-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps II. Cosmological results
Authors:
M. Gatti,
G. Campailla,
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
A. Porredon,
J. Prat,
J. Williamson,
M. Raveri,
B. Jain,
V. Ajani,
G. Giannini,
M. Yamamoto,
C. Zhou,
J. Blazek,
D. Anbajagane,
S. Samuroff,
T. Kacprzak,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. Becker,
G. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
C. Chang,
R. Chen
, et al. (77 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a simulation-based cosmological analysis using a combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian statistics of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years (Y3) of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase harmonics; 3) the scattering transform. Our analysis is fully based on simulations, spans a space of seven $νw$CDM cosm…
▽ More
We present a simulation-based cosmological analysis using a combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian statistics of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years (Y3) of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase harmonics; 3) the scattering transform. Our analysis is fully based on simulations, spans a space of seven $νw$CDM cosmological parameters, and forward models the most relevant sources of systematics inherent in the data: masks, noise variations, clustering of the sources, intrinsic alignments, and shear and redshift calibration. We implement a neural network compression of the summary statistics, and we estimate the parameter posteriors using a simulation-based inference approach. Including and combining different non-Gaussian statistics is a powerful tool that strongly improves constraints over Gaussian statistics (in our case, the second moments); in particular, the Figure of Merit $\textrm{FoM}(S_8, Ω_{\textrm{m}})$ is improved by 70 percent ($Λ$CDM) and 90 percent ($w$CDM). When all the summary statistics are combined, we achieve a 2 percent constraint on the amplitude of fluctuations parameter $S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\textrm{m}}/0.3)^{0.5}$, obtaining $S_8 = 0.794 \pm 0.017$ ($Λ$CDM) and $S_8 = 0.817 \pm 0.021$ ($w$CDM). The constraints from different statistics are shown to be internally consistent (with a $p$-value>0.1 for all combinations of statistics examined). We compare our results to other weak lensing results from the DES Y3 data, finding good consistency; we also compare with results from external datasets, such as \planck{} constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background, finding statistical agreement, with discrepancies no greater than $<2.2σ$.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Weak lensing combined with the kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect: A study of baryonic feedback
Authors:
L. Bigwood,
A. Amon,
A. Schneider,
J. Salcido,
I. G. McCarthy,
C. Preston,
D. Sanchez,
D. Sijacki,
E. Schaan,
S. Ferraro,
N. Battaglia,
A. Chen,
S. Dodelson,
A. Roodman,
A. Pieres,
A. Ferte,
A. Alarcon,
A. Drlica-Wagner,
A. Choi,
A. Navarro-Alsina,
A. Campos,
A. J. Ross,
A. Carnero Rosell,
B. Yin,
B. Yanny
, et al. (100 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Extracting precise cosmology from weak lensing surveys requires modelling the non-linear matter power spectrum, which is suppressed at small scales due to baryonic feedback processes. However, hydrodynamical galaxy formation simulations make widely varying predictions for the amplitude and extent of this effect. We use measurements of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 weak lensing (WL) and Atacama Cosmolo…
▽ More
Extracting precise cosmology from weak lensing surveys requires modelling the non-linear matter power spectrum, which is suppressed at small scales due to baryonic feedback processes. However, hydrodynamical galaxy formation simulations make widely varying predictions for the amplitude and extent of this effect. We use measurements of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 weak lensing (WL) and Atacama Cosmology Telescope DR5 kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) to jointly constrain cosmological and astrophysical baryonic feedback parameters using a flexible analytical model, `baryonification'. First, using WL only, we compare the $S_8$ constraints using baryonification to a simulation-calibrated halo model, a simulation-based emulator model and the approach of discarding WL measurements on small angular scales. We find that model flexibility can shift the value of $S_8$ and degrade the uncertainty. The kSZ provides additional constraints on the astrophysical parameters and shifts $S_8$ to $S_8=0.823^{+0.019}_{-0.020}$, a higher value than attained using the WL-only analysis. We measure the suppression of the non-linear matter power spectrum using WL + kSZ and constrain a mean feedback scenario that is more extreme than the predictions from most hydrodynamical simulations. We constrain the baryon fractions and the gas mass fractions and find them to be generally lower than inferred from X-ray observations and simulation predictions. We conclude that the WL + kSZ measurements provide a new and complementary benchmark for building a coherent picture of the impact of gas around galaxies across observations.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: likelihood-free, simulation-based $w$CDM inference with neural compression of weak-lensing map statistics
Authors:
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
M. Gatti,
J. Williamson,
J. Alsing,
A. Porredon,
J. Prat,
C. Doux,
B. Jain,
C. Chang,
T. -Y. Cheng,
T. Kacprzak,
P. Lemos,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
J. DeRose,
A. Drlica-Wagner,
K. Eckert
, et al. (66 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present simulation-based cosmological $w$CDM inference using Dark Energy Survey Year 3 weak-lensing maps, via neural data compression of weak-lensing map summary statistics: power spectra, peak counts, and direct map-level compression/inference with convolutional neural networks (CNN). Using simulation-based inference, also known as likelihood-free or implicit inference, we use forward-modelled…
▽ More
We present simulation-based cosmological $w$CDM inference using Dark Energy Survey Year 3 weak-lensing maps, via neural data compression of weak-lensing map summary statistics: power spectra, peak counts, and direct map-level compression/inference with convolutional neural networks (CNN). Using simulation-based inference, also known as likelihood-free or implicit inference, we use forward-modelled mock data to estimate posterior probability distributions of unknown parameters. This approach allows all statistical assumptions and uncertainties to be propagated through the forward-modelled mock data; these include sky masks, non-Gaussian shape noise, shape measurement bias, source galaxy clustering, photometric redshift uncertainty, intrinsic galaxy alignments, non-Gaussian density fields, neutrinos, and non-linear summary statistics. We include a series of tests to validate our inference results. This paper also describes the Gower Street simulation suite: 791 full-sky PKDGRAV dark matter simulations, with cosmological model parameters sampled with a mixed active-learning strategy, from which we construct over 3000 mock DES lensing data sets. For $w$CDM inference, for which we allow $-1<w<-\frac{1}{3}$, our most constraining result uses power spectra combined with map-level (CNN) inference. Using gravitational lensing data only, this map-level combination gives $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.283^{+0.020}_{-0.027}$, ${S_8 = 0.804^{+0.025}_{-0.017}}$, and $w < -0.80$ (with a 68 per cent credible interval); compared to the power spectrum inference, this is more than a factor of two improvement in dark energy parameter ($Ω_{\rm DE}, w$) precision.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Comparing Mass Map** Reconstruction Methods with Minkowski Functionals
Authors:
Nisha Grewal,
Joe Zuntz,
Tilman Tröster
Abstract:
Using higher-order statistics to capture cosmological information from weak lensing surveys often requires a transformation of observed shear to a measurement of the convergence signal. This inverse problem is complicated by noise and boundary effects, and various reconstruction methods have been developed to implement the process. Here we evaluate the retention of signal information of four such…
▽ More
Using higher-order statistics to capture cosmological information from weak lensing surveys often requires a transformation of observed shear to a measurement of the convergence signal. This inverse problem is complicated by noise and boundary effects, and various reconstruction methods have been developed to implement the process. Here we evaluate the retention of signal information of four such methods: Kaiser-Squires, Wiener filter, $\texttt{DarkMappy}$, and $\texttt{DeepMass}$. We use the higher order statistics $\textit{Minkowski functionals}$ to determine which method best reconstructs the original convergence with efficiency and precision. We find $\texttt{DeepMass}$ produces the tightest constraints on cosmological parameters, while Kaiser-Squires, Wiener filter, and $\texttt{DarkMappy}$ are similar at a smoothing scale of 3.5 arcmin. We also study the MF inaccuracy caused by inappropriate training sets in the $\texttt{DeepMass}$ method and find it to be large compared to the errors, underlining the importance of selecting appropriate training cosmologies.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024; v1 submitted 21 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
SPT Clusters with DES and HST Weak Lensing. II. Cosmological Constraints from the Abundance of Massive Halos
Authors:
S. Bocquet,
S. Grandis,
L. E. Bleem,
M. Klein,
J. J. Mohr,
T. Schrabback,
T. M. C. Abbott,
P. A. R. Ade,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
S. W. Allen,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
A. J. Anderson,
J. Annis,
B. Ansarinejad,
J. E. Austermann,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
M. Bayliss,
J. A. Beall,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
A. N. Bender
, et al. (171 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present cosmological constraints from the abundance of galaxy clusters selected via the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect in South Pole Telescope (SPT) data with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The cluster sample is constructed from the combined SPT-SZ, SPTpol ECS, and SPTpol 500d…
▽ More
We present cosmological constraints from the abundance of galaxy clusters selected via the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect in South Pole Telescope (SPT) data with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The cluster sample is constructed from the combined SPT-SZ, SPTpol ECS, and SPTpol 500d surveys, and comprises 1,005 confirmed clusters in the redshift range $0.25-1.78$ over a total sky area of 5,200 deg$^2$. We use DES Year 3 weak-lensing data for 688 clusters with redshifts $z<0.95$ and HST weak-lensing data for 39 clusters with $0.6<z<1.7$. The weak-lensing measurements enable robust mass measurements of sample clusters and allow us to empirically constrain the SZ observable--mass relation. For a flat $Λ$CDM cosmology, and marginalizing over the sum of massive neutrinos, we measure $Ω_\mathrm{m}=0.286\pm0.032$, $σ_8=0.817\pm0.026$, and the parameter combination $σ_8\,(Ω_\mathrm{m}/0.3)^{0.25}=0.805\pm0.016$. Our measurement of $S_8\equivσ_8\,\sqrt{Ω_\mathrm{m}/0.3}=0.795\pm0.029$ and the constraint from Planck CMB anisotropies (2018 TT,TE,EE+lowE) differ by $1.1σ$. In combination with that Planck dataset, we place a 95% upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses $\sum m_ν<0.18$ eV. When additionally allowing the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ to vary, we obtain $w=-1.45\pm0.31$ from our cluster-based analysis. In combination with Planck data, we measure $w=-1.34^{+0.22}_{-0.15}$, or a $2.2σ$ difference with a cosmological constant. We use the cluster abundance to measure $σ_8$ in five redshift bins between 0.25 and 1.8, and we find the results to be consistent with structure growth as predicted by the $Λ$CDM model fit to Planck primary CMB data.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024; v1 submitted 4 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps I: validation on simulations
Authors:
M. Gatti,
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
J. Williamson,
B. Jain,
V. Ajani,
D. Anbajagane,
G. Giannini,
C. Zhou,
A. Porredon,
J. Prat,
M. Yamamoto,
J. Blazek,
T. Kacprzak,
S. Samuroff,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. Becker,
G. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
C. Chang,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
C. Davis
, et al. (76 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Beyond-two-point statistics contain additional information on cosmological as well as astrophysical and observational (systematics) parameters. In this methodology paper we provide an end-to-end simulation-based analysis of a set of Gaussian and non-Gaussian weak lensing statistics using detailed mock catalogues of the Dark Energy Survey. We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase…
▽ More
Beyond-two-point statistics contain additional information on cosmological as well as astrophysical and observational (systematics) parameters. In this methodology paper we provide an end-to-end simulation-based analysis of a set of Gaussian and non-Gaussian weak lensing statistics using detailed mock catalogues of the Dark Energy Survey. We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase harmonics (WPH); 3) the scattering transform (ST). Our analysis is fully based on simulations, it spans a space of seven $νw$CDM cosmological parameters, and it forward models the most relevant sources of systematics of the data (masks, noise variations, clustering of the sources, intrinsic alignments, and shear and redshift calibration). We implement a neural network compression of the summary statistics, and we estimate the parameter posteriors using a likelihood-free-inference approach. We validate the pipeline extensively, and we find that WPH exhibits the strongest performance when combined with second moments, followed by ST. and then by third moments. The combination of all the different statistics further enhances constraints with respect to second moments, up to 25 per cent, 15 per cent, and 90 per cent for $S_8$, $Ω_{\rm m}$, and the Figure-Of-Merit ${\rm FoM_{S_8,Ω_{\rm m}}}$, respectively. We further find that non-Gaussian statistics improve constraints on $w$ and on the amplitude of intrinsic alignment with respect to second moments constraints. The methodological advances presented here are suitable for application to Stage IV surveys from Euclid, Rubin-LSST, and Roman with additional validation on mock catalogues for each survey. In a companion paper we present an application to DES Year 3 data.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2023; v1 submitted 26 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
SPT Clusters with DES and HST Weak Lensing. I. Cluster Lensing and Bayesian Population Modeling of Multi-Wavelength Cluster Datasets
Authors:
S. Bocquet,
S. Grandis,
L. E. Bleem,
M. Klein,
J. J. Mohr,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
S. W. Allen,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
B. Ansarinejad,
D. Bacon,
M. Bayliss,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
B. A. Benson,
G. M. Bernstein,
M. Brodwin,
D. Brooks,
A. Campos,
R. E. A. Canning,
J. E. Carlstrom,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind
, et al. (108 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a Bayesian population modeling method to analyze the abundance of galaxy clusters identified by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We discuss and validate the modeling choices with a particular focus on a robust, weak-lensing-based mass calibrati…
▽ More
We present a Bayesian population modeling method to analyze the abundance of galaxy clusters identified by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) with a simultaneous mass calibration using weak gravitational lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We discuss and validate the modeling choices with a particular focus on a robust, weak-lensing-based mass calibration using DES data. For the DES Year 3 data, we report a systematic uncertainty in weak-lensing mass calibration that increases from 1% at $z=0.25$ to 10% at $z=0.95$, to which we add 2% in quadrature to account for uncertainties in the impact of baryonic effects. We implement an analysis pipeline that joins the cluster abundance likelihood with a multi-observable likelihood for the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, optical richness, and weak-lensing measurements for each individual cluster. We validate that our analysis pipeline can recover unbiased cosmological constraints by analyzing mocks that closely resemble the cluster sample extracted from the SPT-SZ, SPTpol ECS, and SPTpol 500d surveys and the DES Year 3 and HST-39 weak-lensing datasets. This work represents a crucial prerequisite for the subsequent cosmological analysis of the real dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024; v1 submitted 18 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Cosmology from Cross-Correlation of ACT-DR4 CMB Lensing and DES-Y3 Cosmic Shear
Authors:
S. Shaikh,
I. Harrison,
A. van Engelen,
G. A. Marques,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
R. An,
D. Bacon,
N. Battaglia,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
J. R. Bond,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
E. Calabrese,
A. Carnero Rosell,
J. Carretero,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
R. Chen,
A. Choi
, et al. (83 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Cross-correlation between weak lensing of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and weak lensing of galaxies offers a way to place robust constraints on cosmological and astrophysical parameters with reduced sensitivity to certain systematic effects affecting individual surveys. We measure the angular cross-power spectrum between the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) DR4 CMB lensing and the galaxy…
▽ More
Cross-correlation between weak lensing of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and weak lensing of galaxies offers a way to place robust constraints on cosmological and astrophysical parameters with reduced sensitivity to certain systematic effects affecting individual surveys. We measure the angular cross-power spectrum between the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) DR4 CMB lensing and the galaxy weak lensing measured by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Y3 data. Our baseline analysis uses the CMB convergence map derived from ACT-DR4 and $\textit{Planck}$ data, where most of the contamination due to the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect is removed, thus avoiding important systematics in the cross-correlation. In our modelling, we consider the nuisance parameters of the photometric uncertainty, multiplicative shear bias and intrinsic alignment of galaxies. The resulting cross-power spectrum has a signal-to-noise ratio $= 7.1$ and passes a set of null tests. We use it to infer the amplitude of the fluctuations in the matter distribution ($S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.782\pm 0.059$) with informative but well-motivated priors on the nuisance parameters. We also investigate the validity of these priors by significantly relaxing them and checking the consistency of the resulting posteriors, finding them consistent, albeit only with relatively weak constraints. This cross-correlation measurement will improve significantly with the new ACT-DR6 lensing map and form a key component of the joint 6x2pt analysis between DES and ACT.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Detection of the significant impact of source clustering on higher-order statistics with DES Year 3 weak gravitational lensing data
Authors:
M. Gatti,
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
V. Ajani,
T. Kacprzak,
D. Zürcher,
C. Chang,
B. Jain,
J. Blazek,
E. Krause,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. Becker,
G. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
C. Davis,
J. Derose,
H. T. Diehl,
S. Dodelson,
C. Doux,
K. Eckert,
J. Elvin-Poole
, et al. (76 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We demonstrate and measure the impact of source galaxy clustering on higher-order summary statistics of weak gravitational lensing data. By comparing simulated data with galaxies that either trace or do not trace the underlying density field, we show this effect can exceed measurement uncertainties for common higher-order statistics for certain analysis choices. Source clustering effects are large…
▽ More
We demonstrate and measure the impact of source galaxy clustering on higher-order summary statistics of weak gravitational lensing data. By comparing simulated data with galaxies that either trace or do not trace the underlying density field, we show this effect can exceed measurement uncertainties for common higher-order statistics for certain analysis choices. Source clustering effects are larger at small scales and for statistics applied to combinations of low and high redshift samples, and diminish at high redshift. We evaluate the impact on different weak lensing observables, finding that third moments and wavelet phase harmonics are more affected than peak count statistics. Using Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data we construct null tests for the source-clustering-free case, finding a $p$-value of $p=4\times10^{-3}$ (2.6 $σ$) using third-order map moments and $p=3\times10^{-11}$ (6.5 $σ$) using wavelet phase harmonics. The impact of source clustering on cosmological inference can be either be included in the model or minimized through \textit{ad-hoc} procedures (e.g. scale cuts). We verify that the procedures adopted in existing DES Y3 cosmological analyses (using map moments and peaks) were sufficient to render this effect negligible. Failing to account for source clustering can significantly impact cosmological inference from higher-order gravitational lensing statistics, e.g. higher-order N-point functions, wavelet-moment observables (including phase harmonics and scattering transforms), and deep learning or field level summary statistics of weak lensing maps. We provide recipes both to minimise the impact of source clustering and to incorporate source clustering effects into forward-modelled mock data.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2023; v1 submitted 25 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys
Authors:
Dark Energy Survey,
Kilo-Degree Survey Collaboration,
:,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
M. Asgari,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
M. Bilicki,
J. Blazek,
S. Bocquet,
D. Brooks,
P. Burger,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell
, et al. (138 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a joint cosmic shear analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) in a collaborative effort between the two survey teams. We find consistent cosmological parameter constraints between DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 which, when combined in a joint-survey analysis, constrain the parameter $S_8 = σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}$ with a mean value of…
▽ More
We present a joint cosmic shear analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) in a collaborative effort between the two survey teams. We find consistent cosmological parameter constraints between DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 which, when combined in a joint-survey analysis, constrain the parameter $S_8 = σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}$ with a mean value of $0.790^{+0.018}_{-0.014}$. The mean marginal is lower than the maximum a posteriori estimate, $S_8=0.801$, owing to skewness in the marginal distribution and projection effects in the multi-dimensional parameter space. Our results are consistent with $S_8$ constraints from observations of the cosmic microwave background by Planck, with agreement at the $1.7σ$ level. We use a Hybrid analysis pipeline, defined from a mock survey study quantifying the impact of the different analysis choices originally adopted by each survey team. We review intrinsic alignment models, baryon feedback mitigation strategies, priors, samplers and models of the non-linear matter power spectrum.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2023; v1 submitted 26 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear Power Spectra
Authors:
Roohi Dalal,
Xiangchong Li,
Andrina Nicola,
Joe Zuntz,
Michael A. Strauss,
Sunao Sugiyama,
Tianqing Zhang,
Markus M. Rau,
Rachel Mandelbaum,
Masahiro Takada,
Surhud More,
Hironao Miyatake,
Arun Kannawadi,
Masato Shirasaki,
Takanori Taniguchi,
Ryuichi Takahashi,
Ken Osato,
Takashi Hamana,
Masamune Oguri,
Atsushi J. Nishizawa,
Andrés A. Plazas Malagón,
Tomomi Sunayama,
David Alonso,
Anže Slosar,
Robert Armstrong
, et al. (13 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We measure weak lensing cosmic shear power spectra from the three-year galaxy shear catalog of the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Subaru Strategic Program imaging survey. The shear catalog covers $416 \ \mathrm{deg}^2$ of the northern sky, with a mean $i$-band seeing of 0.59 arcsec and an effective galaxy number density of 15 $\mathrm{arcmin}^{-2}$ within our adopted redshift range. With an $i$-band magn…
▽ More
We measure weak lensing cosmic shear power spectra from the three-year galaxy shear catalog of the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) Subaru Strategic Program imaging survey. The shear catalog covers $416 \ \mathrm{deg}^2$ of the northern sky, with a mean $i$-band seeing of 0.59 arcsec and an effective galaxy number density of 15 $\mathrm{arcmin}^{-2}$ within our adopted redshift range. With an $i$-band magnitude limit of 24.5 mag, and four tomographic redshift bins spanning $0.3 \leq z_{\mathrm{ph}} \leq 1.5$ based on photometric redshifts, we obtain a high-significance measurement of the cosmic shear power spectra, with a signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 26.4 in the multipole range $300<\ell<1800$. The accuracy of our power spectrum measurement is tested against realistic mock shear catalogs, and we use these catalogs to get a reliable measurement of the covariance of the power spectrum measurements. We use a robust blinding procedure to avoid confirmation bias, and model various uncertainties and sources of bias in our analysis, including point spread function systematics, redshift distribution uncertainties, the intrinsic alignment of galaxies and the modeling of the matter power spectrum. For a flat $Λ$CDM model, we find $S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_m/0.3)^{0.5} =0.776^{+0.032}_{-0.033}$, which is in excellent agreement with the constraints from the other HSC Year 3 cosmology analyses, as well as those from a number of other cosmic shear experiments. This result implies a $\sim$$2σ$-level tension with the Planck 2018 cosmology. We study the effect that various systematic errors and modeling choices could have on this value, and find that they can shift the best-fit value of $S_8$ by no more than $\sim$$0.5σ$, indicating that our result is robust to such systematics.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2023; v1 submitted 2 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
The Intrinsic Alignment of Red Galaxies in DES Y1 redMaPPer Galaxy Clusters
Authors:
C. Zhou,
A. Tong,
M. A. Troxel,
J. Blazek,
C. Lin,
D. Bacon,
L. Bleem,
A. Carnero Rosell,
C. Chang,
M. Costanzi,
J. DeRose,
J. P. Dietrich,
A. Drlica-Wagner,
D. Gruen,
R. A. Gruendl,
B. Hoyle,
M. Jarvis,
N. MacCrann,
B. Mawdsley,
T. McClintock,
P. Melchior,
J. Prat,
A. Pujol,
E. Rozo,
E. S. Rykoff
, et al. (57 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Clusters of galaxies are sensitive to the most nonlinear peaks in the cosmic density field. The weak gravitational lensing of background galaxies by clusters can allow us to infer their masses. However, galaxies associated with the local environment of the cluster can also be intrinsically aligned due to the local tidal gradient, contaminating any cosmology derived from the lensing signal. We meas…
▽ More
Clusters of galaxies are sensitive to the most nonlinear peaks in the cosmic density field. The weak gravitational lensing of background galaxies by clusters can allow us to infer their masses. However, galaxies associated with the local environment of the cluster can also be intrinsically aligned due to the local tidal gradient, contaminating any cosmology derived from the lensing signal. We measure this intrinsic alignment in Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 redMaPPer clusters. We find evidence of a non-zero mean radial alignment of galaxies within clusters between redshift 0.1-0.7. We find a significant systematic in the measured ellipticities of cluster satellite galaxies that we attribute to the central galaxy flux and other intracluster light. We attempt to correct this signal, and fit a simple model for intrinsic alignment amplitude ($A_{\textrm{IA}}$) to the measurement, finding $A_{\textrm{IA}}=0.15\pm 0.04$, when excluding data near the edge of the cluster. We find a significantly stronger alignment of the central galaxy with the cluster dark matter halo at low redshift and with higher richness and central galaxy absolute magnitude (proxies for cluster mass). This is an important demonstration of the ability of large photometric data sets like DES to provide direct constraints on the intrinsic alignment of galaxies within clusters. These measurements can inform improvements to small-scale modeling and simulation of the intrinsic alignment of galaxies to help improve the separation of the intrinsic alignment signal in weak lensing studies.
△ Less
Submitted 5 September, 2023; v1 submitted 23 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
JAX-COSMO: An End-to-End Differentiable and GPU Accelerated Cosmology Library
Authors:
Jean-Eric Campagne,
François Lanusse,
Joe Zuntz,
Alexandre Boucaud,
Santiago Casas,
Minas Karamanis,
David Kirkby,
Denise Lanzieri,
Yin Li,
Austin Peel
Abstract:
We present jax-cosmo, a library for automatically differentiable cosmological theory calculations. It uses the JAX library, which has created a new coding ecosystem, especially in probabilistic programming. As well as batch acceleration, just-in-time compilation, and automatic optimization of code for different hardware modalities (CPU, GPU, TPU), JAX exposes an automatic differentiation (autodiff…
▽ More
We present jax-cosmo, a library for automatically differentiable cosmological theory calculations. It uses the JAX library, which has created a new coding ecosystem, especially in probabilistic programming. As well as batch acceleration, just-in-time compilation, and automatic optimization of code for different hardware modalities (CPU, GPU, TPU), JAX exposes an automatic differentiation (autodiff) mechanism. Thanks to autodiff, jax-cosmo gives access to the derivatives of cosmological likelihoods with respect to any of their parameters, and thus enables a range of powerful Bayesian inference algorithms, otherwise impractical in cosmology, such as Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Variational Inference. In its initial release, jax-cosmo implements background evolution, linear and non-linear power spectra (using halofit or the Eisenstein and Hu transfer function), as well as angular power spectra with the Limber approximation for galaxy and weak lensing probes, all differentiable with respect to the cosmological parameters and their other inputs. We illustrate how autodiff can be a game-changer for common tasks involving Fisher matrix computations, or full posterior inference with gradient-based techniques. In particular, we show how Fisher matrices are now fast, exact, no longer require any fine tuning, and are themselves differentiable. Finally, using a Dark Energy Survey Year 1 3x2pt analysis as a benchmark, we demonstrate how jax-cosmo can be combined with Probabilistic Programming Languages to perform posterior inference with state-of-the-art algorithms including a No U-Turn Sampler, Automatic Differentiation Variational Inference,and Neural Transport HMC. We further demonstrate that Normalizing Flows using Neural Transport are a promising methodology for model validation in the early stages of analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2023; v1 submitted 10 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
The catalog-to-cosmology framework for weak lensing and galaxy clustering for LSST
Authors:
J. Prat,
J. Zuntz,
Y. Omori,
C. Chang,
T. Tröster,
E. Pedersen,
C. García-García,
E. Phillips-Longley,
J. Sanchez,
D. Alonso,
X. Fang,
E. Gawiser,
K. Heitmann,
M. Ishak,
M. Jarvis,
E. Kovacs,
P. Larsen,
Y. -Y. Mao,
L. Medina Varela,
M. Paterno,
S. D. Vitenti,
Z. Zhang,
The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration
Abstract:
We present TXPipe, a modular, automated and reproducible pipeline for ingesting catalog data and performing all the calculations required to obtain quality-assured two-point measurements of lensing and clustering, and their covariances, with the metadata necessary for parameter estimation. The pipeline is developed within the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Dark Energy Sci…
▽ More
We present TXPipe, a modular, automated and reproducible pipeline for ingesting catalog data and performing all the calculations required to obtain quality-assured two-point measurements of lensing and clustering, and their covariances, with the metadata necessary for parameter estimation. The pipeline is developed within the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC), and designed for cosmology analyses using LSST data. In this paper, we present the pipeline for the so-called 3x2pt analysis -- a combination of three two-point functions that measure the auto- and cross-correlation between galaxy density and shapes. We perform the analysis both in real and harmonic space using TXPipe and other LSST-DESC tools. We validate the pipeline using Gaussian simulations and show that it accurately measures data vectors and recovers the input cosmology to the accuracy level required for the first year of LSST data under this simplified scenario. We also apply the pipeline to a realistic mock galaxy sample extracted from the CosmoDC2 simulation suite (Korytov et al. 2019). TXPipe establishes a baseline framework that can be built upon as the LSST survey proceeds. Furthermore, the pipeline is designed to be easily extended to science probes beyond the 3x2pt analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2023; v1 submitted 19 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Improved Tomographic Binning of 3x2pt Lens Samples: Neural Network Classifiers and Optimal Bin Assignments
Authors:
Irene Moskowitz,
Eric Gawiser,
Abby Bault,
Adam Broussard,
Jeffrey A. Newman,
Joe Zuntz,
the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration
Abstract:
Large imaging surveys, such as the Legacy Survey of Space and Time, rely on photometric redshifts and tomographic binning for 3x2pt analyses that combine galaxy clustering and weak lensing. In this paper, we propose a method for optimizing the tomographic binning choice for the lens sample of galaxies. We divide the CosmoDC2 and Buzzard simulated galaxy catalogs into a training set and an applicat…
▽ More
Large imaging surveys, such as the Legacy Survey of Space and Time, rely on photometric redshifts and tomographic binning for 3x2pt analyses that combine galaxy clustering and weak lensing. In this paper, we propose a method for optimizing the tomographic binning choice for the lens sample of galaxies. We divide the CosmoDC2 and Buzzard simulated galaxy catalogs into a training set and an application set, where the training set is nonrepresentative in a realistic way, and then estimate photometric redshifts for the application sets. The galaxies are sorted into redshift bins covering equal intervals of redshift or comoving distance, or with an equal number of galaxies in each bin, and we consider a generalized extension of these approaches. We find that bins of equal comoving distance produce the highest dark energy figure of merit of the initial binning choices, but that the choice of bin edges can be further optimized. We then train a neural network classifier to identify galaxies that are either highly likely to have accurate photometric redshift estimates or highly likely to be sorted into the correct redshift bin. The neural network classifier is used to remove poor redshift estimates from the sample, and the results are compared to the case when none of the sample is removed. We find that the neural network classifiers are able to improve the figure of merit by ~13% and are able to recover ~25% of the loss in the figure of merit that occurs when a nonrepresentative training sample is used.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2023; v1 submitted 13 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Non-local contribution from small scales in galaxy-galaxy lensing: Comparison of mitigation schemes
Authors:
J. Prat,
G. Zacharegkas,
Y. Park,
N. MacCrann,
E. R. Switzer,
S. Pandey,
C. Chang,
J. Blazek,
R. Miquel,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
J. Cordero,
M. Crocce
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3$\times$2pt, had to discard a lot of signal-to-noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy-galaxy lensing, or the position-shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functi…
▽ More
Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3$\times$2pt, had to discard a lot of signal-to-noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy-galaxy lensing, or the position-shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functions that are included in such analyses, usually estimated with the mean tangential shear. However, tangential shear measurements at a given angular scale $θ$ or physical scale $R$ carry information from all scales below that, forcing the scale cuts applied in real data to be significantly larger than the scale at which theoretical uncertainties become problematic. Recently there have been a few independent efforts that aim to mitigate the non-locality of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal. Here we perform a comparison of the different methods, including the Y-transformation, the Point-Mass marginalization methodology and the Annular Differential Surface Density statistic. We do the comparison at the cosmological constraints level in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. We find that all the estimators yield equivalent cosmological results assuming a simulated Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Year 1 like setup and also when applied to DES Y3 data. With the LSST Y1 setup, we find that the mitigation schemes yield $\sim$1.3 times more constraining $S_8$ results than applying larger scale cuts without using any mitigation scheme.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2023; v1 submitted 7 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 high redshift sample: Selection, characterization and analysis of galaxy clustering
Authors:
C. Sánchez,
A. Alarcon,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Sanchez,
S. Pandey,
M. Raveri,
J. Prat,
N. Weaverdyck,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
C. Chang,
E. Baxter,
Y. Omori,
B. Jain,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
J. Blazek,
A. Choi,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
M. Crocce,
D. Cross,
J. DeRose
, et al. (75 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The fiducial cosmological analyses of imaging galaxy surveys like the Dark Energy Survey (DES) typically probe the Universe at redshifts $z < 1$. This is mainly because of the limited depth of these surveys, and also because such analyses rely heavily on galaxy lensing, which is more efficient at low redshifts. In this work we present the selection and characterization of high-redshift galaxy samp…
▽ More
The fiducial cosmological analyses of imaging galaxy surveys like the Dark Energy Survey (DES) typically probe the Universe at redshifts $z < 1$. This is mainly because of the limited depth of these surveys, and also because such analyses rely heavily on galaxy lensing, which is more efficient at low redshifts. In this work we present the selection and characterization of high-redshift galaxy samples using DES Year 3 data, and the analysis of their galaxy clustering measurements. In particular, we use galaxies that are fainter than those used in the previous DES Year 3 analyses and a Bayesian redshift scheme to define three tomographic bins with mean redshifts around $z \sim 0.9$, $1.2$ and $1.5$, which significantly extend the redshift coverage of the fiducial DES Year 3 analysis. These samples contain a total of about 9 million galaxies, and their galaxy density is more than 2 times higher than those in the DES Year 3 fiducial case. We characterize the redshift uncertainties of the samples, including the usage of various spectroscopic and high-quality redshift samples, and we develop a machine-learning method to correct for correlations between galaxy density and survey observing conditions. The analysis of galaxy clustering measurements, with a total signal-to-noise $S/N \sim 70$ after scale cuts, yields robust cosmological constraints on a combination of the fraction of matter in the Universe $Ω_m$ and the Hubble parameter $h$, $Ω_m h = 0.195^{+0.023}_{-0.018}$, and 2-3% measurements of the amplitude of the galaxy clustering signals, probing galaxy bias and the amplitude of matter fluctuations, $b σ_8$. A companion paper $\textit{(in preparation)}$ will present the cross-correlations of these high-$z$ samples with CMB lensing from Planck and SPT, and the cosmological analysis of those measurements in combination with the galaxy clustering presented in this work.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2022; v1 submitted 29 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Magnification modeling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
Authors:
J. Elvin-Poole,
N. MacCrann,
S. Everett,
J. Prat,
E. S. Rykoff,
J. De Vicente,
B. Yanny,
K. Herner,
A. Ferté,
E. Di Valentino,
A. Choi,
D. L. Burke,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell
, et al. (71 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of Luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects usin…
▽ More
We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of Luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects using the Balrog image simulations. We estimate the impact of magnification on the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology analysis, finding it to be a significant systematic for the MagLim sample. We show cosmological constraints from the galaxy clustering auto-correlation and galaxy-galaxy lensing signal with different magnifications priors, finding broad consistency in cosmological parameters in $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM. However, when magnification bias amplitude is allowed to be free, we find the two-point correlations functions prefer a different amplitude to the fiducial input derived from the image simulations. We validate the magnification analysis by comparing the cross-clustering between lens bins with the prediction from the baseline analysis, which uses only the auto-correlation of the lens bins, indicating systematics other than magnification may be the cause of the discrepancy. We show adding the cross-clustering between lens redshift bins to the fit significantly improves the constraints on lens magnification parameters and allows uninformative priors to be used on magnification coefficients, without any loss of constraining power or prior volume concerns.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2023; v1 submitted 20 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
A Unified Catalog-level Reanalysis of Stage-III Cosmic Shear Surveys
Authors:
Emily P. Longley,
Chihway Chang,
Christopher W. Walter,
Joe Zuntz,
Mustapha Ishak,
Rachel Mandelbaum,
Hironao Miyatake,
Andrina Nicola,
Eske M. Pedersen,
Maria E. S. Pereira,
Judit Prat,
J. Sánchez,
Tilman Tröster,
Michael Troxel,
Angus Wright,
The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration
Abstract:
Cosmological parameter constraints from recent galaxy imaging surveys are reaching $2-3\%$-level accuracy. The upcoming Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory will produce sub-percent level measurements of cosmological parameters, providing a milestone test of the $Λ$CDM model. To supply guidance to the upcoming LSST analysis, it is important to understand thorough…
▽ More
Cosmological parameter constraints from recent galaxy imaging surveys are reaching $2-3\%$-level accuracy. The upcoming Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory will produce sub-percent level measurements of cosmological parameters, providing a milestone test of the $Λ$CDM model. To supply guidance to the upcoming LSST analysis, it is important to understand thoroughly the results from different recent galaxy imaging surveys and assess their consistencies. In this work we perform a unified catalog-level reanalysis of three cosmic shear datasets: the first year data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES-Y1), the 1,000 deg$^{2}$ dataset from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000), and the first year data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-Y1). We utilize a pipeline developed and rigorously tested by the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration to perform the reanalysis and assess the robustness of the results to analysis choices. We find the $S_{8}$ constraint to be robust to two different small-scale modeling approaches, and varying choices of cosmological priors. Our unified analysis allows the consistency of the surveys to be rigorously tested and we find the three surveys to be statistically consistent. Due to the partially overlap** footprint, we model the cross-covariance between KiDS-1000 and HSC-Y1 approximately when combining all three datasets, resulting in a $1.6-1.9\%$ constraint on $S_8$ given different assumptions on the cross-covariance.
△ Less
Submitted 15 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Constraints on extensions to $Λ$CDM with weak lensing and galaxy clustering
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. Birrer,
J. Blazek,
S. Bocquet,
A. Brandao-Souza,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero
, et al. (137 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We constrain extensions to the $Λ$CDM model using measurements from the Dark Energy Survey's first three years of observations and external data. The DES data are the two-point correlation functions of weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation. We use simulated data and blind analyses of real data to validate the robustness of our results. In many cases, constraini…
▽ More
We constrain extensions to the $Λ$CDM model using measurements from the Dark Energy Survey's first three years of observations and external data. The DES data are the two-point correlation functions of weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation. We use simulated data and blind analyses of real data to validate the robustness of our results. In many cases, constraining power is limited by the absence of nonlinear predictions that are reliable at our required precision. The models are: dark energy with a time-dependent equation of state, non-zero spatial curvature, sterile neutrinos, modifications of gravitational physics, and a binned $σ_8(z)$ model which serves as a probe of structure growth. For the time-varying dark energy equation of state evaluated at the pivot redshift we find $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-0.99^{+0.28}_{-0.17},-0.9\pm 1.2)$ at 68% confidence with $z_{\rm p}=0.24$ from the DES measurements alone, and $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-1.03^{+0.04}_{-0.03},-0.4^{+0.4}_{-0.3})$ with $z_{\rm p}=0.21$ for the combination of all data considered. Curvature constraints of $Ω_k=0.0009\pm 0.0017$ and effective relativistic species $N_{\rm eff}=3.10^{+0.15}_{-0.16}$ are dominated by external data. For massive sterile neutrinos, we improve the upper bound on the mass $m_{\rm eff}$ by a factor of three compared to previous analyses, giving 95% limits of $(ΔN_{\rm eff},m_{\rm eff})\leq (0.28, 0.20\, {\rm eV})$. We also constrain changes to the lensing and Poisson equations controlled by functions $Σ(k,z) = Σ_0 Ω_Λ(z)/Ω_{Λ,0}$ and $μ(k,z)=μ_0 Ω_Λ(z)/Ω_{Λ,0}$ respectively to $Σ_0=0.6^{+0.4}_{-0.5}$ from DES alone and $(Σ_0,μ_0)=(0.04\pm 0.05,0.08^{+0.21}_{-0.19})$ for the combination of all data. Overall, we find no significant evidence for physics beyond $Λ$CDM.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2023; v1 submitted 12 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck III: Combined cosmological constraints
Authors:
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Annis,
B. Ansarinejad,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. J. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
B. A. Benson,
G. M. Bernstein,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
L. E. Bleem,
S. Bocquet,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
J. E. Carlstrom
, et al. (146 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of two-point correlation functions between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. When jointly analyzing the DES-only two-point functions and the DES cross-correlations with SPT+Planck CMB l…
▽ More
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of two-point correlation functions between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. When jointly analyzing the DES-only two-point functions and the DES cross-correlations with SPT+Planck CMB lensing, we find $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.344\pm 0.030$ and $S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.773\pm 0.016$, assuming $Λ$CDM. When additionally combining with measurements of the CMB lensing autospectrum, we find $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.306^{+0.018}_{-0.021}$ and $S_8 = 0.792\pm 0.012$. The high signal-to-noise of the CMB lensing cross-correlations enables several powerful consistency tests of these results, including comparisons with constraints derived from cross-correlations only, and comparisons designed to test the robustness of the galaxy lensing and clustering measurements from DES. Applying these tests to our measurements, we find no evidence of significant biases in the baseline cosmological constraints from the DES-only analyses or from the joint analyses with CMB lensing cross-correlations. However, the CMB lensing cross-correlations suggest possible problems with the correlation function measurements using alternative lens galaxy samples, in particular the redMaGiC galaxies and high-redshift MagLim galaxies, consistent with the findings of previous studies. We use the CMB lensing cross-correlations to identify directions for further investigating these problems.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Constraining the Baryonic Feedback with Cosmic Shear Using the DES Year-3 Small-Scale Measurements
Authors:
A. Chen,
G. Aricò,
D. Huterer,
R. Angulo,
N. Weaverdyck,
O. Friedrich,
L. F. Secco,
C. Hernández-Monteagudo,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
A. Brandao-Souza,
S. L. Bridle,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang
, et al. (117 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We use the small scales of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-3 cosmic shear measurements, which are excluded from the DES Year-3 cosmological analysis, to constrain the baryonic feedback. To model the baryonic feedback, we adopt a baryonic correction model and use the numerical package \texttt{Baccoemu} to accelerate the evaluation of the baryonic nonlinear matter power spectrum. We design our ana…
▽ More
We use the small scales of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-3 cosmic shear measurements, which are excluded from the DES Year-3 cosmological analysis, to constrain the baryonic feedback. To model the baryonic feedback, we adopt a baryonic correction model and use the numerical package \texttt{Baccoemu} to accelerate the evaluation of the baryonic nonlinear matter power spectrum. We design our analysis pipeline to focus on the constraints of the baryonic suppression effects, utilizing the implication given by a principal component analysis on the Fisher forecasts. Our constraint on the baryonic effects can then be used to better model and ameliorate the effects of baryons in producing cosmological constraints from the next generation large-scale structure surveys. We detect the baryonic suppression on the cosmic shear measurements with a $\sim 2 σ$ significance. The characteristic halo mass for which half of the gas is ejected by baryonic feedback is constrained to be $M_c > 10^{13.2} h^{-1} M_{\odot}$ (95\% C.L.). The best-fit baryonic suppression is $\sim 5\%$ at $k=1.0 {\rm Mpc}\ h^{-1}$ and $\sim 15\%$ at $k=5.0 {\rm Mpc} \ h^{-1}$. Our findings are robust with respect to the assumptions about the cosmological parameters, specifics of the baryonic model, and intrinsic alignments.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Minkowski Functionals in Joint Galaxy Clustering & Weak Lensing Analyses
Authors:
Nisha Grewal,
Joe Zuntz,
Tilman Tröster,
Alexandra Amon
Abstract:
We investigate the inclusion of clustering maps in a weak lensing Minkowski functional (MF) analysis of DES-like and LSST-like simulations to constrain cosmological parameters. The standard 3x2pt approach to lensing and clustering data uses two-point correlations as its primary statistic; MFs, morphological statistics describing the shape of matter fields, provide additional information for non-Ga…
▽ More
We investigate the inclusion of clustering maps in a weak lensing Minkowski functional (MF) analysis of DES-like and LSST-like simulations to constrain cosmological parameters. The standard 3x2pt approach to lensing and clustering data uses two-point correlations as its primary statistic; MFs, morphological statistics describing the shape of matter fields, provide additional information for non-Gaussian fields. Previous analyses have studied MFs of lensing convergence maps; in this project we explore their simultaneous application to clustering maps. We employ a simplified linear galaxy bias model, and using a lognormal curved sky measurement and Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) sampling process for parameter inference, we find that MFs do not yield any information in the $Ω_{\rm m}$ -- $σ_8$ plane not already generated by a 3x2pt analysis. However, we expect that MFs should improve constraining power when nonlinear baryonic and other small-scale effects are taken into account. As with a 3x2pt analysis, we find a significant improvement to constraints when adding clustering data to MF-only and MF$+C_\ell$ shear measurements, and strongly recommend future higher order statistics be measured from both convergence and clustering maps.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2022; v1 submitted 8 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck II: Cross-correlation measurements and cosmological constraints
Authors:
C. Chang,
Y. Omori,
E. J. Baxter,
C. Doux,
A. Choi,
S. Pandey,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
F. Bianchini,
J. Blazek,
L. E. Bleem,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
R. Chen,
J. Cordero,
T. M. Crawford,
M. Crocce
, et al. (141 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Cross-correlations of galaxy positions and galaxy shears with maps of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to the distribution of large-scale structure in the Universe. Such cross-correlations are also expected to be immune to some of the systematic effects that complicate correlation measurements internal to galaxy surveys. We present measurements and model…
▽ More
Cross-correlations of galaxy positions and galaxy shears with maps of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to the distribution of large-scale structure in the Universe. Such cross-correlations are also expected to be immune to some of the systematic effects that complicate correlation measurements internal to galaxy surveys. We present measurements and modeling of the cross-correlations between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey with CMB lensing maps derived from a combination of data from the 2500 deg$^2$ SPT-SZ survey conducted with the South Pole Telescope and full-sky data from the Planck satellite. The CMB lensing maps used in this analysis have been constructed in a way that minimizes biases from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, making them well suited for cross-correlation studies. The total signal-to-noise of the cross-correlation measurements is 23.9 (25.7) when using a choice of angular scales optimized for a linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias model. We use the cross-correlation measurements to obtain constraints on cosmological parameters. For our fiducial galaxy sample, which consist of four bins of magnitude-selected galaxies, we find constraints of $Ω_{m} = 0.272^{+0.032}_{-0.052}$ and $S_{8} \equiv σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{m}/0.3}= 0.736^{+0.032}_{-0.028}$ ($Ω_{m} = 0.245^{+0.026}_{-0.044}$ and $S_{8} = 0.734^{+0.035}_{-0.028}$) when assuming linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias in our modeling. Considering only the cross-correlation of galaxy shear with CMB lensing, we find $Ω_{m} = 0.270^{+0.043}_{-0.061}$ and $S_{8} = 0.740^{+0.034}_{-0.029}$. Our constraints on $S_8$ are consistent with recent cosmic shear measurements, but lower than the values preferred by primary CMB measurements from Planck.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2022; v1 submitted 23 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck I: Construction of CMB Lensing Maps and Modeling Choices
Authors:
Y. Omori,
E. J. Baxter,
C. Chang,
O. Friedrich,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
L. E. Bleem,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
J. Cordero,
T. M. Crawford,
M. Crocce,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose
, et al. (138 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Joint analyses of cross-correlations between measurements of galaxy positions, galaxy lensing, and lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) offer powerful constraints on the large-scale structure of the Universe. In a forthcoming analysis, we will present cosmological constraints from the analysis of such cross-correlations measured using Year 3 data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and…
▽ More
Joint analyses of cross-correlations between measurements of galaxy positions, galaxy lensing, and lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) offer powerful constraints on the large-scale structure of the Universe. In a forthcoming analysis, we will present cosmological constraints from the analysis of such cross-correlations measured using Year 3 data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and CMB data from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Here we present two key ingredients of this analysis: (1) an improved CMB lensing map in the SPT-SZ survey footprint, and (2) the analysis methodology that will be used to extract cosmological information from the cross-correlation measurements. Relative to previous lensing maps made from the same CMB observations, we have implemented techniques to remove contamination from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, enabling the extraction of cosmological information from smaller angular scales of the cross-correlation measurements than in previous analyses with DES Year 1 data. We describe our model for the cross-correlations between these maps and DES data, and validate our modeling choices to demonstrate the robustness of our analysis. We then forecast the expected cosmological constraints from the galaxy survey-CMB lensing auto and cross-correlations. We find that the galaxy-CMB lensing and galaxy shear-CMB lensing correlations will on their own provide a constraint on $S_8=σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}$ at the few percent level, providing a powerful consistency check for the DES-only constraints. We explore scenarios where external priors on shear calibration are removed, finding that the joint analysis of CMB lensing cross-correlations can provide constraints on the shear calibration amplitude at the 5 to 10% level.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space
Authors:
C. Doux,
B. Jain,
D. Zeurcher,
J. Lee,
X. Fang,
R. Rosenfeld,
A. Amon,
H. Camacho,
A. Choi,
L. F. Secco,
J. Blazek,
C. Chang,
M. Gatti,
E. Gaztanaga,
N. Jeffrey,
M. Raveri,
S. Samuroff,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos
, et al. (113 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method and offer a view complementary to that of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Ga…
▽ More
We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method and offer a view complementary to that of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Gaussian information in different ways, due to scale cuts. They may also be differently affected by systematic effects and theoretical uncertainties, such as baryons and intrinsic alignments (IA), making this analysis an important cross-check. In the context of $Λ$CDM, and using the same fiducial model as in the DES Y3 real space analysis, we find ${S_8 \equiv σ_8 \sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.793^{+0.038}_{-0.025}}$, which further improves to ${S_8 = 0.784\pm 0.026 }$ when including shear ratios. This constraint is within expected statistical fluctuations from the real space analysis, and in agreement with DES~Y3 analyses of non-Gaussian statistics, but favors a slightly higher value of $S_8$, which reduces the tension with the Planck cosmic microwave background 2018 results from $2.3σ$ in the real space analysis to $1.5σ$ in this work. We explore less conservative IA models than the one adopted in our fiducial analysis, finding no clear preference for a more complex model. We also include small scales, using an increased Fourier mode cut-off up to $k_{\rm max}={5}{h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}}$, which allows to constrain baryonic feedback while leaving cosmological constraints essentially unchanged. Finally, we present an approximate reconstruction of the linear matter power spectrum at present time, which is found to be about 20\% lower than predicted by Planck 2018, as reflected by the $1.5σ$ lower $S_8$ value.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Snowmass2021: Opportunities from Cross-survey Analyses of Static Probes
Authors:
Eric J. Baxter,
Chihway Chang,
Andrew Hearin,
Jonathan Blazek,
Lindsey E. Bleem,
Simone Ferraro,
Mustapha Ishak,
Kirit S. Karkare,
Alexie Leauthaud,
Jia Liu,
Rachel Mandelbaum,
Joel Meyers,
Azadeh Moradinezhad Dizgah,
Daisuke Nagai,
Jeffrey A. Newman,
Yuuki Omori,
Neelima Sehgal,
Martin White,
Joe Zuntz,
Marcelo A. Alvarez,
Camille Avestruz,
Federico Bianchini,
Sebastian Bocquet,
Boris Bolliet,
John E. Carlstrom
, et al. (15 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Cosmological data in the next decade will be characterized by high-precision, multi-wavelength measurements of thousands of square degrees of the same patches of sky. By performing multi-survey analyses that harness the correlated nature of these datasets, we will gain access to new science, and increase the precision and robustness of science being pursued by each individual survey. However, effe…
▽ More
Cosmological data in the next decade will be characterized by high-precision, multi-wavelength measurements of thousands of square degrees of the same patches of sky. By performing multi-survey analyses that harness the correlated nature of these datasets, we will gain access to new science, and increase the precision and robustness of science being pursued by each individual survey. However, effective application of such analyses requires a qualitatively new level of investment in cross-survey infrastructure, including simulations, associated modeling, coordination of data sharing, and survey strategy. The scientific gains from this new level of investment are multiplicative, as the benefits can be reaped by even present-day instruments, and can be applied to new instruments as they come online.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2022; v1 submitted 13 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Robust sampling for weak lensing and clustering analyses with the Dark Energy Survey
Authors:
P. Lemos,
N. Weaverdyck,
R. P. Rollins,
J. Muir,
A. Ferté,
A. R. Liddle,
A. Campos,
D. Huterer,
M. Raveri,
J. Zuntz,
E. Di Valentino,
X. Fang,
W. G. Hartley,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam,
J. Annis,
E. Bertin,
S. Bocquet,
D. Brooks,
D. L. Burke,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
A. Choi
, et al. (46 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Recent cosmological analyses rely on the ability to accurately sample from high-dimensional posterior distributions. A variety of algorithms have been applied in the field, but justification of the particular sampler choice and settings is often lacking. Here we investigate three such samplers to motivate and validate the algorithm and settings used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES) analyses of the…
▽ More
Recent cosmological analyses rely on the ability to accurately sample from high-dimensional posterior distributions. A variety of algorithms have been applied in the field, but justification of the particular sampler choice and settings is often lacking. Here we investigate three such samplers to motivate and validate the algorithm and settings used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES) analyses of the first 3 years (Y3) of data from combined measurements of weak lensing and galaxy clustering. We employ the full DES Year 1 likelihood alongside a much faster approximate likelihood, which enables us to assess the outcomes from each sampler choice and demonstrate the robustness of our full results. We find that the ellipsoidal nested sampling algorithm $\texttt{MultiNest}$ reports inconsistent estimates of the Bayesian evidence and somewhat narrower parameter credible intervals than the sliced nested sampling implemented in $\texttt{PolyChord}$. We compare the findings from $\texttt{MultiNest}$ and $\texttt{PolyChord}$ with parameter inference from the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm, finding good agreement. We determine that $\texttt{PolyChord}$ provides a good balance of speed and robustness, and recommend different settings for testing purposes and final chains for analyses with DES Y3 data. Our methodology can readily be reproduced to obtain suitable sampler settings for future surveys.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints
Authors:
Dillon Brout,
Dan Scolnic,
Brodie Popovic,
Adam G. Riess,
Joe Zuntz,
Rick Kessler,
Anthony Carr,
Tamara M. Davis,
Samuel Hinton,
David Jones,
W. D'Arcy Kenworthy,
Erik R. Peterson,
Khaled Said,
Georgie Taylor,
Noor Ali,
Patrick Armstrong,
Pranav Charvu,
Arianna Dwomoh,
Antonella Palmese,
Helen Qu,
Benjamin M. Rose,
Christopher W. Stubbs,
Maria Vincenzi,
Charlotte M. Wood,
Peter J. Brown
, et al. (21 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present constraints on cosmological parameters from the Pantheon+ analysis of 1701 light curves of 1550 distinct Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) ranging in redshift from $z=0.001$ to 2.26. This work features an increased sample size, increased redshift span, and improved treatment of systematic uncertainties in comparison to the original Pantheon analysis and results in a factor of two improvement…
▽ More
We present constraints on cosmological parameters from the Pantheon+ analysis of 1701 light curves of 1550 distinct Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) ranging in redshift from $z=0.001$ to 2.26. This work features an increased sample size, increased redshift span, and improved treatment of systematic uncertainties in comparison to the original Pantheon analysis and results in a factor of two improvement in cosmological constraining power. For a Flat$Λ$CDM model, we find $Ω_M=0.334\pm0.018$ from SNe Ia alone. For a Flat$w_0$CDM model, we measure $w_0=-0.90\pm0.14$ from SNe Ia alone, H$_0=73.5\pm1.1$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ when including the Cepheid host distances and covariance (SH0ES), and $w_0=-0.978^{+0.024}_{-0.031}$ when combining the SN likelihood with constraints from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO); both $w_0$ values are consistent with a cosmological constant. We also present the most precise measurements to date on the evolution of dark energy in a Flat$w_0w_a$CDM universe, and measure $w_a=-0.1^{+0.9}_{-2.0}$ from Pantheon+ alone, H$_0=73.3\pm1.1$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ when including SH0ES, and $w_a=-0.65^{+0.28}_{-0.32}$ when combining Pantheon+ with CMB and BAO data. Finally, we find that systematic uncertainties in the use of SNe Ia along the distance ladder comprise less than one third of the total uncertainty in the measurement of H$_0$ and cannot explain the present "Hubble tension" between local measurements and early-Universe predictions from the cosmological model.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2022; v1 submitted 8 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
The DES view of the Eridanus supervoid and the CMB Cold Spot
Authors:
A. Kovács,
N. Jeffrey,
M. Gatti,
C. Chang,
L. Whiteway,
N. Hamaus,
O. Lahav,
G. Pollina,
D. Bacon,
T. Kacprzak,
B. Mawdsley,
S. Nadathur,
D. Zeurcher,
J. García-Bellido,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
J. Cordero
, et al. (97 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Cold Spot is a puzzling large-scale feature in the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature maps and its origin has been subject to active debate. As an important foreground structure at low redshift, the Eridanus supervoid was recently detected, but it was subsequently determined that, assuming the standard $Λ$CDM model, only about 10-20$\%$ of the observed temperature depression can be accoun…
▽ More
The Cold Spot is a puzzling large-scale feature in the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature maps and its origin has been subject to active debate. As an important foreground structure at low redshift, the Eridanus supervoid was recently detected, but it was subsequently determined that, assuming the standard $Λ$CDM model, only about 10-20$\%$ of the observed temperature depression can be accounted for via its Integrated Sachs-Wolfe imprint. However, $R\gtrsim100~h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$ supervoids elsewhere in the sky have shown ISW imprints $A_{\mathrm{ISW}}\approx5.2\pm1.6$ times stronger than expected from $Λ$CDM ($A_{\mathrm{ISW}}=1$), which warrants further inspection. Using the Year-3 redMaGiC catalogue of luminous red galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey, here we confirm the detection of the Eridanus supervoid as a significant under-density in the Cold Spot's direction at $z<0.2$. We also show, with $\mathrm{S/N}\gtrsim5$ significance, that the Eridanus supervoid appears as the most prominent large-scale under-density in the dark matter mass maps that we reconstructed from DES Year-3 gravitational lensing data. While we report no significant anomalies, an interesting aspect is that the amplitude of the lensing signal from the Eridanus supervoid at the Cold Spot centre is about $30\%$ lower than expected from similar peaks found in N-body simulations based on the standard $Λ$CDM model with parameters $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.279$ and $σ_8 = 0.82$. Overall, our results confirm the causal relation between these individually rare structures in the cosmic web and in the CMB, motivating more detailed future surveys in the Cold Spot region.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Cosmic Shear in Harmonic Space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: Compatibility with Configuration Space Results
Authors:
H. Camacho,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
A. Troja,
R. Rosenfeld,
L. Faga,
R. Gomes,
C. Doux,
X. Fang,
M. Lima,
V. Miranda,
T. F. Eifler,
O. Friedrich,
M. Gatti,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
S. L. Bridle,
A. Choi,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose,
E. Gaztanaga,
D. Gruen,
W. G. Hartley,
B. Hoyle,
M. Jarvis,
N. MacCrann
, et al. (74 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We perform a cosmic shear analysis in harmonic space using the first year of data collected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES-Y1). We measure the cosmic weak lensing shear power spectra using the Metacalibration catalogue and perform a likelihood analysis within the framework of CosmoSIS. We set scale cuts based on baryonic effects contamination and model redshift and shear calibration uncertainties…
▽ More
We perform a cosmic shear analysis in harmonic space using the first year of data collected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES-Y1). We measure the cosmic weak lensing shear power spectra using the Metacalibration catalogue and perform a likelihood analysis within the framework of CosmoSIS. We set scale cuts based on baryonic effects contamination and model redshift and shear calibration uncertainties as well as intrinsic alignments. We adopt as fiducial covariance matrix an analytical computation accounting for the mask geometry in the Gaussian term, including non-Gaussian contributions. A suite of 1200 lognormal simulations is used to validate the harmonic space pipeline and the covariance matrix. We perform a series of stress tests to gauge the robustness of the harmonic space analysis. Finally, we use the DES-Y1 pipeline in configuration space to perform a similar likelihood analysis and compare both results, demonstrating their compatibility in estimating the cosmological parameters $S_8$, $σ_8$ and $Ω_m$. The methods implemented and validated in this paper will allow us to perform a consistent harmonic space analysis in the upcoming DES data.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2022; v1 submitted 13 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Transitioning from Stage-III to Stage-IV: Cosmology from galaxy$\times$CMB lensing and shear$\times$CMB lensing
Authors:
Zhuoqi Zhang,
Chihway Chang,
Patricia Larsen,
Lucas F. Secco,
Joe Zuntz,
the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration
Abstract:
We examine the cosmological constraining power from two cross-correlation probes between galaxy and CMB surveys: the cross-correlation of lens galaxy density with CMB lensing convergence $\langleδκ\rangle$, and source galaxy weak lensing shear with CMB lensing convergence $\langleγκ\rangle$. These two cross-correlation probes provide an independent cross-check of other large-scale structure constr…
▽ More
We examine the cosmological constraining power from two cross-correlation probes between galaxy and CMB surveys: the cross-correlation of lens galaxy density with CMB lensing convergence $\langleδκ\rangle$, and source galaxy weak lensing shear with CMB lensing convergence $\langleγκ\rangle$. These two cross-correlation probes provide an independent cross-check of other large-scale structure constraints and are insensitive to galaxy-only or CMB-only systematic effects. In addition, when combined with other large-scale structure probes, the cross-correlations can break degeneracies in cosmological and nuisance parameters, improving both the precision and robustness of the analysis. In this work, we study how the constraining power of $\langleδκ\rangle+\langleγκ\rangle$ changes from Stage-III (ongoing) to Stage-IV (future) surveys. Given the flexibility in selecting the lens galaxy sample, we also explore systematically the impact on cosmological constraints when we vary the redshift range and magnitude limit of the lens galaxies using mock galaxy catalogs. We find that in our setup, the contribution to cosmological constraints from $\langleδκ\rangle$ and $\langleγκ\rangle$ are comparable in the Stage-III datasets; but in Stage-IV surveys, the noise in $\langleδκ\rangle$ becomes subdominant to cosmic variance, preventing $\langleδκ\rangle$ to further improve the constraints. This implies that to maximize the cosmological constraints from future $\langleδκ\rangle+\langleγκ\rangle$ analyses, we should focus more on the requirements on $\langleγκ\rangle$ instead of $\langleδκ\rangle$. Furthermore, the selection of the lens sample should be optimized in terms of our ability to characterize its redshift or galaxy bias instead of its number density.
△ Less
Submitted 3 September, 2023; v1 submitted 8 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Validating Synthetic Galaxy Catalogs for Dark Energy Science in the LSST Era
Authors:
Eve Kovacs,
Yao-Yuan Mao,
Michel Aguena,
Anita Bahmanyar,
Adam Broussard,
James Butler,
Duncan Campbell,
Chihway Chang,
Shenming Fu,
Katrin Heitmann,
Danila Korytov,
François Lanusse,
Patricia Larsen,
Rachel Mandelbaum,
Christopher B. Morrison,
Constantin Payerne,
Marina Ricci,
Eli Rykoff,
F. Javier Sánchez,
Ignacio Sevilla-Noarbe,
Melanie Simet,
Chun-Hao To,
Vinu Vikraman,
Rongpu Zhou,
Camille Avestruz
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Large simulation efforts are required to provide synthetic galaxy catalogs for ongoing and upcoming cosmology surveys. These extragalactic catalogs are being used for many diverse purposes covering a wide range of scientific topics. In order to be useful, they must offer realistically complex information about the galaxies they contain. Hence, it is critical to implement a rigorous validation proc…
▽ More
Large simulation efforts are required to provide synthetic galaxy catalogs for ongoing and upcoming cosmology surveys. These extragalactic catalogs are being used for many diverse purposes covering a wide range of scientific topics. In order to be useful, they must offer realistically complex information about the galaxies they contain. Hence, it is critical to implement a rigorous validation procedure that ensures that the simulated galaxy properties faithfully capture observations and delivers an assessment of the level of realism attained by the catalog. We present here a suite of validation tests that have been developed by the Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC). We discuss how the inclusion of each test is driven by the scientific targets for static ground-based dark energy science and by the availability of suitable validation data. The validation criteria that are used to assess the performance of a catalog are flexible and depend on the science goals. We illustrate the utility of this suite by showing examples for the validation of cosmoDC2, the extragalactic catalog recently released for the LSST DESC second Data Challenge.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2022; v1 submitted 7 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
The LSST-DESC 3x2pt Tomography Optimization Challenge
Authors:
Joe Zuntz,
François Lanusse,
Alex I. Malz,
Angus H. Wright,
Anže Slosar,
Bela Abolfathi,
David Alonso,
Abby Bault,
Clécio R. Bom,
Massimo Brescia,
Adam Broussard,
Jean-Eric Campagne,
Stefano Cavuoti,
Eduardo S. Cypriano,
Bernardo M. O. Fraga,
Eric Gawiser,
Elizabeth J. Gonzalez,
Dylan Green,
Peter Hatfield,
Kartheik Iyer,
David Kirkby,
Andrina Nicola,
Erfan Nourbakhsh,
Andy Park,
Gabriel Teixeira
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper presents the results of the Rubin Observatory Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) 3x2pt tomography challenge, which served as a first step toward optimizing the tomographic binning strategy for the main DESC analysis. The task of choosing an optimal tomographic binning scheme for a photometric survey is made particularly delicate in the context of a metacalibrated lensing catalogue…
▽ More
This paper presents the results of the Rubin Observatory Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) 3x2pt tomography challenge, which served as a first step toward optimizing the tomographic binning strategy for the main DESC analysis. The task of choosing an optimal tomographic binning scheme for a photometric survey is made particularly delicate in the context of a metacalibrated lensing catalogue, as only the photometry from the bands included in the metacalibration process (usually riz and potentially g) can be used in sample definition.
The goal of the challenge was to collect and compare bin assignment strategies under various metrics of a standard 3x2pt cosmology analysis in a highly idealized setting to establish a baseline for realistically complex follow-up studies; in this preliminary study, we used two sets of cosmological simulations of galaxy redshifts and photometry under a simple noise model neglecting photometric outliers and variation in observing conditions, and contributed algorithms were provided with a representative and complete training set.
We review and evaluate the entries to the challenge, finding that even from this limited photometry information, multiple algorithms can separate tomographic bins reasonably well, reaching figures-of-merit scores close to the attainable maximum. We further find that adding the g band to riz photometry improves metric performance by ~15% and that the optimal bin assignment strategy depends strongly on the science case: which figure-of-merit is to be optimized, and which observables (clustering, lensing, or both) are included.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2021; v1 submitted 30 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Galaxy-halo connection from galaxy-galaxy lensing
Authors:
G. Zacharegkas,
C. Chang,
J. Prat,
S. Pandey,
I. Ferrero,
J. Blazek,
B. Jain,
M. Crocce,
J. DeRose,
A. Palmese,
S. Seitz,
E. Sheldon,
W. G. Hartley,
R. H. Wechsler,
S. Dodelson,
P. Fosalba,
E. Krause,
Y. Park,
C. Sánchez,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos
, et al. (92 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Galaxy-galaxy lensing is a powerful probe of the connection between galaxies and their host dark matter halos, which is important both for galaxy evolution and cosmology. We extend the measurement and modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal in the recent Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmology analysis to the highly nonlinear scales ($\sim 100$ kpc). This extension enables us to study the galaxy-…
▽ More
Galaxy-galaxy lensing is a powerful probe of the connection between galaxies and their host dark matter halos, which is important both for galaxy evolution and cosmology. We extend the measurement and modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal in the recent Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmology analysis to the highly nonlinear scales ($\sim 100$ kpc). This extension enables us to study the galaxy-halo connection via a Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) framework for the two lens samples used in the cosmology analysis: a luminous red galaxy sample (redMaGiC) and a magnitude-limited galaxy sample (MagLim). We find that redMaGiC (MagLim) galaxies typically live in dark matter halos of mass $\log_{10}(M_{h}/M_{\odot}) \approx 13.7$ which is roughly constant over redshift ($13.3-13.5$ depending on redshift). We constrain these masses to $\sim 15\%$, approximately $1.5$ times improvement over previous work. We also constrain the linear galaxy bias more than 5 times better than what is inferred by the cosmological scales only. We find the satellite fraction for redMaGiC (MagLim) to be $\sim 0.1-0.2$ ($0.1-0.3$) with no clear trend in redshift. Our constraints on these halo properties are broadly consistent with other available estimates from previous work, large-scale constraints and simulations. The framework built in this paper will be used for future HOD studies with other galaxy samples and extensions for cosmological analyses.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2022; v1 submitted 15 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
M. Aguena,
A. Alarcon,
S. Allam,
O. Alves,
A. Amon,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
J. Annis,
S. Avila,
D. Bacon,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. Bhargava,
S. Birrer,
J. Blazek,
A. Brandao-Souza,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
E. Buckley-Geer,
D. L. Burke,
H. Camacho,
A. Campos
, et al. (146 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to miti…
▽ More
We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results. We model the data within the flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM cosmological models. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude $S_8=0.776^{+0.017}_{-0.017}$ and matter density $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.339^{+0.032}_{-0.031}$ in $Λ$CDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; $S_8=0.775^{+0.026}_{-0.024}$, $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.352^{+0.035}_{-0.041}$, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter $w=-0.98^{+0.32}_{-0.20}$ in $w$CDM. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed $p=0.13$ to $0.48$. When combining DES 3$\times$2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find $p=0.34$. Combining all of these data sets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.306^{+0.004}_{-0.005}$, $h=0.680^{+0.004}_{-0.003}$, and $\sum m_ν<0.13 \;\mathrm{eV\; (95\% \;CL)}$ in $Λ$CDM; $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $Ω_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.302^{+0.006}_{-0.006}$, $h=0.687^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$, and $w=-1.031^{+0.030}_{-0.027}$ in $w$CDM. (abridged)
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation
Authors:
E. Krause,
X. Fang,
S. Pandey,
L. F. Secco,
O. Alves,
H. Huang,
J. Blazek,
J. Prat,
J. Zuntz,
T. F. Eifler,
N. MacCrann,
J. DeRose,
M. Crocce,
A. Porredon,
B. Jain,
M. A. Troxel,
S. Dodelson,
D. Huterer,
A. R. Liddle,
C. D. Leonard,
A. Amon,
A. Chen,
J. Elvin-Poole,
A. Ferté,
J. Muir
, et al. (99 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper details the modeling pipeline and validates the baseline analysis choices of the DES Year 3 joint analysis of galaxy clustering and weak lensing (a so-called "3$\times$2pt" analysis). These analysis choices include the specific combination of cosmological probes, priors on cosmological and systematics parameters, model parameterizations for systematic effects and related approximations,…
▽ More
This paper details the modeling pipeline and validates the baseline analysis choices of the DES Year 3 joint analysis of galaxy clustering and weak lensing (a so-called "3$\times$2pt" analysis). These analysis choices include the specific combination of cosmological probes, priors on cosmological and systematics parameters, model parameterizations for systematic effects and related approximations, and angular scales where the model assumptions are validated. We run a large number of simulated likelihood analyses using synthetic data vectors to test the robustness of our baseline analysis. We demonstrate that the DES Year 3 modeling pipeline, including the calibrated scale cuts, is sufficiently accurate relative to the constraining power of the DES Year 3 analyses. Our systematics mitigation strategy accounts for astrophysical systematics, such as galaxy bias, intrinsic alignments, source and lens magnification, baryonic effects, and source clustering, as well as for uncertainties in modeling the matter power spectrum, reduced shear, and estimator effects. We further demonstrate excellent agreement between two independently-developed modeling pipelines, and thus rule out any residual uncertainties due to the numerical implementation.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology from combined galaxy clustering and lensing -- validation on cosmological simulations
Authors:
J. DeRose,
R. H. Wechsler,
M. R. Becker,
E. S. Rykoff,
S. Pandey,
N. MacCrann,
A. Amon,
J. Myles,
E. Krause,
D. Gruen,
B. Jain,
M. A. Troxel,
J. Prat,
A. Alarcon,
C. Sánchez,
J. Blazek,
M. Crocce,
G. Giannini,
M. Gatti,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Zuntz,
S. Dodelson,
X. Fang,
O. Friedrich,
L. F. Secco
, et al. (92 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) $3\times2$-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard v2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak lensing analyses. We show that the Buzzard v2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photom…
▽ More
We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) $3\times2$-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard v2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak lensing analyses. We show that the Buzzard v2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photometric redshift and magnitude distributions, and the relevant set of two-point clustering and weak lensing statistics. We then show that our model for the $3\times2$-point data vector is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys assuming the true redshift distributions for our source and lens samples, demonstrating robustness to uncertainties in the modeling of the non-linear matter power spectrum, non-linear galaxy bias and higher-order lensing corrections. Additionally, we demonstrate for the first time that our photometric redshift calibration methodology, including information from photometry, spectroscopy, clustering cross-correlations, and galaxy-galaxy lensing ratios, is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys in the presence of realistic photometric redshift uncertainties.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MagLim lens sample
Authors:
A. Porredon,
M. Crocce,
J. Elvin-Poole,
R. Cawthon,
G. Giannini,
J. De Vicente,
A. Carnero Rosell,
I. Ferrero,
E. Krause,
X. Fang,
J. Prat,
M. Rodriguez-Monroy,
S. Pandey,
A. Pocino,
F. J. Castander,
A. Choi,
A. Amon,
I. Tutusaus,
S. Dodelson,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
P. Fosalba,
E. Gaztanaga,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira
, et al. (119 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Two of the most sensitive probes of the large scale structure of the universe are the clustering of galaxies and the tangential shear of background galaxy shapes produced by those foreground galaxies, so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing. Combining the measurements of these two two-point functions leads to cosmological constraints that are independent of the galaxy bias factor. The optimal choice of fo…
▽ More
Two of the most sensitive probes of the large scale structure of the universe are the clustering of galaxies and the tangential shear of background galaxy shapes produced by those foreground galaxies, so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing. Combining the measurements of these two two-point functions leads to cosmological constraints that are independent of the galaxy bias factor. The optimal choice of foreground, or lens, galaxies is governed by the joint, but conflicting requirements to obtain accurate redshift information and large statistics. We present cosmological results from the full 5000 sq. deg. of the Dark Energy Survey first three years of observations (Y3) combining those two-point functions, using for the first time a magnitude-limited lens sample (MagLim) of 11 million galaxies especially selected to optimize such combination, and 100 million background shapes. We consider two cosmological models, flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM. In $Λ$CDM we obtain for the matter density $Ω_m = 0.320^{+0.041}_{-0.034}$ and for the clustering amplitude $S_8 = 0.778^{+0.037}_{-0.031}$, at 68% C.L. The latter is only 1$σ$ smaller than the prediction in this model informed by measurements of the cosmic microwave background by the Planck satellite. In $w$CDM we find $Ω_m = 0.32^{+0.044}_{-0.046}$, $S_8=0.777^{+0.049}_{-0.051}$, and dark energy equation of state $w=-1.031^{+0.218}_{-0.379}$. We find that including smaller scales while marginalizing over non-linear galaxy bias improves the constraining power in the $Ω_m-S_8$ plane by $31$% and in the $Ω_m-w$ plane by $41$% while yielding consistent cosmological parameters from those in the linear bias case. These results are combined with those from cosmic shear in a companion paper to present full DES-Y3 constraints from the three two-point functions (3x2pt).
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Constraints on cosmological parameters and galaxy bias models from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the redMaGiC sample
Authors:
S. Pandey,
E. Krause,
J. DeRose,
N. MacCrann,
B. Jain,
M. Crocce,
J. Blazek,
A. Choi,
H. Huang,
C. To,
X. Fang,
J. Elvin-Poole,
J. Prat,
A. Porredon,
L. F. Secco,
M. Rodriguez-Monroy,
N. Weaverdyck,
Y. Park,
M. Raveri,
E. Rozo,
E. S. Rykoff,
G. M. Bernstein,
C. Sánchez,
M. Jarvis,
M. A. Troxel
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We constrain cosmological and galaxy-bias parameters using the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year-3 data. We describe our modeling framework, and choice of scales analyzed, validating their robustness to theoretical uncertainties in small-scale clustering by analyzing simulated data. Using a linear galaxy bias model and redMaGiC…
▽ More
We constrain cosmological and galaxy-bias parameters using the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year-3 data. We describe our modeling framework, and choice of scales analyzed, validating their robustness to theoretical uncertainties in small-scale clustering by analyzing simulated data. Using a linear galaxy bias model and redMaGiC galaxy sample, we obtain constraints on the matter density to be $Ω_{\rm m} = 0.325^{+0.033}_{-0.034}$. We also implement a non-linear galaxy bias model to probe smaller scales that includes parameterization based on hybrid perturbation theory and find that it leads to a 17% gain in cosmological constraining power. We perform robustness tests of our methodology pipeline and demonstrate the stability of the constraints to changes in the theoretical model. Using the redMaGiC galaxy sample as foreground lens galaxies, we find the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements to exhibit significant signals akin to de-correlation between galaxies and mass on large scales, which is not expected in any current models. This likely systematic measurement error biases our constraints on galaxy bias and the $S_8$ parameter. We find that a scale-, redshift- and sky-area-independent phenomenological de-correlation parameter can effectively capture the impact of this systematic error. We trace the source of this de-correlation to a color-dependent photometric issue and minimize its impact on our result by changing the selection criteria of redMaGiC galaxies. Using this new sample, our constraints on the $S_8$ parameter are consistent with previous studies, and we find a small shift in the $Ω_{\rm m}$ constraints compared to the fiducial redMaGiC sample. We constrain the mean host halo mass of the redMaGiC galaxies in this new sample to be approximately $1.6 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}/h$.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Modeling Uncertainty
Authors:
L. F. Secco,
S. Samuroff,
E. Krause,
B. Jain,
J. Blazek,
M. Raveri,
A. Campos,
A. Amon,
A. Chen,
C. Doux,
A. Choi,
D. Gruen,
G. M. Bernstein,
C. Chang,
J. DeRose,
J. Myles,
A. Ferté,
P. Lemos,
D. Huterer,
J. Prat,
M. A. Troxel,
N. MacCrann,
A. R. Liddle,
T. Kacprzak,
X. Fang
, et al. (129 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. (2021), present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter $S_8\equivσ_8\sqrt{Ω_\textrm{m}/0.3}$ at the 3% level in $Λ$CDM: $S_8=0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angu…
▽ More
This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. (2021), present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter $S_8\equivσ_8\sqrt{Ω_\textrm{m}/0.3}$ at the 3% level in $Λ$CDM: $S_8=0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the $Λ$CDM analysis: $S_8=0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak-lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We additionally quantify the agreement between our data and external constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our DES Y3 result under the assumption of $Λ$CDM is found to be in statistical agreement with Planck 2018, although favors a lower $S_8$ than the CMB-inferred value by $2.3σ$ (a $p$-value of 0.02). This paper explores the robustness of these cosmic shear results to modeling of intrinsic alignments, the matter power spectrum and baryonic physics. We additionally explore the statistical preference of our data for intrinsic alignment models of different complexity. The fiducial cosmic shear model is tested using synthetic data, and we report no biases greater than 0.3$σ$ in the plane of $S_8\timesΩ_\textrm{m}$ caused by uncertainties in the theoretical models.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration
Authors:
A. Amon,
D. Gruen,
M. A. Troxel,
N. MacCrann,
S. Dodelson,
A. Choi,
C. Doux,
L. F. Secco,
S. Samuroff,
E. Krause,
J. Cordero,
J. Myles,
J. DeRose,
R. H. Wechsler,
M. Gatti,
A. Navarro-Alsina,
G. M. Bernstein,
B. Jain,
J. Blazek,
A. Alarcon,
A. Ferté,
M. Raveri,
P. Lemos,
A. Campos,
J. Prat
, et al. (123 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This work, together with its companion paper, Secco and Samuroff et al. (2021), presents the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints based on an analysis of over 100 million source galaxies. With the data spanning 4143 deg$^2$ on the sky, divided into four redshift bins, we produce the highest significance measurement of cosmic shear to date, with a signal-…
▽ More
This work, together with its companion paper, Secco and Samuroff et al. (2021), presents the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints based on an analysis of over 100 million source galaxies. With the data spanning 4143 deg$^2$ on the sky, divided into four redshift bins, we produce the highest significance measurement of cosmic shear to date, with a signal-to-noise of 40. We conduct a blind analysis in the context of the $Λ$CDM model and find a 3% constraint of the clustering amplitude, $S_8\equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$. A $Λ$CDM-Optimized analysis, which safely includes smaller scale information, yields a 2% precision measurement of $S_8= 0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ that is consistent with the fiducial case. The two low-redshift measurements are statistically consistent with the Planck Cosmic Microwave Background result, however, both recovered $S_8$ values are lower than the high-redshift prediction by $2.3σ$ and $2.1σ$ ($p$-values of 0.02 and 0.05), respectively. The measurements are shown to be internally consistent across redshift bins, angular scales and correlation functions. The analysis is demonstrated to be robust to calibration systematics, with the $S_8$ posterior consistent when varying the choice of redshift calibration sample, the modeling of redshift uncertainty and methodology. Similarly, we find that the corrections included to account for the blending of galaxies shifts our best-fit $S_8$ by $0.5σ$ without incurring a substantial increase in uncertainty. We examine the limiting factors for the precision of the cosmological constraints and find observational systematics to be subdominant to the modeling of astrophysics. Specifically, we identify the uncertainties in modeling baryonic effects and intrinsic alignments as the limiting systematics.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Exploiting small-scale information with lensing shear ratios
Authors:
C. Sánchez,
J. Prat,
G. Zacharegkas,
S. Pandey,
E. Baxter,
G. M. Bernstein,
J. Blazek,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
E. Krause,
P. Lemos,
Y. Park,
M. Raveri,
J. Sanchez,
M. A. Troxel,
A. Amon,
X. Fang,
O. Friedrich,
D. Gruen,
A. Porredon,
L. F. Secco,
S. Samuroff,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey, we use ratios of small-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements around the same lens sample to constrain source redshift uncertainties, intrinsic alignments and other nuisance parameters of our model. Instead of using a simple geometric approach for the ratios, we use the full modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, inclu…
▽ More
Using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey, we use ratios of small-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements around the same lens sample to constrain source redshift uncertainties, intrinsic alignments and other nuisance parameters of our model. Instead of using a simple geometric approach for the ratios, we use the full modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, including the corresponding integration over the power spectrum and the contributions from intrinsic alignments and lens magnification. We perform extensive testing of the small-scale shear ratio (SR) modeling by studying the impact of different effects such as the inclusion of baryonic physics, non-linear biasing, halo occupation distribution descriptions and lens magnification, among others, and using realistic $N$-body simulations. We validate the robustness of our constraints in the data by using two independent lens samples, and by deriving constraints using the corresponding large-scale ratios for which the modeling is simpler. The DES Y3 results demonstrate how the ratios provide significant improvements in constraining power for several nuisance parameters in our model, especially on source redshift calibration and intrinsic alignments (IA). For source redshifts, SR improves the constraints from the prior by up to 38\% in some redshift bins. Such improvements, and especially the constraints it provides on IA, translate to tighter cosmological constraints when SR is combined with cosmic shear and other 2pt functions. In particular, for the DES Y3 data, SR improves $S_8$ constraints from cosmic shear by up to 31\%, and for the full combination of probes (3$\times$2pt) by up to 10\%. The shear ratios presented in this work are used as an additional likelihood for cosmic shear, 2$\times$2pt and the full 3$\times$2pt in the fiducial DES Y3 cosmological analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: High-precision measurement and modeling of galaxy-galaxy lensing
Authors:
J. Prat,
J. Blazek,
C. Sánchez,
I. Tutusaus,
S. Pandey,
J. Elvin-Poole,
E. Krause,
M. A. Troxel,
L. F. Secco,
A. Amon,
J. DeRose,
G. Zacharegkas,
C. Chang,
B. Jain,
N. MacCrann,
Y. Park,
E. Sheldon,
G. Giannini,
S. Bocquet,
C. To,
A. Alarcon,
O. Alves,
F. Andrade-Oliveira,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present and characterize the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal measured using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) covering 4132 deg$^2$. These galaxy-galaxy measurements are used in the DES Y3 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis, which combines weak lensing and galaxy clustering information. We use two lens samples: a magnitude-limited sample and the redMaGic sample, wh…
▽ More
We present and characterize the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal measured using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) covering 4132 deg$^2$. These galaxy-galaxy measurements are used in the DES Y3 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis, which combines weak lensing and galaxy clustering information. We use two lens samples: a magnitude-limited sample and the redMaGic sample, which span the redshift range $\sim 0.2-1$ with 10.7 M and 2.6 M galaxies respectively. For the source catalog, we use the Metacalibration shape sample, consisting of $\simeq$100 M galaxies separated into 4 tomographic bins. Our galaxy-galaxy lensing estimator is the mean tangential shear, for which we obtain a total S/N of $\sim$148 for MagLim ($\sim$120 for redMaGic), and $\sim$67 ($\sim$55) after applying the scale cuts of 6 Mpc/$h$. Thus we reach percent-level statistical precision, which requires that our modeling and systematic-error control be of comparable accuracy. The tangential shear model used in the 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis includes lens magnification, a five-parameter intrinsic alignment model (TATT), marginalization over a point-mass to remove information from small scales and a linear galaxy bias model validated with higher-order terms. We explore the impact of these choices on the tangential shear observable and study the significance of effects not included in our model, such as reduced shear, source magnification and source clustering. We also test the robustness of our measurements to various observational and systematics effects, such as the impact of observing conditions, lens-source clustering, random-point subtraction, scale-dependent Metacalibration responses, PSF residuals, and B-modes.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: curved-sky weak lensing mass map reconstruction
Authors:
N. Jeffrey,
M. Gatti,
C. Chang,
L. Whiteway,
U. Demirbozan,
A. Kovacs,
G. Pollina,
D. Bacon,
N. Hamaus,
T. Kacprzak,
O. Lahav,
F. Lanusse,
B. Mawdsley,
S. Nadathur,
J. L. Starck,
P. Vielzeuf,
D. Zeurcher,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Cawthon
, et al. (105 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present reconstructed convergence maps, \textit{mass maps}, from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) third year (Y3) weak gravitational lensing data set. The mass maps are weighted projections of the density field (primarily dark matter) in the foreground of the observed galaxies. We use four reconstruction methods, each is a \textit{maximum a posteriori} estimate with a different model for the prior…
▽ More
We present reconstructed convergence maps, \textit{mass maps}, from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) third year (Y3) weak gravitational lensing data set. The mass maps are weighted projections of the density field (primarily dark matter) in the foreground of the observed galaxies. We use four reconstruction methods, each is a \textit{maximum a posteriori} estimate with a different model for the prior probability of the map: Kaiser-Squires, null B-mode prior, Gaussian prior, and a sparsity prior. All methods are implemented on the celestial sphere to accommodate the large sky coverage of the DES Y3 data. We compare the methods using realistic $Λ$CDM simulations with mock data that are closely matched to the DES Y3 data. We quantify the performance of the methods at the map level and then apply the reconstruction methods to the DES Y3 data, performing tests for systematic error effects. The maps are compared with optical foreground cosmic-web structures and are used to evaluate the lensing signal from cosmic-void profiles. The recovered dark matter map covers the largest sky fraction of any galaxy weak lensing map to date.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2021; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Probing gravity with the DES-CMASS sample and BOSS spectroscopy
Authors:
S. Lee,
E. M. Huff,
A. Choi,
J. Elvin-Poole,
C. Hirata,
K. Honscheid,
N. MacCrann,
A. J. Ross,
M. A. Troxel,
T. F. Eifler,
H. Kong,
A. Ferté,
J. Blazek,
D. Huterer,
A. Amara,
A. Campos,
A. Chen,
S. Dodelson,
P. Lemos,
C. D. Leonard,
V. Miranda,
J. Muir,
M. Raveri,
L. F. Secco,
N. Weaverdyck
, et al. (80 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The DES-CMASS sample (DMASS) is designed to optimally combine the weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and redshift-space distortions (RSD) probed by the CMASS galaxy sample from the Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of adopting DMASS as the equivalent of BOSS CMASS for a joint analysis of DES and BOSS in the fram…
▽ More
The DES-CMASS sample (DMASS) is designed to optimally combine the weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and redshift-space distortions (RSD) probed by the CMASS galaxy sample from the Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of adopting DMASS as the equivalent of BOSS CMASS for a joint analysis of DES and BOSS in the framework of modified gravity. We utilize the angular clustering of the DMASS galaxies, cosmic shear of the DES METACALIBRATION sources, and cross-correlation of the two as data vectors. By jointly fitting the combination of the data with the RSD measurements from the BOSS CMASS sample and Planck data, we obtain the constraints on modified gravity parameters $μ_0 = -0.37^{+0.47}_{-0.45}$ and $Σ_0 = 0.078^{+0.078}_{-0.082}$. We do not detect any significant deviation from General Relativity. Our constraints of modified gravity measured with DMASS are tighter than those with the DES Year 1 redMaGiC galaxy sample with the same external data sets by $29\%$ for $μ_0$ and $21\%$ for $Σ_0$, and comparable to the published results of the DES Year 1 modified gravity analysis despite this work using fewer external data sets. This improvement is mainly because the galaxy bias parameter is shared and more tightly constrained by both CMASS and DMASS, effectively breaking the degeneracy between the galaxy bias and other cosmological parameters. Such an approach to optimally combine photometric and spectroscopic surveys using a photometric sample equivalent to a spectroscopic sample can be applied to combining future surveys having a limited overlap such as DESI and LSST.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2021; v1 submitted 29 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Galaxy-galaxy lensing with the DES-CMASS catalogue: measurement and constraints on the galaxy-matter cross-correlation
Authors:
S. Lee,
M. A. Troxel,
A. Choi,
J. Elvin-Poole,
C. Hirata,
K. Honscheid,
E. M. Huff,
N. MacCrann,
A. J. Ross,
T. F. Eifler,
C. Chang,
R. Miquel,
Y. Omori,
J. Prat,
G. M. Bernstein,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose,
M. Gatti,
M. M. Rau,
S. Samuroff,
C. Sánchez,
P. Vielzeuf,
J. Zuntz,
M. Aguena,
S. Allam
, et al. (68 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The DMASS sample is a photometric sample from the DES Year 1 data set designed to replicate the properties of the CMASS sample from BOSS, in support of a joint analysis of DES and BOSS beyond the small overlap** area. In this paper, we present the measurement of galaxy-galaxy lensing using the DMASS sample as gravitational lenses in the DES Y1 imaging data. We test a number of potential systemat…
▽ More
The DMASS sample is a photometric sample from the DES Year 1 data set designed to replicate the properties of the CMASS sample from BOSS, in support of a joint analysis of DES and BOSS beyond the small overlap** area. In this paper, we present the measurement of galaxy-galaxy lensing using the DMASS sample as gravitational lenses in the DES Y1 imaging data. We test a number of potential systematics that can bias the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, including those from shear estimation, photometric redshifts, and observing conditions. After careful systematic tests, we obtain a highly significant detection of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal, with total $S/N=25.7$. With the measured signal, we assess the feasibility of using DMASS as gravitational lenses equivalent to CMASS, by estimating the galaxy-matter cross-correlation coefficient $r_{\rm cc}$. By jointly fitting the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurement with the galaxy clustering measurement from CMASS, we obtain $r_{\rm cc}=1.09^{+0.12}_{-0.11}$ for the scale cut of $4~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$ and $r_{\rm cc}=1.06^{+0.13}_{-0.12}$ for $12~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$ in fixed cosmology. By adding the angular galaxy clustering of DMASS, we obtain $r_{\rm cc}=1.06\pm 0.10$ for the scale cut of $4~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$ and $r_{\rm cc}=1.03\pm 0.11$ for $12~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc}$. The resulting values of $r_{\rm cc}$ indicate that the lensing signal of DMASS is statistically consistent with the one that would have been measured if CMASS had populated the DES region within the given statistical uncertainty. The measurement of galaxy-galaxy lensing presented in this paper will serve as part of the data vector for the forthcoming cosmology analysis in preparation.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2021; v1 submitted 22 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Synthetic Galaxy Clusters and Observations Based on Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Data
Authors:
T. N. Varga,
D. Gruen,
S. Seitz,
N. MacCrann,
E. Sheldon,
W. G. Hartley,
A. Amon,
A. Choi,
A. Palmese,
Y. Zhang,
M. R. Becker,
J. McCullough,
E. Rozo,
E. S. Rykoff,
C. To,
S. Grandis,
G. M. Bernstein,
S. Dodelson,
K. Eckert,
S. Everett,
R. A. Gruendl,
I. Harrison,
K. Herner,
R. P. Rollins,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe
, et al. (53 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We develop a novel data-driven method for generating synthetic optical observations of galaxy clusters. In cluster weak lensing, the interplay between analysis choices and systematic effects related to source galaxy selection, shape measurement and photometric redshift estimation can be best characterized in end-to-end tests going from mock observations to recovered cluster masses. To create such…
▽ More
We develop a novel data-driven method for generating synthetic optical observations of galaxy clusters. In cluster weak lensing, the interplay between analysis choices and systematic effects related to source galaxy selection, shape measurement and photometric redshift estimation can be best characterized in end-to-end tests going from mock observations to recovered cluster masses. To create such test scenarios, we measure and model the photometric properties of galaxy clusters and their sky environments from the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) data in two bins of cluster richness $λ\in[30;\,45)$, $λ\in[45;\,60)$ and three bins in cluster redshift ($z\in[0.3;\,0.35)$, $z\in[0.45;\,0.5)$ and $z\in[0.6;\,0.65)$. Using deep-field imaging data we extrapolate galaxy populations beyond the limiting magnitude of DES Y3 and calculate the properties of cluster member galaxies via statistical background subtraction. We construct mock galaxy clusters as random draws from a distribution function, and render mock clusters and line-of-sight catalogs into synthetic images in the same format as actual survey observations. Synthetic galaxy clusters are generated from real observational data, and thus are independent from the assumptions inherent to cosmological simulations. The recipe can be straightforwardly modified to incorporate extra information, and correct for survey incompleteness. New realizations of synthetic clusters can be created at minimal cost, which will allow future analyses to generate the large number of images needed to characterize systematic uncertainties in cluster mass measurements.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2022; v1 submitted 20 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Deep Field Optical + Near-Infrared Images and Catalogue
Authors:
W. G. Hartley,
A. Choi,
A. Amon,
R. A. Gruendl,
E. Sheldon,
I. Harrison,
G. M. Bernstein,
I. Sevilla-Noarbe,
B. Yanny,
K. Eckert,
H. T. Diehl,
A. Alarcon,
M. Banerji,
K. Bechtol,
R. Buchs,
S. Cantu,
C. Conselice,
J. Cordero,
C. Davis,
T. M. Davis,
S. Dodelson,
A. Drlica-Wagner,
S. Everett,
A. Ferté,
D. Gruen
, et al. (93 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Deep Fields, a set of images and associated multi-wavelength catalogue ($ugrizJHKs$) built from Dark Energy Camera (DECam) and Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) data. The DES Deep Fields comprise 11 fields (10 DES supernova fields plus COSMOS), with a total area of $\sim30~$ square degrees in $ugriz$ bands and reaching a maximum…
▽ More
We describe the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Deep Fields, a set of images and associated multi-wavelength catalogue ($ugrizJHKs$) built from Dark Energy Camera (DECam) and Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) data. The DES Deep Fields comprise 11 fields (10 DES supernova fields plus COSMOS), with a total area of $\sim30~$ square degrees in $ugriz$ bands and reaching a maximum $i$-band depth of 26.75 (AB, $10σ$, 2 arcsec). We present a catalogue for the DES 3-year cosmology analysis of those four fields with full 8-band coverage, totalling $5.88~$ sq. deg. after masking. Numbering $2.8~$million objects ($1.6~$million post masking), our catalogue is drawn from images coadded to consistent depths of $r=25.7, i=25, z=24.3$ mag. We use a new model-fitting code, built upon established methods, to deblend sources and ensure consistent colours across the $u$-band to $Ks$-band wavelength range. We further detail the tight control we maintain over the point-spread function modelling required for the model fitting, astrometry and consistency of photometry between the four fields. The catalogue allows us to perform a careful star-galaxy separation and produces excellent photometric redshift performance (${\rm NMAD} = 0.023$ at $i<23$). The Deep-Fields catalogue will be made available as part of the cosmology data products release, following the completion of the DES 3-year weak lensing and galaxy clustering cosmology work.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2022; v1 submitted 23 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Assessing tension metrics with Dark Energy Survey and Planck data
Authors:
P. Lemos,
M. Raveri,
A. Campos,
Y. Park,
C. Chang,
N. Weaverdyck,
D. Huterer,
A. R. Liddle,
J. Blazek,
R. Cawthon,
A. Choi,
J. DeRose,
S. Dodelson,
C. Doux,
M. Gatti,
D. Gruen,
I. Harrison,
E. Krause,
O. Lahav,
N. MacCrann,
J. Muir,
J. Prat,
M. M. Rau,
R. P. Rollins,
S. Samuroff
, et al. (81 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Quantifying tensions -- inconsistencies amongst measurements of cosmological parameters by different experiments -- has emerged as a crucial part of modern cosmological data analysis. Statistically-significant tensions between two experiments or cosmological probes may indicate new physics extending beyond the standard cosmological model and need to be promptly identified. We apply several tension…
▽ More
Quantifying tensions -- inconsistencies amongst measurements of cosmological parameters by different experiments -- has emerged as a crucial part of modern cosmological data analysis. Statistically-significant tensions between two experiments or cosmological probes may indicate new physics extending beyond the standard cosmological model and need to be promptly identified. We apply several tension estimators proposed in the literature to the Dark Energy Survey (DES) large-scale structure measurement and Planck cosmic microwave background data. We first evaluate the responsiveness of these metrics to an input tension artificially introduced between the two, using synthetic DES data. We then apply the metrics to the comparison of Planck and actual DES Year 1 data. We find that the parameter differences, Eigentension, and Suspiciousness metrics all yield similar results on both simulated and real data, while the Bayes ratio is inconsistent with the rest due to its dependence on the prior volume. Using these metrics, we calculate the tension between DES Year 1 $3\times 2$pt and Planck, finding the surveys to be in $\sim 2.3σ$ tension under the $Λ$CDM paradigm. This suite of metrics provides a toolset for robustly testing tensions in the DES Year 3 data and beyond.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2021; v1 submitted 17 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.