The International Pulsar Timing Array second data release: Search for an isotropic Gravitational Wave Background
Authors:
J. Antoniadis,
Z. Arzoumanian,
S. Babak,
M. Bailes,
A. -S. Bak Nielsen,
P. T. Baker,
C. G. Bassa,
B. Becsy,
A. Berthereau,
M. Bonetti,
A. Brazier,
P. R. Brook,
M. Burgay,
S. Burke-Spolaor,
R. N. Caballero,
J. A. Casey-Clyde,
A. Chalumeau,
D. J. Champion,
M. Charisi,
S. Chatterjee,
S. Chen,
I. Cognard,
J. M. Cordes,
N. J. Cornish,
F. Crawford
, et al. (101 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We searched for an isotropic stochastic gravitational wave background in the second data release of the International Pulsar Timing Array, a global collaboration synthesizing decadal-length pulsar-timing campaigns in North America, Europe, and Australia. In our reference search for a power law strain spectrum of the form $h_c = A(f/1\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1})^α$, we found strong evidence for a spectrally…
▽ More
We searched for an isotropic stochastic gravitational wave background in the second data release of the International Pulsar Timing Array, a global collaboration synthesizing decadal-length pulsar-timing campaigns in North America, Europe, and Australia. In our reference search for a power law strain spectrum of the form $h_c = A(f/1\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1})^α$, we found strong evidence for a spectrally-similar low-frequency stochastic process of amplitude $A = 3.8^{+6.3}_{-2.5}\times10^{-15}$ and spectral index $α= -0.5 \pm 0.5$, where the uncertainties represent 95\% credible regions, using information from the auto- and cross-correlation terms between the pulsars in the array. For a spectral index of $α= -2/3$, as expected from a population of inspiralling supermassive black hole binaries, the recovered amplitude is $A = 2.8^{+1.2}_{-0.8}\times10^{-15}$. Nonetheless, no significant evidence of the Hellings-Downs correlations that would indicate a gravitational-wave origin was found. We also analyzed the constituent data from the individual pulsar timing arrays in a consistent way, and clearly demonstrate that the combined international data set is more sensitive. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this combined data set produces comparable constraints to recent single-array data sets which have more data than the constituent parts of the combination. Future international data releases will deliver increased sensitivity to gravitational wave radiation, and significantly increase the detection probability.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
Comparison of Pulsar Positions from Timing and Very Long Baseline Astrometry
Authors:
J. B. Wang,
W. A. Coles,
G. Hobbs,
R. M. Shannon,
R. N. Manchester,
M. Kerr,
J. P. Yuan,
N. Wang,
M. Bailes,
N. D. R. Bhat,
S. Dai J. Dempsey,
M. J. Keith,
P. D. Lasky,
Y. Levin,
S. Os lowski,
V. Ravi,
D. J. Reardon,
P A. Rosado,
C. J. Russell,
R. Spiewak,
W. van Straten,
L. Toomey,
L. Wen,
X. -P. You,
X. -J. Zhu
Abstract:
Pulsar positions can be measured with high precision using both pulsar timing methods and very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI). Pulsar timing positions are referenced to a solar-system ephemeris, whereas VLBI positions are referenced to distant quasars. Here we compare pulsar positions from published VLBI measurements with those obtained from pulsar timing data from the Nanshan and Parkes radi…
▽ More
Pulsar positions can be measured with high precision using both pulsar timing methods and very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI). Pulsar timing positions are referenced to a solar-system ephemeris, whereas VLBI positions are referenced to distant quasars. Here we compare pulsar positions from published VLBI measurements with those obtained from pulsar timing data from the Nanshan and Parkes radio telescopes in order to relate the two reference frames. We find that the timing positions differ significantly from the VLBI positions (and also differ between different ephemerides). A statistically significant change in the obliquity of the ecliptic of $2.16\pm0.33$\,mas is found for the JPL ephemeris DE405, but no significant rotation is found in subsequent JPL ephemerides. The accuracy with which we can relate the two frames is limited by the current uncertainties in the VLBI reference source positions and in matching the pulsars to their reference source. Not only do the timing positions depend on the ephemeris used in computing them, but also different segments of the timing data lead to varying position estimates. These variations are mostly common to all ephemerides, but slight changes are seen at the 10$μ$as level between ephemerides.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
