-
Projection matrices and the sweep operator
Authors:
A. T. James,
E. R. Williams
Abstract:
These notes have been adapted from an undergraduate course given by Professor Alan James at the University of Adelaide from around 1965 and onwards. This adaption has put a focus on the definition of projection matrices and the sweep operator. These devices were at the heart of the development of the statistical package Genstat which initially focussed on the analysis of variance using the sweep o…
▽ More
These notes have been adapted from an undergraduate course given by Professor Alan James at the University of Adelaide from around 1965 and onwards. This adaption has put a focus on the definition of projection matrices and the sweep operator. These devices were at the heart of the development of the statistical package Genstat which initially focussed on the analysis of variance using the sweep operator. The notes provide an algebraic background to the sweep operator which has since been used to effect in a number of experimental design settings.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Regression Models for Order-of-Addition Experiments
Authors:
Hans-Peter Piepho,
Emlyn R. Williams
Abstract:
The purpose of order-of-addition (OofA) experiments is to identify the best order in a sequence of m components in a system or treatment. Such experiments may be analysed by various regression models, the most popular ones being based on pairwise ordering (PWO) factors or on component-position (CP) factors. This paper reviews these models and extensions and proposes a new class of models based on…
▽ More
The purpose of order-of-addition (OofA) experiments is to identify the best order in a sequence of m components in a system or treatment. Such experiments may be analysed by various regression models, the most popular ones being based on pairwise ordering (PWO) factors or on component-position (CP) factors. This paper reviews these models and extensions and proposes a new class of models based on response surface (RS) regression using component position numbers as predictor variables. Using two published examples, it is shown that RS models can be quite competitive. In case of model uncertainty, we advocate the use of model averaging for analysis. The averaging idea leads naturally to a design approach based on a compound optimality criterion assigning weights to each candidate model.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Substitutes for the non-existent square lattice designs for 36 varieties
Authors:
R. A. Bailey,
Peter J. Cameron,
L. H. Soicher,
E. R. Williams
Abstract:
Square lattice designs are often used in trials of new varieties of various agricultural crops. However, there are no square lattice designs for 36 varieties in blocks of size six for four or more replicates. Here we use three different approaches to construct designs for up to eight replicates. All the designs perform well in terms of giving a low average variance of variety contrasts.
Suppleme…
▽ More
Square lattice designs are often used in trials of new varieties of various agricultural crops. However, there are no square lattice designs for 36 varieties in blocks of size six for four or more replicates. Here we use three different approaches to construct designs for up to eight replicates. All the designs perform well in terms of giving a low average variance of variety contrasts.
Supplementary materials are available online.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
A summary of the Planck constant measurements using a watt balance with a superconducting solenoid at NIST
Authors:
S. Schlamminger,
R. L. Steiner,
D. Haddad,
D. B. Newell,
F. Seifert,
L. S. Chao,
R. Liu,
E. R. Williams,
J. R. Pratt
Abstract:
Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have been using a watt balance, NIST-3, to measure the Planck constant $h$ for over ten years. Two recently published values disagree by more than one standard uncertainty. The motivation for the present manuscript is twofold. First, we correct the latest published number to take into account a recently discovered systematic error i…
▽ More
Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have been using a watt balance, NIST-3, to measure the Planck constant $h$ for over ten years. Two recently published values disagree by more than one standard uncertainty. The motivation for the present manuscript is twofold. First, we correct the latest published number to take into account a recently discovered systematic error in mass dissemination at the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM). Second, we provide guidance on how to combine the two numbers into one final result. In order to adequately reflect the discrepancy, we added an additional systematic uncertainty to the published uncertainty budgets. The final value of $h$ measured with NIST-3 is $h = 6.626\,069\,36(37)\times 10^{-34}\,\mbox{J\,s}$. This result is $77(57) \times 10^{-9}$ fractionally higher than $h_{\mathrm{90}}$. Each number in parentheses gives the value of the standard uncertainty in the last two digits of the respective value and $h_{\mathrm{90}}$ is the conventional value of the Planck constant given by $h_{\mathrm{90}}\equiv 4 /( K_{\mathrm{J-90}}^2 R_{\mathrm{K-90}})$, where $K_{\mathrm{J-90}}$ and $R_{\mathrm{K-90}}$ denote the conventional values of the Josephson and von Klitzing constants, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
