-
Solar wind parameters in rising phase of solar cycle 25
Authors:
Yuri I. Yermolaev,
Irina G. Lodkina,
Alexander A. Khokhlachev,
Michael Yu. Yermolaev,
Maria O. Riazantseva,
Liudmila S. Rakhmanova,
Natalia L. Borodkova,
Olga V. Sapunova,
Anastasiia V. Moskaleva
Abstract:
Solar activity and solar wind parameters decreased significantly in solar cycles (SCs) 23-24. In this paper, we analyze solar wind measurements at the rising phase of SC 25 and compare them with similar data from the previous cycles. For this purpose, we simultaneously selected the OMNI database data for 1976-2022, both by phases of the 11-year solar cycle and by large-scale solar wind types (in a…
▽ More
Solar activity and solar wind parameters decreased significantly in solar cycles (SCs) 23-24. In this paper, we analyze solar wind measurements at the rising phase of SC 25 and compare them with similar data from the previous cycles. For this purpose, we simultaneously selected the OMNI database data for 1976-2022, both by phases of the 11-year solar cycle and by large-scale solar wind types (in accordance with IKI's catalog, see http://www.iki.rssi.ru/pub/omni ), and calculated the mean values of the parameters for the selected datasets. The obtained results testify in favor of the hypothesis that the continuation of this cycle will be similar to the previous cycle 24, i.e. SC 25 will be weaker than SCs 21 and 22.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Dynamics of He++ ions at interplanetary and Earth's bow shocks
Authors:
Olga V. Sapunova,
Natalia L. Borodkova,
Georgii N. Zastenker,
Yuri I. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Experimental investigations of the fine plasma structure of interplanetary shocks are extremely difficult to conduct due to their small thickness and high speed relative to the spacecraft. We study the variations in the parameters of twice-ionized helium ions (4He++ ions or α-particles) in the solar wind plasma during the passage of interplanetary shocks and Earth's bow shock. We use data with hig…
▽ More
Experimental investigations of the fine plasma structure of interplanetary shocks are extremely difficult to conduct due to their small thickness and high speed relative to the spacecraft. We study the variations in the parameters of twice-ionized helium ions (4He++ ions or α-particles) in the solar wind plasma during the passage of interplanetary shocks and Earth's bow shock. We use data with high time resolution gathered by the BMSW (Bright Monitor of Solar Wind) instrument installed on the SPEKTR-R satellite, which operated between August 2011 and 2019. The MHD parameters of He++ ions (the bulk velocity Va, temperature Ta, absolute density Na, and helium abundance Na/Np) are analyzed for 20 interplanetary shocks and compared with similar parameters for 25 Earth's bow shock crossings. Measurements from the WIND, Cluster and THEMIS satellites were also analyzed. The correlations in the changes in helium abundance Na/Np with the parameters β_{i}, θ_{Bn} and M_{ms} were investigated. A correlation between Na/Np and the angle θ_{Bn} was found: the lower the value of θ_{Bn}, the greater the drop in helium abundance Na/Np falls behind the IP shock front. For Earth's bow shock crossings, we found a significant increase in the helium abundance Na/Np in quasi-perpendicular events.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Dynamics of Large Scale Solar Wind Streams Obtained by the Double Superposed Epoch Analysis: 5. Influence of the Solar Activity Decrease
Authors:
Yuri I. Yermolaev,
Irina G. Lodkina,
Alexander A. Khokhlachev,
Michael Yu. Yermolaev,
Maria O. Riazantseva,
Liudmila S. Rakhmanova,
Natalia L. Borodkova,
Olga V. Sapunova,
Anastasiia V. Moskaleva
Abstract:
In solar cycles 23-24, solar activity noticeably decreased, and, as a result, solar wind parameters decreased. Based on the measurements of the OMNI base for the period 1976-2019, the time profiles of the main solar wind parameters and magnetospheric indices for the main interplanetary drivers of magnetospheric disturbances (solar wind types CIR, Sheath, ejecta and MC) are studied using the double…
▽ More
In solar cycles 23-24, solar activity noticeably decreased, and, as a result, solar wind parameters decreased. Based on the measurements of the OMNI base for the period 1976-2019, the time profiles of the main solar wind parameters and magnetospheric indices for the main interplanetary drivers of magnetospheric disturbances (solar wind types CIR, Sheath, ejecta and MC) are studied using the double superposed epoch method. The main task of the research is to compare time profiles for the epoch of high solar activity at 21-22 solar cycles and the epoch of low activity at 23-24 solar cycles. The following results were obtained. (1) The analysis did not show a statistically significant change in driver durations during the epoch of minimum. (2) The time profiles of all parameters for all types of SW in the epoch of low activity have the same shape as in the epoch of high activity, but locate at lower values of the parameters. (3) In CIR events, the longitude angle of the solar wind flow has a characteristic S-shape, but in the epoch of low activity it varies in a larger range than in the previous epoch.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Peculiarities of the Solar-Wind/Magnetosphere Coupling in the Era of Solar Grand Minimum
Authors:
Yuri I. Yermolaev,
Irina G. Lodkina,
Aleksander A. Khokhlachev,
Mikhail Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Based on the data of the solar wind (SW) measurements of the OMNI base for the period 1976-2019, the behavior of SW types as well as plasma and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) parameters for 21-24 solar cycles (SCs) is studied. It is shown that with the beginning of the Era of Solar Grand Minimum (SC 23), the proportion of magnetic storms initiated by CIR increased. In addition, a change in th…
▽ More
Based on the data of the solar wind (SW) measurements of the OMNI base for the period 1976-2019, the behavior of SW types as well as plasma and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) parameters for 21-24 solar cycles (SCs) is studied. It is shown that with the beginning of the Era of Solar Grand Minimum (SC 23), the proportion of magnetic storms initiated by CIR increased. In addition, a change in the nature of SW interaction with the magnetosphere could occur due to a decrease in the density, temperature, and IMF of the solar wind.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
On the Probability of <<The Inhomogeneity of Composition Along the Magnetic Cloud Axis>>
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
A. A. Khokhlachev,
I. G. Lodkina
Abstract:
In the present work, we study the possibility of assessing the inhomogeneities of the ionic composition along the axis of the magnetic cloud using the method that was recently used by Song et al. (2021). Possible violations of the used assumptions do not allow one to draw reliable conclusions.
In the present work, we study the possibility of assessing the inhomogeneities of the ionic composition along the axis of the magnetic cloud using the method that was recently used by Song et al. (2021). Possible violations of the used assumptions do not allow one to draw reliable conclusions.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Drop of solar wind at the end of the 20th century
Authors:
Yuri I. Yermolaev,
Irina G. Lodkina,
Alexander A. Khokhlachev,
Michael Yu. Yermolaev,
Maria O. Riazantseva,
Liudmila S. Rakhmanova,
Natalia L. Borodkova,
Olga V. Sapunova,
Anastasiia V. Moskaleva
Abstract:
Variations in the solar wind (SW) parameters with scales of several years are an important characteristic of solar activity and the basis for a long-term space weather forecast. We examine the behavior of interplanetary parameters over 21-24 solar cycles (SCs) on the basis of OMNI database (https://spdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/data/omni). Since changes in parameters can be associated both with changes i…
▽ More
Variations in the solar wind (SW) parameters with scales of several years are an important characteristic of solar activity and the basis for a long-term space weather forecast. We examine the behavior of interplanetary parameters over 21-24 solar cycles (SCs) on the basis of OMNI database (https://spdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/data/omni). Since changes in parameters can be associated both with changes in the number of different large-scale types of SW, and with variations in the values of these parameters at different phases of the solar cycle and during the transition from one cycle to another, we select the entire study period in accordance with the Catalog of large-scale SW types for 1976-2019 (See the site http://www.iki.rssi.ru/pub/omni, [Yermolaev et al., 2009]), which covers the period from 21 to 24 SCs, and in accordance with the phases of the cycles, and averaging the parameters at selected intervals. In addition to a sharp drop in the number of ICMEs (and associated Sheath types), there is a noticeable drop in the value (by 20-40%) of plasma parameters and magnetic field in different types of solar wind at the end of the 20th century and a continuation of the fall or persistence at a low level in the 23-24 cycles. Such a drop in the solar wind is apparently associated with a decrease in solar activity and manifests itself in a noticeable decrease in space weather factors.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Comment on "Solar Wind and Heavy Ion Properties of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections" by M.J.Owens
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina
Abstract:
A recent paper by Owens (2018) presents a statistical analysis of the properties of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) and variations in their compositions and ion charge-state signatures using data from the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft. However, the article contains several serious flaws, which we will discuss here.
A recent paper by Owens (2018) presents a statistical analysis of the properties of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) and variations in their compositions and ion charge-state signatures using data from the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft. However, the article contains several serious flaws, which we will discuss here.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Probing the ionosphere by the pulsar B0950+08 with help of RadioAstron ground-space baselines
Authors:
V. I. Zhuravlev,
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
A. S. Andrianov
Abstract:
The ionospheric scattering of pulses emitted by PSR B0950+08 is measured using the 10-m RadioAstron Space Radio Telescope, the 300-m Arecibo Radio Telescope and the 14x25-m Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) at a frequency band between 316 and 332 MHz. We analyse this phenomenon based on a simulated model of the phase difference obtained between antennas that are widely separated by nearl…
▽ More
The ionospheric scattering of pulses emitted by PSR B0950+08 is measured using the 10-m RadioAstron Space Radio Telescope, the 300-m Arecibo Radio Telescope and the 14x25-m Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) at a frequency band between 316 and 332 MHz. We analyse this phenomenon based on a simulated model of the phase difference obtained between antennas that are widely separated by nearly 25 Earth diameters. We present a technique for processing and analysing the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) at the ground stations of the ground-space interferometer. This technique allows us to derive almost synchronous half-hour structures of the TEC in the ionosphere at an intercontinental distance between the Arecibo and WSRT stations. We find that the amplitude values of the detected structures are approximately twice as large as the values for the TEC derived in the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) project. Furthermore, the values of the TEC outside these structures are almost the same as the corresponding values found by the IRI. According to a preliminary analysis, the detected structures were observed during a geomagnetic storm with a minimum Dst index of ~75 nT generated by interplanetary disturbances, and may be due to the influence of interplanetary and magnetospheric phenomena on ionospheric disturbances. We show that the Space Very Long Baseline Interferometry provides us with new opportunities to study the TEC, and we demonstrate the capabilities of this instrument to research the ionosphere.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2019; v1 submitted 25 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Dynamics of large-scale solar-wind streams obtained by the double superposed epoch analysis. 4. Helium abundance
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina,
M. Yu. Yermolaev,
M. O. Riazantseva,
L. S. Rakhmanova,
N. L. Borodkova,
Yu. S. Shugay,
V. A. Slemzin,
I. S. Veselovsky,
D. G. Rodkin
Abstract:
This work is a continuation of our previous articles (Yermolaev et al. in J. Geophys. Res. 120, 7094, 2015; Yermolaev et al. in Solar Phys. 292, 193, 2017; Yermolaev et al. in Solar Phys. 293, 91, 2018), which describe the average temporal profiles of interplanetary plasma and field parameters in large-scale solar-wind (SW) streams: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), interplanetary coronal mas…
▽ More
This work is a continuation of our previous articles (Yermolaev et al. in J. Geophys. Res. 120, 7094, 2015; Yermolaev et al. in Solar Phys. 292, 193, 2017; Yermolaev et al. in Solar Phys. 293, 91, 2018), which describe the average temporal profiles of interplanetary plasma and field parameters in large-scale solar-wind (SW) streams: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs including both magnetic clouds (MCs) and ejecta), and sheaths as well as interplanetary shocks (ISs). In this work we analyze the average profile of helium abundance Nα/Np for interval of 1976-2016. Our results confirm main early obtained results: Nα/Np is higher in quasi-stationary fast streams than in slow ones; it slowly changes in compression regions CIRs and Sheaths from values in undisturbed solar wind to values in corresponding type of piston (HSS or ICME); in Ejecta it is closed to abundance in undisturbed streams and it is maximal in MCs. We obtained for first time that Nα/Np correlates with plasma β-parameter in compression regions CIRs and Sheaths and anti-correlates in ICMEs. The Nα/Np vs. β dependence is stronger in MCs than in Ejecta and may be used as an indicator of conditions in CME formation place on the Sun.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2019; v1 submitted 10 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
Dynamics of large-scale solar-wind streams obtained by the double superposed epoch analysis. 3. Deflection of speed vector
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
This work is a continuation of our previous articles (Yermolaev et al. in J. Geophys.Res. 120, 7094, 2015, Yermolaev et al. in Solar Phys. 292, 193, 2017), which describe the average temporal profiles of interplanetary plasma and field parameters in large-scale solar-wind (SW) streams: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs including both magnetic cloud…
▽ More
This work is a continuation of our previous articles (Yermolaev et al. in J. Geophys.Res. 120, 7094, 2015, Yermolaev et al. in Solar Phys. 292, 193, 2017), which describe the average temporal profiles of interplanetary plasma and field parameters in large-scale solar-wind (SW) streams: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs including both magnetic clouds (MCs) and ejecta), and sheaths as well as interplanetary shocks (ISs). Changes of longitude angle φ in CIRs from -2 to +2° agree with earlier observations. Besides we have for the first time analyzed the average temporal profiles of bulk velocity angles in Sheaths and ICMEs and found that the angle φ in ICME changes from 2 to -2° while in Sheath it changes from -2 to 2° (similar to change in CIR), i.e., the streams in CIR/Sheath and ICME deflects in the opposite side. When averaging the latitude angle θ on all intervals of the chosen SW type, the angle θ is almost constant ~1°. We made selection of SW events with increasing and decreasing angle θ for the first time and found that average temporal profiles for angle θ in selected events have the same <<integral-like>> shape as for angle φ. The difference in average profiles for angles φ and θ is explained by the fact that most events have increasing profiles for angle in ecliptic plane due to solar rotation while for angle in meridional plane numbers of increasing and decreasing profiles are equal.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Interaction of CME/ICME with HSS solar wind from coronal holes: case study
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina,
Yu. S. Shugay,
V. A. Slemzin,
I. S. Veselovsky,
D. G. Rodkin,
N. S. Nikolaeva,
N. L. Borodkova,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
In this paper we look for traces of interaction of CME/ICME with high-speed stream (HSS) of solar wind from coronal hole (CH) for two serial Carrington rotations (CRs) during December 2011 - January 2012. We analyze two cases. (1) In CR 2118 instead of predicted arrival of HSS the signatures of ICME with modified back side and compressed slow stream were observed. (2) In CR 2119 the predicted HSS…
▽ More
In this paper we look for traces of interaction of CME/ICME with high-speed stream (HSS) of solar wind from coronal hole (CH) for two serial Carrington rotations (CRs) during December 2011 - January 2012. We analyze two cases. (1) In CR 2118 instead of predicted arrival of HSS the signatures of ICME with modified back side and compressed slow stream were observed. (2) In CR 2119 the predicted HSS was observed in time, and after arrival of preceding ICME. Our analysis shows that difference of these cases can be explained by different interactions between HSS and CME, which in the first case result in significant deflection of HSS of solar wind from the Sun-Earth line. Thus, the CH passage through the central meridian with simultaneous occurrence of CMEs in the nearby located sources can result in interaction between HSS and CME streams, deflection of the HSS stream aside of the ecliptic and changes in parameters of the solar wind.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
Dynamics of large-scale solar-wind streams obtained by the double superposed epoch analysis. 2. CIR.vs.Sheath and MC.vs.Ejecta comparisons
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina,
N. S. Nikolaeva,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
This work is a continuation of our previous paper [Yermolaevetal2015] which describes the average temporal profiles of interplanetary plasma and field parameters in large-scale solar-wind (SW) streams: CIR, ICME (both MC and Ejecta) and Sheath as well as the interplanetary shock (IS). Like in the previous work we use data of OMNI database, our catalog of large-scale solar-wind phenomena during 197…
▽ More
This work is a continuation of our previous paper [Yermolaevetal2015] which describes the average temporal profiles of interplanetary plasma and field parameters in large-scale solar-wind (SW) streams: CIR, ICME (both MC and Ejecta) and Sheath as well as the interplanetary shock (IS). Like in the previous work we use data of OMNI database, our catalog of large-scale solar-wind phenomena during 1976--2000 [Yermolaevetal2009] and the double superposed epoch analysis (DSEA) method [Yermolaevetal2010]: re-scaling the duration of interval for all types in such a manner that, respectively, beginning and end for all intervals of selected type coincide. We present new detailed results of comparison of two pair phenomena: (1) both types of compression regions (CIR.vs.Sheath) and (2) both types of ICMEs (MC.vs.Ejecta). Obtained data allows us to suggest that the formation of all types of compression regions has the same physical mechanism irrespective of piston (High-Speed Stream (HSS) or ICME) type and differences are connected with geometry (angle between speed gradient in front of piston and satellite trajectory) and full jumps of speed in edges of compression regions. One of consequences of this hypothesis is the conclusion that one of the reasons of observed distinctions of parameters in MC and Ejecta can be fact that at measurements of Ejecta the satellite passes further from the nose area of ICME, than at measurements of MC. We also discuss the impact of Sheath in magnetospheric activity and its contribution in estimation of Sun's open magnetic flux.
△ Less
Submitted 29 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Does generation of magnetic storm depend on type of solar wind?
Authors:
N. S. Nikolaeva,
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina
Abstract:
The purpose of this work is to draw attention of readers to a problem of possible differences in generation of magnetic storms induced by various large scale solar wind (SW) streams: CIR, Sheath and ICME (including MC and Ejecta). Recently we showed that when using a modification of formula by Burton et al. [1975] for connection of interplanetary conditions with Dst and Dst* indices the efficiency…
▽ More
The purpose of this work is to draw attention of readers to a problem of possible differences in generation of magnetic storms induced by various large scale solar wind (SW) streams: CIR, Sheath and ICME (including MC and Ejecta). Recently we showed that when using a modification of formula by Burton et al. [1975] for connection of interplanetary conditions with Dst and Dst* indices the efficiency of storm generation by Sheath and CIR is about 50 percent higher than generation by ICME [Nikolaeva et al., 2013, 2015]. In the literature there are many various functions coupling (FC) various interplanetary parameters with magnetospheric state. In this work we study the efficiency of main phase storm generation by different SW streams when using 12 another FCs on the basis of OMNI data during 1976 ... 2000. Obtained results show that for most part of FCs Sheaths have the highest efficiency and MCs have the lowest efficiency in accordance with our previous results. The reliability of the obtained data and possible reasons of divergences for various FCs and various SW types require further researches.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Dynamics of large-scale solar-wind streams obtained by the double superposed epoch analysis
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina,
N. S. Nikolaeva,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Using the OMNI data for period 1976-2000 we investigate the temporal profiles of 20 plasma and field parameters in the disturbed large-scale types of solar wind (SW): CIR, ICME (both MC and Ejecta) and Sheath as well as the interplanetary shock (IS). To take into account the different durations of SW types, we use the double superposed epoch analysis (DSEA) method: re-scaling the duration of the i…
▽ More
Using the OMNI data for period 1976-2000 we investigate the temporal profiles of 20 plasma and field parameters in the disturbed large-scale types of solar wind (SW): CIR, ICME (both MC and Ejecta) and Sheath as well as the interplanetary shock (IS). To take into account the different durations of SW types, we use the double superposed epoch analysis (DSEA) method: re-scaling the duration of the interval for all types in such a manner that, respectively, beginning and end for all intervals of selected type coincide. As the analyzed SW types can interact with each other and change parameters as a result of such interaction, we investigate separately 8 sequences of SW types: (1) CIR, (2) IS/CIR, (3) Ejecta, (4) Sheath/Ejecta, (5) IS/Sheath/Ejecta, (6) MC, (7) Sheath/MC, and (8) IS/Sheath/MC. The main conclusion is that the behavior of parameters in Sheath and in CIR are very similar both qualitatively and quantitatively. Both the high-speed stream (HSS) and the fast ICME play a role of pistons which push the plasma located ahead them. The increase of speed in HSS and ICME leads at first to formation of compression regions (CIR and Sheath, respectively), and then to IS. The occurrence of compression regions and IS increases the probability of growth of magnetospheric activity.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Whether duration of the recovery phase of magnetic storm depends on the development rate of storm at its main phase?
Authors:
Yuri I. Yermolaev
Abstract:
We compare dependences between the storm development rate $|Dst_{min}|/ΔT$ ($ΔT$ is the durations of main phase) and the duration of recovery phase of magnetic storms generated by three various types of interplanetary drivers: (1, 2) compression regions CIR and Sheath, and (3) body of interplanetary CME (magnetic clouds and Ejecta). Our analyze shows that the duration of recovery phase correlates…
▽ More
We compare dependences between the storm development rate $|Dst_{min}|/ΔT$ ($ΔT$ is the durations of main phase) and the duration of recovery phase of magnetic storms generated by three various types of interplanetary drivers: (1, 2) compression regions CIR and Sheath, and (3) body of interplanetary CME (magnetic clouds and Ejecta). Our analyze shows that the duration of recovery phase correlates with the storm development rate for CIR- and Sheath-induced storms, and does not correlate for ICME- induced storms.
△ Less
Submitted 7 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Influence of the interplanetary driver type on the durations of main and recovery phases of magnetic storms
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina,
N. S. Nikolaeva,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
We study durations of main and recovery phases of magnetic storms induced by different types of large-scale solar-wind streams (Sheath, magnetic cloud (MC), Ejecta and CIR) on the basis of OMNI data base during 1976-2000. Durations of both main and recovery phases depend on types of interplanetary drivers. On the average, duration of main phase of storms induced by compressed regions (CIR and Shea…
▽ More
We study durations of main and recovery phases of magnetic storms induced by different types of large-scale solar-wind streams (Sheath, magnetic cloud (MC), Ejecta and CIR) on the basis of OMNI data base during 1976-2000. Durations of both main and recovery phases depend on types of interplanetary drivers. On the average, duration of main phase of storms induced by compressed regions (CIR and Sheath) is shorter than by MC and Ejecta while duration of recovery phase of CIR- and Sheath-induced storms is longer. Analysis of durations of individual storms shows that durations of main and recovery phases anti-correlate for CIR- and Sheath-induced storms and there is not dependence between them for (MC+Ejecta)-induced storms.
△ Less
Submitted 30 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Dependence of the cross polar cap potential saturation on the type of solar wind streams
Authors:
N. S. Nikolaeva,
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina
Abstract:
We compare of the cross polar cap potential (CPCP) saturation during magnetic storms induced by various types of the solar wind drivers. By using the model of Siscoe-Hill \citep{Hilletal1976,Siscoeetal2002a,Siscoeetal2002b,Siscoeetal2004,Siscoe2011} we evaluate criteria of the CPCP saturation during the main phases of 257 magnetic storms ($Dst_{min} \le -50$ nT) induced by the following types of t…
▽ More
We compare of the cross polar cap potential (CPCP) saturation during magnetic storms induced by various types of the solar wind drivers. By using the model of Siscoe-Hill \citep{Hilletal1976,Siscoeetal2002a,Siscoeetal2002b,Siscoeetal2004,Siscoe2011} we evaluate criteria of the CPCP saturation during the main phases of 257 magnetic storms ($Dst_{min} \le -50$ nT) induced by the following types of the solar wind streams: magnetic clouds (MC), Ejecta, the compress region Sheath before MC ($Sh_{MC}$) and before Ejecta ($Sh_{E}$), corotating interaction regions (CIR) and indeterminate type (IND). Our analysis shows that occurrence rate of the CPCP saturation is higher for storms induced by ICME ($13.2%$) than for storms driven by CIR ($3.5%$) or by IND ($3.5%$).The CPCP saturation was obtained more often for storms initiated by MC ($25%$) than by Ejecta ($2.9%$); it was obtained for $8.6%$ of magnetic storms induced by sum of MC and Ejecta, and for $21.5%$ magnetic storms induced by Sheath before them (sum of $Sh_{MC}$ and $Sh_{E}$). These results allow us to conclude that occurrence rate of the CPCP saturation at the main phase of magnetic storms depends on the type of the solar wind stream.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Occurrence rate of extreme magnetic storms
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina,
N. S. Nikolaeva,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Statistical analysis of occurrence rate of magnetic storms induced by different types of interplanetary drivers is made on the basis of OMNI data for period 1976-2000. Using our catalog of large scale types of solar wind streams we study storms induced by interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICME) (separately magnetic clouds (MC) and Ejecta) and both types of compressed regions: corotating inter…
▽ More
Statistical analysis of occurrence rate of magnetic storms induced by different types of interplanetary drivers is made on the basis of OMNI data for period 1976-2000. Using our catalog of large scale types of solar wind streams we study storms induced by interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICME) (separately magnetic clouds (MC) and Ejecta) and both types of compressed regions: corotating interaction regions (CIR) and Sheaths. For these types of drivers we calculate integral probabilities of storms with minimum Dst < -50, -70, -100, -150, and -200 nT. The highest probability in this interval of Dst is observed for MC, probabilities for other drivers are 3-10 times lower than for MC. Extrapolation of obtained results to extreme storms shows that such a magnetic storm as Carrington storm in 1859 with Dst = -1760 nT is observed on the Earth with frequency 1 event during ~500 year.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2012;
originally announced November 2012.
-
Recovery phase of magnetic storms induced by different interplanetary drivers
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina,
N. S. Nikolaeva,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Statistical analysis of Dst behaviour during recovery phase of magnetic storms induced by different types of interplanetary drivers is made on the basis of OMNI data in period 1976-2000. We study storms induced by ICMEs (including magnetic clouds (MC) and Ejecta) and both types of compressed regions: corotating interaction regions (CIR) and Sheaths. The shortest, moderate and longest durations of…
▽ More
Statistical analysis of Dst behaviour during recovery phase of magnetic storms induced by different types of interplanetary drivers is made on the basis of OMNI data in period 1976-2000. We study storms induced by ICMEs (including magnetic clouds (MC) and Ejecta) and both types of compressed regions: corotating interaction regions (CIR) and Sheaths. The shortest, moderate and longest durations of recovery phase are observed in ICME-, CIR-, and Sheath-induced storms, respectively. Recovery phases of strong ($Dst_{min} < -100$ nT) magnetic storms are well approximated by hyperbolic functions $Dst(t)= a/(1+t/τ_h)$ with constant $τ_h$ times for all types of drivers while for moderate ($-100 < Dst_{min} < -50$ nT) storms $Dst$ profile can not be approximated by hyperbolic function with constant $τ_h$ because hyperbolic time $τ_h$ increases with increasing time of recovery phase. Relation between duration and value $Dst_{min}$ for storms induced by ICME and Sheath has 2 parts: $Dst_{min}$ and duration correlate at small durations while they anticorrelate at large durations.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2011;
originally announced November 2011.
-
Geoeffectiveness and efficiency of CIR, Sheath and ICME in generation of magnetic storms
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
N. S. Nikolaeva,
I. G. Lodkina,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
We investigate relative role of various types of solar wind streams in generation of magnetic storms. On the basis of the OMNI data of interplanetary measurements for the period of 1976-2000 we analyze 798 geomagnetic storms with Dst < -50 nT and their interplanetary sources: corotating interaction regions (CIR), interplanetary CME (ICME) including magnetic clouds (MC) and Ejecta and compression r…
▽ More
We investigate relative role of various types of solar wind streams in generation of magnetic storms. On the basis of the OMNI data of interplanetary measurements for the period of 1976-2000 we analyze 798 geomagnetic storms with Dst < -50 nT and their interplanetary sources: corotating interaction regions (CIR), interplanetary CME (ICME) including magnetic clouds (MC) and Ejecta and compression regions Sheath before both types of ICME. For various types of solar wind we study following relative characteristics: occurrence rate; mass, momentum, energy and magnetic fluxes; probability of generation of magnetic storm (geoeffectiveness) and efficiency of process of this generation. Obtained results show that despite magnetic clouds have lower occurrence rate and lower efficiency than CIR and Sheath they play an essential role in generation of magnetic storms due to higher geoeffectiveness of storm generation (i.e higher probability to contain large and long-term southward IMF Bz component).
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
-
Comment on "Are periodic solar wind number density structures formed in the solar corona?" by N. M. Viall et al., 2009, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L23102, doi:10.1029/2009GL041191
Authors:
Yuri I. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Location of formation of periodic solar wind number density structures is discussed. Observation of proton and alpha anticorrelation in these structures [Viall et al., 2009] indicates that taking into account that bulk velocity of aplha-particles is higher than that of proton the place of formation for these structures should be located at distance less 0.002 AU from place of observation.
Location of formation of periodic solar wind number density structures is discussed. Observation of proton and alpha anticorrelation in these structures [Viall et al., 2009] indicates that taking into account that bulk velocity of aplha-particles is higher than that of proton the place of formation for these structures should be located at distance less 0.002 AU from place of observation.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2010;
originally announced September 2010.
-
Specific interplanetary conditions for CIR-, Sheath-, and ICME-induced geomagnetic storms obtained by double superposed epoch analysis
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
N. S. Nikolaeva,
I. G. Lodkina,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
The comparison of specific interplanetary conditions for 798 magnetic storms with Dst < -50 nT for the period 1976-2000 was made on the basis of the OMNI archive data.We categorized various large-scale types of solar wind as interplanetary drivers of storms: corotating interaction region (CIR), Sheath, interplanetary CME (ICME) including magnetic cloud (MC) and Ejecta, separately MC and Ejecta,…
▽ More
The comparison of specific interplanetary conditions for 798 magnetic storms with Dst < -50 nT for the period 1976-2000 was made on the basis of the OMNI archive data.We categorized various large-scale types of solar wind as interplanetary drivers of storms: corotating interaction region (CIR), Sheath, interplanetary CME (ICME) including magnetic cloud (MC) and Ejecta, separately MC and Ejecta, and "Indeterminate" type. The data processing was carried out by the method of double superposed epoch analysis which uses two reference times (onset of storm and the minimum Dst index) and make a re-scaling of main phase of storm a such way that after this transformation all storms have equal durations of main phase in new time reference frame. This method reproduced some well-known results and allowed us to obtain some new results. Specifically, obtained results demonstrate high importance of Sheath in generation of magnetic storms as well as a significant differences in properties of MC and Ejecta and in their geoeffectiveness.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2009;
originally announced November 2009.
-
The floor in the interplanetary magnetic field: Estimation on the basis of relative duration of ICME observations in solar wind during 1976-2000
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina,
N. S. Nikolaeva,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
To measure the floor in interplanetary magnetic field and estimate the time- invariant open magnetic flux of Sun, it is necessary to know a part of magnetic field of Sun carried away by CMEs. In contrast with previous papers, we did not use global solar parameters: we identified different large-scale types of solar wind for 1976-2000 interval, obtained a fraction of interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) a…
▽ More
To measure the floor in interplanetary magnetic field and estimate the time- invariant open magnetic flux of Sun, it is necessary to know a part of magnetic field of Sun carried away by CMEs. In contrast with previous papers, we did not use global solar parameters: we identified different large-scale types of solar wind for 1976-2000 interval, obtained a fraction of interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) and calculated magnitude of interplanetary magnetic field B averaged over 2 Carrington rotations. The floor of magnetic field is estimated as B value at solar cycle minimum when the ICMEs were not observed and it was calculated to be 4,65 \pm 6,0 nT. Obtained value is in a good agreement with previous results.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2009;
originally announced April 2009.
-
Comment on "Sizes and relative geoeffectiveness of interplanetary coronal mass ejections and the preceding shock sheaths during intense storms in 1996-2005" by J. Zhang et al
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Recently Zhang et al. [2008] presented a statistical study of sizes and relative geoeffectiveness of ICMEs (bodies of magnetic clouds) and preceding sheaths for 46 events responsible for intense (Dst < -100 nT) geomagnetic storms in 1996-2005 in which only a single ICME was responsible for generating the storm. Here we would like to comment several results and conclusions of this paper.
Recently Zhang et al. [2008] presented a statistical study of sizes and relative geoeffectiveness of ICMEs (bodies of magnetic clouds) and preceding sheaths for 46 events responsible for intense (Dst < -100 nT) geomagnetic storms in 1996-2005 in which only a single ICME was responsible for generating the storm. Here we would like to comment several results and conclusions of this paper.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2008;
originally announced September 2008.
-
Comment on "CAWSES November 7-8, 2004, superstorm: Complex solar and interplanetary features in the post-solar maximum phase" by B. T. Tsurutani, E. Echer, F. L. Guarnieri, and J. U. Kozyra
Authors:
V. G. Eselevich,
V. M. Bogod,
I. V. Chashey,
M. V. Eselevich,
Yu. I. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Recently Tsurutani et al., (2008) (Paper 1) analyzed the complex interplanetary structures during 7 to 8 November, 2004 to identify their properties as well as resultant geomagnetic effects and the solar origins. Besides mentioned paper by Gopalswamy et al., (2006) the solar and interplanetary sources of geomagnetic storm on 7-10 November, 2004 have also been discussed in details in series of ot…
▽ More
Recently Tsurutani et al., (2008) (Paper 1) analyzed the complex interplanetary structures during 7 to 8 November, 2004 to identify their properties as well as resultant geomagnetic effects and the solar origins. Besides mentioned paper by Gopalswamy et al., (2006) the solar and interplanetary sources of geomagnetic storm on 7-10 November, 2004 have also been discussed in details in series of other papers. Some conclusions of these works essentially differ from conclusions of the Paper 1 but have not been discussed by authors of Paper 1. In this comment we would like to discuss some of these distinctions.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2008;
originally announced April 2008.
-
Comment on "Geoeffectiveness of halo coronal mass ejections" by N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Comment on paper: Gopalswamy, N., S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama (2007), Geoeffectiveness of halo coronal mass ejections, J. Geophys. Res., 112, A06112, doi:10.1029/2006JA012149
Gopalswamy et al. [2007] studied the geoeffectiveness of halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) on the basis of solar observations during 1996-2005 and found that the geoeffectiveness of 229 frontside halo CMEs was 71%. Recent…
▽ More
Comment on paper: Gopalswamy, N., S. Yashiro, and S. Akiyama (2007), Geoeffectiveness of halo coronal mass ejections, J. Geophys. Res., 112, A06112, doi:10.1029/2006JA012149
Gopalswamy et al. [2007] studied the geoeffectiveness of halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) on the basis of solar observations during 1996-2005 and found that the geoeffectiveness of 229 frontside halo CMEs was 71%. Recently for observations of 305 frontside halo CMEs during 1997-2003 the geoeffectiveness was found to be 40% [Kim et al., 2005]. Complex analysis of both solar and interplanetary measurements showed that the geoeffectiveness of frontside halo CMEs is likely to be about 50% [Yermolaev et al., 2005; Yermolaev and Yermolaev, 2006]. Gopalswamy et al. [2007] did not discuss possible causes of this difference and were limited only to the general words: "The reason for the conflicting results (geoeffectiveness of CMEs ranging from 35% to more than 80%) may be attributed to the different definition of halo CMEs and geoeffectiveness." So, here we shall present our point of view on high geoeffectivenees of CME obtained in paper by Gopalswamy et al. [2007].
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2008;
originally announced January 2008.
-
Comment on "A statistical comparison of solar wind sources of moderate and intense geomagnetic storms at solar minimum and maximum" by Zhang, J.-C., M. W. Liemohn, J. U. Kozyra, M. F. Thomsen, H. A. Elliott, and J. M. Weygand, JGR, 2006
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
M. Yu. Yermolaev,
I. G. Lodkina
Abstract:
Conditions in the solar wind resulting in magnetic storms on the Earth are a subject of long and intensive investigations. Recently Zhang et al. (2006), published a paper, where they used superposed epoch analyses method to study solar wind features during 549 geomagnetic storms. Unfortunately, the used methodical approach has not allowed to improve essentially understanding of relation of magne…
▽ More
Conditions in the solar wind resulting in magnetic storms on the Earth are a subject of long and intensive investigations. Recently Zhang et al. (2006), published a paper, where they used superposed epoch analyses method to study solar wind features during 549 geomagnetic storms. Unfortunately, the used methodical approach has not allowed to improve essentially understanding of relation of magnetic storms with conditions in the solar wind, and first of all for the following reasons: (1) they did not take into account of existance of storms generated by different types of solar wind, and (2) they took minimum Dst index time as epoch zero time rather than storm onset.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2006;
originally announced March 2006.
-
Geomagnetic storm dependence on the solar flare class
Authors:
Yu. I. Yermolaev,
M. Yu. Yermolaev
Abstract:
Content. Solar flares are often used as precursors of geomagnetic storms. In particular, Howard and Tappin (2005) recently published in A&A a dependence between X-ray class of solar flares and Ap and Dst indexes of geomagnetic storms which contradicts to early published results.
Aims. We compare published results on flare-storm dependences and discuss possible sources of the discrepancy.
Met…
▽ More
Content. Solar flares are often used as precursors of geomagnetic storms. In particular, Howard and Tappin (2005) recently published in A&A a dependence between X-ray class of solar flares and Ap and Dst indexes of geomagnetic storms which contradicts to early published results.
Aims. We compare published results on flare-storm dependences and discuss possible sources of the discrepancy.
Methods. We analyze following sources of difference: (1) different intervals of observations, (2) different statistics and (3) different methods of event identification and comparison.
Results. Our analysis shows that magnitude of geomagnetic storms is likely to be independent on X-ray class of solar flares.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2006;
originally announced January 2006.