Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Wood, A M

Patient stratification in multi-arm trials: a two-stage procedure with Bayesian profile regression

Authors: Yuejia Xu, Angela M. Wood, Brian D. M. Tom

Abstract: Precision medicine is an emerging field that takes into account individual heterogeneity to inform better clinical practice. In clinical trials, the evaluation of treatment effect heterogeneity is an important component, and recently, many statistical methods have been proposed for stratifying patients into different subgroups based on such heterogeneity. However, the majority of existing methods… ▽ More Precision medicine is an emerging field that takes into account individual heterogeneity to inform better clinical practice. In clinical trials, the evaluation of treatment effect heterogeneity is an important component, and recently, many statistical methods have been proposed for stratifying patients into different subgroups based on such heterogeneity. However, the majority of existing methods developed for this purpose focus on the case with a dichotomous treatment and are not directly applicable to multi-arm trials. In this paper, we consider the problem of patient stratification in multi-arm trial settings and propose a two-stage procedure within the Bayesian nonparametric framework. Specifically, we first use Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) to predict potential outcomes (treatment responses) under different treatment options for each patient, and then we leverage Bayesian profile regression to cluster patients into subgroups according to their baseline characteristics and predicted potential outcomes. We further embed a variable selection procedure into our proposed framework to identify the patient characteristics that actively "drive" the clustering structure. We conduct simulation studies to examine the performance of our proposed method and demonstrate the method by applying it to a UK-based multi-arm blood donation trial, wherein our method uncovers five clinically meaningful donor subgroups. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Sequential Re-estimation Learning of Optimal Individualized Treatment Rules Among Ordinal Treatments with Application to Recommended Intervals Between Blood Donations

Authors: Yuejia Xu, Angela M. Wood, David J. Roberts, Brian D. M. Tom

Abstract: Personalized medicine has gained much popularity recently as a way of providing better healthcare by tailoring treatments to suit individuals. Our research, motivated by the UK INTERVAL blood donation trial, focuses on estimating the optimal individualized treatment rule (ITR) in the ordinal treatment-arms setting. Restrictions on minimum lengths between whole blood donations exist to safeguard do… ▽ More Personalized medicine has gained much popularity recently as a way of providing better healthcare by tailoring treatments to suit individuals. Our research, motivated by the UK INTERVAL blood donation trial, focuses on estimating the optimal individualized treatment rule (ITR) in the ordinal treatment-arms setting. Restrictions on minimum lengths between whole blood donations exist to safeguard donor health and quality of blood received. However, the evidence-base for these limits is lacking. Moreover, in England, the blood service is interested in making blood donation both safe and sustainable by integrating multi-marker data from INTERVAL and develo** personalized donation strategies. As the three inter-donation interval options in INTERVAL have clear orderings, we propose a sequential re-estimation learning method that effectively incorporates "treatment" orderings when identifying optimal ITRs. Furthermore, we incorporate variable selection into our method for both linear and nonlinear decision rules to handle situations with (noise) covariates irrelevant for decision-making. Simulations demonstrate its superior performance over existing methods that assume multiple nominal treatments by achieving smaller misclassification rates and larger value functions. Application to a much-in-demand donor subgroup shows that the estimated optimal ITR achieves both the highest utilities and largest proportions of donors assigned to the safest inter-donation interval option in INTERVAL. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Optimal risk-assessment scheduling for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Authors: Francesca Gasperoni, Christopher H. Jackson, Angela M. Wood, Michael J. Sweeting, Paul J. Newcombe, David Stevens, Jessica K. Barrett

Abstract: In this work, we introduce a personalised and age-specific Net Benefit function, composed of benefits and costs, to recommend optimal timing of risk assessments for cardiovascular disease prevention. We extend the 2-stage landmarking model to estimate patient-specific CVD risk profiles, adjusting for time-varying covariates. We apply our model to data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink,… ▽ More In this work, we introduce a personalised and age-specific Net Benefit function, composed of benefits and costs, to recommend optimal timing of risk assessments for cardiovascular disease prevention. We extend the 2-stage landmarking model to estimate patient-specific CVD risk profiles, adjusting for time-varying covariates. We apply our model to data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, comprising primary care electronic health records from the UK. We find that people at lower risk could be recommended an optimal risk-assessment interval of 5 years or more. Time-varying risk-factors are required to discriminate between more frequent schedules for higher-risk people. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Population-calibrated multiple imputation for a binary/categorical covariate in categorical regression models

Authors: Tra My Pham, James R Carpenter, Tim P Morris, Angela M Wood, Irene Petersen

Abstract: Multiple imputation (MI) has become popular for analyses with missing data in medical research. The standard implementation of MI is based on the assumption of data being missing at random (MAR). However, for missing data generated by missing not at random (MNAR) mechanisms, MI performed assuming MAR might not be satisfactory. For an incomplete variable in a given dataset, its corresponding popula… ▽ More Multiple imputation (MI) has become popular for analyses with missing data in medical research. The standard implementation of MI is based on the assumption of data being missing at random (MAR). However, for missing data generated by missing not at random (MNAR) mechanisms, MI performed assuming MAR might not be satisfactory. For an incomplete variable in a given dataset, its corresponding population marginal distribution might also be available in an external data source. We show how this information can be readily utilised in the imputation model to calibrate inference to the population, by incorporating an appropriately calculated offset termed the `calibrated-$δ$ adjustment'. We describe the derivation of this offset from the population distribution of the incomplete variable and show how in applications it can be used to closely (and often exactly) match the post-imputation distribution to the population level. Through analytic and simulation studies, we show that our proposed calibrated-$δ$ adjustment MI method can give the same inference as standard MI when data are MAR, and can produce more accurate inference under two general MNAR missingness mechanisms. The method is used to impute missing ethnicity data in a type 2 diabetes prevalence case study using UK primary care electronic health records, where it results in scientifically relevant changes in inference for non-White ethnic groups compared to standard MI. Calibrated-$δ$ adjustment MI represents a pragmatic approach for utilising available population-level information in a sensitivity analysis to explore potential departure from the MAR assumption. △ Less

Submitted 4 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.