Active Personal Eye Lens Dosimetry with the Hybrid Pixelated Dosepix Detector
Authors:
Florian Beißer,
Dennis Haag,
Rafael Ballabriga,
Rolf Behrens,
Michael Campbell,
Christian Fuhg,
Patrick Hufschmidt,
Oliver Hupe,
Carolin Kupillas,
Xavier Llopart,
Jürgen Roth,
Sebastian Schmidt,
Markus Schneider,
Lukas Tlustos,
Winnie Wong,
Hayo Zutz,
Thilo Michel,
Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics,
CERN,
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesantalt,
was with the Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics,
is now with Helene-Lange-Gymnasium,
was with the Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics,
is now with CodeCamp,
:
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Eye lens dosimetry has been an important field of research in the last decade. Dose measurements with a prototype of an active personal eye lens dosemeter based on the Dosepix detector are presented. The personal dose equivalent at $3\,$mm depth of soft tissue, $H_\text{p}(3)$, was measured in the center front of a water-filled cylinder phantom with a height and diameter of $20\,$cm. The energy de…
▽ More
Eye lens dosimetry has been an important field of research in the last decade. Dose measurements with a prototype of an active personal eye lens dosemeter based on the Dosepix detector are presented. The personal dose equivalent at $3\,$mm depth of soft tissue, $H_\text{p}(3)$, was measured in the center front of a water-filled cylinder phantom with a height and diameter of $20\,$cm. The energy dependence of the normalized response is investigated for mean photon energies between $12.4\,$keV and $248\,$keV for continuous reference radiation fields (N-series) according to ISO 4037. The response normalized to N-60 ($\overline{E}=47.9\,\text{keV}$) at $0^\circ$ angle of irradiation stays within the approval limits of IEC 61526 for angles of incidence between $-75^\circ$ and $+75^\circ$. Performance in pulsed photon fields was tested for varying dose rates from $0.1\,\frac{\text{Sv}}{\text{h}}$ up to $1000\,\frac{\text{Sv}}{\text{h}}$ and pulse durations from $1\,\text{ms}$ up to $10\,\text{s}$. The dose measurement works well within the approval limits (acc. to IEC 61526) up to $1\,\frac{\text{Sv}}{\text{h}}$. No significant influence of the pulse duration on the measured dose is found. Reproducibility measurements yield a coefficient of variation which does not exceed $1\,\%$ for two tested eye lens dosemeter prototypes.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2023; v1 submitted 9 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
Personal Dosimetry in Direct Pulsed Photon Fields with the Dosepix Detector
Authors:
Dennis Haag,
Sebastian Schmidt,
Patrick Hufschmidt,
Gisela Anton,
Rafael Ballabriga,
Rolf Behrens,
Michael Campbell,
Franziska Eberle,
Christian Fuhg,
Oliver Hupe,
Xavier Llopart,
Jürgen Roth,
Lukas Tlustos,
Winnie Wong,
Hayo Zutz,
Thilo Michel
Abstract:
First investigations regarding dosimetric properties of the hybrid, pixelated, photon-counting Dosepix detector in the direct beam of a pulsed photon field (RQR8) for the personal dose equivalent $H\mathrm{_p(10)}$ are presented. The influence quantities such as pulse duration and dose rate were varied, and their responses were compared to the legal limits provided in PTB-A 23.2. The variation of…
▽ More
First investigations regarding dosimetric properties of the hybrid, pixelated, photon-counting Dosepix detector in the direct beam of a pulsed photon field (RQR8) for the personal dose equivalent $H\mathrm{_p(10)}$ are presented. The influence quantities such as pulse duration and dose rate were varied, and their responses were compared to the legal limits provided in PTB-A 23.2. The variation of pulse duration at a nearly constant dose rate of about 3.7$\,$Sv/h shows a flat response around 1.0 from 3.6$\,$s down to 2$\,$ms. A response close to 1.0 is achieved for dose rates from 0.07$\,$Sv/h to 35$\,$Sv/h for both pixel sizes. Above this dose rate, the large pixels (220$\,μ$m edge length) are below the lower limit. The small pixels (55$\,μ$m edge length) stay within limits up to 704$\,$Sv/h. The count rate linearity is compared to previous results, confirming the saturating count rate for high dose rates.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2022; v1 submitted 12 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
