Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) survey: The colour evolution of galaxies in the distant Universe
Authors:
Stephen M. Wilkins,
Jack C. Turner,
Micaela B. Bagley,
Steven L. Finkelstein,
Ricardo O. Amorín,
Adrien Aufan Stoffels D Hautefort,
Peter Behroozi,
Rachana Bhatawdekar,
Avishai Dekel,
James Donnellan,
Nicole E. Drakos,
Flaminia Fortuni,
Nimish P. Hathi,
Michaela Hirschmann,
Benne W. Holwerda,
Dimitrios Irodotou,
Anton M. Koekemoer,
Christopher C. Lovell,
Emiliano Merlin,
Will J. Roper,
Louise T. C. Seeyave,
Aswin P. Vijayan,
L. Y. Aaron Yung
Abstract:
The wavelength-coverage and sensitivity of JWST now enables us to probe the rest-frame UV - optical spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of galaxies at high-redshift ($z>4$). From these SEDs it is, in principle, through SED fitting possible to infer key physical properties, including stellar masses, star formation rates, and dust attenuation. These in turn can be compared with the predictions of g…
▽ More
The wavelength-coverage and sensitivity of JWST now enables us to probe the rest-frame UV - optical spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of galaxies at high-redshift ($z>4$). From these SEDs it is, in principle, through SED fitting possible to infer key physical properties, including stellar masses, star formation rates, and dust attenuation. These in turn can be compared with the predictions of galaxy formation simulations allowing us to validate and refine the incorporated physics. However, the inference of physical properties, particularly from photometry alone, can lead to large uncertainties and potential biases. Instead, it is now possible, and common, for simulations to be \emph{forward-modelled} to yield synthetic observations that can be compared directly to real observations. In this work, we measure the JWST broadband fluxes and colours of a robust sample of $5<z<10$ galaxies using the Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science (CEERS) Survey. We then analyse predictions from a variety of models using the same methodology and compare the NIRCam/F277W magnitude distribution and NIRCam colours with observations. We find that the predicted and observed magnitude distributions are similar, at least at $5<z<8$. At $z>8$ the distributions differ somewhat, though our observed sample size is small and thus susceptible to statistical fluctuations. Likewise, the predicted and observed colour evolution show broad agreement, at least at $5<z<8$. There is however some disagreement between the observed and modelled strength of the strong line contribution. In particular all the models fails to reproduce the F410M-F444W colour at $z>8$, though, again, the sample size is small here.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
