-
Coronal Heating as Determined by the Solar Flare Frequency Distribution Obtained by Aggregating Case Studies
Authors:
James Paul Mason,
Alexandra Werth,
Colin G. West,
Allison A. Youngblood,
Donald L. Woodraska,
Courtney Peck,
Kevin Lacjak,
Florian G. Frick,
Moutamen Gabir,
Reema A. Alsinan,
Thomas Jacobsen,
Mohammad Alrubaie,
Kayla M. Chizmar,
Benjamin P. Lau,
Lizbeth Montoya Dominguez,
David Price,
Dylan R. Butler,
Connor J. Biron,
Nikita Feoktistov,
Kai Dewey,
N. E. Loomis,
Michal Bodzianowski,
Connor Kuybus,
Henry Dietrick,
Aubrey M. Wolfe
, et al. (977 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Flare frequency distributions represent a key approach to addressing one of the largest problems in solar and stellar physics: determining the mechanism that counter-intuitively heats coronae to temperatures that are orders of magnitude hotter than the corresponding photospheres. It is widely accepted that the magnetic field is responsible for the heating, but there are two competing mechanisms th…
▽ More
Flare frequency distributions represent a key approach to addressing one of the largest problems in solar and stellar physics: determining the mechanism that counter-intuitively heats coronae to temperatures that are orders of magnitude hotter than the corresponding photospheres. It is widely accepted that the magnetic field is responsible for the heating, but there are two competing mechanisms that could explain it: nanoflares or Alfvén waves. To date, neither can be directly observed. Nanoflares are, by definition, extremely small, but their aggregate energy release could represent a substantial heating mechanism, presuming they are sufficiently abundant. One way to test this presumption is via the flare frequency distribution, which describes how often flares of various energies occur. If the slope of the power law fitting the flare frequency distribution is above a critical threshold, $α=2$ as established in prior literature, then there should be a sufficient abundance of nanoflares to explain coronal heating. We performed $>$600 case studies of solar flares, made possible by an unprecedented number of data analysts via three semesters of an undergraduate physics laboratory course. This allowed us to include two crucial, but nontrivial, analysis methods: pre-flare baseline subtraction and computation of the flare energy, which requires determining flare start and stop times. We aggregated the results of these analyses into a statistical study to determine that $α= 1.63 \pm 0.03$. This is below the critical threshold, suggesting that Alfvén waves are an important driver of coronal heating.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Observations of SN2011fe with INTEGRAL
Authors:
J. Isern,
P. Jean,
E. Bravo,
R. Diehl,
J. Knödlseder,
A. Domingo,
A. Hirschmann,
P. Hoeflich,
F. Lebrun,
M. Renaud,
S. Soldi,
N. Elias--Rosa,
M. Hernanz,
B. Kulebi,
X. Zhang,
C. Badenes,
I. Domínguezk,
D. Garcia-Senz,
C. Jordi,
G. Lichti,
G. Vedrenneb,
P. Von Ballmoos
Abstract:
SN2011fe was detected by the Palomar Transient Factory on August 24th 2011 in M101 few hours after the explosion. From the early spectra it was immediately realized that it was a Type Ia supernova thus making this event the brightest one discovered in the last twenty years. In this paper the observations performed with the instruments on board of INTEGRAL (SPI, IBIS/ISGRI, JEM-X and OMC) before an…
▽ More
SN2011fe was detected by the Palomar Transient Factory on August 24th 2011 in M101 few hours after the explosion. From the early spectra it was immediately realized that it was a Type Ia supernova thus making this event the brightest one discovered in the last twenty years. In this paper the observations performed with the instruments on board of INTEGRAL (SPI, IBIS/ISGRI, JEM-X and OMC) before and after the maximum of the optical light as well as the interpretation in terms of the existing models of $γ$--ray emission from such kind of supernovae are reported. All INTEGRAL high-energy have only been able to provide upper limits to the expected emission due to the decay of $^{56}$Ni. These bounds allow to reject explosions involving a massive white dwarf in the sub--Chandrasekhar scenario. On the other hand, the optical light curve obtained with the OMC camera suggests that the event was produced by a delayed detonation of a CO white dwarf that produced $\sim 0.5$ M$\odot$ of $^{56}$Ni. In this particular case, INTEGRAL would have only been able to detect the early $γ$--ray emission if the supernova had occurred at a distance of 2 -3 Mpc, although the brightest event could be visible up to distances larger by a factor two.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
Observation of SN2011fe with INTEGRAL. I. Pre--maximum phase
Authors:
J. Isern,
P. Jean,
E. Bravo,
R. Diehl,
J. Knödlseder,
A. Domingo,
A. Hirschmann,
P. Hoeflich,
F. Lebrun,
M. Renaud,
S. Soldi,
N. Elias-Rosa,
M. Hernanz,
B. Kulebi,
X. Zhang,
C. Badenes,
I. Domínguez,
D. Garcia-Senz,
C. Jordi,
G. Lichti,
G. Vedrenne,
P. Von Ballmoos
Abstract:
SN2011fe was detected by the Palomar Transient Factory on August 24th 2011 in M101 a few hours after the explosion. From the early optical spectra it was immediately realized that it was a Type Ia supernova thus making this event the brightest one discovered in the last twenty years. The distance of the event offered the rare opportunity to perform a detailed observation with the instruments on bo…
▽ More
SN2011fe was detected by the Palomar Transient Factory on August 24th 2011 in M101 a few hours after the explosion. From the early optical spectra it was immediately realized that it was a Type Ia supernova thus making this event the brightest one discovered in the last twenty years. The distance of the event offered the rare opportunity to perform a detailed observation with the instruments on board of INTEGRAL to detect the gamma-ray emission expected from the decay chains of $^{56}$Ni. The observations were performed in two runs, one before and around the optical maximum, aimed to detect the early emission from the decay of $^{56}$Ni and another after this maximum aimed to detect the emission of $^{56}$Co. The observations performed with the instruments on board of INTEGRAL (SPI, IBIS/ISGRI, JEMX and OMC) have been analyzed and compared with the existing models of gamma-ray emission from such kind of supernovae. In this paper, the analysis of the gamma-ray emission has been restricted to the first epoch. Both, SPI and IBIS/ISGRI, only provide upper-limits to the expected emission due to the decay of $^{56}$Ni. These upper-limits on the gamma-ray flux are of 7.1 $\times$ 10$^{-5}$ ph/s/cm$^2$ for the 158 keV line and of 2.3 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ ph/s/cm$^2$ for the 812 keV line. These bounds allow to reject at the $2σ$ level explosions involving a massive white dwarf, $\sim 1$ M$\odot$ in the sub--Chandrasekhar scenario and specifically all models that would have substantial amounts of radioactive $^{56}$Ni in the outer layers of the exploding star responsible of the SN2011fe event. The optical light curve obtained with the OMC camera also suggests that SN2011fe was the outcome of the explosion, possibly a delayed detonation although other models are possible, of a CO white dwarf that synthesized $\sim 0.55$ M$_\odot$ of $^{56}$Ni. For this specific model.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2013;
originally announced February 2013.
-
Unified 1-D Simulations of Gamma-Ray Line Emission from Type Ia Supernovae
Authors:
P. A. Milne,
A. L. Hungerford,
C. L. Fryer,
T. M. Evans,
T. J. Urbatsch,
S. E. Boggs,
J. Isern,
E. Bravo,
A. Hirschmann,
S. Kumagai,
P. A. Pinto,
L. -S. The
Abstract:
The light curves of Type Ia Supernovae (SN Ia) are powered by gamma-rays emitted by the decay of radioactive elements such as $^{56}$Ni and its decay products. These gamma-rays are downscattered,absorbed, and eventually reprocessed into the optical emission which makes up the bulk of all supernova observations. Detection of the gamma-rays that escape the expanding star provide the only direct me…
▽ More
The light curves of Type Ia Supernovae (SN Ia) are powered by gamma-rays emitted by the decay of radioactive elements such as $^{56}$Ni and its decay products. These gamma-rays are downscattered,absorbed, and eventually reprocessed into the optical emission which makes up the bulk of all supernova observations. Detection of the gamma-rays that escape the expanding star provide the only direct means to study this power source for SN Ia light curves. Unfortunately, disagreements between calculations for the gamma-ray lines have made it difficult to interpret any gamma-ray observations.
Here we present a detailed comparison of the major gamma-ray line transport codes for a series of 1-dimensional Ia models. Discrepancies in past results were due to errors in the codes, and the corrected versions of the seven different codes yield very similar results. This convergence of the simulation results allows us to infer more reliable information from the current set of gamma-ray observations of SNe Ia. The observations of SNe 1986G, 1991T and 1998bu are consistent with explosion models based on their classification: sub-luminous, super-luminous and normally-luminous respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2004;
originally announced June 2004.
