-
Cherenkov Telescope Array Contributions to the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017)
Authors:
F. Acero,
B. S. Acharya,
V. Acín Portella,
C. Adams,
I. Agudo,
F. Aharonian,
I. Al Samarai,
A. Alberdi,
M. Alcubierre,
R. Alfaro,
J. Alfaro,
C. Alispach,
R. Aloisio,
R. Alves Batista,
J. -P. Amans,
E. Amato,
L. Ambrogi,
G. Ambrosi,
M. Ambrosio,
J. Anderson,
M. Anduze,
E. O. Angüner,
E. Antolini,
L. A. Antonelli,
V. Antonuccio
, et al. (1117 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium presented at the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference, July 12-20 2017, Busan, Korea.
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium presented at the 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference, July 12-20 2017, Busan, Korea.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2017; v1 submitted 11 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Contributions of the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) to the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016)
Authors:
The CTA Consortium,
:,
A. Abchiche,
U. Abeysekara,
Ó. Abril,
F. Acero,
B. S. Acharya,
C. Adams,
G. Agnetta,
F. Aharonian,
A. Akhperjanian,
A. Albert,
M. Alcubierre,
J. Alfaro,
R. Alfaro,
A. J. Allafort,
R. Aloisio,
J. -P. Amans,
E. Amato,
L. Ambrogi,
G. Ambrosi,
M. Ambrosio,
J. Anderson,
M. Anduze,
E. O. Angüner
, et al. (1387 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) Consortium presented at the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016), July 11-15, 2016, in Heidelberg, Germany.
List of contributions from the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) Consortium presented at the 6th International Symposium on High-Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy (Gamma 2016), July 11-15, 2016, in Heidelberg, Germany.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Morphological Number Counts and Redshift Distributions to I = 25 from the Hubble Deep Fields: Constraints on Cosmological Models from Early Type Galaxies
Authors:
S. Phillipps,
S. P. Driver,
W. J. Couch,
A. Fernandez-Soto,
P. D. Bristow,
S. C. Odewahn,
R. A. Windhorst,
K. Lanzetta
Abstract:
We combine magnitude and photometric redshift data on galaxies in the Hubble Deep Fields with morphological classifications in order to separate out the distributions for early type galaxies. The updated morphological galaxy number counts down to I = 25 and the corresponding redshift distributions are used as joint constraints on cosmological models, in particular on the values of the density pa…
▽ More
We combine magnitude and photometric redshift data on galaxies in the Hubble Deep Fields with morphological classifications in order to separate out the distributions for early type galaxies. The updated morphological galaxy number counts down to I = 25 and the corresponding redshift distributions are used as joint constraints on cosmological models, in particular on the values of the density parameter Omega_{0} and normalised cosmological constant Lambda_{0}.
We find that an Einstein - de Sitter universe with simple passive evolution gives an excellent fit to the counts and redshift data at all magnitudes. An open, low Omega_{0}, model with no net evolution (and conservation of the number of ellipticals), which fits the counts equally well, is somewhat less successful, predicting slightly lower mean redshifts and, more significantly, the lack of a high--z tail. A number conserving model with a dominant contribution from Lambda_{0}, on the other hand, is far less successful, predicting a much narrower distribution than seen. More complex models are obviously possible, but we conclude that if large scale transmutation between types does {\it not} occur, then the lambda-dominated models provide a very poor fit to the current data.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2000;
originally announced September 2000.
-
Hubble Space Telescope Counts of Elliptical Galaxies: Constraints on Cosmological Models ?
Authors:
Simon P. Driver,
Rogier A. Windhorst,
Steven Phillipps,
Paul D. Bristow
Abstract:
The interpretation of galaxy number counts in terms of cosmological models is fraught with difficulty due to uncertainties in the overall galaxy population (mix of morphological types, luminosity functions etc.) and in the observations (loss of low surface brightness images, image blending etc.). Many of these can be overcome if we use deep high resolution imaging of a single class of high surfa…
▽ More
The interpretation of galaxy number counts in terms of cosmological models is fraught with difficulty due to uncertainties in the overall galaxy population (mix of morphological types, luminosity functions etc.) and in the observations (loss of low surface brightness images, image blending etc.). Many of these can be overcome if we use deep high resolution imaging of a single class of high surface brightness galaxies, whose evolution is thought to be fairly well understood. This is now possible by selecting elliptical and S0 galaxies using Hubble Space Telescope images from the Medium Deep Survey and other ultradeep WFPC2 images. In the present paper, we examine whether such data can be used to discriminate between open and closed universes, or between conventional cosmological models and those dominated by a cosmological constant. We find, based on the currently available data, that unless elliptical galaxies undergo very strong merging since $z \sim 1$ (and/or very large errors exist in the morphological classifications), then flat models dominated by a cosmological constant are ruled out. However, both an Einstein-de Sitter ($Ω_{0}=1$) model with standard passive stellar evolution and an open ($Ω_{0}=0.05$) model with no net evolution ({\it i.e.} cancelling stellar and dynamical evolution) predict virtually identical elliptical and S0 galaxy counts.
Based on these findings and the recent reportings of $H_{o} \simeq 80$ km/s Mpc/s, we find that the maximum acceptable age of the universe is 13.3 Gyrs and a value of $\leq 9$ Gyrs favored. A flat---$Λ\neq 0$---universe is therefore {\it not} a viable solution to the $H_{o}$/globular cluster age problem.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 1995;
originally announced November 1995.
