-
Near field Exposure Assessment of Complex Anatomical Structures in 5G Bands
Authors:
G. Sacco,
A. Kapetanović,
D. Poljak,
M. Zhadobov
Abstract:
With the proliferation of 5G wireless networks, the population is increasingly exposed to frequencies approaching the millimeter-wave (mmW) range. Human ears are among the most exposed body parts. This paper proposes an analysis of the ear exposure in the near field using an anatomical model in presence of different electromagnetic (EM) sources (vertical dipole, horizontal dipole, 4X4 array of ver…
▽ More
With the proliferation of 5G wireless networks, the population is increasingly exposed to frequencies approaching the millimeter-wave (mmW) range. Human ears are among the most exposed body parts. This paper proposes an analysis of the ear exposure in the near field using an anatomical model in presence of different electromagnetic (EM) sources (vertical dipole, horizontal dipole, 4X4 array of vertical dipoles, and 4X4 array of horizontal dipoles). This study demonstrates that, for a given input power and antenna-ear distance, the absorbed power density (Sab) induced by a dipole antenna array is up to 3.9 times higher than the one produced by a single dipole. Sab is only slightly sensitive to the dipole orientation (vertical or horizontal) resulting in relatively weak variations (up to 7%).
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Exposure Assessment for Wearable Patch Antenna Arrays at Millimeter Waves
Authors:
Silvia Gallucci,
Marta Bonato,
Martina Benini,
Marta Parazzini,
Maxim Zhadobov
Abstract:
Since the spread of the wearable systems and the implementation of the forthcoming 5G in many devices, the question about the assessment of the exposure in wearable typical usage to millimeter waves is crucial and timely. For such frequencies, the power absorption becomes strongly superficial and involves only the most superficial tissue of the human body, i.e., the skin. In literature there are s…
▽ More
Since the spread of the wearable systems and the implementation of the forthcoming 5G in many devices, the question about the assessment of the exposure in wearable typical usage to millimeter waves is crucial and timely. For such frequencies, the power absorption becomes strongly superficial and involves only the most superficial tissue of the human body, i.e., the skin. In literature there are some models able to describe the layered structure of the skin but, until now, there is no literature consensus on the skin model to employ in computational exposure assessment studies. For these reasons, the present work aimed to simulate four different models of the most superficial tissues with different degree of detail exposed to two wearable patch antennas at different frequencies i.e., 28 GHz and 39 GHz. This allows to investigate the impact that the choice of a layered model rather than the homogeneous one has on the exposure. Simulations were performed through the FDTD method, implemented in the Sim4life platform and the exposure was assessed with the absorbed power density averaged over 1 cm2 and 4 cm2 (Sab). The data showed that the homogeneous model underestimates the peak value of Sab obtained for multi-layer models in the stratum corneum (by 14% to 21% depending on the number of layers of the model and the frequency). This finding was confirmed by an analytical approach with two im**ing plane wave TEM-polarized with normal incidence at 28 GHz and 39 GHz respectively. Conversely, there are no substantial differences in the exposure levels between the layered models
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Quasi-Static Approximation Error of Electric Field Analysis for Transcranial Current Stimulation
Authors:
Gabriel Gaugain,
Lorette Quéguiner,
Marom Bikson,
Ronan Sauleau,
Maxim Zhadobov,
Julien Modolo,
Denys Nikolayev
Abstract:
Objective: Numerical modeling of electric fields induced by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is currently a part of the standard procedure to predict and understand neural response. Quasi-static approximation for electric field calculations is generally applied to reduce the computational cost. Here, we aimed to analyze and quantify the validity of the approximation over a broad…
▽ More
Objective: Numerical modeling of electric fields induced by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is currently a part of the standard procedure to predict and understand neural response. Quasi-static approximation for electric field calculations is generally applied to reduce the computational cost. Here, we aimed to analyze and quantify the validity of the approximation over a broad frequency range. Approach: We performed electromagnetic modeling studies using an anatomical head models and considered approximations assuming either a purely ohmic medium (i.e., static formulation) or a lossy dielectric medium (quasi-static formulation). The results were compared with the solution of Maxwell's equations in the cases of harmonic and pulsed signals. Finally, we analyzed the effect of electrode positioning on these errors. Main Results: Our findings demonstrate that the quasi-static approximation is valid and produces a relative error below 1% up to 1.43 MHz. The largest error is introduced in the static case, where the error is over 1% across the entire considered spectrum and as high as 20% in the brain at 10 Hz. We also highlight the special importance of considering the capacitive effect of tissues for pulsed waveforms, which prevents signal distortion induced by the purely ohmic approximation. At the neuron level, the results point a difference of sense electric field as high as 22% at focusing point, impacting pyramidal cells firing times. Significance: Quasi-static approximation remains valid in the frequency range currently used for tACS. However, neglecting permittivity (static formulation) introduces significant error for both harmonic and non-harmonic signals. It points out that reliable low frequency dielectric data are needed for accurate tCS numerical modeling.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2022; v1 submitted 7 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
