Diversity of symptom phenotypes in SARS-CoV-2 community infections observed in multiple large datasets
Authors:
Martyn Fyles,
Karina-Doris Vihta,
Carole H Sudre,
Harry Long,
Rajenki Das,
Caroline Jay,
Tom Wingfield,
Fergus Cumming,
William Green,
Pantelis Hadjipantelis,
Joni Kirk,
Claire J Steves,
Sebastien Ourselin,
Graham F Medley,
Elizabeth Fearon,
Thomas House
Abstract:
Through the use of cutting-edge unsupervised classification techniques from statistics and machine learning, we characterise symptom phenotypes among symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive community cases. We first analyse each dataset in isolation and across age bands, before using methods that allow us to compare multiple datasets. While we observe separation due to the total number of symptoms exp…
▽ More
Through the use of cutting-edge unsupervised classification techniques from statistics and machine learning, we characterise symptom phenotypes among symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive community cases. We first analyse each dataset in isolation and across age bands, before using methods that allow us to compare multiple datasets. While we observe separation due to the total number of symptoms experienced by cases, we also see a separation of symptoms into gastrointestinal, respiratory and other types, and different symptom co-occurrence patterns at the extremes of age. In this way, we are able to demonstrate the deep structure of symptoms of COVID-19 without usual biases due to study design. This is expected to have implications for the identification and management of community SARS-CoV-2 cases and could be further applied to symptom-based management of other diseases and syndromes.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2023; v1 submitted 10 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
Unfolding selection to infer individual risk heterogeneity for optimising disease forecasts and policy development
Authors:
M. Gabriela M. Gomes,
Nicholas A. Feasey,
Marcelo U. Ferreira,
E. James LaCourse,
Kate E. Langwig,
Lisa Reimer,
Beate Ringwald,
Jamie Rylance,
J. Russell Stothard,
Miriam Taegtmeyer,
Dianne J. Terlouw,
Rachel Tolhurst,
Tom Wingfield,
Stephen B. Gordon
Abstract:
Mathematical models are increasing adopted for setting targets for disease prevention and control. As model-informed policies are implemented, however, the inaccuracies of some forecasts become apparent, for example overprediction of infection burdens and overestimation of intervention impacts. Here, we attribute these discrepancies to methodological limitations in capturing the heterogeneities of…
▽ More
Mathematical models are increasing adopted for setting targets for disease prevention and control. As model-informed policies are implemented, however, the inaccuracies of some forecasts become apparent, for example overprediction of infection burdens and overestimation of intervention impacts. Here, we attribute these discrepancies to methodological limitations in capturing the heterogeneities of real-world systems. The mechanisms underpinning single factors for infection and their interactions determine individual propensities to acquire disease. These are potentially so numerous that to attain a full mechanistic description may be unfeasible. To contribute constructively to the development of health policies, model developers either leave factors out (reductionism) or adopt a broader but coarse description (holism). In our view, predictive capacity requires holistic descriptions of heterogeneity which are currently underutilised in infectious disease epidemiology but common in other disciplines.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2022; v1 submitted 2 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
