Skip to main content

Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Mahony, C

Searching in archive astro-ph. Search in all archives.
.
  1. DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys

    Authors: Dark Energy Survey, Kilo-Degree Survey Collaboration, :, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, O. Alves, A. Amon, F. Andrade-Oliveira, M. Asgari, S. Avila, D. Bacon, K. Bechtol, M. R. Becker, G. M. Bernstein, E. Bertin, M. Bilicki, J. Blazek, S. Bocquet, D. Brooks, P. Burger, D. L. Burke, H. Camacho, A. Campos, A. Carnero Rosell , et al. (138 additional authors not shown)

    Abstract: We present a joint cosmic shear analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) in a collaborative effort between the two survey teams. We find consistent cosmological parameter constraints between DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 which, when combined in a joint-survey analysis, constrain the parameter $S_8 = σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}$ with a mean value of… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 October, 2023; v1 submitted 26 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

    Comments: 40 pages, 21 figures, 15 tables, accepted Open Journal of Astrophysics. Download the chains from https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y3a2/Y3key-joint-des-kids or create your own chains with CosmoSIS using https://github.com/joezuntz/cosmosis-standard-library/blob/main/examples/des-y3_and_kids-1000.ini Watch the core team discuss this analysis at https://cosmologytalks.com/2023/05/26/des-kids

    Report number: FERMILAB-PUB-23-267-PPD

  2. KiDS-1000: Combined halo-model cosmology constraints from galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing

    Authors: Andrej Dvornik, Catherine Heymans, Marika Asgari, Constance Mahony, Benjamin Joachimi, Maciej Bilicki, Elisa Chisari, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Henk Hoekstra, Harry Johnston, Konrad Kuijken, Alexander Mead, Hironao Miyatake, Takahiro Nishimichi, Robert Reischke, Sandra Unruh, Angus H. Wright

    Abstract: We present constraints on the flat $Λ$CDM cosmological model through a joint analysis of galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing observables with the Kilo-Degree Survey. Our theoretical model combines a flexible conditional stellar mass function, to describe the galaxy-halo connection, with a cosmological N-body simulation-calibrated halo model to describe the non-linear matt… ▽ More

    Submitted 13 June, 2023; v1 submitted 6 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

    Comments: 25 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication in A&A

    Journal ref: A&A 675, A189 (2023)

  3. The halo model with beyond-linear halo bias: unbiasing cosmological constraints from galaxy-galaxy lensing and clustering

    Authors: Constance Mahony, Andrej Dvornik, Alexander Mead, Catherine Heymans, Marika Asgari, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Hironao Miyatake, Takahiro Nishimichi, Robert Reischke

    Abstract: We determine the error introduced in a joint halo model analysis of galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering observables when adopting the standard approximation of linear halo bias. Considering the Kilo-Degree Survey, we forecast that ignoring the non-linear halo bias would result in up to 5$σ$ offsets in the recovered cosmological parameters describing structure growth, $S_8$, and the matter… ▽ More

    Submitted 30 June, 2022; v1 submitted 3 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

    Comments: v2: Version accepted in MNRAS. Minor clarifications and added robustness test, conclusions unchanged

    Report number: YITP-22-07

  4. Forecasting the potential of weak lensing magnification to enhance LSST large-scale structure analyses

    Authors: Constance Mahony, Maria Cristina Fortuna, Benjamin Joachimi, Andreas Korn, Henk Hoekstra, Samuel J. Schmidt, The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration

    Abstract: Recent works have shown that weak lensing magnification must be included in upcoming large-scale structure analyses, such as for the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), to avoid biasing the cosmological results. In this work we investigate whether including magnification has a positive impact on the precision of the cosmological constraints, as well as being necessary… ▽ More

    Submitted 28 April, 2022; v1 submitted 2 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

    Comments: v2: Version accepted in MNRAS. Minor clarifications, conclusions unchanged

  5. arXiv:2003.02700  [pdf, other

    astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

    The halo model as a versatile tool to predict intrinsic alignments

    Authors: Maria Cristina Fortuna, Henk Hoekstra, Benjamin Joachimi, Harry Johnston, Nora Elisa Chisari, Christos Georgiou, Constance Mahony

    Abstract: Intrinsic alignments (IAs) of galaxies are an important contaminant for cosmic shear studies, but the modelling is complicated by the dependence of the signal on the source galaxy sample. In this paper, we use the halo model formalism to capture this diversity and examine its implications for Stage-III and Stage-IV cosmic shear surveys. We account for the different IA signatures at large and small… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 December, 2020; v1 submitted 5 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

    Comments: 21 pages, 15 figure, accepted for publication in MNRAS

  6. arXiv:1907.04331  [pdf, other

    astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM hep-ph

    Target Neutrino Mass Precision for Determining the Neutrino Hierarchy

    Authors: Constance Mahony, Boris Leistedt, Hiranya V. Peiris, Jonathan Braden, Benjamin Joachimi, Andreas Korn, Linda Cremonesi, Ryan Nichol

    Abstract: Recent works combining neutrino oscillation and cosmological data to determine the neutrino hierarchy found a range of odds in favour of the normal hierarchy. These results arise from differing approaches to incorporating prior knowledge about neutrinos. We develop a hierarchy-agnostic prior and show that the hierarchy cannot be conclusively determined with current data. The determination of the h… ▽ More

    Submitted 18 March, 2020; v1 submitted 9 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

    Comments: v3: Version accepted in Phys Rev D. Minor clarifications and added robustness tests, conclusions unchanged

    Journal ref: Phys. Rev. D 101, 083513 (2020)