-
Computer-aided diagnosis and prediction in brain disorders
Authors:
Vikram Venkatraghavan,
Sebastian R. van der Voort,
Daniel Bos,
Marion Smits,
Frederik Barkhof,
Wiro J. Niessen,
Stefan Klein,
Esther E. Bron
Abstract:
Computer-aided methods have shown added value for diagnosing and predicting brain disorders and can thus support decision making in clinical care and treatment planning. This chapter will provide insight into the type of methods, their working, their input data - such as cognitive tests, imaging and genetic data - and the types of output they provide. We will focus on specific use cases for diagno…
▽ More
Computer-aided methods have shown added value for diagnosing and predicting brain disorders and can thus support decision making in clinical care and treatment planning. This chapter will provide insight into the type of methods, their working, their input data - such as cognitive tests, imaging and genetic data - and the types of output they provide. We will focus on specific use cases for diagnosis, i.e. estimating the current 'condition' of the patient, such as early detection and diagnosis of dementia, differential diagnosis of brain tumours, and decision making in stroke. Regarding prediction, i.e. estimation of the future 'condition' of the patient, we will zoom in on use cases such as predicting the disease course in multiple sclerosis and predicting patient outcomes after treatment in brain cancer. Furthermore, based on these use cases, we will assess the current state-of-the-art methodology and highlight current efforts on benchmarking of these methods and the importance of open science therein. Finally, we assess the current clinical impact of computer-aided methods and discuss the required next steps to increase clinical impact.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2022; v1 submitted 29 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detection
Authors:
Sarthak Pati,
Ujjwal Baid,
Brandon Edwards,
Micah Sheller,
Shih-Han Wang,
G Anthony Reina,
Patrick Foley,
Alexey Gruzdev,
Deepthi Karkada,
Christos Davatzikos,
Chiharu Sako,
Satyam Ghodasara,
Michel Bilello,
Suyash Mohan,
Philipp Vollmuth,
Gianluca Brugnara,
Chandrakanth J Preetha,
Felix Sahm,
Klaus Maier-Hein,
Maximilian Zenk,
Martin Bendszus,
Wolfgang Wick,
Evan Calabrese,
Jeffrey Rudie,
Javier Villanueva-Meyer
, et al. (254 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Although machine learning (ML) has shown promise in numerous domains, there are concerns about generalizability to out-of-sample data. This is currently addressed by centrally sharing ample, and importantly diverse, data from multiple sites. However, such centralization is challenging to scale (or even not feasible) due to various limitations. Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative to train acc…
▽ More
Although machine learning (ML) has shown promise in numerous domains, there are concerns about generalizability to out-of-sample data. This is currently addressed by centrally sharing ample, and importantly diverse, data from multiple sites. However, such centralization is challenging to scale (or even not feasible) due to various limitations. Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative to train accurate and generalizable ML models, by only sharing numerical model updates. Here we present findings from the largest FL study to-date, involving data from 71 healthcare institutions across 6 continents, to generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma, utilizing the largest dataset of such patients ever used in the literature (25,256 MRI scans from 6,314 patients). We demonstrate a 33% improvement over a publicly trained model to delineate the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% improvement over the tumor's entire extent. We anticipate our study to: 1) enable more studies in healthcare informed by large and diverse data, ensuring meaningful results for rare diseases and underrepresented populations, 2) facilitate further quantitative analyses for glioblastoma via performance optimization of our consensus model for eventual public release, and 3) demonstrate the effectiveness of FL at such scale and task complexity as a paradigm shift for multi-site collaborations, alleviating the need for data sharing.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2022; v1 submitted 22 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Reproducible radiomics through automated machine learning validated on twelve clinical applications
Authors:
Martijn P. A. Starmans,
Sebastian R. van der Voort,
Thomas Phil,
Milea J. M. Timbergen,
Melissa Vos,
Guillaume A. Padmos,
Wouter Kessels,
David Hanff,
Dirk J. Grunhagen,
Cornelis Verhoef,
Stefan Sleijfer,
Martin J. van den Bent,
Marion Smits,
Roy S. Dwarkasing,
Christopher J. Els,
Federico Fiduzi,
Geert J. L. H. van Leenders,
Anela Blazevic,
Johannes Hofland,
Tessa Brabander,
Renza A. H. van Gils,
Gaston J. H. Franssen,
Richard A. Feelders,
Wouter W. de Herder,
Florian E. Buisman
, et al. (21 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Radiomics uses quantitative medical imaging features to predict clinical outcomes. Currently, in a new clinical application, finding the optimal radiomics method out of the wide range of available options has to be done manually through a heuristic trial-and-error process. In this study we propose a framework for automatically optimizing the construction of radiomics workflows per application. To…
▽ More
Radiomics uses quantitative medical imaging features to predict clinical outcomes. Currently, in a new clinical application, finding the optimal radiomics method out of the wide range of available options has to be done manually through a heuristic trial-and-error process. In this study we propose a framework for automatically optimizing the construction of radiomics workflows per application. To this end, we formulate radiomics as a modular workflow and include a large collection of common algorithms for each component. To optimize the workflow per application, we employ automated machine learning using a random search and ensembling. We evaluate our method in twelve different clinical applications, resulting in the following area under the curves: 1) liposarcoma (0.83); 2) desmoid-type fibromatosis (0.82); 3) primary liver tumors (0.80); 4) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (0.77); 5) colorectal liver metastases (0.61); 6) melanoma metastases (0.45); 7) hepatocellular carcinoma (0.75); 8) mesenteric fibrosis (0.80); 9) prostate cancer (0.72); 10) glioma (0.71); 11) Alzheimer's disease (0.87); and 12) head and neck cancer (0.84). We show that our framework has a competitive performance compared human experts, outperforms a radiomics baseline, and performs similar or superior to Bayesian optimization and more advanced ensemble approaches. Concluding, our method fully automatically optimizes the construction of radiomics workflows, thereby streamlining the search for radiomics biomarkers in new applications. To facilitate reproducibility and future research, we publicly release six datasets, the software implementation of our framework, and the code to reproduce this study.
△ Less
Submitted 29 July, 2022; v1 submitted 19 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Evaluating glioma growth predictions as a forward ranking problem
Authors:
Karin A. van Garderen,
Sebastian R. van der Voort,
Maarten M. J. Wijnenga,
Fatih Incekara,
Georgios Kapsas,
Renske Gahrmann,
Ahmad Alafandi,
Marion Smits,
Stefan Klein
Abstract:
The problem of tumor growth prediction is challenging, but promising results have been achieved with both model-driven and statistical methods. In this work, we present a framework for the evaluation of growth predictions that focuses on the spatial infiltration patterns, and specifically evaluating a prediction of future growth. We propose to frame the problem as a ranking problem rather than a s…
▽ More
The problem of tumor growth prediction is challenging, but promising results have been achieved with both model-driven and statistical methods. In this work, we present a framework for the evaluation of growth predictions that focuses on the spatial infiltration patterns, and specifically evaluating a prediction of future growth. We propose to frame the problem as a ranking problem rather than a segmentation problem. Using the average precision as a metric, we can evaluate the results with segmentations while using the full spatiotemporal prediction. Furthermore, by separating the model goodness-of-fit from future predictive performance, we show that in some cases, a better fit of model parameters does not guarantee a better the predictive power.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
WHO 2016 subty** and automated segmentation of glioma using multi-task deep learning
Authors:
Sebastian R. van der Voort,
Fatih Incekara,
Maarten M. J. Wijnenga,
Georgios Kapsas,
Renske Gahrmann,
Joost W. Schouten,
Rishi Nandoe Tewarie,
Geert J. Lycklama,
Philip C. De Witt Hamer,
Roelant S. Eijgelaar,
Pim J. French,
Hendrikus J. Dubbink,
Arnaud J. P. E. Vincent,
Wiro J. Niessen,
Martin J. van den Bent,
Marion Smits,
Stefan Klein
Abstract:
Accurate characterization of glioma is crucial for clinical decision making. A delineation of the tumor is also desirable in the initial decision stages but is a time-consuming task. Leveraging the latest GPU capabilities, we developed a single multi-task convolutional neural network that uses the full 3D, structural, pre-operative MRI scans to can predict the IDH mutation status, the 1p/19q co-de…
▽ More
Accurate characterization of glioma is crucial for clinical decision making. A delineation of the tumor is also desirable in the initial decision stages but is a time-consuming task. Leveraging the latest GPU capabilities, we developed a single multi-task convolutional neural network that uses the full 3D, structural, pre-operative MRI scans to can predict the IDH mutation status, the 1p/19q co-deletion status, and the grade of a tumor, while simultaneously segmenting the tumor. We trained our method using the largest, most diverse patient cohort to date containing 1508 glioma patients from 16 institutes. We tested our method on an independent dataset of 240 patients from 13 different institutes, and achieved an IDH-AUC of 0.90, 1p/19q-AUC of 0.85, grade-AUC of 0.81, and a mean whole tumor DICE score of 0.84. Thus, our method non-invasively predicts multiple, clinically relevant parameters and generalizes well to the broader clinical population.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.