Andrea Biviano,
Jonathan Blazek,
Kimberly K. Boddy,
Ana Bonaca,
Julian Borrill,
Sownak Bose,
Jo Bovy
, et al. (155 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Astrophysical observations currently provide the only robust, empirical measurements of dark matter. In the coming decade, astrophysical observations will guide other experimental efforts, while simultaneously probing unique regions of dark matter parameter space. This white paper summarizes astrophysical observations that can constrain the fundamental physics of dark matter in the era of LSST. We…
▽ More
Astrophysical observations currently provide the only robust, empirical measurements of dark matter. In the coming decade, astrophysical observations will guide other experimental efforts, while simultaneously probing unique regions of dark matter parameter space. This white paper summarizes astrophysical observations that can constrain the fundamental physics of dark matter in the era of LSST. We describe how astrophysical observations will inform our understanding of the fundamental properties of dark matter, such as particle mass, self-interaction strength, non-gravitational interactions with the Standard Model, and compact object abundances. Additionally, we highlight theoretical work and experimental/observational facilities that will complement LSST to strengthen our understanding of the fundamental characteristics of dark matter.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Probing the Fundamental Nature of Dark Matter with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
Authors:
Alex Drlica-Wagner,
Yao-Yuan Mao,
Susmita Adhikari,
Robert Armstrong,
Arka Banerjee,
Nilanjan Banik,
Keith Bechtol,
Simeon Bird,
Kimberly K. Boddy,
Ana Bonaca,
Jo Bovy,
Matthew R. Buckley,
Esra Bulbul,
Chihway Chang,
George Chapline,
Johann Cohen-Tanugi,
Alessandro Cuoco,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
William A. Dawson,
Ana Díaz Rivero,
Cora Dvorkin,
Denis Erkal,
Christopher D. Fassnacht,
Juan García-Bellido,
Maurizio Giannotti
, et al. (75 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Astrophysical and cosmological observations currently provide the only robust, empirical measurements of dark matter. Future observations with Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will provide necessary guidance for the experimental dark matter program. This white paper represents a community effort to summarize the science case for studying the fundamental physics of dark matter with LSST. We d…
▽ More
Astrophysical and cosmological observations currently provide the only robust, empirical measurements of dark matter. Future observations with Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will provide necessary guidance for the experimental dark matter program. This white paper represents a community effort to summarize the science case for studying the fundamental physics of dark matter with LSST. We discuss how LSST will inform our understanding of the fundamental properties of dark matter, such as particle mass, self-interaction strength, non-gravitational couplings to the Standard Model, and compact object abundances. Additionally, we discuss the ways that LSST will complement other experiments to strengthen our understanding of the fundamental characteristics of dark matter. More information on the LSST dark matter effort can be found at https://lsstdarkmatter.github.io/ .
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2019; v1 submitted 4 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Cosmological Constraints from Multiple Probes in the Dark Energy Survey
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
P. Andersen,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Annis,
J. Asorey,
A. Avelino,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
N. Banik,
B. A. Bassett,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
D. Brout,
D. L. Burke,
J. Calcino,
H. Camacho
, et al. (144 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results from these pr…
▽ More
The combination of multiple observational probes has long been advocated as a powerful technique to constrain cosmological parameters, in particular dark energy. The Dark Energy Survey has measured 207 spectroscopically--confirmed Type Ia supernova lightcurves; the baryon acoustic oscillation feature; weak gravitational lensing; and galaxy clustering. Here we present combined results from these probes, deriving constraints on the equation of state, $w$, of dark energy and its energy density in the Universe. Independently of other experiments, such as those that measure the cosmic microwave background, the probes from this single photometric survey rule out a Universe with no dark energy, finding $w=-0.80^{+0.09}_{-0.11}$. The geometry is shown to be consistent with a spatially flat Universe, and we obtain a constraint on the baryon density of $Ω_b=0.069^{+0.009}_{-0.012}$ that is independent of early Universe measurements. These results demonstrate the potential power of large multi-probe photometric surveys and pave the way for order of magnitude advances in our constraints on properties of dark energy and cosmology over the next decade.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2019; v1 submitted 6 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
S. Avila,
M. Banerji,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
D. Brout,
D. L. Burke,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
A. Chen,
M. Crocce,
C. E. Cunha,
L. N. da Costa
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated scenarios: 1) nonzero curv…
▽ More
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated scenarios: 1) nonzero curvature $Ω_k$, 2) number of relativistic species $N_{\rm eff}$ different from the standard value of 3.046, 3) time-varying equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$ (alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, $w_p$, and $w_a$), and 4) modified gravity described by the parameters $μ_0$ and $Σ_0$ that modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck CMB measurements; BAO measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; RSD measurements from BOSS; and SNIa information from the Pantheon compilation. Constraints on curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find $Ω_k=0.0020^{+0.0037}_{-0.0032}$ at the 68% confidence level, and $N_{\rm eff}<3.28\, (3.55)$ at 68% (95%) confidence. For the time-varying equation-of-state, we find the pivot value $(w_p, w_a)=(-0.91^{+0.19}_{-0.23}, -0.57^{+0.93}_{-1.11})$ at pivot redshift $z_p=0.27$ from DES alone, and $(w_p, w_a)=(-1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.04}, -0.28^{+0.37}_{-0.48})$ at $z_p=0.20$ from DES Y1 combined with external data; in either case we find no evidence for the temporal variation of the equation of state. For modified gravity, we find the present-day value of the relevant parameters to be $Σ_0= 0.43^{+0.28}_{-0.29}$ from DES Y1 alone, and $(Σ_0, μ_0)=(0.06^{+0.08}_{-0.07}, -0.11^{+0.42}_{-0.46})$ from DES Y1 combined with external data, consistent with predictions from GR.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2019; v1 submitted 4 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Galaxy Angular Power Spectrum
Authors:
H. Camacho,
N. Kokron,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
R. Rosenfeld,
M. Lima,
F. Lacasa,
F. Sobreira,
L. N. da Costa,
S. Avila,
K. C. Chan,
M. Crocce,
A. J. Ross,
A. Troja,
J. García-Bellido,
T. M. C. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
S. Allam,
J. Annis,
R. A. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
D. L. Burke,
A. Carnero Rosell
, et al. (51 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We use data from the first-year (Y1) observations of the DES collaboration to measure the galaxy angular power spectrum (APS), and search for its BAO feature using a template-fitting method. We test our methodology in a sample of 1800 DES Y1-like mock catalogs. The APS is measured with the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method, using pixelized maps constructed from the mock catalogs and the DES mask. The covaria…
▽ More
We use data from the first-year (Y1) observations of the DES collaboration to measure the galaxy angular power spectrum (APS), and search for its BAO feature using a template-fitting method. We test our methodology in a sample of 1800 DES Y1-like mock catalogs. The APS is measured with the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method, using pixelized maps constructed from the mock catalogs and the DES mask. The covariance matrix of the $C_\ell$'s in these tests are also obtained from the mock catalogs. We use templates to model the measured spectra and estimate template parameters firstly from the $C_\ell$'s of the mocks using two different methods, a maximum likelihood estimator and a MCMC, finding consistent results with a good reduced $χ^2$. Robustness tests are performed to estimate the impact of different choices of settings used in our analysis. After these tests on mocks, we apply our method to a galaxy sample constructed from DES Y1 data specifically for LSS studies. This catalog comprises galaxies within an effective area of 1318 deg$^2$ and $0.6<z<1.0$. We fit the observed spectra with our optimized templates, considering models with and without BAO features. We find that the DES Y1 data favors a model with BAO at the $2.6\,σ$ C.L. with a best-fit shift parameter of $α=1.023\pm 0.047$. However, the goodness-of-fit is somewhat poor, with $χ^2/$(dof) = 1.49. We identify a possible cause of this issue and show that using a theoretical covariance matrix obtained from $C_\ell$'s that are better adjusted to data results in an improved value of $χ^2/$(dof) = 1.36 which is similar to the value obtained with the real-space analysis. Our results correspond to a distance measurement of $D_A(z_{\rm eff} = 0.81)/r_d = 10.65 \pm 0.49$, consistent with the main DES BAO findings. This is a companion paper to the main DES BAO article showing the details of the harmonic space analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
Forecasts for Warm Dark Matter from Photometric Galaxy Surveys
Authors:
Jéssica S. Martins,
Rogerio Rosenfeld,
Flavia Sobreira
Abstract:
We present a Fisher matrix forecast for the sensitivity on the mass of a thermal warm dark matter (WDM) particle from current (DES-like) and future (LSST-like) photometric galaxy surveys using the galaxy angular power spectrum. We model the nonlinear clustering using a modified Halo Model proposed to account for WDM effects. We estimate that from this observable alone a lower bound of…
▽ More
We present a Fisher matrix forecast for the sensitivity on the mass of a thermal warm dark matter (WDM) particle from current (DES-like) and future (LSST-like) photometric galaxy surveys using the galaxy angular power spectrum. We model the nonlinear clustering using a modified Halo Model proposed to account for WDM effects. We estimate that from this observable alone a lower bound of $m_{\text{wdm}}>647$\,eV ($m_{\text{wdm}}>126$\,eV) for the LSST (DES) case could be obtained.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2018; v1 submitted 8 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
BAO from angular clustering: optimization and mitigation of theoretical systematics
Authors:
K. C. Chan,
M. Crocce,
A. J. Ross,
S. Avila,
J. Elvin-Poole,
M. Manera,
W. J. Percival,
R. Rosenfeld,
T. M. C. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
S. Allam,
E. Bertin,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
C. E. Cunha,
C. B. D'Andrea,
L. N. da Costa,
C. Davis,
J. De Vicente,
T. F. Eifler,
J. Estrada
, et al. (36 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We study the methodology and potential theoretical systematics of measuring Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) using the angular correlation functions in tomographic bins. We calibrate and optimize the pipeline for the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 dataset using 1800 mocks. We compare the BAO fitting results obtained with three estimators: the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE), Profile Likelihood, an…
▽ More
We study the methodology and potential theoretical systematics of measuring Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) using the angular correlation functions in tomographic bins. We calibrate and optimize the pipeline for the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 dataset using 1800 mocks. We compare the BAO fitting results obtained with three estimators: the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE), Profile Likelihood, and Markov Chain Monte Carlo. The fit results from the MLE are the least biased and their derived 1-$σ$ error bar are closest to the Gaussian distribution value after removing the extreme mocks with non-detected BAO signal. We show that incorrect assumptions in constructing the template, such as mismatches from the cosmology of the mocks or the underlying photo-$z$ errors, can lead to BAO angular shifts. We find that MLE is the method that best traces this systematic biases, allowing to recover the true angular distance values. In a real survey analysis, it may happen that the final data sample properties are slightly different from those of the mock catalog. We show that the effect on the mock covariance due to the sample differences can be corrected with the help of the Gaussian covariance matrix or more effectively using the eigenmode expansion of the mock covariance. In the eigenmode expansion, the eigenmodes are provided by some proxy covariance matrix. The eigenmode expansion is significantly less susceptible to statistical fluctuations relative to the direct measurements of the covariance matrix because of the number of free parameters is substantially reduced
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2018; v1 submitted 13 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO
Authors:
S. Avila,
M. Crocce,
A. J. Ross,
J. García-Bellido,
W. J. Percival,
N. Banik H. Camacho,
N. Kokron,
K. C. Chan,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
R. Gomes,
D. Gomes,
M. Lima,
R. Rosenfeld,
A. I. Salvador,
O. Friedrich,
F. B. Abdalla,
J. Annis,
A. Benoit-Lévy,
E. Bertin,
D. Brooks,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
C. E. Cunha,
L. N. da Costa
, et al. (29 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Mock catalogues are a crucial tool in the analysis of galaxy surveys data, both for the accurate computation of covariance matrices, and for the optimisation of analysis methodology and validation of data sets. In this paper, we present a set of 1800 galaxy mock catalogues designed to match the Dark Energy Survey Year-1 BAO sample (Crocce et al. 2017) in abundance, observational volume, redshift d…
▽ More
Mock catalogues are a crucial tool in the analysis of galaxy surveys data, both for the accurate computation of covariance matrices, and for the optimisation of analysis methodology and validation of data sets. In this paper, we present a set of 1800 galaxy mock catalogues designed to match the Dark Energy Survey Year-1 BAO sample (Crocce et al. 2017) in abundance, observational volume, redshift distribution and uncertainty, and redshift dependent clustering. The simulated samples were built upon HALOGEN (Avila et al. 2015) halo catalogues, based on a $2LPT$ density field with an exponential bias. For each of them, a lightcone is constructed by the superposition of snapshots in the redshift range $0.45<z<1.4$. Uncertainties introduced by so-called photometric redshifts estimators were modelled with a \textit{double-skewed-Gaussian} curve fitted to the data. We also introduce a hybrid HOD-HAM model with two free parameters that are adjusted to achieve a galaxy bias evolution $b(z_{\rm ph})$ that matches the data at the 1-$σ$ level in the range $0.6<z_{\rm ph}<1.0$. We further analyse the galaxy mock catalogues and compare their clustering to the data using the angular correlation function $ w(θ)$, the comoving transverse separation clustering $ξ_{μ<0.8}(s_{\perp})$ and the angular power spectrum $C_\ell$.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2018; v1 submitted 17 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy Sample for BAO Measurement
Authors:
M. Crocce,
A. J. Ross,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
E. Gaztanaga,
J. Elvin-Poole,
S. Avila,
A. Alarcon,
K. C. Chan,
N. Banik,
J. Carretero,
E. Sanchez,
W. G. Hartley,
C. Sanchez,
T. Giannantonio,
R. Rosenfeld,
A. I. Salvador,
M. Garcia-Fernandez,
J. Garcia-Bellido,
T. M. C. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
S. Allam,
J. Annis,
K. Bechtol,
A. Benoit-Levy,
G. M. Bernstein
, et al. (63 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We define and characterise a sample of 1.3 million galaxies extracted from the first year of Dark Energy Survey data, optimised to measure Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the presence of significant redshift uncertainties. The sample is dominated by luminous red galaxies located at redshifts $z \gtrsim 0.6$. We define the exact selection using color and magnitude cuts that balance the need of high…
▽ More
We define and characterise a sample of 1.3 million galaxies extracted from the first year of Dark Energy Survey data, optimised to measure Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the presence of significant redshift uncertainties. The sample is dominated by luminous red galaxies located at redshifts $z \gtrsim 0.6$. We define the exact selection using color and magnitude cuts that balance the need of high number densities and small photometric redshift uncertainties, using the corresponding forecasted BAO distance error as a figure-of-merit in the process. The typical photo-$z$ uncertainty varies from $2.3\%$ to $3.6\%$ (in units of 1+$z$) from $z=0.6$ to $1$, with number densities from $200$ to $130$ galaxies per deg$^2$ in tomographic bins of width $Δz = 0.1$. Next we summarise the validation of the photometric redshift estimation. We characterise and mitigate observational systematics including stellar contamination, and show that the clustering on large scales is robust in front of those contaminants. We show that the clustering signal in the auto-correlations and cross-correlations is generally consistent with theoretical models, which serves as an additional test of the redshift distributions.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2018; v1 submitted 17 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1
Authors:
The Dark Energy Survey Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
M. Banerji,
N. Banik,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
R. A. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
R. Cawthon,
K. C. Chan,
M. Crocce
, et al. (87 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present angular diameter distance measurements obtained by locating the BAO scale in the distribution of galaxies selected from the first year of Dark Energy Survey data. We consider a sample of over 1.3 million galaxies distributed over a footprint of 1318 deg$^2$ with $0.6 < z_{\rm photo} < 1$ and a typical redshift uncertainty of $0.03(1+z)$. This sample was selected, as fully described in a…
▽ More
We present angular diameter distance measurements obtained by locating the BAO scale in the distribution of galaxies selected from the first year of Dark Energy Survey data. We consider a sample of over 1.3 million galaxies distributed over a footprint of 1318 deg$^2$ with $0.6 < z_{\rm photo} < 1$ and a typical redshift uncertainty of $0.03(1+z)$. This sample was selected, as fully described in a companion paper, using a color/magnitude selection that optimizes trade-offs between number density and redshift uncertainty. We investigate the BAO signal in the projected clustering using three conventions, the angular separation, the co-moving transverse separation, and spherical harmonics. Further, we compare results obtained from template based and machine learning photometric redshift determinations. We use 1800 simulations that approximate our sample in order to produce covariance matrices and allow us to validate our distance scale measurement methodology. We measure the angular diameter distance, $D_A$, at the effective redshift of our sample divided by the true physical scale of the BAO feature, $r_{\rm d}$. We obtain close to a 4 per cent distance measurement of $D_A(z_{\rm eff}=0.81)/r_{\rm d} = 10.75\pm 0.43 $. These results are consistent with the flat $Λ$CDM concordance cosmological model supported by numerous other recent experimental results. All data products are publicly available here: https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y1a1/bao
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2018; v1 submitted 17 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
DES Science Portal: Creating Science-Ready Catalogs
Authors:
Angelo Fausti Neto,
Luiz da Costa,
Aurelio Carnero Rosell,
Julia Gschwend,
Ricardo Ogando,
Flavia Sobreira,
Marcio Maia,
Basilio Santiago,
Rogerio Rosenfeld,
Cristiano Singulani,
Lucas Nunes,
Carlos Adean,
Riccardo Campisano,
Rafael Brito,
Guilherme Soares,
Glauber C. Vila-Verde,
Tim Abbott,
Filipe Abdalla,
Sahar Allam,
Aurélien Benoit-Lévy,
David Brooks,
Elizabeth Buckley-Geer,
Diego Capozzi,
Matias Carrasco Kind,
Jorge Carretero
, et al. (33 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a novel approach for creating science-ready catalogs through a software infrastructure developed for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We integrate the data products released by the DES Data Management and additional products created by the DES collaboration in an environment known as DES Science Portal. Each step involved in the creation of a science-ready catalog is recorded in a relation…
▽ More
We present a novel approach for creating science-ready catalogs through a software infrastructure developed for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We integrate the data products released by the DES Data Management and additional products created by the DES collaboration in an environment known as DES Science Portal. Each step involved in the creation of a science-ready catalog is recorded in a relational database and can be recovered at any time. We describe how the DES Science Portal automates the creation and characterization of lightweight catalogs for DES Year 1 Annual Release, and show its flexibility in creating multiple catalogs with different inputs and configurations. Finally, we discuss the advantages of this infrastructure for large surveys such as DES and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. The capability of creating science-ready catalogs efficiently and with full control of the inputs and configurations used is an important asset for supporting science analysis using data from large astronomical surveys.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2018; v1 submitted 18 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
A. Alarcon,
J. Aleksić,
S. Allam,
S. Allen,
A. Amara,
J. Annis,
J. Asorey,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. Balbinot,
M. Banerji,
N. Banik,
W. Barkhouse,
M. Baumer,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
A. Benoit-Lévy,
B. A. Benson,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek
, et al. (175 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation function of 650,000…
▽ More
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias, the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for $Λ$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $Ω_m = 0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $Λ$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 = 0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $Ω_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and $w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms. Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $Ω_m$ are lower than the central values from Planck ...
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2019; v1 submitted 4 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Multi-Probe Methodology and Simulated Likelihood Analyses
Authors:
E. Krause,
T. F. Eifler,
J. Zuntz,
O. Friedrich,
M. A. Troxel,
S. Dodelson,
J. Blazek,
L. F. Secco,
N. MacCrann,
E. Baxter,
C. Chang,
N. Chen,
M. Crocce,
J. DeRose,
A. Ferte,
N. Kokron,
F. Lacasa,
V. Miranda,
Y. Omori,
A. Porredon,
R. Rosenfeld,
S. Samuroff,
M. Wang,
R. H. Wechsler,
T. M. C. Abbott
, et al. (61 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the methodology for and detail the implementation of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) 3x2pt DES Year 1 (Y1) analysis, which combines configuration-space two-point statistics from three different cosmological probes: cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and galaxy clustering, using data from the first year of DES observations. We have developed two independent modeling pipelines and describe…
▽ More
We present the methodology for and detail the implementation of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) 3x2pt DES Year 1 (Y1) analysis, which combines configuration-space two-point statistics from three different cosmological probes: cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing, and galaxy clustering, using data from the first year of DES observations. We have developed two independent modeling pipelines and describe the code validation process. We derive expressions for analytical real-space multi-probe covariances, and describe their validation with numerical simulations. We stress-test the inference pipelines in simulated likelihood analyses that vary 6-7 cosmology parameters plus 20 nuisance parameters and precisely resemble the analysis to be presented in the DES 3x2pt analysis paper, using a variety of simulated input data vectors with varying assumptions.
We find that any disagreement between pipelines leads to changes in assigned likelihood $Δχ^2 \le 0.045$ with respect to the statistical error of the DES Y1 data vector. We also find that angular binning and survey mask do not impact our analytic covariance at a significant level. We determine lower bounds on scales used for analysis of galaxy clustering (8 Mpc$~h^{-1}$) and galaxy-galaxy lensing (12 Mpc$~h^{-1}$) such that the impact of modeling uncertainties in the non-linear regime is well below statistical errors, and show that our analysis choices are robust against a variety of systematics. These tests demonstrate that we have a robust analysis pipeline that yields unbiased cosmological parameter inferences for the flagship 3x2pt DES Y1 analysis. We emphasize that the level of independent code development and subsequent code comparison as demonstrated in this paper is necessary to produce credible constraints from increasingly complex multi-probe analyses of current data.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
Combining cluster number counts and galaxy clustering
Authors:
Fabien Lacasa,
Rogerio Rosenfeld
Abstract:
The abundance of clusters and the clustering of galaxies are two of the important cosmological probes for current and future large scale surveys of galaxies, such as the Dark Energy Survey. In order to combine them one has to account for the fact that they are not independent quantities, since they probe the same density field. It is important to develop a good understanding of their correlation i…
▽ More
The abundance of clusters and the clustering of galaxies are two of the important cosmological probes for current and future large scale surveys of galaxies, such as the Dark Energy Survey. In order to combine them one has to account for the fact that they are not independent quantities, since they probe the same density field. It is important to develop a good understanding of their correlation in order to extract parameter constraints. We present a detailed modelling of the joint covariance matrix between cluster number counts and the galaxy angular power spectrum. We employ the framework of the halo model complemented by a Halo Occupation Distribution model (HOD). We demonstrate the importance of accounting for non-Gaussianity to produce accurate covariance predictions. Indeed, we show that the non-Gaussian covariance becomes dominant at small scales, low redshifts or high cluster masses. We discuss in particular the case of the super-sample covariance (SSC), including the effects of galaxy shot-noise, halo second order bias and non-local bias. We demonstrate that the SSC obeys mathematical inequalities and positivity. Using the joint covariance matrix and a Fisher matrix methodology, we examine the prospects of combining these two probes to constrain cosmological and HOD parameters. We find that the combination indeed results in noticeably better constraints, with improvements of order 20\% on cosmological parameters compared to the best single probe, and even greater improvement on HOD parameters, with reduction of error bars by a factor 1.4-4.8. This happens in particular because the cross-covariance introduces a synergy between the probes on small scales. We conclude that accounting for non-Gaussian effects is required for the joint analysis of these observables in galaxy surveys.
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2016; v1 submitted 2 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Galaxy clustering, photometric redshifts and diagnosis of systematics in the DES Science Verification data
Authors:
M. Crocce,
J. Carretero,
A. H. Bauer,
A. J. Ross,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
T. Giannantonio,
F. Sobreira,
J. Sanchez,
E. Gaztanaga,
M. Carrasco Kind,
C. Sanchez,
C. Bonnett,
A. Benoit-Levy,
R. J. Brunner,
A. Carnero Rosell,
R. Cawthon,
P. Fosalba,
W. Hartley,
E. J. Kim,
B. Leistedt,
R. Miquel,
H. V. Peiris,
W. J. Percival,
R. Rosenfeld,
E. S. Rykoff
, et al. (62 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We study the clustering of galaxies detected at $i<22.5$ in the Science Verification observations of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). Two-point correlation functions are measured using $2.3\times 10^6$ galaxies over a contiguous 116 deg$^2$ region in five bins of photometric redshift width $Δz = 0.2$ in the range $0.2 < z < 1.2.$ The impact of photometric redshift errors are assessed by comparing res…
▽ More
We study the clustering of galaxies detected at $i<22.5$ in the Science Verification observations of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). Two-point correlation functions are measured using $2.3\times 10^6$ galaxies over a contiguous 116 deg$^2$ region in five bins of photometric redshift width $Δz = 0.2$ in the range $0.2 < z < 1.2.$ The impact of photometric redshift errors are assessed by comparing results using a template-based photo-$z$ algorithm (BPZ) to a machine-learning algorithm (TPZ). A companion paper (Leistedt et al 2015) presents maps of several observational variables (e.g. seeing, sky brightness) which could modulate the galaxy density. Here we characterize and mitigate systematic errors on the measured clustering which arise from these observational variables, in addition to others such as Galactic dust and stellar contamination. After correcting for systematic effects we measure galaxy bias over a broad range of linear scales relative to mass clustering predicted from the Planck $Λ$CDM model, finding agreement with CFHTLS measurements with $χ^2$ of 4.0 (8.7) with 5 degrees of freedom for the TPZ (BPZ) redshifts. We test a "linear bias" model, in which the galaxy clustering is a fixed multiple of the predicted non-linear dark-matter clustering. The precision of the data allow us to determine that the linear bias model describes the observed galaxy clustering to $2.5\%$ accuracy down to scales at least $4$ to $10$ times smaller than those on which linear theory is expected to be sufficient.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2015; v1 submitted 19 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.