On the Complexity and Approximability of Optimal Sensor Selection and Attack for Kalman Filtering
Authors:
Lintao Ye,
Nathaniel Woodford,
Sandip Roy,
Shreyas Sundaram
Abstract:
Given a linear dynamical system affected by stochastic noise, we consider the problem of selecting an optimal set of sensors (at design-time) to minimize the trace of the steady state a priori or a posteriori error covariance of the Kalman filter, subject to certain selection budget constraints. We show the fundamental result that there is no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm…
▽ More
Given a linear dynamical system affected by stochastic noise, we consider the problem of selecting an optimal set of sensors (at design-time) to minimize the trace of the steady state a priori or a posteriori error covariance of the Kalman filter, subject to certain selection budget constraints. We show the fundamental result that there is no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem. This contrasts with other classes of sensor selection problems studied in the literature, which typically pursue constant-factor approximations by leveraging greedy algorithms and submodularity (or supermodularity) of the cost function. Here, we provide a specific example showing that greedy algorithms can perform arbitrarily poorly for the problem of design-time sensor selection for Kalman filtering. We then study the problem of attacking (i.e., removing) a set of installed sensors, under predefined attack budget constraints, to maximize the trace of the steady state a priori or a posteriori error covariance of the Kalman filter. Again, we show that there is no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem, and show specifically that greedy algorithms can perform arbitrarily poorly.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2020; v1 submitted 24 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
Identifying lineage effects when controlling for population structure improves power in bacterial association studies
Authors:
Sarah G Earle,
Chieh-Hsi Wu,
Jane Charlesworth,
Nicole Stoesser,
N Claire Gordon,
Timothy M Walker,
Chris C A Spencer,
Zamin Iqbal,
David A Clifton,
Katie L Hopkins,
Neil Woodford,
E Grace Smith,
Nazir Ismail,
Martin J Llewelyn,
Tim E Peto,
Derrick W Crook,
Gil McVean,
A Sarah Walker,
Daniel J Wilson
Abstract:
Bacteria pose unique challenges for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) because of strong structuring into distinct strains and substantial linkage disequilibrium across the genome. While methods developed for human studies can correct for strain structure, this risks considerable loss- of-power because genetic differences between strains often contribute substantial phenotypic variability. Her…
▽ More
Bacteria pose unique challenges for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) because of strong structuring into distinct strains and substantial linkage disequilibrium across the genome. While methods developed for human studies can correct for strain structure, this risks considerable loss- of-power because genetic differences between strains often contribute substantial phenotypic variability. Here we propose a new method that captures lineage-level associations even when locus-specific associations cannot be fine-mapped. We demonstrate its ability to detect genes and genetic variants underlying resistance to 17 antimicrobials in 3144 isolates from four taxonomically diverse clonal and recombining bacteria: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Strong selection, recombination and penetrance confer high power to recover known antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, and reveal a candidate association between the outer membrane porin nmpC and cefazolin resistance in E. coli. Hence our method pinpoints locus-specific effects where possible, and boosts power by detecting lineage-level differences when fine-map** is intractable.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2016; v1 submitted 23 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
