-
Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challenge
Authors:
Marc Aubreville,
Nikolas Stathonikos,
Christof A. Bertram,
Robert Klopleisch,
Natalie ter Hoeve,
Francesco Ciompi,
Frauke Wilm,
Christian Marzahl,
Taryn A. Donovan,
Andreas Maier,
Jack Breen,
Nishant Ravikumar,
You** Chung,
**ah Park,
Ramin Nateghi,
Fattaneh Pourakpour,
Rutger H. J. Fick,
Saima Ben Hadj,
Mostafa Jahanifar,
Nasir Rajpoot,
Jakob Dexl,
Thomas Wittenberg,
Satoshi Kondo,
Maxime W. Lafarge,
Viktor H. Koelzer
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The density of mitotic figures within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of mitotic figures by pathologists is known to be subject to a strong inter-rater bias, which limits the prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support the expert in this assessment but are known to strongly…
▽ More
The density of mitotic figures within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of mitotic figures by pathologists is known to be subject to a strong inter-rater bias, which limits the prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support the expert in this assessment but are known to strongly deteriorate when applied in a different clinical environment than was used for training. One decisive component in the underlying domain shift has been identified as the variability caused by using different whole slide scanners. The goal of the MICCAI MIDOG 2021 challenge has been to propose and evaluate methods that counter this domain shift and derive scanner-agnostic mitosis detection algorithms. The challenge used a training set of 200 cases, split across four scanning systems. As a test set, an additional 100 cases split across four scanning systems, including two previously unseen scanners, were given. The best approaches performed on an expert level, with the winning algorithm yielding an F_1 score of 0.748 (CI95: 0.704-0.781). In this paper, we evaluate and compare the approaches that were submitted to the challenge and identify methodological factors contributing to better performance.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Quantifying the Scanner-Induced Domain Gap in Mitosis Detection
Authors:
Marc Aubreville,
Christof Bertram,
Mitko Veta,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Nikolas Stathonikos,
Katharina Breininger,
Natalie ter Hoeve,
Francesco Ciompi,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
Automated detection of mitotic figures in histopathology images has seen vast improvements, thanks to modern deep learning-based pipelines. Application of these methods, however, is in practice limited by strong variability of images between labs. This results in a domain shift of the images, which causes a performance drop of the models. Hypothesizing that the scanner device plays a decisive role…
▽ More
Automated detection of mitotic figures in histopathology images has seen vast improvements, thanks to modern deep learning-based pipelines. Application of these methods, however, is in practice limited by strong variability of images between labs. This results in a domain shift of the images, which causes a performance drop of the models. Hypothesizing that the scanner device plays a decisive role in this effect, we evaluated the susceptibility of a standard mitosis detection approach to the domain shift introduced by using a different whole slide scanner. Our work is based on the MICCAI-MIDOG challenge 2021 data set, which includes 200 tumor cases of human breast cancer and four scanners.
Our work indicates that the domain shift induced not by biochemical variability but purely by the choice of acquisition device is underestimated so far. Models trained on images of the same scanner yielded an average F1 score of 0.683, while models trained on a single other scanner only yielded an average F1 score of 0.325. Training on another multi-domain mitosis dataset led to mean F1 scores of 0.52. We found this not to be reflected by domain-shifts measured as proxy A distance-derived metric.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Deep Learning-Based Grading of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Breast Histopathology Images
Authors:
Suzanne C. Wetstein,
Nikolas Stathonikos,
Josien P. W. Pluim,
Yu**g J. Heng,
Natalie D. ter Hoeve,
Celien P. H. Vreuls,
Paul J. van Diest,
Mitko Veta
Abstract:
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast cancer that can progress into invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Studies suggest DCIS is often overtreated since a considerable part of DCIS lesions may never progress into IDC. Lower grade lesions have a lower progression speed and risk, possibly allowing treatment de-escalation. However, studies show significant inter-observer variation in D…
▽ More
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast cancer that can progress into invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Studies suggest DCIS is often overtreated since a considerable part of DCIS lesions may never progress into IDC. Lower grade lesions have a lower progression speed and risk, possibly allowing treatment de-escalation. However, studies show significant inter-observer variation in DCIS grading. Automated image analysis may provide an objective solution to address high subjectivity of DCIS grading by pathologists.
In this study, we developed a deep learning-based DCIS grading system. It was developed using the consensus DCIS grade of three expert observers on a dataset of 1186 DCIS lesions from 59 patients. The inter-observer agreement, measured by quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa, was used to evaluate the system and compare its performance to that of expert observers. We present an analysis of the lesion-level and patient-level inter-observer agreement on an independent test set of 1001 lesions from 50 patients.
The deep learning system (dl) achieved on average slightly higher inter-observer agreement to the observers (o1, o2 and o3) ($κ_{o1,dl}=0.81, κ_{o2,dl}=0.53, κ_{o3,dl}=0.40$) than the observers amongst each other ($κ_{o1,o2}=0.58, κ_{o1,o3}=0.50, κ_{o2,o3}=0.42$) at the lesion-level. At the patient-level, the deep learning system achieved similar agreement to the observers ($κ_{o1,dl}=0.77, κ_{o2,dl}=0.75, κ_{o3,dl}=0.70$) as the observers amongst each other ($κ_{o1,o2}=0.77, κ_{o1,o3}=0.75, κ_{o2,o3}=0.72$).
In conclusion, we developed a deep learning-based DCIS grading system that achieved a performance similar to expert observers. We believe this is the first automated system that could assist pathologists by providing robust and reproducible second opinions on DCIS grade.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
