-
\texttt{Simba}-\texttt{C}: the evolution of the thermal and chemical properties in the intragroup medium
Authors:
Renier T. Hough,
Zhiwei Shao,
Weiguang Cui,
S. Ilani Loubser,
Arif Babul,
Romeel Davé,
Douglas Rennehan,
Chiaki Kobayashi
Abstract:
The newly updated \texttt{GIZMO} and \texttt{Simba} based simulation, \texttt{Simba-C}, with its new stellar feedback, chemical enrichment, and recalibrated AGN feedback, allows for a detailed study of the intragroup medium X-ray properties. We discuss the impact of various physical mechanisms, e.g. stellar and AGN feedback, and chemical enrichment, on the composition and the global scaling relati…
▽ More
The newly updated \texttt{GIZMO} and \texttt{Simba} based simulation, \texttt{Simba-C}, with its new stellar feedback, chemical enrichment, and recalibrated AGN feedback, allows for a detailed study of the intragroup medium X-ray properties. We discuss the impact of various physical mechanisms, e.g. stellar and AGN feedback, and chemical enrichment, on the composition and the global scaling relations of nearby galaxy groups. We also study the evolution ($z=2$ to $0$) of the global properties for the $1\,\mathrm{keV}$ temperature groups. \texttt{Simba-C} shows improved consistent matching with the observations of all X-ray scaling relations compared to \texttt{Simba}. It is well known that AGN feedback has a significant influence on $L_{X,0.5-2.0}-T_{spec,corr}$, $S_{500/2500}-T_{spec,corr}$, and gas mass fractions, with our \texttt{Simba-C} results consistent with it. Our recalibrated AGN feedback strength also showed an additional improvement in gas entropy, which now aligns with CLoGS observations. The updated stellar feedback and chemical enrichment model is shown to play an important role in our understanding of the chemical abundance ratios and their evolution within galaxy groups. In particular, we find that \texttt{Simba-C} produces an increase in the amount of heavier elements (specifically Si and Fe) relative to O, compared to \texttt{Simba}.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
The Nature and Evolution of Early Massive Quenched Galaxies in the Simba-C Simulation
Authors:
Jakub Szpila,
Romeel Davé,
Douglas Rennehan,
Weiguang Cui,
Renier Hough
Abstract:
We examine the nature, origin, and fate of early ($z\geq 2$) massive ($M_\star>10^{10}M_\odot$) quenched galaxies (EQGs) in a new $(100h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}^3)$ run of the Simba-C galaxy formation model. We define ``quenched'' to be $>4σ$ below an iterative polynomial fit to the star-forming sequence (SFS), and find that Simba-C produces EQGs as early as $z\sim 5$ and number densities agreeing with obse…
▽ More
We examine the nature, origin, and fate of early ($z\geq 2$) massive ($M_\star>10^{10}M_\odot$) quenched galaxies (EQGs) in a new $(100h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}^3)$ run of the Simba-C galaxy formation model. We define ``quenched'' to be $>4σ$ below an iterative polynomial fit to the star-forming sequence (SFS), and find that Simba-C produces EQGs as early as $z\sim 5$ and number densities agreeing with observations at $z\leq 3$ (though slightly low at $z\geq 4$). Using a photometric-based EQG selection or a fixed sSFR cut of $10^{-10}$yr$^{-1}$ yields similar results. EQGs predominantly arise in central galaxies with stellar mass $M_\star\sim 10^{10.5-11.3}M_\odot$, not necessarily the most massive systems. A UMAP projection shows that quenched galaxies have notably large black hole-to-stellar mass ratios, lower rotational support, and less dust, but are not atypical versus similar-mass non-EQGs in their environments, halo mass, or halo gas temperatures at the time of quenching. However, via galaxy tracking we show that the progenitor environments of EQGs are significantly more overdense than that of non-EQGs, which drives higher black hole mass fractions and stellar-to-halo mass ratios. This results in the Eddington ratio drop** sufficiently low for Simba-C's jet mode feedback to turn on, which quickly quenches the host galaxies. EQGs thus seem to be galaxies that grow their black holes quickly within highly dense environments, but end up in moderately-dense environments where black hole feedback can quench effectively. We find that $\geq 30\%$ of EQGs rejuvenate, but the rejuvenating fraction drops quickly at $z\leq 2$. By $z=0$ it is difficult to distinguish the descendants of EQGs vs. non-EQGs.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
SIMBA-C: An updated chemical enrichment model for galactic chemical evolution in the SIMBA simulation
Authors:
Renier T. Hough,
Douglas Rennehan,
Chiaki Kobayashi,
S. Ilani Loubser,
Romeel Davé,
Arif Babul,
Weiguang Cui
Abstract:
We introduce a new chemical enrichment and stellar feedback model into GIZMO, using the SIMBA sub-grid models as a base. Based on the state-of-the-art chemical evolution model of Kobayashi et al., SIMBA-C tracks 34 elements from H$\rightarrow$Ge and removes SIMBA's instantaneous recycling approximation. Furthermore, we make some minor improvements to SIMBA's base feedback models. SIMBA-C provides…
▽ More
We introduce a new chemical enrichment and stellar feedback model into GIZMO, using the SIMBA sub-grid models as a base. Based on the state-of-the-art chemical evolution model of Kobayashi et al., SIMBA-C tracks 34 elements from H$\rightarrow$Ge and removes SIMBA's instantaneous recycling approximation. Furthermore, we make some minor improvements to SIMBA's base feedback models. SIMBA-C provides significant improvements on key diagnostics such as the knee of the $z=0$ galaxy stellar mass function, the faint end of the main sequence, and the ability to track black holes in dwarf galaxies. SIMBA-C also matches better with recent observations of the mass-metallicity relation at $z=0,2$. By not assuming instantaneous recycling, SIMBA-C provides a much better match to galactic abundance ratio measures such as [O/Fe] and [N/O]. SIMBA-C thus opens up new avenues to constrain feedback models using detailed chemical abundance measures across cosmic time.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2023; v1 submitted 7 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Viability tests of \textit{f(R)}-gravity models with Supernovae Type 1A data
Authors:
Renier Hough,
Amare Abebe,
Stefan Ferreira
Abstract:
In this work, we will be testing four different general \textit{f(R)}-gravity models, two of which are the more realistic models (namely the Starobinsky and the Hu-Sawicki models), to determine if they are viable alternative models to pursue a more vigorous constraining test upon them. For the testing of these models, we use 359 low- and intermediate-redshift Supernovae Type 1A data obtained from…
▽ More
In this work, we will be testing four different general \textit{f(R)}-gravity models, two of which are the more realistic models (namely the Starobinsky and the Hu-Sawicki models), to determine if they are viable alternative models to pursue a more vigorous constraining test upon them. For the testing of these models, we use 359 low- and intermediate-redshift Supernovae Type 1A data obtained from thRede SDSS-II/SNLS2 Joint Light-curve Analysis (JLA). We develop a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation to find a best-fitting function within reasonable ranges for each \textit{f(R)}-gravity model, as well as for the Lambda Cold Dark Matter ($Λ$CDM) model. For simplicity, we assume a flat universe with a negligible radiation density distribution. Therefore, the only difference between the accepted $Λ$CDM model and the \textit{f(R)}-gravity models will be the dark energy term and the arbitrary free parameters. By doing a statistical analysis and using the $Λ$CDM model as our "true model", we can obtain an indication whether or not a certain \textit{f(R)}-gravity model shows promise and requires a more in-depth view in future studies. In our results, we found that the Starobinsky model obtained a larger likelihood function value than the $Λ$CDM model, while still obtaining the cosmological parameters to be $Ω_{m} = 0.268^{+0.027}_{-0.024}$ for the matter density distribution and $\bar{h} = 0.690^{+0.005}_{-0.005}$ for the Hubble uncertainty parameter. We also found a reduced Starobinsky model that are able to explain the data, as well as being statistically significant.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2020; v1 submitted 14 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
