-
Asteroids were born bigger: An implication of surface mass ablation during gas-assisted implantation into the asteroid belt
Authors:
Rafael Ribeiro de Sousa,
Andre Izidoro,
Rogerio Deienno,
Rajdeep Dasgupta
Abstract:
The origins of carbonaceous asteroids in the asteroid belt is not fully understood. The leading hypothesis is that they were not born at their current location but instead implanted into the asteroid belt early in the Solar System history. We investigate how the migration and growth of Jupiter and Saturn in their natal disk impact nearby planetesimals and subsequent planetesimal implantation into…
▽ More
The origins of carbonaceous asteroids in the asteroid belt is not fully understood. The leading hypothesis is that they were not born at their current location but instead implanted into the asteroid belt early in the Solar System history. We investigate how the migration and growth of Jupiter and Saturn in their natal disk impact nearby planetesimals and subsequent planetesimal implantation into the asteroid belt. We account for the effects of surface ablation of planetesimals caused by thermal and frictional heating between the gas-disk medium and planetesimal surface, when planetesimals travel through the gas disk. We have performed simulations considering planetesimals of different compositions as water-ice rich planetesimals, water-ice poor planetesimals, organic-rich planetesimals, and fayalite-rich planetesimals. Our findings indicate that, regardless of the migration history of the giant planets, water-ice rich, organic-rich, and fayalite-rich planetesimals implanted into the asteroid belt generally experience surface ablation during implantation in the asteroid belt, shrinking in size. Planetesimals with enstatite-like compositions were inconsequential to surface ablation, preserving their original sizes. By assuming an initial planetesimal size-frequency distribution, our results show that -- under the effects of surface ablation -- the planetesimal population implanted into the asteroid belt shows a SFD slope slightly steeper than that of the initial one. This holds true for all migration histories of the giant planets considered in this work, but for the Grand-Tack model where the SFD slope remains broadly unchanged. Altogether, our results suggest that the largest C-type asteroids in the asteroid belt may have been born bigger. High-degree surface ablation during implantation into the asteroid belt may have even exposed the cores of early differentiated C-type planetesimals.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Dynamical origin of the Dwarf Planet Ceres
Authors:
Rafael Ribeiro de Sousa,
Alessandro Morbidelli,
Rodney Gomes,
Ernesto Vieira Neto,
Andre Izidoro,
Abreuçon Atanasio Alves
Abstract:
The Dwarf Planet Ceres revealed the presence of ammonia and other unique properties compared to other asteroids in the main belt which suggests that it was not formed in situ. We model the early dynamical evolution of the outer Solar System to study possible dynamical mechanisms to implant a Ceres-sized planetesimal in the asteroid belt from the trans-Saturnian region. We calculate that the fracti…
▽ More
The Dwarf Planet Ceres revealed the presence of ammonia and other unique properties compared to other asteroids in the main belt which suggests that it was not formed in situ. We model the early dynamical evolution of the outer Solar System to study possible dynamical mechanisms to implant a Ceres-sized planetesimal in the asteroid belt from the trans-Saturnian region. We calculate that the fraction of the population of Ceres-sized planetesimals that are captured in the asteroid belt is in the range of 2.8e-5 to 1.2e-3 depending on the initial location in the outer planetesimal disk. The captured bodies have a 70% probability to have a semimajor axis between 2.5 and 3 au, a 33% probability to have an eccentricity smaller than 0.2 and a 45% probability to have an orbital inclination smaller than 10 degrees. Assuming the existence of 3,600 Ceres-size planetesimals in the inner part of the trans-Saturnian disk, consistent with the estimate of Nesvorny & Vokrouhlicky (2016) for the trans-Neptunian disk, our estimated capture probability and a final 80% depletion of the asteroid belt during the subsequent giant planet instability, lead to capture 1 Ceres in the asteroid belt, with a probability of 15%, 34%, and 51% to be located in the inner, middle and outer belt respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Dynamical evidence for an early giant planet instability
Authors:
Rafael Ribeiro de Sousa,
Alessandro Morbidelli,
Sean N. Raymond,
Andre Izidoro,
Rodney Gomes,
Ernesto Vieira Neto
Abstract:
The dynamical structure of the Solar System can be explained by a period of orbital instability experienced by the giant planets. While a late instability was originally proposed to explain the Late Heavy Bombardment, recent work favors an early instability. We model the early dynamical evolution of the outer Solar System to self-consistently constrain the most likely timing of the instability. We…
▽ More
The dynamical structure of the Solar System can be explained by a period of orbital instability experienced by the giant planets. While a late instability was originally proposed to explain the Late Heavy Bombardment, recent work favors an early instability. We model the early dynamical evolution of the outer Solar System to self-consistently constrain the most likely timing of the instability. We first simulate the dynamical sculpting of the primordial outer planetesimal disk during the accretion of Uranus and Neptune from migrating planetary embryos during the gas disk phase, and determine the separation between Neptune and the inner edge of the planetesimal disk. We performed simulations with a range of migration histories for Jupiter. We find that, unless Jupiter migrated inwards by 10 AU or more, the instability almost certainly happened within 100 Myr of the start of Solar System formation. There are two distinct possible instability triggers. The first is an instability that is triggered by the planets themselves, with no appreciable influence from the planetesimal disk. Of those, the median instability time is $\sim4$Myr. Among self-stable systems -- where the planets are locked in a resonant chain that remains stable in the absence of a planetesimal's disk-- our self-consistently sculpted planetesimal disks nonetheless trigger a giant planet instability with a median instability time of 37-62 Myr for a reasonable range of migration histories of Jupiter. The simulations that give the latest instability times are those that invoked long-range inward migration of Jupiter from 15 AU or beyond; however these simulations over-excited the inclinations of Kuiper belt objects and are inconsistent with the present-day Solar System. We conclude on dynamical grounds that the giant planet instability is likely to have occurred early in Solar System history.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Dynamical effects on the classical Kuiper Belt during the excited-Neptune model
Authors:
Rafael Ribeiro de Sousa,
Rodney Gomes,
Alessandro Morbidelli,
Ernesto Vieira Neto
Abstract:
The link between the dynamical evolution of the giant planets and the Kuiper Belt orbital structure can provide clues and insight about the dynamical history of the Solar System. The classical region of the Kuiper Belt has two populations (the cold and hot populations) with completely different physical and dynamical properties. These properties have been explained in the framework of a subset of…
▽ More
The link between the dynamical evolution of the giant planets and the Kuiper Belt orbital structure can provide clues and insight about the dynamical history of the Solar System. The classical region of the Kuiper Belt has two populations (the cold and hot populations) with completely different physical and dynamical properties. These properties have been explained in the framework of a subset of the simulations of the Nice Model, in which Neptune remained on a low-eccentricity orbit (Neptune's eccentricity is never larger than 0.1) throughout the giant planet instability. However, recent simulations have showed that the remaining Nice model simulations, in which Neptune temporarily acquires a large-eccentricity orbit (larger than 0.1), are also consistent with the preservation of the cold population (inclination smaller than 4 degrees), if the latter formed in situ. However, the resulting a cold population showed in many of the simulations eccentricities larger than those observed for the real population. We focus on a short period of time which is characterized by Neptune's large eccentricity and a slow precession of Neptune's perihelion. We show that if self-gravity is considered in the disk, the precession rate of the particles longitude of perihelion is slowed down. This, combined with the effect of mutual scattering among the bodies, which spreads all orbital elements, allows some objects to return to low eccentricities. However, we show that if the cold population originally had a small total mass, this effect is negligible. Thus, we conclude that the only possibilities to keep at low eccentricity some cold-population objects during a high-eccentricity phase of Neptune are that (i) either Neptune's precession was rapid, as suggested by Batygin et al. (2011) or (ii) Neptune's slow precession phase was long enough to allow some particles to experience a full secular cycle.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
