Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Farooki, H

Kappa-tail technique: Modeling and application to Solar Energetic Particles observed by Parker Solar Probe

Authors: G. Livadiotis, A. T. Cummings, M. E. Cuesta, R. Bandyopadhyay, H. A. Farooki, L. Y. Khoo, D. J. McComas, J. S. Rankin, T. Sharma, M. M. Shen, C. M. S. Cohen, G. D. Muro, Z. Xu

Abstract: We develop the kappa-tail fitting technique, which analyzes observations of power-law tails of distributions and energy-flux spectra and connects them to theoretical modeling of kappa distributions, to determine the thermodynamics of the examined space plasma. In particular, we (i) construct the associated mathematical formulation, (ii) prove its decisive lead for determining whether the observed… ▽ More We develop the kappa-tail fitting technique, which analyzes observations of power-law tails of distributions and energy-flux spectra and connects them to theoretical modeling of kappa distributions, to determine the thermodynamics of the examined space plasma. In particular, we (i) construct the associated mathematical formulation, (ii) prove its decisive lead for determining whether the observed power-law is associated with kappa distributions; and (iii) provide a validation of the technique using pseudo-observations of typical input plasma parameters. Then, we apply this technique to a case-study by determining the thermodynamics of solar energetic particle (SEP) protons, for a SEP event observed on April 17, 2021, by the PSP/ISOIS instrument suite onboard PSP. The results show SEP temperatures and densities of the order of $\sim 1$ MeV and $ \sim 5 \cdot 10^{-7} $ cm$^{-3}$, respectively. △ Less

Submitted 4 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

A Machine Learning Approach to Understanding the Physical Properties of Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Solar Wind at 1 AU

Authors: Hameedullah Farooki, Yasser Abduallah, Sung Jun Noh, Hyomin Kim, George Bizos, Youra Shin, Jason T. L. Wang, Haimin Wang

Abstract: Interplanetary magnetic flux ropes (MFRs) are commonly observed structures in the solar wind, categorized as magnetic clouds (MCs) and small-scale MFRs (SMFRs) depending on whether they are associated with coronal mass ejections. We apply machine learning to systematically compare SMFRs, MCs, and ambient solar wind plasma properties. We construct a dataset of 3-minute averaged sequential data poin… ▽ More Interplanetary magnetic flux ropes (MFRs) are commonly observed structures in the solar wind, categorized as magnetic clouds (MCs) and small-scale MFRs (SMFRs) depending on whether they are associated with coronal mass ejections. We apply machine learning to systematically compare SMFRs, MCs, and ambient solar wind plasma properties. We construct a dataset of 3-minute averaged sequential data points of the solar wind's instantaneous bulk fluid plasma properties using about twenty years of measurements from \emph{Wind}. We label samples by the presence and type of MFRs containing them using a catalog based on Grad-Shafranov (GS) automated detection for SMFRs and NASA's catalog for MCs (with samples in neither labeled non-MFRs). We apply the random forest machine learning algorithm to find which categories can be more easily distinguished and by what features. MCs were distinguished from non-MFRs with an AUC of 94% and SMFRs with an AUC of 89% and had distinctive plasma properties. In contrast, while SMFRs were distinguished from non-MFRs with an AUC of 86%, this appears to rely solely on the $\langle B \rangle$ > 5 nT threshold applied by the GS catalog. The results indicate that SMFRs have virtually the same plasma properties as the ambient solar wind, unlike the distinct plasma regimes of MCs. We interpret our findings as additional evidence that most SMFRs at 1 au are generated within the solar wind, and furthermore, suggesting that they should be considered a salient feature of the solar wind's magnetic structure rather than transient events. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: Accepted for publication to ApJ

A Closer Look at Small-Scale Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Solar Wind at 1 AU: Results from Improved Automated Detection

Authors: Hameedullah Farooki, Sung Jun Noh, Jeongwoo Lee, Haimin Wang, Hyomin Kim, Yasser Abduallah, Jason T. L. Wang, Yu Chen, Sergio Servidio, Francesco Pecora

Abstract: Small-scale interplanetary magnetic flux ropes (SMFRs) are similar to ICMEs in magnetic structure, but are smaller and do not exhibit ICME plasma signatures. We present a computationally efficient and GPU-powered version of the single-spacecraft automated SMFR detection algorithm based on the Grad-Shafranov (GS) technique. Our algorithm is capable of processing higher resolution data, eliminates s… ▽ More Small-scale interplanetary magnetic flux ropes (SMFRs) are similar to ICMEs in magnetic structure, but are smaller and do not exhibit ICME plasma signatures. We present a computationally efficient and GPU-powered version of the single-spacecraft automated SMFR detection algorithm based on the Grad-Shafranov (GS) technique. Our algorithm is capable of processing higher resolution data, eliminates selection bias caused by a fixed $\avg{B}$ threshold, has improved detection criteria demonstrated to have better results on an MHD simulation, and recovers full 2.5D cross sections using GS reconstruction. We used it to detect 512,152 SMFRs from 27 years (1996 to 2022) of 3-second cadence \emph{Wind} measurements. Our novel findings are: (1) the radial density of SMFRs at 1 au (${\sim}1$ per $\si{10^6\kilo\meter}$) and filling factor (${\sim}$35\%) are independent of solar activity, distance to the heliospheric current sheet (HCS), and solar wind plasma type, although the minority of SMFRs with diameters greater than ${\sim}$0.01 au have a strong solar activity dependence; (2) SMFR diameters follow a log-normal distribution that peaks below the resolved range ($\gtrsim 10^4$ km), although the filling factor is dominated by SMFRs between $10^5$ to $10^6$ km; (3) most SMFRs at 1 au have strong field-aligned flows like those from PSP measurements; (4) in terms of diameter $d$, SMFR poloidal flux $\propto d^{1.2}$, axial flux $\propto d^{2.0}$, average twist number $\propto d^{-0.8}$, current density $\propto d^{-0.8}$, and helicity $\propto d^{3.2}$. Implications for the origin of SMFRs and switchbacks are briefly discussed. The new algorithm and SMFR dataset are made freely available. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.