-
Lidar Panoptic Segmentation and Tracking without Bells and Whistles
Authors:
Abhinav Agarwalla,
Xuhua Huang,
Jason Ziglar,
Francesco Ferroni,
Laura Leal-Taixé,
James Hays,
Aljoša Ošep,
Deva Ramanan
Abstract:
State-of-the-art lidar panoptic segmentation (LPS) methods follow bottom-up segmentation-centric fashion wherein they build upon semantic segmentation networks by utilizing clustering to obtain object instances. In this paper, we re-think this approach and propose a surprisingly simple yet effective detection-centric network for both LPS and tracking. Our network is modular by design and optimized…
▽ More
State-of-the-art lidar panoptic segmentation (LPS) methods follow bottom-up segmentation-centric fashion wherein they build upon semantic segmentation networks by utilizing clustering to obtain object instances. In this paper, we re-think this approach and propose a surprisingly simple yet effective detection-centric network for both LPS and tracking. Our network is modular by design and optimized for all aspects of both the panoptic segmentation and tracking task. One of the core components of our network is the object instance detection branch, which we train using point-level (modal) annotations, as available in segmentation-centric datasets. In the absence of amodal (cuboid) annotations, we regress modal centroids and object extent using trajectory-level supervision that provides information about object size, which cannot be inferred from single scans due to occlusions and the sparse nature of the lidar data. We obtain fine-grained instance segments by learning to associate lidar points with detected centroids. We evaluate our method on several 3D/4D LPS benchmarks and observe that our model establishes a new state-of-the-art among open-sourced models, outperforming recent query-based models.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Differentiable Raycasting for Self-supervised Occupancy Forecasting
Authors:
Tarasha Khurana,
Peiyun Hu,
Achal Dave,
Jason Ziglar,
David Held,
Deva Ramanan
Abstract:
Motion planning for safe autonomous driving requires learning how the environment around an ego-vehicle evolves with time. Ego-centric perception of driveable regions in a scene not only changes with the motion of actors in the environment, but also with the movement of the ego-vehicle itself. Self-supervised representations proposed for large-scale planning, such as ego-centric freespace, confoun…
▽ More
Motion planning for safe autonomous driving requires learning how the environment around an ego-vehicle evolves with time. Ego-centric perception of driveable regions in a scene not only changes with the motion of actors in the environment, but also with the movement of the ego-vehicle itself. Self-supervised representations proposed for large-scale planning, such as ego-centric freespace, confound these two motions, making the representation difficult to use for downstream motion planners. In this paper, we use geometric occupancy as a natural alternative to view-dependent representations such as freespace. Occupancy maps naturally disentangle the motion of the environment from the motion of the ego-vehicle. However, one cannot directly observe the full 3D occupancy of a scene (due to occlusion), making it difficult to use as a signal for learning. Our key insight is to use differentiable raycasting to "render" future occupancy predictions into future LiDAR sweep predictions, which can be compared with ground-truth sweeps for self-supervised learning. The use of differentiable raycasting allows occupancy to emerge as an internal representation within the forecasting network. In the absence of groundtruth occupancy, we quantitatively evaluate the forecasting of raycasted LiDAR sweeps and show improvements of upto 15 F1 points. For downstream motion planners, where emergent occupancy can be directly used to guide non-driveable regions, this representation relatively reduces the number of collisions with objects by up to 17% as compared to freespace-centric motion planners.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2022; v1 submitted 4 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
What You See is What You Get: Exploiting Visibility for 3D Object Detection
Authors:
Peiyun Hu,
Jason Ziglar,
David Held,
Deva Ramanan
Abstract:
Recent advances in 3D sensing have created unique challenges for computer vision. One fundamental challenge is finding a good representation for 3D sensor data. Most popular representations (such as PointNet) are proposed in the context of processing truly 3D data (e.g. points sampled from mesh models), ignoring the fact that 3D sensored data such as a LiDAR sweep is in fact 2.5D. We argue that re…
▽ More
Recent advances in 3D sensing have created unique challenges for computer vision. One fundamental challenge is finding a good representation for 3D sensor data. Most popular representations (such as PointNet) are proposed in the context of processing truly 3D data (e.g. points sampled from mesh models), ignoring the fact that 3D sensored data such as a LiDAR sweep is in fact 2.5D. We argue that representing 2.5D data as collections of (x, y, z) points fundamentally destroys hidden information about freespace. In this paper, we demonstrate such knowledge can be efficiently recovered through 3D raycasting and readily incorporated into batch-based gradient learning. We describe a simple approach to augmenting voxel-based networks with visibility: we add a voxelized visibility map as an additional input stream. In addition, we show that visibility can be combined with two crucial modifications common to state-of-the-art 3D detectors: synthetic data augmentation of virtual objects and temporal aggregation of LiDAR sweeps over multiple time frames. On the NuScenes 3D detection benchmark, we show that, by adding an additional stream for visibility input, we can significantly improve the overall detection accuracy of a state-of-the-art 3D detector.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2020; v1 submitted 10 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Context-Aware System Synthesis, Task Assignment, and Routing
Authors:
Jason Ziglar,
Ryan Williams,
Alfred Wicks
Abstract:
The design and organization of complex robotic systems traditionally requires laborious trial-and-error processes to ensure both hardware and software components are correctly connected with the resources necessary for computation. This paper presents a novel generalization of the quadratic assignment and routing problem, introducing formalisms for selecting components and interconnections to synt…
▽ More
The design and organization of complex robotic systems traditionally requires laborious trial-and-error processes to ensure both hardware and software components are correctly connected with the resources necessary for computation. This paper presents a novel generalization of the quadratic assignment and routing problem, introducing formalisms for selecting components and interconnections to synthesize a complete system capable of providing some user-defined functionality. By introducing mission context, functional requirements, and modularity directly into the assignment problem, we derive a solution where components are automatically selected and then organized into an optimal hardware and software interconnection structure, all while respecting restrictions on component viability and required functionality. The ability to generate \emph{complete} functional systems directly from individual components reduces manual design effort by allowing for a guided exploration of the design space. Additionally, our formulation increases resiliency by quantifying resource margins and enabling adaptation of system structure in response to changing environments, hardware or software failure. The proposed formulation is cast as an integer linear program which is provably $\mathcal{NP}$-hard. Two case studies are developed and analyzed to highlight the expressiveness and complexity of problems that can be addressed by this approach: the first explores the iterative development of a ground-based search-and-rescue robot in a variety of mission contexts, while the second explores the large-scale, complex design of a humanoid disaster robot for the DARPA Robotics Challenge. Numerical simulations quantify real world performance and demonstrate tractable time complexity for the scale of problems encountered in many modern robotic systems.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2017; v1 submitted 14 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
