-
Testing the lognormality of the galaxy and weak lensing convergence distributions from Dark Energy Survey maps
Authors:
L. Clerkin,
D. Kirk,
M. Manera,
O. Lahav,
F. Abdalla,
A. Amara,
D. Bacon,
C. Chang,
E. Gaztañaga,
A. Hawken,
B. Jain,
B. Joachimi,
V. Vikram,
T. Abbott,
S. Allam,
R. Armstrong,
A Benoit-Lévy,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burk,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
M. Crocce,
C. E. Cunha
, et al. (35 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
It is well known that the probability distribution function (PDF) of galaxy density contrast is approximately lognormal; whether the PDF of mass fluctuations derived from weak lensing convergence (kappa_WL) is lognormal is less well established. We derive PDFs of the galaxy and projected matter density distributions via the Counts in Cells (CiC) method. We use maps of galaxies and weak lensing con…
▽ More
It is well known that the probability distribution function (PDF) of galaxy density contrast is approximately lognormal; whether the PDF of mass fluctuations derived from weak lensing convergence (kappa_WL) is lognormal is less well established. We derive PDFs of the galaxy and projected matter density distributions via the Counts in Cells (CiC) method. We use maps of galaxies and weak lensing convergence produced from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data over 139 deg^2. We test whether the underlying density contrast is well described by a lognormal distribution for the galaxies, the convergence and their joint PDF. We confirm that the galaxy density contrast distribution is well modeled by a lognormal PDF convolved with Poisson noise at angular scales from 10-40 arcmin (corresponding to physical scales of 3-10 Mpc). We note that as kappa_WL is a weighted sum of the mass fluctuations along the line of sight, its PDF is expected to be only approximately lognormal. We find that the kappa_WL distribution is well modeled by a lognormal PDF convolved with Gaussian shape noise at scales between 10 and 20 arcmin, with a best-fit chi^2/DOF of 1.11 compared to 1.84 for a Gaussian model, corresponding to p-values 0.35 and 0.07 respectively, at a scale of 10 arcmin. Above 20 arcmin a simple Gaussian model is sufficient. The joint PDF is also reasonably fitted by a bivariate lognormal. As a consistency check we compare the variances derived from the lognormal modelling with those directly measured via CiC. Our methods are validated against maps from the MICE Grand Challenge N-body simulation.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview
Authors:
Dark Energy Survey Collaboration,
T. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
J. Aleksic,
S. Allam,
A. Amara,
D. Bacon,
E. Balbinot,
M. Banerji,
K. Bechtol,
A. Benoit-Levy,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
C. Bonnett,
S. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
R. J. Brunner,
E. Buckley-Geer,
D. L. Burke,
G. B. Caminha,
D. Capozzi,
J. Carlsen,
A. Carnero-Rosell,
M. Carollo
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This overview article describes the legacy prospect and discovery potential of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) beyond cosmological studies, illustrating it with examples from the DES early data. DES is using a wide-field camera (DECam) on the 4m Blanco Telescope in Chile to image 5000 sq deg of the sky in five filters (grizY). By its completion the survey is expected to have generated a catalogue of…
▽ More
This overview article describes the legacy prospect and discovery potential of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) beyond cosmological studies, illustrating it with examples from the DES early data. DES is using a wide-field camera (DECam) on the 4m Blanco Telescope in Chile to image 5000 sq deg of the sky in five filters (grizY). By its completion the survey is expected to have generated a catalogue of 300 million galaxies with photometric redshifts and 100 million stars. In addition, a time-domain survey search over 27 sq deg is expected to yield a sample of thousands of Type Ia supernovae and other transients. The main goals of DES are to characterise dark energy and dark matter, and to test alternative models of gravity; these goals will be pursued by studying large scale structure, cluster counts, weak gravitational lensing and Type Ia supernovae. However, DES also provides a rich data set which allows us to study many other aspects of astrophysics. In this paper we focus on additional science with DES, emphasizing areas where the survey makes a difference with respect to other current surveys. The paper illustrates, using early data (from `Science Verification', and from the first, second and third seasons of observations), what DES can tell us about the solar system, the Milky Way, galaxy evolution, quasars, and other topics. In addition, we show that if the cosmological model is assumed to be Lambda+ Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) then important astrophysics can be deduced from the primary DES probes. Highlights from DES early data include the discovery of 34 Trans Neptunian Objects, 17 dwarf satellites of the Milky Way, one published z > 6 quasar (and more confirmed) and two published superluminous supernovae (and more confirmed).
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2016; v1 submitted 3 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
-
A Prescription for Galaxy Biasing Evolution as a Nuisance Parameter
Authors:
L. Clerkin,
D. Kirk,
O. Lahav,
F. B. Abdalla,
E. Gaztanaga
Abstract:
There is currently no consistent approach to modelling galaxy bias evolution in cosmological inference. This lack of a common standard makes the rigorous comparison or combination of probes difficult. We show that the choice of biasing model has a significant impact on cosmological parameter constraints for a survey such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES), considering the 2-point correlations of gala…
▽ More
There is currently no consistent approach to modelling galaxy bias evolution in cosmological inference. This lack of a common standard makes the rigorous comparison or combination of probes difficult. We show that the choice of biasing model has a significant impact on cosmological parameter constraints for a survey such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES), considering the 2-point correlations of galaxies in five tomographic redshift bins. We find that modelling galaxy bias with a free biasing parameter per redshift bin gives a Figure of Merit (FoM) for Dark Energy equation of state parameters w_0, w_a smaller by a factor of 10 than if a constant bias is assumed. An incorrect bias model will also cause a shift in measured values of cosmological parameters. Motivated by these points and focusing on the redshift evolution of linear bias, we propose the use of a generalised galaxy bias which encompasses a range of bias models from theory, observations and simulations, b(z) = c + (b_0 - c)/D(z)^alpha, where parameters c, b_0 and alpha depend on galaxy properties such as halo mass. For a DES-like galaxy survey we find that this model gives an unbiased estimate of w_0, w_a with the same number or fewer nuisance parameters and a higher FoM than a simple b(z) model allowed to vary in z-bins. We show how the parameters of this model are correlated with cosmological parameters. We fit a range of bias models to two recent datasets, and conclude that this generalised parameterisation is a sensible benchmark expression of galaxy bias on large scales.
△ Less
Submitted 15 December, 2015; v1 submitted 21 May, 2014;
originally announced May 2014.
