-
Ferromagnetic Ising Model on multiregular random graphs
Authors:
Diego Alberici,
Pierluigi Contucci,
Emanuele Mingione,
Filippo Zimmaro
Abstract:
A family of multispecies Ising models on generalized regular random graphs is investigated in the thermodynamic limit. The architecture is specified by class-dependent couplings and magnetic fields. We prove that the magnetizations, neighbours correlations and free energy converge to suitable functions evaluated at the solution of a belief propagation fixed point equation. In absence of magnetic f…
▽ More
A family of multispecies Ising models on generalized regular random graphs is investigated in the thermodynamic limit. The architecture is specified by class-dependent couplings and magnetic fields. We prove that the magnetizations, neighbours correlations and free energy converge to suitable functions evaluated at the solution of a belief propagation fixed point equation. In absence of magnetic fields, a phase transition is identified and the corresponding critical parameters are determined by the spectral radius of a low-dimensional matrix.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Trust AI Regulation? Discerning users are vital to build trust and effective AI regulation
Authors:
Zainab Alalawi,
Paolo Bova,
Theodor Cimpeanu,
Alessandro Di Stefano,
Manh Hong Duong,
Elias Fernandez Domingos,
The Anh Han,
Marcus Krellner,
Bianca Ogbo,
Simon T. Powers,
Filippo Zimmaro
Abstract:
There is general agreement that some form of regulation is necessary both for AI creators to be incentivised to develop trustworthy systems, and for users to actually trust those systems. But there is much debate about what form these regulations should take and how they should be implemented. Most work in this area has been qualitative, and has not been able to make formal predictions. Here, we p…
▽ More
There is general agreement that some form of regulation is necessary both for AI creators to be incentivised to develop trustworthy systems, and for users to actually trust those systems. But there is much debate about what form these regulations should take and how they should be implemented. Most work in this area has been qualitative, and has not been able to make formal predictions. Here, we propose that evolutionary game theory can be used to quantitatively model the dilemmas faced by users, AI creators, and regulators, and provide insights into the possible effects of different regulatory regimes. We show that creating trustworthy AI and user trust requires regulators to be incentivised to regulate effectively. We demonstrate the effectiveness of two mechanisms that can achieve this. The first is where governments can recognise and reward regulators that do a good job. In that case, if the AI system is not too risky for users then some level of trustworthy development and user trust evolves. We then consider an alternative solution, where users can condition their trust decision on the effectiveness of the regulators. This leads to effective regulation, and consequently the development of trustworthy AI and user trust, provided that the cost of implementing regulations is not too high. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the effect of different regulatory regimes from an evolutionary game theoretic perspective.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Asymmetric games on networks: map** to Ising models and bounded rationality
Authors:
Filippo Zimmaro,
Serge Galam,
Marco Alberto Javarone
Abstract:
We investigate the dynamics of coordination and consensus in an agent population. Considering agents endowed with bounded rationality, we study asymmetric coordination games using a map** to random field Ising models. In doing so, we investigate the relationship between group coordination and agent rationality. Analytical calculations and numerical simulations of the proposed model lead to novel…
▽ More
We investigate the dynamics of coordination and consensus in an agent population. Considering agents endowed with bounded rationality, we study asymmetric coordination games using a map** to random field Ising models. In doing so, we investigate the relationship between group coordination and agent rationality. Analytical calculations and numerical simulations of the proposed model lead to novel insight into opinion dynamics. For instance, we find that bounded rationality and preference intensity can determine a series of possible scenarios with different levels of opinion polarization. To conclude, we deem our investigation opens a new avenue for studying game dynamics through methods of statistical physics.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2024; v1 submitted 17 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Discriminatory or Samaritan -- which AI is needed for humanity? An Evolutionary Game Theory Analysis of Hybrid Human-AI populations
Authors:
Tim Booker,
Manuel Miranda,
Jesús A. Moreno López,
José María Ramos Fernández,
Max Reddel,
Valeria Widler,
Filippo Zimmaro,
Alberto Antonioni,
The Anh Han
Abstract:
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly embedded in our lives, their presence leads to interactions that shape our behaviour, decision-making, and social interactions. Existing theoretical research has primarily focused on human-to-human interactions, overlooking the unique dynamics triggered by the presence of AI. In this paper, resorting to methods from evolutionary game theory,…
▽ More
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly embedded in our lives, their presence leads to interactions that shape our behaviour, decision-making, and social interactions. Existing theoretical research has primarily focused on human-to-human interactions, overlooking the unique dynamics triggered by the presence of AI. In this paper, resorting to methods from evolutionary game theory, we study how different forms of AI influence the evolution of cooperation in a human population playing the one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma game in both well-mixed and structured populations. We found that Samaritan AI agents that help everyone unconditionally, including defectors, can promote higher levels of cooperation in humans than Discriminatory AI that only help those considered worthy/cooperative, especially in slow-moving societies where change is viewed with caution or resistance (small intensities of selection). Intuitively, in fast-moving societies (high intensities of selection), Discriminatory AIs promote higher levels of cooperation than Samaritan AIs.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2023; v1 submitted 30 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Voter-like dynamics with conflicting preferences on modular networks
Authors:
Filippo Zimmaro,
Pierluigi Contucci,
János Kertész
Abstract:
Two of the main factors sha** an individual's opinion are social coordination and personal preferences, or personal biases. To understand the role of those and that of the topology of the network of interactions, we study an extension of the voter model proposed by Masuda and Redner (2011), where the agents are divided into two populations with opposite preferences. We consider a modular graph w…
▽ More
Two of the main factors sha** an individual's opinion are social coordination and personal preferences, or personal biases. To understand the role of those and that of the topology of the network of interactions, we study an extension of the voter model proposed by Masuda and Redner (2011), where the agents are divided into two populations with opposite preferences. We consider a modular graph with two communities that reflect the bias assignment, modeling the phenomenon of epistemic bubbles. We analyze the models by approximate analytical methods and by simulations. Depending on the network and the biases' strengths, the system can either reach a consensus or a polarized state, in which the two populations stabilize to different average opinions. The modular structure has generally the effect of increasing both the degree of polarization and its range in the space of parameters. When the difference in the bias strengths between the populations is large, the success of the very committed group in imposing its preferred opinion onto the other one depends largely on the level of segregation of the latter population, while the dependency on the topological structure of the former is negligible. We compare the simple mean-field approach with the pair approximation and test the goodness of the mean-field predictions on a real network.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2023; v1 submitted 16 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
