Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Wolfson, T

Generating Tables from the Parametric Knowledge of Language Models

Authors: Yevgeni Berkovitch, Oren Glickman, Amit Somech, Tomer Wolfson

Abstract: We explore generating factual and accurate tables from the parametric knowledge of large language models (LLMs). While LLMs have demonstrated impressive capabilities in recreating knowledge bases and generating free-form text, we focus on generating structured tabular data, which is crucial in domains like finance and healthcare. We examine the table generation abilities of four state-of-the-art L… ▽ More We explore generating factual and accurate tables from the parametric knowledge of large language models (LLMs). While LLMs have demonstrated impressive capabilities in recreating knowledge bases and generating free-form text, we focus on generating structured tabular data, which is crucial in domains like finance and healthcare. We examine the table generation abilities of four state-of-the-art LLMs: GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Llama2-13B, and Llama2-70B, using three prompting methods for table generation: (a) full-table, (b) row-by-row; (c) cell-by-cell. For evaluation, we introduce a novel benchmark, WikiTabGen which contains 100 curated Wikipedia tables. Tables are further processed to ensure their factual correctness and manually annotated with short natural language descriptions. Our findings reveal that table generation remains a challenge, with GPT-4 reaching the highest accuracy at 19.6%. Our detailed analysis sheds light on how various table properties, such as size, table popularity, and numerical content, influence generation performance. This work highlights the unique challenges in LLM-based table generation and provides a solid evaluation framework for future research. Our code, prompts and data are all publicly available: https://github.com/analysis-bots/WikiTabGen △ Less

Submitted 16 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

LINX: A Language Driven Generative System for Goal-Oriented Automated Data Exploration

Authors: Tavor Lipman, Tova Milo, Amit Somech, Tomer Wolfson, Oz Zafar

Abstract: Data exploration is a challenging process in which users examine a dataset by iteratively employing a series of queries. While in some cases the user explores a new dataset to become familiar with it, more often, the exploration process is conducted with a specific analysis goal or question in mind. To assist users in exploring a new dataset, Automated Data Exploration (ADE) systems have been devi… ▽ More Data exploration is a challenging process in which users examine a dataset by iteratively employing a series of queries. While in some cases the user explores a new dataset to become familiar with it, more often, the exploration process is conducted with a specific analysis goal or question in mind. To assist users in exploring a new dataset, Automated Data Exploration (ADE) systems have been devised in previous work. These systems aim to auto-generate a full exploration session, containing a sequence of queries that showcase interesting elements of the data. However, existing ADE systems are often constrained by a predefined objective function, thus always generating the same session for a given dataset. Therefore, their effectiveness in goal-oriented exploration, in which users need to answer specific questions about the data, are extremely limited. To this end, this paper presents LINX, a generative system augmented with a natural language interface for goal-oriented ADE. Given an input dataset and an analytical goal described in natural language, LINX generates a personalized exploratory session that is relevant to the user's goal. LINX utilizes a Large Language Model (LLM) to interpret the input analysis goal, and then derive a set of specifications for the desired output exploration session. These specifications are then transferred to a novel, modular ADE engine based on Constrained Deep Reinforcement Learning (CDRL), which can adapt its output according to the specified instructions. To validate LINX's effectiveness, we introduce a new benchmark dataset for goal-oriented exploration and conduct an extensive user study. Our analysis underscores LINX's superior capability in producing exploratory notebooks that are significantly more relevant and beneficial than those generated by existing solutions, including ChatGPT, goal-agnostic ADE, and commercial systems. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context

Authors: Ori Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan Berant

Abstract: Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) hold promise to produce language understanding systems that are are factual, efficient, and up-to-date. An important desideratum of RALMs, is that retrieved information helps model performance when it is relevant, and does not harm performance when it is not. This is particularly important in multi-hop reasoning scenarios, where misuse of irrelevant evid… ▽ More Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) hold promise to produce language understanding systems that are are factual, efficient, and up-to-date. An important desideratum of RALMs, is that retrieved information helps model performance when it is relevant, and does not harm performance when it is not. This is particularly important in multi-hop reasoning scenarios, where misuse of irrelevant evidence can lead to cascading errors. However, recent work has shown that retrieval augmentation can sometimes have a negative effect on performance. In this work, we present a thorough analysis on five open-domain question answering benchmarks, characterizing cases when retrieval reduces accuracy. We then propose two methods to mitigate this issue. First, a simple baseline that filters out retrieved passages that do not entail question-answer pairs according to a natural language inference (NLI) model. This is effective in preventing performance reduction, but at a cost of also discarding relevant passages. Thus, we propose a method for automatically generating data to fine-tune the language model to properly leverage retrieved passages, using a mix of relevant and irrelevant contexts at training time. We empirically show that even 1,000 examples suffice to train the model to be robust to irrelevant contexts while maintaining high performance on examples with relevant ones. △ Less

Submitted 5 May, 2024; v1 submitted 2 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Answering Questions by Meta-Reasoning over Multiple Chains of Thought

Authors: Ori Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ben Bogin, Uri Katz, Daniel Deutch, Jonathan Berant

Abstract: Modern systems for multi-hop question answering (QA) typically break questions into a sequence of reasoning steps, termed chain-of-thought (CoT), before arriving at a final answer. Often, multiple chains are sampled and aggregated through a voting mechanism over the final answers, but the intermediate steps themselves are discarded. While such approaches improve performance, they do not consider t… ▽ More Modern systems for multi-hop question answering (QA) typically break questions into a sequence of reasoning steps, termed chain-of-thought (CoT), before arriving at a final answer. Often, multiple chains are sampled and aggregated through a voting mechanism over the final answers, but the intermediate steps themselves are discarded. While such approaches improve performance, they do not consider the relations between intermediate steps across chains and do not provide a unified explanation for the predicted answer. We introduce Multi-Chain Reasoning (MCR), an approach which prompts large language models to meta-reason over multiple chains of thought, rather than aggregating their answers. MCR examines different reasoning chains, mixes information between them and selects the most relevant facts in generating an explanation and predicting the answer. MCR outperforms strong baselines on 7 multi-hop QA datasets. Moreover, our analysis reveals that MCR explanations exhibit high quality, enabling humans to verify its answers. △ Less

Submitted 17 October, 2023; v1 submitted 25 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: Accepted for publication in The 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2023). Author's final version

QAMPARI: An Open-domain Question Answering Benchmark for Questions with Many Answers from Multiple Paragraphs

Authors: Samuel Joseph Amouyal, Tomer Wolfson, Ohad Rubin, Ori Yoran, Jonathan Herzig, Jonathan Berant

Abstract: Existing benchmarks for open-domain question answering (ODQA) typically focus on questions whose answers can be extracted from a single paragraph. By contrast, many natural questions, such as "What players were drafted by the Brooklyn Nets?" have a list of answers. Answering such questions requires retrieving and reading from many passages, in a large corpus. We introduce QAMPARI, an ODQA benchmar… ▽ More Existing benchmarks for open-domain question answering (ODQA) typically focus on questions whose answers can be extracted from a single paragraph. By contrast, many natural questions, such as "What players were drafted by the Brooklyn Nets?" have a list of answers. Answering such questions requires retrieving and reading from many passages, in a large corpus. We introduce QAMPARI, an ODQA benchmark, where question answers are lists of entities, spread across many paragraphs. We created QAMPARI by (a) generating questions with multiple answers from Wikipedia's knowledge graph and tables, (b) automatically pairing answers with supporting evidence in Wikipedia paragraphs, and (c) manually paraphrasing questions and validating each answer. We train ODQA models from the retrieve-and-read family and find that QAMPARI is challenging in terms of both passage retrieval and answer generation, reaching an F1 score of 32.8 at best. Our results highlight the need for develo** ODQA models that handle a broad range of question types, including single and multi-answer questions. △ Less

Submitted 29 May, 2023; v1 submitted 25 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Weakly Supervised Text-to-SQL Parsing through Question Decomposition

Authors: Tomer Wolfson, Daniel Deutch, Jonathan Berant

Abstract: Text-to-SQL parsers are crucial in enabling non-experts to effortlessly query relational data. Training such parsers, by contrast, generally requires expertise in annotating natural language (NL) utterances with corresponding SQL queries. In this work, we propose a weak supervision approach for training text-to-SQL parsers. We take advantage of the recently proposed question meaning representation… ▽ More Text-to-SQL parsers are crucial in enabling non-experts to effortlessly query relational data. Training such parsers, by contrast, generally requires expertise in annotating natural language (NL) utterances with corresponding SQL queries. In this work, we propose a weak supervision approach for training text-to-SQL parsers. We take advantage of the recently proposed question meaning representation called QDMR, an intermediate between NL and formal query languages. Given questions, their QDMR structures (annotated by non-experts or automatically predicted), and the answers, we are able to automatically synthesize SQL queries that are used to train text-to-SQL models. We test our approach by experimenting on five benchmark datasets. Our results show that the weakly supervised models perform competitively with those trained on annotated NL-SQL data. Overall, we effectively train text-to-SQL parsers, while using zero SQL annotations. △ Less

Submitted 26 April, 2022; v1 submitted 12 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: Accepted for publication in Findings of NAACL 2022. Author's final version

Break, Perturb, Build: Automatic Perturbation of Reasoning Paths Through Question Decomposition

Authors: Mor Geva, Tomer Wolfson, Jonathan Berant

Abstract: Recent efforts to create challenge benchmarks that test the abilities of natural language understanding models have largely depended on human annotations. In this work, we introduce the "Break, Perturb, Build" (BPB) framework for automatic reasoning-oriented perturbation of question-answer pairs. BPB represents a question by decomposing it into the reasoning steps that are required to answer it, s… ▽ More Recent efforts to create challenge benchmarks that test the abilities of natural language understanding models have largely depended on human annotations. In this work, we introduce the "Break, Perturb, Build" (BPB) framework for automatic reasoning-oriented perturbation of question-answer pairs. BPB represents a question by decomposing it into the reasoning steps that are required to answer it, symbolically perturbs the decomposition, and then generates new question-answer pairs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of BPB by creating evaluation sets for three reading comprehension (RC) benchmarks, generating thousands of high-quality examples without human intervention. We evaluate a range of RC models on our evaluation sets, which reveals large performance gaps on generated examples compared to the original data. Moreover, symbolic perturbations enable fine-grained analysis of the strengths and limitations of models. Last, augmenting the training data with examples generated by BPB helps close the performance gaps, without any drop on the original data distribution. △ Less

Submitted 18 October, 2021; v1 submitted 29 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: Accepted for publication in Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 2021. Author's final version

Obtaining Faithful Interpretations from Compositional Neural Networks

Authors: Sanjay Subramanian, Ben Bogin, Nitish Gupta, Tomer Wolfson, Sameer Singh, Jonathan Berant, Matt Gardner

Abstract: Neural module networks (NMNs) are a popular approach for modeling compositionality: they achieve high accuracy when applied to problems in language and vision, while reflecting the compositional structure of the problem in the network architecture. However, prior work implicitly assumed that the structure of the network modules, describing the abstract reasoning process, provides a faithful explan… ▽ More Neural module networks (NMNs) are a popular approach for modeling compositionality: they achieve high accuracy when applied to problems in language and vision, while reflecting the compositional structure of the problem in the network architecture. However, prior work implicitly assumed that the structure of the network modules, describing the abstract reasoning process, provides a faithful explanation of the model's reasoning; that is, that all modules perform their intended behaviour. In this work, we propose and conduct a systematic evaluation of the intermediate outputs of NMNs on NLVR2 and DROP, two datasets which require composing multiple reasoning steps. We find that the intermediate outputs differ from the expected output, illustrating that the network structure does not provide a faithful explanation of model behaviour. To remedy that, we train the model with auxiliary supervision and propose particular choices for module architecture that yield much better faithfulness, at a minimal cost to accuracy. △ Less

Submitted 8 September, 2020; v1 submitted 2 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: ACL 2020; first three authors contributed equally

Break It Down: A Question Understanding Benchmark

Authors: Tomer Wolfson, Mor Geva, Ankit Gupta, Matt Gardner, Yoav Goldberg, Daniel Deutch, Jonathan Berant

Abstract: Understanding natural language questions entails the ability to break down a question into the requisite steps for computing its answer. In this work, we introduce a Question Decomposition Meaning Representation (QDMR) for questions. QDMR constitutes the ordered list of steps, expressed through natural language, that are necessary for answering a question. We develop a crowdsourcing pipeline, show… ▽ More Understanding natural language questions entails the ability to break down a question into the requisite steps for computing its answer. In this work, we introduce a Question Decomposition Meaning Representation (QDMR) for questions. QDMR constitutes the ordered list of steps, expressed through natural language, that are necessary for answering a question. We develop a crowdsourcing pipeline, showing that quality QDMRs can be annotated at scale, and release the Break dataset, containing over 83K pairs of questions and their QDMRs. We demonstrate the utility of QDMR by showing that (a) it can be used to improve open-domain question answering on the HotpotQA dataset, (b) it can be deterministically converted to a pseudo-SQL formal language, which can alleviate annotation in semantic parsing applications. Last, we use Break to train a sequence-to-sequence model with copying that parses questions into QDMR structures, and show that it substantially outperforms several natural baselines. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: Accepted for publication in Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 2020. Author's final version

Explaining Queries over Web Tables to Non-Experts

Authors: Jonathan Berant, Daniel Deutch, Amir Globerson, Tova Milo, Tomer Wolfson

Abstract: Designing a reliable natural language (NL) interface for querying tables has been a longtime goal of researchers in both the data management and natural language processing (NLP) communities. Such an interface receives as input an NL question, translates it into a formal query, executes the query and returns the results. Errors in the translation process are not uncommon, and users typically strug… ▽ More Designing a reliable natural language (NL) interface for querying tables has been a longtime goal of researchers in both the data management and natural language processing (NLP) communities. Such an interface receives as input an NL question, translates it into a formal query, executes the query and returns the results. Errors in the translation process are not uncommon, and users typically struggle to understand whether their query has been mapped correctly. We address this problem by explaining the obtained formal queries to non-expert users. Two methods for query explanations are presented: the first translates queries into NL, while the second method provides a graphic representation of the query cell-based provenance (in its execution on a given table). Our solution augments a state-of-the-art NL interface over web tables, enhancing it in both its training and deployment phase. Experiments, including a user study conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk, show our solution to improve both the correctness and reliability of an NL interface. △ Less

Submitted 14 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Comments: Short paper version to appear in ICDE 2019