-
Detection of asteroid trails in Hubble Space Telescope images using Deep Learning
Authors:
Andrei A. Parfeni,
Laurentiu I. Caramete,
Andreea M. Dobre,
Nguyen Tran Bach
Abstract:
We present an application of Deep Learning for the image recognition of asteroid trails in single-exposure photos taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. Using algorithms based on multi-layered deep Convolutional Neural Networks, we report accuracies of above 80% on the validation set. Our project was motivated by the Hubble Asteroid Hunter project on Zooniverse, which focused on identifying these ob…
▽ More
We present an application of Deep Learning for the image recognition of asteroid trails in single-exposure photos taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. Using algorithms based on multi-layered deep Convolutional Neural Networks, we report accuracies of above 80% on the validation set. Our project was motivated by the Hubble Asteroid Hunter project on Zooniverse, which focused on identifying these objects in order to localize and better characterize them. We aim to demonstrate that Machine Learning techniques can be very useful in trying to solve problems that are closely related to Astronomy and Astrophysics, but that they are still not developed enough for very specific tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2020; v1 submitted 29 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams
Authors:
Gaia Collaboration,
C. Babusiaux,
F. van Leeuwen,
M. A. Barstow,
C. Jordi,
A. Vallenari,
D. Bossini,
A. Bressan,
T. Cantat-Gaudin,
M. van Leeuwen,
A. G. A. Brown,
T. Prusti,
J. H. J. de Bruijne,
C. A. L. Bailer-Jones,
M. Biermann,
D. W. Evans,
L. Eyer,
F. Jansen,
S. A. Klioner,
U. Lammers,
L. Lindegren,
X. Luri,
F. Mignard,
C. Panem,
D. Pourbaix
, et al. (428 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe some of the select…
▽ More
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for HRD-based studies.
△ Less
Submitted 13 August, 2018; v1 submitted 25 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
Gaia Data Release 1. Testing the parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars
Authors:
Gaia Collaboration,
G. Clementini,
L. Eyer,
V. Ripepi,
M. Marconi,
T. Muraveva,
A. Garofalo,
L. M. Sarro,
M. Palmer,
X. Luri,
R. Molinaro,
L. Rimoldini,
L. Szabados,
I. Musella,
R. I. Anderson,
T. Prusti,
J. H. J. de Bruijne,
A. G. A. Brown,
A. Vallenari,
C. Babusiaux,
C. A. L. Bailer-Jones,
U. Bastian,
M. Biermann,
D. W. Evans,
F. Jansen
, et al. (566 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve astrometry collected by…
▽ More
Parallaxes for 331 classical Cepheids, 31 Type II Cepheids and 364 RR Lyrae stars in common between Gaia and the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues are published in Gaia Data Release 1 (DR1) as part of the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS). In order to test these first parallax measurements of the primary standard candles of the cosmological distance ladder, that involve astrometry collected by Gaia during the initial 14 months of science operation, we compared them with literature estimates and derived new period-luminosity ($PL$), period-Wesenheit ($PW$) relations for classical and Type II Cepheids and infrared $PL$, $PL$-metallicity ($PLZ$) and optical luminosity-metallicity ($M_V$-[Fe/H]) relations for the RR Lyrae stars, with zero points based on TGAS. The new relations were computed using multi-band ($V,I,J,K_{\mathrm{s}},W_{1}$) photometry and spectroscopic metal abundances available in the literature, and applying three alternative approaches: (i) by linear least squares fitting the absolute magnitudes inferred from direct transformation of the TGAS parallaxes, (ii) by adopting astrometric-based luminosities, and (iii) using a Bayesian fitting approach. TGAS parallaxes bring a significant added value to the previous Hipparcos estimates. The relations presented in this paper represent first Gaia-calibrated relations and form a "work-in-progress" milestone report in the wait for Gaia-only parallaxes of which a first solution will become available with Gaia's Data Release 2 (DR2) in 2018.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations, and future prospects
Authors:
Gaia Collaboration,
F. van Leeuwen,
A. Vallenari,
C. Jordi,
L. Lindegren,
U. Bastian,
T. Prusti,
J. H. J. de Bruijne,
A. G. A. Brown,
C. Babusiaux,
C. A. L. Bailer-Jones,
M. Biermann,
D. W. Evans,
L. Eyer,
F. Jansen,
S. A. Klioner,
U. Lammers,
X. Luri,
F. Mignard,
C. Panem,
D. Pourbaix,
S. Randich,
P. Sartoretti,
H. I. Siddiqui,
C. Soubiran
, et al. (567 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by means of the ast…
▽ More
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
-
COTS software in science operations, is it worth it?
Authors:
William O'Mullane,
Nana Bach,
Jose Hernandez,
Alexander Hutton,
Rosario Messineo
Abstract:
Often, perhaps not often enough, we choose Common Off the Shelf (COTS) software for integration in our systems. These range from repositories to databases and tools we use on a daily basis. It is very hard to assess the effectiveness of these choices. While none of us would consider a project specific word processing solution when LaTeX (or even Word) many will consider writing their own data mana…
▽ More
Often, perhaps not often enough, we choose Common Off the Shelf (COTS) software for integration in our systems. These range from repositories to databases and tools we use on a daily basis. It is very hard to assess the effectiveness of these choices. While none of us would consider a project specific word processing solution when LaTeX (or even Word) many will consider writing their own data management systems. We will look at some of the COTS we have used and attempt to explain how we came to the decision and if it was worth it.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2016;
originally announced January 2017.
-
Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million proper motions and parallaxes
Authors:
L. Lindegren,
U. Lammers,
U. Bastian,
J. Hernández,
S. Klioner,
D. Hobbs,
A. Bombrun,
D. Michalik,
M. Ramos-Lerate,
A. Butkevich,
G. Comoretto,
E. Joliet,
B. Holl,
A. Hutton,
P. Parsons,
H. Steidelmüller,
U. Abbas,
M. Altmann,
A. Andrei,
S. Anton,
N. Bach,
C. Barache,
U. Becciani,
J. Berthier,
L. Bianchi
, et al. (58 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1 billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in common with…
▽ More
Gaia Data Release 1 (Gaia DR1) contains astrometric results for more than 1 billion stars brighter than magnitude 20.7 based on observations collected by the Gaia satellite during the first 14 months of its operational phase. We give a brief overview of the astrometric content of the data release and of the model assumptions, data processing, and validation of the results. For stars in common with the Hipparcos and Tycho-2 catalogues, complete astrometric single-star solutions are obtained by incorporating positional information from the earlier catalogues. For other stars only their positions are obtained by neglecting their proper motions and parallaxes. The results are validated by an analysis of the residuals, through special validation runs, and by comparison with external data. Results. For about two million of the brighter stars (down to magnitude ~11.5) we obtain positions, parallaxes, and proper motions to Hipparcos-type precision or better. For these stars, systematic errors depending e.g. on position and colour are at a level of 0.3 milliarcsecond (mas). For the remaining stars we obtain positions at epoch J2015.0 accurate to ~10 mas. Positions and proper motions are given in a reference frame that is aligned with the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF) to better than 0.1 mas at epoch J2015.0, and non-rotating with respect to ICRF to within 0.03 mas/yr. The Hipparcos reference frame is found to rotate with respect to the Gaia DR1 frame at a rate of 0.24 mas/yr. Based on less than a quarter of the nominal mission length and on very provisional and incomplete calibrations, the quality and completeness of the astrometric data in Gaia DR1 are far from what is expected for the final mission products. The results nevertheless represent a huge improvement in the available fundamental stellar data and practical definition of the optical reference frame.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
