Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Winschel, V

The algebra of predicting agents

Authors: Joe Bolt, Jules Hedges, Viktor Winschel

Abstract: The category of open games, which provides a strongly compositional foundation of economic game theory, is intermediate between symmetric monoidal and compact closed. More precisely it has counits with no corresponding units, and a partially defined duality. There exist open games with the same types as unit maps, given by agents with the strategic goal of predicting a future value. Such agents ap… ▽ More The category of open games, which provides a strongly compositional foundation of economic game theory, is intermediate between symmetric monoidal and compact closed. More precisely it has counits with no corresponding units, and a partially defined duality. There exist open games with the same types as unit maps, given by agents with the strategic goal of predicting a future value. Such agents appear in earlier work on selection functions. We explore the algebraic properties of these agents via the symmetric monoidal bicategory whose 2-cells are morphisms between open games, and show how the resulting structure approximates a compact closed category with a family of lax commutative bialgebras. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

A Compositional Coalgebraic Semantics of Strategic Games

Authors: Achim Blumensath, Viktor Winschel

Abstract: We provide a compositional coalgebraic semantics for strategic games. In our framework, like in the semantics of functional programming languages, coalgebras represent the observable behaviour of systems derived from the behaviour of the parts over an unobservable state space. We use coalgebras to describe and program stage games, finitely and potentially infinitely repeated hierarchical or parall… ▽ More We provide a compositional coalgebraic semantics for strategic games. In our framework, like in the semantics of functional programming languages, coalgebras represent the observable behaviour of systems derived from the behaviour of the parts over an unobservable state space. We use coalgebras to describe and program stage games, finitely and potentially infinitely repeated hierarchical or parallel games with imperfect and incomplete information based on deterministic, non-deterministic or probabilistic decisions of learning agents in possibly endogenous networks. Our framework is compositional in that arbitrarily complex network of games can be composed. The coalgebraic approach allows to represent self-referential or reflexive structures like institutional dynamics, strategic network formation from within the network, belief formation, learning agents or other self-referential phenomena that characterise complex social systems of cognitive agents. And finally our games represent directly runnable code in functional programming languages that can also be analysed by sophisticated verification and logical tools of software engineering. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Compositionality and String Diagrams for Game Theory

Authors: Jules Hedges, Evguenia Shprits, Viktor Winschel, Philipp Zahn

Abstract: We introduce string diagrams as a formal mathematical, graphical language to represent, compose, program and reason about games. The language is well established in quantum physics, quantum computing and quantum linguistic with the semantics given by category theory. We apply this language to the game theoretical setting and show examples how to use it for some economic games where we highlight th… ▽ More We introduce string diagrams as a formal mathematical, graphical language to represent, compose, program and reason about games. The language is well established in quantum physics, quantum computing and quantum linguistic with the semantics given by category theory. We apply this language to the game theoretical setting and show examples how to use it for some economic games where we highlight the compositional nature of our higher-order game theory. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

Compositional game theory

Authors: Neil Ghani, Jules Hedges, Viktor Winschel, Philipp Zahn

Abstract: We introduce open games as a compositional foundation of economic game theory. A compositional approach potentially allows methods of game theory and theoretical computer science to be applied to large-scale economic models for which standard economic tools are not practical. An open game represents a game played relative to an arbitrary environment and to this end we introduce the concept of cout… ▽ More We introduce open games as a compositional foundation of economic game theory. A compositional approach potentially allows methods of game theory and theoretical computer science to be applied to large-scale economic models for which standard economic tools are not practical. An open game represents a game played relative to an arbitrary environment and to this end we introduce the concept of coutility, which is the utility generated by an open game and returned to its environment. Open games are the morphisms of a symmetric monoidal category and can therefore be composed by categorical composition into sequential move games and by monoidal products into simultaneous move games. Open games can be represented by string diagrams which provide an intuitive but formal visualisation of the information flows. We show that a variety of games can be faithfully represented as open games in the sense of having the same Nash equilibria and off-equilibrium best responses. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2018; v1 submitted 15 March, 2016; originally announced March 2016.

Comments: This version submitted to LiCS 2018

Higher-Order Decision Theory

Authors: Jules Hedges, Paulo Oliva, Evguenia Sprits, Viktor Winschel, Philipp Zahn

Abstract: Classical decision theory models behaviour in terms of utility maximisation where utilities represent rational preference relations over outcomes. However, empirical evidence and theoretical considerations suggest that we need to go beyond this framework. We propose to represent goals by higher-order functions or operators that take other functions as arguments where the max and argmax operators a… ▽ More Classical decision theory models behaviour in terms of utility maximisation where utilities represent rational preference relations over outcomes. However, empirical evidence and theoretical considerations suggest that we need to go beyond this framework. We propose to represent goals by higher-order functions or operators that take other functions as arguments where the max and argmax operators are special cases. Our higher-order functions take a context function as their argument where a context represents a process from actions to outcomes. By that we can define goals being dependent on the actions and the process in addition to outcomes only. This formulation generalises outcome based preferences to context-dependent goals. We show how to uniformly represent within our higher-order framework classical utility maximisation but also various other extensions that have been debated in economics. △ Less

Submitted 3 June, 2015; v1 submitted 2 June, 2015; originally announced June 2015.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1409.7411

Higher-Order Game Theory

Authors: Jules Hedges, Paulo Oliva, Evguenia Sprits, Viktor Winschel, Philipp Zahn

Abstract: In applied game theory the motivation of players is a key element. It is encoded in the payoffs of the game form and often based on utility functions. But there are cases were formal descriptions in the form of a utility function do not exist. In this paper we introduce a representation of games where players' goals are modeled based on so-called higher-order functions. Our representation provides… ▽ More In applied game theory the motivation of players is a key element. It is encoded in the payoffs of the game form and often based on utility functions. But there are cases were formal descriptions in the form of a utility function do not exist. In this paper we introduce a representation of games where players' goals are modeled based on so-called higher-order functions. Our representation provides a general and powerful way to mathematically summarize players' intentions. In our framework utility functions as well as preference relations are special cases to describe players' goals. We show that in higher-order functions formal descriptions of players may still exist where utility functions do not using a classical example, a variant of Keynes' beauty contest. We also show that equilibrium conditions based on Nash can be easily adapted to our framework. Lastly, this framework serves as a step** stone to powerful tools from computer science that can be usefully applied to economic game theory in the future such as computational and computability aspects. △ Less

Submitted 3 June, 2015; v1 submitted 2 June, 2015; originally announced June 2015.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1409.7411

A Higher-order Framework for Decision Problems and Games

Authors: Jules Hedges, Paulo Oliva, Evguenia Winschel, Viktor Winschel, Philipp Zahn

Abstract: We introduce a new unified framework for modelling both decision problems and finite games based on quantifiers and selection functions. We show that the canonical utility maximisation is one special case of a quantifier and that our more abstract framework provides several additional degrees of freedom in modelling. In particular, incomplete preferences, non-maximising heuristics, and context-dep… ▽ More We introduce a new unified framework for modelling both decision problems and finite games based on quantifiers and selection functions. We show that the canonical utility maximisation is one special case of a quantifier and that our more abstract framework provides several additional degrees of freedom in modelling. In particular, incomplete preferences, non-maximising heuristics, and context-dependent motives can be taken into account when describing an agent's goal. We introduce a suitable generalisation of Nash equilibrium for games in terms of quantifiers and selection functions. Moreover, we introduce a refinement of Nash that captures context-dependency of goals. Modelling in our framework is compositional as the parts of the game are modular and can be easily exchanged. We provide an extended example where we illustrate concepts and highlight the benefits of our alternative modelling approach. △ Less

Submitted 25 September, 2014; originally announced September 2014.

Comments: 45 pages

Coalgebraic Analysis of Subgame-perfect Equilibria in Infinite Games without Discounting

Authors: Samson Abramsky, Viktor Winschel

Abstract: We present a novel coalgebraic formulation of infinite extensive games. We define both the game trees and the strategy profiles by possibly infinite systems of corecursive equations. Certain strategy profiles are proved to be subgame perfect equilibria using a novel proof principle of predicate coinduction. We characterize all subgame perfect equilibria for the dollar auction game. The economicall… ▽ More We present a novel coalgebraic formulation of infinite extensive games. We define both the game trees and the strategy profiles by possibly infinite systems of corecursive equations. Certain strategy profiles are proved to be subgame perfect equilibria using a novel proof principle of predicate coinduction. We characterize all subgame perfect equilibria for the dollar auction game. The economically interesting feature is that in order to prove these results we do not need to rely on continuity assumptions on the payoffs which amount to discounting the future. In particular, we prove a form of one-deviation principle without any such assumptions. This suggests that coalgebra supports a more adequate treatment of infinite-horizon models in game theory and economics. △ Less

Submitted 5 June, 2013; v1 submitted 16 October, 2012; originally announced October 2012.