Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Wood, M E

Treatments for pregestational chronic conditions during pregnancy: emulating a target trial with a treatment decision design

Authors: Mollie E. Wood, Chase D. Latour, Lucia C. Petito

Abstract: As a solution to methodologic challenges inherent to estimating causal effects of exposures in early pregnancy, we suggest emulating a target trial using a treatment decision design, wherein time zero is centered around clinical landmarks where treatment decisions may occur, such as the date of preconception counseling or prenatal care initiation. These ideas are illustrated via protocols for two… ▽ More As a solution to methodologic challenges inherent to estimating causal effects of exposures in early pregnancy, we suggest emulating a target trial using a treatment decision design, wherein time zero is centered around clinical landmarks where treatment decisions may occur, such as the date of preconception counseling or prenatal care initiation. These ideas are illustrated via protocols for two target trials in large administrative databases, antidepressant use for pre-existing depressive disorder and antihypertensive medication use for mild-to-moderate chronic hypertension. Careful consideration of these issues is critical to the identification of the causal effects of early-pregnancy pharmacotherapies on pregnancy outcomes. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

DAG With Omitted Objects Displayed (DAGWOOD): A framework for revealing causal assumptions in DAGs

Authors: Noah A Haber, Mollie E Wood, Sarah Wieten, Alexander Breskin

Abstract: Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are frequently used in epidemiology as a method to encode causal inference assumptions. We propose the DAGWOOD framework to bring many of those encoded assumptions to the forefront. DAGWOOD combines a root DAG (the DAG in the proposed analysis) and a set of branch DAGs (alternative hidden assumptions to the root DAG). All branch DAGs share a common ruleset, and mus… ▽ More Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are frequently used in epidemiology as a method to encode causal inference assumptions. We propose the DAGWOOD framework to bring many of those encoded assumptions to the forefront. DAGWOOD combines a root DAG (the DAG in the proposed analysis) and a set of branch DAGs (alternative hidden assumptions to the root DAG). All branch DAGs share a common ruleset, and must 1) change the root DAG, 2) be a valid DAG, and either 3a) change the minimally sufficient adjustment set or 3b) change the number of frontdoor paths. Branch DAGs comprise a list of assumptions which must be justified as negligible. We define two types of branch DAGs: exclusion branch DAGs add a single- or bidirectional pathway between two nodes in the root DAG (e.g. direct pathways and colliders), while misdirection branch DAGs represent alternative pathways that could be drawn between objects (e.g., creating a collider by reversing the direction of causation for a controlled confounder). The DAGWOOD framework 1) organizes causal model assumptions, 2) reinforces best DAG practices, 3) provides a framework for evaluation of causal models, and 4) can be used for generating causal models. △ Less

Submitted 23 November, 2021; v1 submitted 8 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.