-
The XMM Cluster Survey: Exploring scaling relations and completeness of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 redMaPPer cluster catalogue
Authors:
E. W. Upsdell,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
R. Wilkinson,
D. J. Turner,
M. Hilton,
E. Rykoff,
A. Farahi,
S. Bhargava,
T. Jeltema,
M. Klein,
A. Bermeo,
C. A. Collins,
L. Ebrahimpour,
D. Hollowood,
R. G. Mann,
M. Manolopoulou,
C. J. Miller,
P. J. Rooney,
Martin Sahlén,
J. P. Stott,
P. T. P. Viana,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
D. Bacon
, et al. (45 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We cross-match and compare characteristics of galaxy clusters identified in observations from two sky surveys using two completely different techniques. One sample is optically selected from the analysis of three years of Dark Energy Survey observations using the redMaPPer cluster detection algorithm. The second is X-ray selected from XMM observations analysed by the XMM Cluster Survey. The sample…
▽ More
We cross-match and compare characteristics of galaxy clusters identified in observations from two sky surveys using two completely different techniques. One sample is optically selected from the analysis of three years of Dark Energy Survey observations using the redMaPPer cluster detection algorithm. The second is X-ray selected from XMM observations analysed by the XMM Cluster Survey. The samples comprise a total area of 57.4 deg$^2$, bounded by the area of 4 contiguous XMM survey regions that overlap the DES footprint. We find that the X-ray selected sample is fully matched with entries in the redMaPPer catalogue, above $λ>$20 and within 0.1$< z <$0.9. Conversely, only 38\% of the redMaPPer catalogue is matched to an X-ray extended source. Next, using 120 optically clusters and 184 X-ray selected clusters, we investigate the form of the X-ray luminosity-temperature ($L_{X}-T_{X}$), luminosity-richness ($L_{X}-λ$) and temperature-richness ($T_{X}-λ$) scaling relations. We find that the fitted forms of the $L_{X}-T_{X}$ relations are consistent between the two selection methods and also with other studies in the literature. However, we find tentative evidence for a steepening of the slope of the relation for low richness systems in the X-ray selected sample. When considering the scaling of richness with X-ray properties, we again find consistency in the relations (i.e., $L_{X}-λ$ and $T_{X}-λ$) between the optical and X-ray selected samples. This is contrary to previous similar works that find a significant increase in the scatter of the luminosity scaling relation for X-ray selected samples compared to optically selected samples.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey analysis of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer Catalogue: Implications for scatter, selection bias, and isotropy in cluster scaling relations
Authors:
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
R. Wilkinson,
A. Bermeo,
D. J. Turner,
M. Hilton,
E. W. Upsdell,
P. J. Rooney,
S. Bhargava,
L. Ebrahimpour,
A. Farahi,
R. G. Mann,
M. Manolopoulou,
J. Mayers,
C. Vergara,
P. T. P. Viana,
C. A. Collins,
D. Hollowood,
T. Jeltema,
C. J. Miller,
R. C. Nichol,
R. Noorali,
M. Splettstoesser,
J. P. Stott
Abstract:
In this paper we present the X-ray analysis of SDSS DR8 redMaPPer (SDSSRM) clusters using data products from the $XMM$ Cluster Survey (XCS). In total, 1189 SDSSRM clusters fall within the $XMM$-Newton footprint. This has yielded 456 confirmed detections accompanied by X-ray luminosity ($L_{X}$) measurements. Of the detected clusters, 382 have an associated X-ray temperature measurement ($T_{X}$).…
▽ More
In this paper we present the X-ray analysis of SDSS DR8 redMaPPer (SDSSRM) clusters using data products from the $XMM$ Cluster Survey (XCS). In total, 1189 SDSSRM clusters fall within the $XMM$-Newton footprint. This has yielded 456 confirmed detections accompanied by X-ray luminosity ($L_{X}$) measurements. Of the detected clusters, 382 have an associated X-ray temperature measurement ($T_{X}$). This represents one of the largest samples of coherently derived cluster $T_{X}$ values to date. Our analysis of the X-ray observable to richness ($λ$) scaling relations has demonstrated that scatter in the $T_{X}-λ$ relation is roughly a third of that in the $L_{X}-λ$ relation, and that the $L_{X}-λ$ scatter is intrinsic, i.e. will not be significantly reduced with larger sample sizes. Our analysis of the scaling relation between $L_{X}$ and $T_{X}$ has shown that the fits are sensitive to the selection method of the sample, i.e. whether the sample is made up of clusters detected "serendipitously" compared to those deliberately targeted by $XMM$. These differences are also seen in the $L_{X}-λ$ relation and, to a lesser extent, in the $T_{X}-λ$ relation. Exclusion of the emission from the cluster core does not make a significant impact to the findings. A combination of selection biases is a likely, but as yet unproven, reason for these differences. Finally, we have also used our data to probe recent claims of anisotropy in the $L_{X}-T_{X}$ relation across the sky. We find no evidence of anistropy, but stress that this may be masked in our analysis by the incomplete declination coverage of the SDSS DR8 sample.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2022; v1 submitted 22 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Velocity Dispersions of Clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Y3 redMaPPer Catalog
Authors:
V. Wetzell,
T. E. Jeltema,
B. Hegland,
S. Everett,
P. A. Giles,
R. Wilkinson,
A. Farahi,
M. Costanzi,
D. L. Hollowood,
E. Upsdell,
A. Saro,
J. Myles,
A. Bermeo,
S. Bhargava,
C. A. Collins,
D. Cross,
O. Eiger,
G. Gardner,
M. Hilton,
J. Jobel,
P. Kelly,
D. Laubner,
A. R. Liddle,
R. G. Mann,
V. Martinez
, et al. (74 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We measure the velocity dispersions of clusters of galaxies selected by the redMaPPer algorithm in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), allowing us to probe cluster selection and richness estimation, $λ$, in light of cluster dynamics. Our sample consists of 126 clusters with sufficient spectroscopy for individual velocity dispersion estimates. We examine the correlation…
▽ More
We measure the velocity dispersions of clusters of galaxies selected by the redMaPPer algorithm in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), allowing us to probe cluster selection and richness estimation, $λ$, in light of cluster dynamics. Our sample consists of 126 clusters with sufficient spectroscopy for individual velocity dispersion estimates. We examine the correlations between cluster velocity dispersion, richness, X-ray temperature and luminosity as well as central galaxy velocity offsets. The velocity dispersion-richness relation exhibits a bimodal distribution. The majority of clusters follow scaling relations between velocity dispersion, richness, and X-ray properties similar to those found for previous samples; however, there is a significant population of clusters with velocity dispersions which are high for their richness. These clusters account for roughly 22\% of the $λ< 70$ systems in our sample, but more than half (55\%) of $λ< 70$ clusters at $z>0.5$. A couple of these systems are hot and X-ray bright as expected for massive clusters with richnesses that appear to have been underestimated, but most appear to have high velocity dispersions for their X-ray properties likely due to line-of-sight structure. These results suggest that projection effects contribute significantly to redMaPPer selection, particularly at higher redshifts and lower richnesses. The redMaPPer determined richnesses for the velocity dispersion outliers are consistent with their X-ray properties, but several are X-ray undetected and deeper data is needed to understand their nature.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2022; v1 submitted 15 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
The Growth of Intracluster Light in XCS-HSC Galaxy Clusters from $0.1 < z < 0.5$
Authors:
Kate E. Furnell,
Chris A. Collins,
Lee S. Kelvin,
Ivan K. Baldry,
Phil A. James,
Maria Manolopoulou,
Robert G. Mann,
Paul A. Giles,
Alberto Bermeo,
Matthew Hilton,
Reese Wilkinson,
A. Kathy Romer,
Carlos Vergara,
Sunayana Bhargava,
John P. Stott,
Julian Mayers,
Pedro Viana
Abstract:
We estimate the Intracluster Light (ICL) component within a sample of 18 clusters detected in XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) data using deep ($\sim$ 26.8 mag) Hyper Suprime Cam Subaru Strategic Program DR1 (HSC-SSP DR1) $i$-band data. We apply a rest-frame $μ_{B} = 25 \ \mathrm{mag/arcsec^{2}}$ isophotal threshold to our clusters, below which we define light as the ICL within an aperture of $R_{X,500}$…
▽ More
We estimate the Intracluster Light (ICL) component within a sample of 18 clusters detected in XMM Cluster Survey (XCS) data using deep ($\sim$ 26.8 mag) Hyper Suprime Cam Subaru Strategic Program DR1 (HSC-SSP DR1) $i$-band data. We apply a rest-frame $μ_{B} = 25 \ \mathrm{mag/arcsec^{2}}$ isophotal threshold to our clusters, below which we define light as the ICL within an aperture of $R_{X,500}$ (X-ray estimate of $R_{500}$) centered on the Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG). After applying careful masking and corrections for flux losses from background subtraction, we recover $\sim$20% of the ICL flux, approximately four times our estimate of the typical background at the same isophotal level ($\sim$ 5%). We find that the ICL makes up about $\sim$ 24% of the total cluster stellar mass on average ($\sim$ 41% including the flux contained in the BCG within 50 kpc); this value is well-matched with other observational studies and semi-analytic/numerical simulations, but is significantly smaller than results from recent hydrodynamical simulations (even when measured in an observationally consistent way). We find no evidence for any links between the amount of ICL flux with cluster mass, but find a growth rate of $2-4$ for the ICL between $0.1 < z < 0.5$. We conclude that the ICL is the dominant evolutionary component of stellar mass in clusters from $z \sim 1$. Our work highlights the need for a consistent approach when measuring ICL alongside the need for deeper imaging, in order to unambiguously measure the ICL across as broad a redshift range as possible (e.g. 10-year stacked imaging from the Vera C. Rubin Observatory).
△ Less
Submitted 9 January, 2021; v1 submitted 5 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
The XMM Cluster Survey: new evidence for the 3.5 keV feature in clusters is inconsistent with a dark matter origin
Authors:
S. Bhargava,
P. A. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
T. Jeltema,
J. Mayers,
A. Bermeo,
M. Hilton,
R. Wilkinson,
C. Vergara,
C. A. Collins,
M. Manolopoulou,
P. J. Rooney,
S. Rosborough,
K. Sabirli,
J. P. Stott,
E. Swann,
P. T. P. Viana
Abstract:
There have been several reports of a detection of an unexplained excess of X-ray emission at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV in astrophysical systems. One interpretation of this excess is the decay of sterile neutrino dark matter. The most influential study to date analysed 73 clusters observed by the XMM-Newton satellite. We explore evidence for a $\simeq$ 3.5 keV excess in the XMM-PN spectra of 117 redMaPPer g…
▽ More
There have been several reports of a detection of an unexplained excess of X-ray emission at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV in astrophysical systems. One interpretation of this excess is the decay of sterile neutrino dark matter. The most influential study to date analysed 73 clusters observed by the XMM-Newton satellite. We explore evidence for a $\simeq$ 3.5 keV excess in the XMM-PN spectra of 117 redMaPPer galaxy clusters ($0.1 < z < 0.6$). In our analysis of individual spectra, we identify three systems with an excess of flux at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV. In one case (XCS J0003.3+0204) this excess may result from a discrete emission line. None of these systems are the most dark matter dominated in our sample. We group the remaining 114 clusters into four temperature ($T_{\rm X}$) bins to search for an increase in $\simeq$ 3.5 keV flux excess with $T_{\rm X}$ - a reliable tracer of halo mass. However, we do not find evidence of a significant excess in flux at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV in any $T_{\rm X}$ bins. To maximise sensitivity to a potentially weak dark matter decay feature at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV, we jointly fit 114 clusters. Again, no significant excess is found at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV. We estimate the upper limit of an undetected emission line at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV to be $2.41 \times 10^{-6}$ photons cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, corresponding to a mixing angle of $\sin^2(2θ)=4.4 \times 10^{-11}$, lower than previous estimates from cluster studies. We conclude that a flux excess at $\simeq$ 3.5 keV is not a ubiquitous feature in clusters and therefore unlikely to originate from sterile neutrino dark matter decay.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2020; v1 submitted 24 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances and Weak Lensing
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
Tim Abbott,
Michel Aguena,
Alex Alarcon,
Sahar Allam,
Steve Allen,
James Annis,
Santiago Avila,
David Bacon,
Alberto Bermeo,
Gary Bernstein,
Emmanuel Bertin,
Sunayana Bhargava,
Sebastian Bocquet,
David Brooks,
Dillon Brout,
Elizabeth Buckley-Geer,
David Burke,
Aurelio Carnero Rosell,
Matias Carrasco Kind,
Jorge Carretero,
Francisco Javier Castander,
Ross Cawthon,
Chihway Chang,
Xinyi Chen
, et al. (107 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values for $S_8 =σ_8(Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm 0.04$, driven by a low matter densi…
▽ More
We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values for $S_8 =σ_8(Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm 0.04$, driven by a low matter density parameter, $Ω_{\rm m}=0.179^{+0.031}_{-0.038}$, with $σ_8-Ω_{\rm m}$ posteriors in $2.4σ$ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in $5.6σ$ with the Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant physics. Cross checks with X-ray and microwave data, as well as independent constraints on the observable--mass relation from SZ selected clusters, suggest that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness threshold ($λ\ge 30$) significantly reduces the tension with other probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by our model.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Stellar mass as a galaxy cluster mass proxy: application to the Dark Energy Survey redMaPPer clusters
Authors:
A. Palmese,
J. Annis,
J. Burgad,
A. Farahi,
M. Soares-Santos,
B. Welch,
M. da Silva Pereira,
H. Lin,
S. Bhargava,
D. L. Hollowood,
R. Wilkinson,
P. Giles,
T. Jeltema,
A. K. Romer,
A. E. Evrard,
M. Hilton,
C. Vergara Cervantes,
A. Bermeo,
J. Mayers,
J. DeRose,
D. Gruen,
W. G. Hartley,
O. Lahav,
B. Leistedt,
T. McClintock
, et al. (60 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We introduce a galaxy cluster mass observable, $μ_\star$, based on the stellar masses of cluster members, and we present results for the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 observations. Stellar masses are computed using a Bayesian Model Averaging method, and are validated for DES data using simulations and COSMOS data. We show that $μ_\star$ works as a promising mass proxy by comparing our prediction…
▽ More
We introduce a galaxy cluster mass observable, $μ_\star$, based on the stellar masses of cluster members, and we present results for the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 observations. Stellar masses are computed using a Bayesian Model Averaging method, and are validated for DES data using simulations and COSMOS data. We show that $μ_\star$ works as a promising mass proxy by comparing our predictions to X-ray measurements. We measure the X-ray temperature-$μ_\star$ relation for a total of 150 clusters matched between the wide-field DES Year 1 redMaPPer catalogue, and Chandra and XMM archival observations, spanning the redshift range $0.1<z<0.7$. For a scaling relation which is linear in logarithmic space, we find a slope of $α= 0.488\pm0.043$ and a scatter in the X-ray temperature at fixed $μ_\star$ of $σ_{{\rm ln} T_X|μ_\star}=0.266^{+0.019}_{-0.020}$ for the joint sample. By using the halo mass scaling relations of the X-ray temperature from the Weighing the Giants program, we further derive the $μ_\star$-conditioned scatter in mass, finding $σ_{{\rm ln} M|μ_\star}=0.26^{+ 0.15}_{- 0.10}$. These results are competitive with well-established cluster mass proxies used for cosmological analyses, showing that $μ_\star$ can be used as a reliable and physically motivated mass proxy to derive cosmological constraints.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2019; v1 submitted 20 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Mass Variance from Archival X-ray Properties of Dark Energy Survey Year-1 Galaxy Clusters
Authors:
A. Farahi,
X. Chen,
A. E. Evrard,
D. L. Hollowood,
R. Wilkinson,
S. Bhargava,
P. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
T. Jeltema,
M. Hilton,
A. Bermeo,
J. Mayers,
C. Vergara Cervantes,
E. Rozo,
E. S. Rykoff,
C. Collins,
M. Costanzi,
S. Everett,
A. R. Liddle,
R. G. Mann,
A. Mantz,
P. Rooney,
M. Sahlen,
J. Stott,
P. T. P. Viana
, et al. (54 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using archival X-ray observations and a log-normal population model, we estimate constraints on the intrinsic scatter in halo mass at fixed optical richness for a galaxy cluster sample identified in Dark Energy Survey Year-One (DES-Y1) data with the redMaPPer algorithm. We examine the scaling behavior of X-ray temperatures, $T_X$, with optical richness, $λ_{RM}$, for clusters in the redshift range…
▽ More
Using archival X-ray observations and a log-normal population model, we estimate constraints on the intrinsic scatter in halo mass at fixed optical richness for a galaxy cluster sample identified in Dark Energy Survey Year-One (DES-Y1) data with the redMaPPer algorithm. We examine the scaling behavior of X-ray temperatures, $T_X$, with optical richness, $λ_{RM}$, for clusters in the redshift range $0.2<z<0.7$. X-ray temperatures are obtained from Chandra and XMM observations for 58 and 110 redMaPPer systems, respectively. Despite non-uniform sky coverage, the $T_X$ measurements are $> 50\%$ complete for clusters with $λ_{RM} > 130$. Regression analysis on the two samples produces consistent posterior scaling parameters, from which we derive a combined constraint on the residual scatter, $σ_{\ln Tx | λ} = 0.275 \pm 0.019$. Joined with constraints for $T_X$ scaling with halo mass from the Weighing the Giants program and richness--temperature covariance estimates from the LoCuSS sample, we derive the richness-conditioned scatter in mass, $σ_{\ln M | λ} = 0.30 \pm 0.04\, _{({\rm stat})} \pm 0.09\, _{({\rm sys})}$, at an optical richness of approximately 70. Uncertainties in external parameters, particularly the slope and variance of the $T_X$--mass relation and the covariance of $T_X$ and $λ_{RM}$ at fixed mass, dominate the systematic error. The $95\%$ confidence region from joint sample analysis is relatively broad, $σ_{\ln M | λ} \in [0.14, \, 0.55]$, or a factor ten in variance.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Calibration of Cluster Mis-centering in the redMaPPer Catalogs
Authors:
Y. Zhang,
T. Jeltema,
D. L. Hollowood,
S. Everett,
E. Rozo,
A. Farahi,
A. Bermeo,
S. Bhargava,
P. Giles,
A. K. Romer,
R. Wilkinson,
E. S. Rykoff,
A. Mantz,
H. T. Diehl,
A. E. Evrard,
C. Stern,
D. Gruen,
A. von der Linden,
M. Splettstoesser,
X. Chen,
M. Costanzi,
S. Allen,
C. Collins,
M. Hilton,
M. Klein
, et al. (61 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The center determination of a galaxy cluster from an optical cluster finding algorithm can be offset from theoretical prescriptions or $N$-body definitions of its host halo center. These offsets impact the recovered cluster statistics, affecting both richness measurements and the weak lensing shear profile around the clusters. This paper models the centering performance of the \RM~cluster finding…
▽ More
The center determination of a galaxy cluster from an optical cluster finding algorithm can be offset from theoretical prescriptions or $N$-body definitions of its host halo center. These offsets impact the recovered cluster statistics, affecting both richness measurements and the weak lensing shear profile around the clusters. This paper models the centering performance of the \RM~cluster finding algorithm using archival X-ray observations of \RM-selected clusters. Assuming the X-ray emission peaks as the fiducial halo centers, and through analyzing their offsets to the \RM~centers, we find that $\sim 75\pm 8 \%$ of the \RM~clusters are well centered and the mis-centered offset follows a Gamma distribution in normalized, projected distance. These mis-centering offsets cause a systematic underestimation of cluster richness relative to the well-centered clusters, for which we propose a descriptive model. Our results enable the DES Y1 cluster cosmology analysis by characterizing the necessary corrections to both the weak lensing and richness abundance functions of the DES Y1 redMaPPer cluster catalog.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2019; v1 submitted 21 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Chandra Follow-Up of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer Catalog Using the MATCha Pipeline
Authors:
Devon L. Hollowood,
Tesla Jeltema,
Xinyi Chen,
Arya Farahi,
August Evrard,
Spencer Everett,
Eduardo Rozo,
Eli Rykoff,
Rebecca Bernstein,
Alberto Bermeo,
Lena Eiger,
Paul Giles,
Holger Israel,
Renee Michel,
Raziq Noorali,
Kathy Romer,
Philip Rooney,
Megan Splettstoesser
Abstract:
In order to place constraints on cosmology through optical surveys of galaxy clusters, one must first understand the properties of those clusters. To this end, we introduce the Mass Analysis Tool for Chandra (MATCha), a pipeline which uses a parallellized algorithm to analyze archival Chandra data. MATCha simultaneously calculates X-ray temperatures and luminosities and performs centering measurem…
▽ More
In order to place constraints on cosmology through optical surveys of galaxy clusters, one must first understand the properties of those clusters. To this end, we introduce the Mass Analysis Tool for Chandra (MATCha), a pipeline which uses a parallellized algorithm to analyze archival Chandra data. MATCha simultaneously calculates X-ray temperatures and luminosities and performs centering measurements for hundreds of potential galaxy clusters using archival X-ray exposures. We run MATCha on the redMaPPer SDSS DR8 cluster catalog and use MATCha's output X-ray temperatures and luminosities to analyze the galaxy cluster temperature-richness, luminosity-richness, luminosity-temperature, and temperature-luminosity scaling relations. We detect 447 clusters and determine 246 r2500 temperatures across all redshifts. Within 0.1 < z < 0.35 we find that r2500 Tx scales with optical richness as ln(kB Tx / 1.0 keV) = (0.52 \pm 0.05) ln(λ/70) + (1.85 \pm 0.03) with intrinsic scatter of 0.27 \pm 0.02 (1 σ). We investigate the distribution of offsets between the X-ray center and redMaPPer center within 0.1 < z < 0.35, finding that 68.3 \pm 6.5% of clusters are well-centered. However, we find a broad tail of large offsets in this distribution, and we explore some of the causes of redMaPPer miscentering.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2019; v1 submitted 20 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Mass Calibration of redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters
Authors:
T. McClintock,
T. N. Varga,
D. Gruen,
E. Rozo,
E. S. Rykoff,
T. Shin,
P. Melchior,
J. DeRose,
S. Seitz,
J. P. Dietrich,
E. Sheldon,
Y. Zhang,
A. von der Linden,
T. Jeltema,
A. Mantz,
A. K. Romer,
S. Allen,
M. R. Becker,
A. Bermeo,
S. Bhargava,
M. Costanzi,
S. Everett,
A. Farahi,
N. Hamaus,
W. G. Hartley
, et al. (77 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We constrain the mass--richness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $λ$ and redshift $z$ for $λ\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling the scaling relation as…
▽ More
We constrain the mass--richness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $λ$ and redshift $z$ for $λ\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}|λ,z\rangle = M_0 (λ/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm 0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $λ=40$ and $z=0.35$. The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=-0.30\pm 0.30\ ({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semi-analytic covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling of the halo--mass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with, but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and WFIRST.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2018; v1 submitted 30 April, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Galaxies in X-ray Selected Clusters and Groups in Dark Energy Survey Data II: Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling of the Red-Sequence Galaxy Luminosity Function
Authors:
Y. Zhang,
C. J. Miller,
P. Rooney,
A. Bermeo,
A. K. Romer,
C. Vergara cervantes,
E. S. Rykoff,
C. Hennig,
R. Das,
T. Mckay,
J. Song,
H. Wilcox,
D. Bacon,
S. L. Bridle,
C. Collins,
C. Conselice,
M. Hilton,
B. Hoyle,
S. Kay,
A. R. Liddle,
R. G. Mann,
N. Mehrtens,
J. Mayers,
R. C. Nichol,
M. Sahlen
, et al. (55 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using $\sim 100$ X-ray selected clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data, we constrain the luminosity function (LF) of cluster red sequence galaxies as a function of redshift. This is the first homogeneous optical/X-ray sample large enough to constrain the evolution of the luminosity function simultaneously in redshift ($0.1<z<1.05$) and cluster mass (…
▽ More
Using $\sim 100$ X-ray selected clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data, we constrain the luminosity function (LF) of cluster red sequence galaxies as a function of redshift. This is the first homogeneous optical/X-ray sample large enough to constrain the evolution of the luminosity function simultaneously in redshift ($0.1<z<1.05$) and cluster mass ($13.5 \le \rm{log_{10}}(M_{200crit}) \sim< 15.0$). We pay particular attention to completeness issues and the detection limit of the galaxy sample. We then apply a hierarchical Bayesian model to fit the cluster galaxy LFs via a Schecter function, including its characteristic break ($m^*$) to a faint end power-law slope ($α$). Our method enables us to avoid known issues in similar analyses based on stacking or binning the clusters. We find weak and statistically insignificant ($\sim 1.9 σ$) evolution in the faint end slope $α$ versus redshift. We also find no dependence in $α$ or $m^*$ with the X-ray inferred cluster masses. However, the amplitude of the LF as a function of cluster mass is constrained to $\sim 20\%$ precision. As a by-product of our algorithm, we utilize the correlation between the LF and cluster mass to provide an improved estimate of the individual cluster masses as well as the scatter in true mass given the X-ray inferred masses. This technique can be applied to a larger sample of X-ray or optically selected clusters from the Dark Energy Survey, significantly improving the sensitivity of the analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2019; v1 submitted 16 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
Authors:
P. Melchior,
D. Gruen,
T. McClintock,
T. N. Varga,
E. Sheldon,
E. Rozo,
A. Amara,
M. R. Becker,
B. A. Benson,
A. Bermeo,
S. L. Bridle,
J. Clampitt,
J. P. Dietrich,
W. G. Hartley,
D. Hollowood,
B. Jain,
M. Jarvis,
T. Jeltema,
T. Kacprzak,
N. MacCrann,
E. S. Rykoff,
A. Saro,
E. Suchyta,
M. A. Troxel,
J. Zuntz
, et al. (56 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We use weak-lensing shear measurements to determine the mean mass of optically selected galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. In a blinded analysis, we split the sample of more than 8,000 redMaPPer clusters into 15 subsets, spanning ranges in the richness parameter $5 \leq λ\leq 180$ and redshift $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.8$, and fit the averaged mass density contrast profiles…
▽ More
We use weak-lensing shear measurements to determine the mean mass of optically selected galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. In a blinded analysis, we split the sample of more than 8,000 redMaPPer clusters into 15 subsets, spanning ranges in the richness parameter $5 \leq λ\leq 180$ and redshift $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.8$, and fit the averaged mass density contrast profiles with a model that accounts for seven distinct sources of systematic uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors; cluster-member contamination; miscentering; deviations from the NFW halo profile; halo triaxiality; and line-of-sight projections. We combine the inferred cluster masses to estimate the joint scaling relation between mass, richness and redshift, $\mathcal{M}(λ,z) \varpropto M_0 λ^{F} (1+z)^{G}$. We find $M_0 \equiv \langle M_{200\mathrm{m}}\,|\,λ=30,z=0.5\rangle=\left[ 2.35 \pm 0.22\ \rm{(stat)} \pm 0.12\ \rm{(sys)} \right] \cdot 10^{14}\ M_\odot$, with $F = 1.12\,\pm\,0.20\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.06\ \rm{(sys)}$ and $G = 0.18\,\pm\, 0.75\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.24\ \rm{(sys)}$. The amplitude of the mass-richness relation is in excellent agreement with the weak-lensing calibration of redMaPPer clusters in SDSS by Simet et al. (2016) and with the Saro et al. (2015) calibration based on abundance matching of SPT-detected clusters. Our results extend the redshift range over which the mass-richness relation of redMaPPer clusters has been calibrated with weak lensing from $z\leq 0.3$ to $z\leq0.8$. Calibration uncertainties of shear measurements and photometric redshift estimates dominate our systematic error budget and require substantial improvements for forthcoming studies.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2017; v1 submitted 21 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Galaxies in X-ray Selected Clusters and Groups in Dark Energy Survey Data I: Stellar Mass Growth of Bright Central Galaxies Since z~1.2
Authors:
Y. Zhang,
C. Miller,
T. Mckay,
P. Rooney,
A. E. Evrard,
A. K. Romer,
R. Perfecto,
J. Song,
S. Desai,
J. Mohr,
H. Wilcox,
A. Bermeo,
T. Jeltema,
D. Hollowood,
D. Bacon,
D. Capozzi,
C. Collins,
R. Das,
D. Gerdes,
C. Hennig,
M. Hilton,
B. Hoyle,
S. Kay,
A. Liddle,
R. G. Mann
, et al. (58 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using the science verification data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) for a new sample of 106 X-Ray selected clusters and groups, we study the stellar mass growth of Bright Central Galaxies (BCGs) since redshift 1.2. Compared with the expectation in a semi-analytical model applied to the Millennium Simulation, the observed BCGs become under-massive/under-luminous with decreasing redshift. We incorpo…
▽ More
Using the science verification data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) for a new sample of 106 X-Ray selected clusters and groups, we study the stellar mass growth of Bright Central Galaxies (BCGs) since redshift 1.2. Compared with the expectation in a semi-analytical model applied to the Millennium Simulation, the observed BCGs become under-massive/under-luminous with decreasing redshift. We incorporate the uncertainties associated with cluster mass, redshift, and BCG stellar mass measurements into analysis of a redshift-dependent BCG-cluster mass relation, $m_{*}\propto(\frac{M_{200}}{1.5\times 10^{14}M_{\odot}})^{0.24\pm 0.08}(1+z)^{-0.19\pm0.34}$, and compare the observed relation to the model prediction. We estimate the average growth rate since $z = 1.0$ for BCGs hosted by clusters of $M_{200, z}=10^{13.8}M_{\odot}$, at $z=1.0$: $m_{*, BCG}$ appears to have grown by $0.13\pm0.11$ dex, in tension at $\sim 2.5 σ$ significance level with the $0.40$ dex growth rate expected from the semi-analytic model. We show that the buildup of extended intra-cluster light after $z=1.0$ may alleviate this tension in BCG growth rates.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2015; v1 submitted 12 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
