Detection of Cosmic Structures using the Bispectrum Phase. II. First Results from Application to Cosmic Reionization Using the Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array
Authors:
Nithyanandan Thyagarajan,
Chris L. Carilli,
Bojan Nikolic,
James Kent,
Andrei Mesinger,
Nicholas S. Kern,
Gianni Bernardi,
Siyanda Matika,
Zara Abdurashidova,
James E. Aguirre,
Paul Alexander,
Zaki S. Ali,
Yanga Balfour,
Adam P. Beardsley,
Tashalee S. Billings,
Judd D. Bowman,
Richard F. Bradley,
Jacob Burba,
Steve Carey,
Carina Cheng,
David R. DeBoer,
Matt Dexter,
Eloy de Lera Acedo,
Joshua S. Dillon,
John Ely
, et al. (47 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Characterizing the epoch of reionization (EoR) at $z\gtrsim 6$ via the redshifted 21 cm line of neutral Hydrogen (HI) is critical to modern astrophysics and cosmology, and thus a key science goal of many current and planned low-frequency radio telescopes. The primary challenge to detecting this signal is the overwhelmingly bright foreground emission at these frequencies, placing stringent requirem…
▽ More
Characterizing the epoch of reionization (EoR) at $z\gtrsim 6$ via the redshifted 21 cm line of neutral Hydrogen (HI) is critical to modern astrophysics and cosmology, and thus a key science goal of many current and planned low-frequency radio telescopes. The primary challenge to detecting this signal is the overwhelmingly bright foreground emission at these frequencies, placing stringent requirements on the knowledge of the instruments and inaccuracies in analyses. Results from these experiments have largely been limited not by thermal sensitivity but by systematics, particularly caused by the inability to calibrate the instrument to high accuracy. The interferometric bispectrum phase is immune to antenna-based calibration and errors therein, and presents an independent alternative to detect the EoR HI fluctuations while largely avoiding calibration systematics. Here, we provide a demonstration of this technique on a subset of data from the Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array (HERA) to place approximate constraints on the brightness temperature of the intergalactic medium (IGM). From this limited data, at $z=7.7$ we infer "$1σ$" upper limits on the IGM brightness temperature to be $\le 316$ "pseudo" mK at $κ_\parallel=0.33$ "pseudo" $h$ Mpc$^{-1}$ (data-limited) and $\le 1000$ "pseudo" mK at $κ_\parallel=0.875$ "pseudo" $h$ Mpc$^{-1}$ (noise-limited). The "pseudo" units denote only an approximate and not an exact correspondence to the actual distance scales and brightness temperatures. By propagating models in parallel to the data analysis, we confirm that the dynamic range required to separate the cosmic HI signal from the foregrounds is similar to that in standard approaches, and the power spectrum of the bispectrum phase is still data-limited (at $\gtrsim 10^6$ dynamic range) indicating scope for further improvement in sensitivity as the array build-out continues.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2020; v1 submitted 20 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
Foreground modelling via Gaussian process regression: an application to HERA data
Authors:
Abhik Ghosh,
Florent Mertens,
Gianni Bernardi,
Mário G. Santos,
Nicholas S. Kern,
Christopher L. Carilli,
Trienko L. Grobler,
Léon V. E. Koopmans,
Daniel C. Jacobs,
Adrian Liu,
Aaron R. Parsons,
Miguel F. Morales,
James E. Aguirre,
Joshua S. Dillon,
Bryna J. Hazelton,
Oleg M. Smirnov,
Bharat K. Gehlot,
Siyanda Matika,
Paul Alexander,
Zaki S. Ali,
Adam P. Beardsley,
Roshan K. Benefo,
Tashalee S. Billings,
Judd D. Bowman,
Richard F. Bradley
, et al. (48 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The key challenge in the observation of the redshifted 21-cm signal from cosmic reionization is its separation from the much brighter foreground emission. Such separation relies on the different spectral properties of the two components, although, in real life, the foreground intrinsic spectrum is often corrupted by the instrumental response, inducing systematic effects that can further jeopardize…
▽ More
The key challenge in the observation of the redshifted 21-cm signal from cosmic reionization is its separation from the much brighter foreground emission. Such separation relies on the different spectral properties of the two components, although, in real life, the foreground intrinsic spectrum is often corrupted by the instrumental response, inducing systematic effects that can further jeopardize the measurement of the 21-cm signal. In this paper, we use Gaussian Process Regression to model both foreground emission and instrumental systematics in $\sim 2$ hours of data from the Hydrogen Epoch of Reionization Array. We find that a simple co-variance model with three components matches the data well, giving a residual power spectrum with white noise properties. These consist of an "intrinsic" and instrumentally corrupted component with a coherence-scale of 20 MHz and 2.4 MHz respectively (dominating the line of sight power spectrum over scales $k_{\parallel} \le 0.2$ h cMpc$^{-1}$) and a baseline dependent periodic signal with a period of $\sim 1$ MHz (dominating over $k_{\parallel} \sim 0.4 - 0.8$h cMpc$^{-1}$) which should be distinguishable from the 21-cm EoR signal whose typical coherence-scales is $\sim 0.8$ MHz.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2020; v1 submitted 13 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
