-
New $^{63}$Ga(p,$γ$)$^{64}$Ge and $^{64}$Ge(p,$γ$)$^{65}$As reaction rates corresponding to the temperature regime of thermonuclear X-ray bursts
Authors:
Ning Lu,
Yi Hua Lam,
Alexander Heger,
Zi Xin Liu,
Hidetoshi Yamaguchi
Abstract:
We compute the $^{63}$Ga(p,$γ$)$^{64}$Ge and $^{64}$Ge(p,$γ$)$^{65}$As thermonuclear reaction rates using the latest experimental input supplemented with theoretical nuclear spectroscopic information. The experimental input consists of the latest proton thresholds of $^{64}$Ge and $^{65}$As, and the nuclear spectroscopic information of $^{65}$As, whereas the theoretical nuclear spectroscopic infor…
▽ More
We compute the $^{63}$Ga(p,$γ$)$^{64}$Ge and $^{64}$Ge(p,$γ$)$^{65}$As thermonuclear reaction rates using the latest experimental input supplemented with theoretical nuclear spectroscopic information. The experimental input consists of the latest proton thresholds of $^{64}$Ge and $^{65}$As, and the nuclear spectroscopic information of $^{65}$As, whereas the theoretical nuclear spectroscopic information for $^{64}$Ge and $^{65}$As are deduced from the full pf-shell space configuration-interaction shell-model calculations with the GXPF1A Hamiltonian. Both thermonuclear reaction rates are determined with known uncertainties at the energies that correspond to the Gamow windows of the temperature regime relevant to Type I X-ray bursts, covering the typical temperature range of the thermonuclear runaway of the GS 1826$-$24 periodic bursts and SAX J1808.4$-$3658 photospheric radius expansion bursts.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
The Impact of the New $^{65\!}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66\!}$Se Reaction Rate on the Two-Proton Sequential Capture of $^{64}\!$Ge, Weak GeAs Cycles, and Type-I X-Ray Bursts such as the Clocked Burster GS 1826$-$24
Authors:
Yi Hua Lam,
Zi Xin Liu,
Alexander Heger,
Ning Lu,
Adam Michael Jacobs,
Zac Johnston
Abstract:
We re-assess $^{65}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction rates based on a set of proton thresholds of $^{66}$Se, $S_\mathrm{p}$($^{66}$Se), estimated from the experimental mirror nuclear masses, theoretical mirror displacement energies, and full $pf$-model space shell-model calculation. The self-consistent relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory is employed to obtain the mirror displacement energies with mu…
▽ More
We re-assess $^{65}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction rates based on a set of proton thresholds of $^{66}$Se, $S_\mathrm{p}$($^{66}$Se), estimated from the experimental mirror nuclear masses, theoretical mirror displacement energies, and full $pf$-model space shell-model calculation. The self-consistent relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory is employed to obtain the mirror displacement energies with much reduced uncertainty, and thus reducing the proton-threshold uncertainty up to 161 keV compared to the AME2020 evaluation. Using the simulation instantiated by the one-dimensional multi-zone hydrodynamic code, KEPLER, that closely reproduces the observed GS 1826$-$24 clocked bursts, the present forward and reverse $^{65}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction rates based on a selected $S_\mathrm{p}$($^{66}$Se) = 2.469$\pm$0.054 MeV, and the latest $^{22}$Mg($α$,p)$^{25}$Al, $^{56}$Ni(p,$γ$)$^{57}$Cu(p,$γ$)$^{58}$Zn, $^{55}$Ni(p,$γ$)$^{56}$Cu, and $^{64}$Ge(p,$γ$)$^{65}$As reaction rates, we find that though the GeAs cycles is weakly established in the rapid-proton capture process path, the $^{65}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction still strongly characterizes the burst tail end due to the two-proton sequential capture on $^{64}$Ge, not found by Cyburt et al. (2016) sensitivity study. The $^{65}$As(p,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction influences the abundances of nuclei $A$ = 64, 68, 72, 76, and 80 up to a factor of 1.4. The new $S_\mathrm{p}$($^{66}$Se) and the inclusion of the updated $^{22}$Mg($α$,p)$^{25}$Al reaction rate increases the production of $^{12}$C up to a factor of $4.5$ that is not observable and could be the main fuel for superburst. The waiting point status of and two-proton sequential capture on $^{64}$Ge, weak-cycle feature of GeAs at region heavier than $^{64}$Ge, and impact of other possible $S_\mathrm{p}$($^{66}$Se) are also discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2022; v1 submitted 26 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Advancement of Photospheric Radius Expansion and Clocked Type-I X-Ray Burst Models with the New $^{22}$Mg$(α,p)^{25}$Al Reaction Rate Determined at Gamow Energy
Authors:
J. Hu,
H. Yamaguchi,
Y. H. Lam,
A. Heger,
D. Kahl,
A. M. Jacobs,
Z. Johnston,
S. W. Xu,
N. T. Zhang,
S. B. Ma,
L. H. Ru,
E. Q. Liu,
T. Liu,
S. Hayakawa,
L. Yang,
H. Shimizu,
C. B. Hamill,
A. St J. Murphy,
J. Su,
X. Fang,
K. Y. Chae,
M. S. Kwag,
S. M. Cha,
N. N. Duy,
N. K. Uyen
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report the first (in)elastic scattering measurement of $^{25}\mathrm{Al}+p$ with the capability to select and measure in a broad energy range the proton resonances in $^{26}$Si contributing to the $^{22}$Mg$(α,p)$ reaction at type I x-ray burst energies. We measured spin-parities of four resonances above the $α$ threshold of $^{26}$Si that are found to strongly impact the $^{22}$Mg$(α,p)$ rate.…
▽ More
We report the first (in)elastic scattering measurement of $^{25}\mathrm{Al}+p$ with the capability to select and measure in a broad energy range the proton resonances in $^{26}$Si contributing to the $^{22}$Mg$(α,p)$ reaction at type I x-ray burst energies. We measured spin-parities of four resonances above the $α$ threshold of $^{26}$Si that are found to strongly impact the $^{22}$Mg$(α,p)$ rate. The new rate advances a state-of-the-art model to remarkably reproduce light curves of the GS 1826$-$24 clocked burster with mean deviation $<9$ % and permits us to discover a strong correlation between the He abundance in the accreting envelope of photospheric radius expansion burster and the dominance of $^{22}$Mg$(α,p)$ branch.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2021; v1 submitted 10 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
The Regulated NiCu Cycles with the new $^{57}$Cu(p,$γ$)$^{58}$Zn reaction rate and the Influence on Type-I X-Ray Bursts: GS 1826$-$24 Clocked Burster
Authors:
Yi Hua Lam,
Ning Lu,
Alexander Heger,
Adam Michael Jacobs,
Nadezda A. Smirnova,
Teresa Kurtukian Nieto,
Zac Johnston,
Shigeru Kubono
Abstract:
During the X-ray bursts of GS 1826$-$24, "clocked burster", the nuclear reaction flow that surges through the rapid-proton capture process path has to pass through the NiCu cycles before reaching the ZnGa cycles that moderate the further extent of hydrogen burning in the region above germanium and selenium isotopes. The $^{57}$Cu(p,$γ$)$^{58}$Zn reaction located in the NiCu cycles plays an importa…
▽ More
During the X-ray bursts of GS 1826$-$24, "clocked burster", the nuclear reaction flow that surges through the rapid-proton capture process path has to pass through the NiCu cycles before reaching the ZnGa cycles that moderate the further extent of hydrogen burning in the region above germanium and selenium isotopes. The $^{57}$Cu(p,$γ$)$^{58}$Zn reaction located in the NiCu cycles plays an important role in influencing the burst light curves as found by Cyburt et al. (2016). We deduce the $^{57}$Cu(p,$γ$)$^{58}$Zn reaction rate based on the experimentally determined important nuclear structure information, isobaric-multiplet-mass equation, and large-scale shell model calculations. Based on the isobaric-multiplet-mass equation, we propose a possible order of $1^+_1$ and $2^+_3$ dominant resonance states and constrain the resonance energy of the $1^+_2$ state. The latter reduces the contribution of the $1^+_2$ dominant resonance state. The new reaction rate is up to a factor of four lower than the Forstner et al. (2001) rate recommended by JINA REACLIB v2.2 at the temperature regime sensitive to clocked bursts of GS 1826$-$24. Using the simulation from the one-dimensional implicit hydrodynamic code, KEPLER, to model the thermonuclear X-ray bursts of GS 1826$-$24 clocked burster, we find that the new $^{57}$Cu(p,$γ$)$^{58}$Zn coupled with the latest $^{56}$Ni(p,$γ$)$^{57}$Cu and $^{55}$Ni(p,$γ$)$^{56}$Cu reaction rates redistributes the reaction flow in the NiCu cycles and strongly influences the burst ash composition, whereas the $^{59}$Cu(p,$α$)$^{56}$Ni and $^{59}$Cu(p,$γ$)$^{60}$Zn reactions suppress the influence of the $^{57}$Cu(p,$γ$)$^{58}$Zn reaction and diminish the impact of nuclear reaction flow that by-passes the important $^{56}$Ni waiting point induced by the $^{55}$Ni(p,$γ$)$^{56}$Cu reaction on burst light curve.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2022; v1 submitted 24 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Mass Measurements of Neutron-Deficient Y, Zr, and Nb Isotopes and Their Impact on $rp$ and $νp$ Nucleosynthesis Processes
Authors:
Y. M. Xing,
K. A. Li,
Y. H. Zhang,
X. H. Zhou,
M. Wang,
Yu. A. Litvinov,
K. Blaum,
S. Wanajo,
S. Kubono,
G. Martínez-Pinedo,
A. Sieverding,
R. J. Chen,
P. Shuai,
C. Y. Fu,
X. L. Yan,
W. J. Huang,
X. Xu,
X. D. Tang,
H. S. Xu,
T. Bao,
X. C. Chen,
B. S. Gao,
J. J. He,
Y. H. Lam,
H. F. Li
, et al. (26 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using isochronous mass spectrometry at the experimental storage ring CSRe in Lanzhou, the masses of $^{82}$Zr and $^{84}$Nb were measured for the first time with an uncertainty of $\sim 10$ keV, and the masses of $^{79}$Y, $^{81}$Zr, and $^{83}$Nb were re-determined with a higher precision. %The latter differ significantly from their literature values. The latter are significantly less bound than…
▽ More
Using isochronous mass spectrometry at the experimental storage ring CSRe in Lanzhou, the masses of $^{82}$Zr and $^{84}$Nb were measured for the first time with an uncertainty of $\sim 10$ keV, and the masses of $^{79}$Y, $^{81}$Zr, and $^{83}$Nb were re-determined with a higher precision. %The latter differ significantly from their literature values. The latter are significantly less bound than their literature values. Our new and accurate masses remove the irregularities of the mass surface in this region of the nuclear chart. Our results do not support the predicted island of pronounced low $α$ separation energies for neutron-deficient Mo and Tc isotopes, making the formation of Zr-Nb cycle in the $rp$-process unlikely. The new proton separation energy of $^{83}$Nb was determined to be 490(400)~keV smaller than that in the Atomic Mass Evaluation 2012. This partly removes the overproduction of the $p$-nucleus $^{84}$Sr relative to the neutron-deficient molybdenum isotopes in the previous $νp$-process simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
Reaction rates of $^{64}$Ge($p,γ$)$^{65}$As and $^{65}$As($p,γ$)$^{66}$Se and the extent of nucleosynthesis in type I X-ray bursts
Authors:
Y. H. Lam,
J. J. He,
A. Parikh,
H. Schatz,
B. A. Brown,
M. Wang,
B. Guo,
Y. H. Zhang,
X. H. Zhou,
H. S. Xu
Abstract:
The extent of nucleosynthesis in models of type I X-ray bursts and the associated impact on the energy released in these explosive events are sensitive to nuclear masses and reaction rates around the $^{64}$Ge waiting point. Using the well known mass of $^{64}$Ge, the recently measured $^{65}$As mass, and large-scale shell model calculations, we have determined new thermonuclear rates of the…
▽ More
The extent of nucleosynthesis in models of type I X-ray bursts and the associated impact on the energy released in these explosive events are sensitive to nuclear masses and reaction rates around the $^{64}$Ge waiting point. Using the well known mass of $^{64}$Ge, the recently measured $^{65}$As mass, and large-scale shell model calculations, we have determined new thermonuclear rates of the $^{64}$Ge($p$,$γ$)$^{65}$As and $^{65}$As($p$,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reactions with reliable uncertainties. The new reaction rates differ significantly from previously published rates. Using the new data we analyze the impact of the new rates and the remaining nuclear physics uncertainties on the $^{64}$Ge waiting point in a number of representative one-zone X-ray burst models. We find that in contrast to previous work, when all relevant uncertainties are considered, a strong $^{64}$Ge $rp$-process waiting point cannot be ruled out. The nuclear physics uncertainties strongly affect X-ray burst model predictions of the synthesis of $^{64}$Zn, the synthesis of nuclei beyond $A=64$, energy generation, and burst light curve. We also identify key nuclear uncertainties that need to be addressed to determine the role of the $^{64}$Ge waiting point in X-ray bursts. These include the remaining uncertainty in the $^{65}$As mass, the uncertainty of the $^{66}$Se mass, and the remaining uncertainty in the $^{65}$As($p$,$γ$)$^{66}$Se reaction rate, which mainly originates from uncertain resonance energies.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2016; v1 submitted 9 May, 2015;
originally announced May 2015.
-
Astrophysical weak-interaction rates for selected $A=20$ and $A=24$ nuclei
Authors:
G. Martínez-Pinedo,
Y. H. Lam,
K. Langanke,
R. G. T. Zegers,
C. Sullivan
Abstract:
We have evaluated the electron capture rates on $^{20}$Ne, $^{20}$F, $^{24}$Mg, $^{24}$Na and the $β$ decay rates for $^{20}$F and $^{24}$Na at temperature and density conditions relevant for the late-evolution stages of stars with $M=8$-12 M$_\odot$. The rates are based on recent experimental data and large-scale shell model calculations. We show that the electron capture rates on $^{20}$Ne,…
▽ More
We have evaluated the electron capture rates on $^{20}$Ne, $^{20}$F, $^{24}$Mg, $^{24}$Na and the $β$ decay rates for $^{20}$F and $^{24}$Na at temperature and density conditions relevant for the late-evolution stages of stars with $M=8$-12 M$_\odot$. The rates are based on recent experimental data and large-scale shell model calculations. We show that the electron capture rates on $^{20}$Ne, $^{24}$Mg and the $^{20}$F, $^{24}$Na $β$-decay rates are based on data in this astrophysical range, except for the capture rate on $^{20}$Ne, which we predict to have a dominating contribution from the second-forbidden transition between the $^{20}$Ne and $^{20}$F ground states in the density range $\log ρY_e (\mathrm{g~cm}^{-3}) = 9.3$-9.6. The dominance of a few individual transitions allows us to present the various rates by analytical expressions at the relevant astrophysical conditions. We also derive the screening corrections to the rates.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2014;
originally announced February 2014.
-
Advanced burning stages and fate of 8-10 Mo stars
Authors:
Samuel Jones,
Raphael Hirschi,
Ken'ichi Nomoto,
Tobias Fischer,
Frank X. Timmes,
Falk Herwig,
Bill Paxton,
Hiroshi Toki,
Toshio Suzuki,
Gabriel Martinez-Pinedo,
Yi Hua Lam,
Michael G. Bertolli
Abstract:
The stellar mass range 8<M/Mo<12 corresponds to the most massive AGB stars and the most numerous massive stars. It is host to a variety of supernova progenitors and is therefore very important for galactic chemical evolution and stellar population studies. In this paper, we study the transition from super-AGB star to massive star and find that a propagating neon-oxygen burning shell is common to b…
▽ More
The stellar mass range 8<M/Mo<12 corresponds to the most massive AGB stars and the most numerous massive stars. It is host to a variety of supernova progenitors and is therefore very important for galactic chemical evolution and stellar population studies. In this paper, we study the transition from super-AGB star to massive star and find that a propagating neon-oxygen burning shell is common to both the most massive electron capture supernova (EC-SN) progenitors and the lowest mass iron-core collapse supernova (FeCCSN) progenitors. Of the models that ignite neon burning off-center, the 9.5Mo model would evolve to an FeCCSN after the neon-burning shell propagates to the center, as in previous studies. The neon-burning shell in the 8.8Mo model, however, fails to reach the center as the URCA process and an extended (0.6 Mo) region of low Ye (0.48) in the outer part of the core begin to dominate the late evolution; the model evolves to an EC-SN. This is the first study to follow the most massive EC-SN progenitors to collapse, representing an evolutionary path to EC-SN in addition to that from SAGB stars undergoing thermal pulses. We also present models of an 8.75Mo super-AGB star through its entire thermal pulse phase until electron captures on 20Ne begin at its center and of a 12Mo star up to the iron core collapse. We discuss key uncertainties and how the different pathways to collapse affect the pre-supernova structure. Finally, we compare our results to the observed neutron star mass distribution.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2013;
originally announced June 2013.
