-
Chain event graphs for assessing activity-level propositions in forensic science in relation to drug traces on banknotes
Authors:
Gail Robertson,
Amy L Wilson,
Jim Q Smith
Abstract:
Graphical models and likelihood ratios can be used by forensic scientists to compare support given by evidence to propositions put forward by competing parties during court proceedings. Such models can also be used to evaluate support for activity-level propositions, i.e. propositions that refer to the nature of activities associated with evidence and how this evidence came to be at a crime scene.…
▽ More
Graphical models and likelihood ratios can be used by forensic scientists to compare support given by evidence to propositions put forward by competing parties during court proceedings. Such models can also be used to evaluate support for activity-level propositions, i.e. propositions that refer to the nature of activities associated with evidence and how this evidence came to be at a crime scene. Graphical methods can be used to show explicitly different scenarios that might explain the evidence in a case and to distinguish between evidence requiring evaluation by a jury and quantifiable evidence from the crime scene. Such visual representations can be helpful for forensic practitioners, the police and lawyers who may need to assess the value that different pieces of evidence make to their arguments in a case. In this paper we demonstrate for the first time how chain event graphs can be applied to a criminal case involving drug trafficking. We show how different types of evidence (i.e. expert judgement and data collected from a crime scene) can be combined using a chain event graph and show how the hierarchical model deriving from the graph can be used to evaluate the degree of support for different activity-level propositions in the case. We also develop a modification of the standard chain event graph to simplify their use in forensic applications.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
A comparison of graphical methods in the case of the murder of Meredith Kercher
Authors:
A. Philip Dawid,
Francesco Dotto,
Maxine Graves,
Jay B. Kadane,
Julia Mortera,
Gail Robertson,
Jim Q. Smith,
Amy L. Wilson
Abstract:
We compare three graphical methods for displaying evidence in a legal case: Wigmore Charts, Bayesian Networks and Chain Event Graphs. We find that these methods are aimed at three distinct audiences, respectively lawyers, forensic scientists and the police. The methods are illustrated using part of the evidence in the case of the murder of Meredith Kercher. More specifically, we focus on represent…
▽ More
We compare three graphical methods for displaying evidence in a legal case: Wigmore Charts, Bayesian Networks and Chain Event Graphs. We find that these methods are aimed at three distinct audiences, respectively lawyers, forensic scientists and the police. The methods are illustrated using part of the evidence in the case of the murder of Meredith Kercher. More specifically, we focus on representing the list of propositions, evidence, testimony and facts given in the first trial against Raffaele Sollecito and Amanda Knox with these graphical methodologies.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Resource Adequacy and Capacity Procurement: Metrics and Decision Support Analysis
Authors:
Chris J. Dent,
Nestor Sanchez,
Aditi Shevni,
Jim Q. Smith,
Amy L. Wilson,
Xuewen Yu
Abstract:
Resource adequacy studies typically use standard metrics such as Loss of Load Expectation and Expected Energy Unserved to quantify the risk of supply shortfalls. This paper critiques present approaches to adequacy assessment and capacity procurement in terms of their relevance to decision maker interests, before demonstrating alternatives including risk-averse metrics and visualisations of wider r…
▽ More
Resource adequacy studies typically use standard metrics such as Loss of Load Expectation and Expected Energy Unserved to quantify the risk of supply shortfalls. This paper critiques present approaches to adequacy assessment and capacity procurement in terms of their relevance to decision maker interests, before demonstrating alternatives including risk-averse metrics and visualisations of wider risk profile. This is illustrated with results for a Great Britain example, in which the risk profile varies substantially with the installed capacity of wind generation. This paper goes beyond previous literature through its critical discussion of how current practices reflect decision maker interests; and how decision making can be improved using a broader range of outputs available from standard models.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Capacity Value of Solar Power and Other Variable Generation
Authors:
S. Awara,
M. Lynch,
S. Pfenninger,
K. Schell,
R. Sioshansi,
I. Staffell,
N. Samaan,
S. H. Tindemans,
A. L. Wilson,
S. Zachary,
H. Zareipour,
C. J. Dent
Abstract:
This paper reviews methods that are used for adequacy risk assessment considering solar power and for assessment of the capacity value of solar power. The properties of solar power are described as seen from the perspective of the power-system operator, comparing differences in energy availability and capacity factors with those of wind power. Methodologies for risk calculations considering variab…
▽ More
This paper reviews methods that are used for adequacy risk assessment considering solar power and for assessment of the capacity value of solar power. The properties of solar power are described as seen from the perspective of the power-system operator, comparing differences in energy availability and capacity factors with those of wind power. Methodologies for risk calculations considering variable generation are surveyed, including the probability background, statistical-estimation approaches, and capacity-value metrics. Issues in incorporating variable generation in capacity markets are described, followed by a review of applied studies considering solar power. Finally, recommendations for further research are presented.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Bayesian estimates of transmission line outage rates that consider line dependencies
Authors:
Kai Zhou,
James R. Cruise,
Chris J. Dent,
Ian Dobson,
Louis Wehenkel,
Zhaoyu Wang,
Amy L. Wilson
Abstract:
Transmission line outage rates are fundamental to power system reliability analysis. Line outages are infrequent, occurring only about once a year, so outage data are limited. We propose a Bayesian hierarchical model that leverages line dependencies to better estimate outage rates of individual transmission lines from limited outage data. The Bayesian estimates have a lower standard deviation than…
▽ More
Transmission line outage rates are fundamental to power system reliability analysis. Line outages are infrequent, occurring only about once a year, so outage data are limited. We propose a Bayesian hierarchical model that leverages line dependencies to better estimate outage rates of individual transmission lines from limited outage data. The Bayesian estimates have a lower standard deviation than estimating the outage rates simply by dividing the number of outages by the number of years of data, especially when the number of outages is small. The Bayesian model produces more accurate individual line outage rates, as well as estimates of the uncertainty of these rates. Better estimates of line outage rates can improve system risk assessment, outage prediction, and maintenance scheduling.
△ Less
Submitted 23 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Using extreme value theory for the estimation of risk metrics for capacity adequacy assessment
Authors:
Amy L Wilson,
Stan Zachary
Abstract:
This paper investigates the use of extreme value theory for modelling the distribution of demand-net-of-wind for capacity adequacy assessment. Extreme value theory approaches are well-established and mathematically justified methods for estimating the tails of a distribution and so are ideally suited for problems in capacity adequacy, where normally only the tails of the relevant distributions are…
▽ More
This paper investigates the use of extreme value theory for modelling the distribution of demand-net-of-wind for capacity adequacy assessment. Extreme value theory approaches are well-established and mathematically justified methods for estimating the tails of a distribution and so are ideally suited for problems in capacity adequacy, where normally only the tails of the relevant distributions are significant. The extreme value theory peaks over threshold approach is applied directly to observations of demand-net-of-wind, meaning that no assumption is needed about the nature of any dependence between demand and wind.
The methodology is tested on data from Great Britain and compared to two alternative approaches: use of the empirical distribution of demand-net-of-wind and use of a model which assumes independence between demand and wind. Extreme value theory is shown to produce broadly similar estimates of risk metrics to the use of the above empirical distribution but with smaller sampling uncertainty. Estimates of risk metrics differ when the approach assuming independence is used, especially when data across different historical years are pooled, suggesting that assuming independence might result in the over- or under-estimation of risk metrics.
△ Less
Submitted 30 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
