Response to NITRD, NCO, NSF Request for Information on "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan"
Authors:
J. Amundson,
J. Annis,
C. Avestruz,
D. Bowring,
J. Caldeira,
G. Cerati,
C. Chang,
S. Dodelson,
D. Elvira,
A. Farahi,
K. Genser,
L. Gray,
O. Gutsche,
P. Harris,
J. Kinney,
J. B. Kowalkowski,
R. Kutschke,
S. Mrenna,
B. Nord,
A. Para,
K. Pedro,
G. N. Perdue,
A. Scheinker,
P. Spentzouris,
J. St. John
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a response to the 2018 Request for Information (RFI) from the NITRD, NCO, NSF regarding the "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan." Through this document, we provide a response to the question of whether and how the National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (NAIRDSP) should be updated from the perspect…
▽ More
We present a response to the 2018 Request for Information (RFI) from the NITRD, NCO, NSF regarding the "Update to the 2016 National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan." Through this document, we provide a response to the question of whether and how the National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan (NAIRDSP) should be updated from the perspective of Fermilab, America's premier national laboratory for High Energy Physics (HEP). We believe the NAIRDSP should be extended in light of the rapid pace of development and innovation in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) since 2016, and present our recommendations below. AI has profoundly impacted many areas of human life, promising to dramatically reshape society --- e.g., economy, education, science --- in the coming years. We are still early in this process. It is critical to invest now in this technology to ensure it is safe and deployed ethically. Science and society both have a strong need for accuracy, efficiency, transparency, and accountability in algorithms, making investments in scientific AI particularly valuable. Thus far the US has been a leader in AI technologies, and we believe as a national Laboratory it is crucial to help maintain and extend this leadership. Moreover, investments in AI will be important for maintaining US leadership in the physical sciences.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review Report
Authors:
Salman Habib,
Robert Roser,
Richard Gerber,
Katie Antypas,
Katherine Riley,
Tim Williams,
Jack Wells,
Tjerk Straatsma,
A. Almgren,
J. Amundson,
S. Bailey,
D. Bard,
K. Bloom,
B. Bockelman,
A. Borgland,
J. Borrill,
R. Boughezal,
R. Brower,
B. Cowan,
H. Finkel,
N. Frontiere,
S. Fuess,
L. Ge,
N. Gnedin,
S. Gottlieb
, et al. (29 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 ti…
▽ More
This draft report summarizes and details the findings, results, and recommendations derived from the ASCR/HEP Exascale Requirements Review meeting held in June, 2015. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Larger, more capable computing and data facilities are needed to support HEP science goals in all three frontiers: Energy, Intensity, and Cosmic. The expected scale of the demand at the 2025 timescale is at least two orders of magnitude -- and in some cases greater -- than that available currently. 2) The growth rate of data produced by simulations is overwhelming the current ability, of both facilities and researchers, to store and analyze it. Additional resources and new techniques for data analysis are urgently needed. 3) Data rates and volumes from HEP experimental facilities are also straining the ability to store and analyze large and complex data volumes. Appropriately configured leadership-class facilities can play a transformational role in enabling scientific discovery from these datasets. 4) A close integration of HPC simulation and data analysis will aid greatly in interpreting results from HEP experiments. Such an integration will minimize data movement and facilitate interdependent workflows. 5) Long-range planning between HEP and ASCR will be required to meet HEP's research needs. To best use ASCR HPC resources the experimental HEP program needs a) an established long-term plan for access to ASCR computational and data resources, b) an ability to map workflows onto HPC resources, c) the ability for ASCR facilities to accommodate workflows run by collaborations that can have thousands of individual members, d) to transition codes to the next-generation HPC platforms that will be available at ASCR facilities, e) to build up and train a workforce capable of develo** and using simulations and analysis to support HEP scientific research on next-generation systems.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2016; v1 submitted 30 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
