-
Tree balance in phylogenetic models
Authors:
Sophie J. Kersting,
Kristina Wicke,
Mareike Fischer
Abstract:
Tree shape statistics, particularly measures of tree (im)balance, play an important role in the analysis of the shape of phylogenetic trees. With applications ranging from testing evolutionary models to studying the impact of fertility inheritance and selection, or tumor development and language evolution, the assessment of tree balance is crucial. Currently, a multitude of at least 30 (im)balance…
▽ More
Tree shape statistics, particularly measures of tree (im)balance, play an important role in the analysis of the shape of phylogenetic trees. With applications ranging from testing evolutionary models to studying the impact of fertility inheritance and selection, or tumor development and language evolution, the assessment of tree balance is crucial. Currently, a multitude of at least 30 (im)balance indices can be found in the literature, alongside numerous other tree shape statistics.
This diversity prompts essential questions: How can we minimize the selection of indices to mitigate the challenges of multiple testing? Is there a preeminent balance index tailored to specific tasks? Previous studies comparing the statistical power of indices in detecting trees deviating from the Yule model have been limited in scope, utilizing only a subset of indices and alternative tree models.
This research expands upon the examination of index power, encompassing all established indices and a broader array of alternative models. Our investigation reveals distinct groups of balance indices better suited for different tree models, suggesting that decisions on balance index selection can be enhanced with prior knowledge. Furthermore, we present the \textsf{R} software package \textsf{poweRbal} which allows the inclusion of new indices and models, thus facilitating future research.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2024; v1 submitted 7 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Bounding the softwired parsimony score of a phylogenetic network
Authors:
Janosch Döcker,
Simone Linz,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
In comparison to phylogenetic trees, phylogenetic networks are more suitable to represent complex evolutionary histories of species whose past includes reticulation such as hybridisation or lateral gene transfer. However, the reconstruction of phylogenetic networks remains challenging and computationally expensive due to their intricate structural properties. For example, the small parsimony probl…
▽ More
In comparison to phylogenetic trees, phylogenetic networks are more suitable to represent complex evolutionary histories of species whose past includes reticulation such as hybridisation or lateral gene transfer. However, the reconstruction of phylogenetic networks remains challenging and computationally expensive due to their intricate structural properties. For example, the small parsimony problem that is solvable in polynomial time for phylogenetic trees, becomes NP-hard on phylogenetic networks under softwired and parental parsimony, even for a single binary character and structurally constrained networks. To calculate the parsimony score of a phylogenetic network $N$, these two parsimony notions consider different exponential-size sets of phylogenetic trees that can be extracted from $N$ and infer the minimum parsimony score over all trees in the set. In this paper, we ask: What is the maximum difference between the parsimony score of any phylogenetic tree that is contained in the set of considered trees and a phylogenetic tree whose parsimony score equates to the parsimony score of $N$? Given a gap-free sequence alignment of multi-state characters and a rooted binary level-$k$ phylogenetic network, we use the novel concept of an informative blob to show that this difference is bounded by $k+1$ times the softwired parsimony score of $N$. In particular, the difference is independent of the alignment length and the number of character states. We show that an analogous bound can be obtained for the softwired parsimony score of semi-directed networks, while under parental parsimony on the other hand, such a bound does not hold.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Phylogenetic diversity indices from an affine and projective viewpoint
Authors:
Vincent Moulton,
Andreas Spillner,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Phylogenetic diversity indices are commonly used to rank the elements in a collection of species or populations for conservation purposes. The derivation of these indices is typically based on some quantitative description of the evolutionary history of the species in question, which is often given in terms of a phylogenetic tree. Both rooted and unrooted phylogenetic trees can be employed, and th…
▽ More
Phylogenetic diversity indices are commonly used to rank the elements in a collection of species or populations for conservation purposes. The derivation of these indices is typically based on some quantitative description of the evolutionary history of the species in question, which is often given in terms of a phylogenetic tree. Both rooted and unrooted phylogenetic trees can be employed, and there are close connections between the indices that are derived in these two different ways. In this paper, we introduce more general phylogenetic diversity indices that can be derived from collections of subsets (clusters) and collections of bipartitions (splits) of the given set of species. Such indices could be useful, for example, in case there is some uncertainty in the topology of the tree being used to derive a phylogenetic diversity index. As well as characterizing some of the indices that we introduce in terms of their special properties, we provide a link between cluster-based and split-based phylogenetic diversity indices that uses a discrete analogue of the classical link between affine and projective geometry. This provides a unified framework for many of the various phylogenetic diversity indices used in the literature based on rooted and unrooted phylogenetic trees, generalizations and new proofs for previous results concerning tree-based indices, and a way to define some new phylogenetic diversity indices that naturally arise as affine or projective variants of each other.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
On the maximum value of the stairs2 index
Authors:
Bryan Currie,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Measures of tree balance play an important role in different research areas such as mathematical phylogenetics or theoretical computer science. The balance of a tree is usually quantified in a single number, called a balance or imbalance index, and several such indices exist in the literature. Here, we focus on the stairs2 balance index for rooted binary trees, which was first introduced in the co…
▽ More
Measures of tree balance play an important role in different research areas such as mathematical phylogenetics or theoretical computer science. The balance of a tree is usually quantified in a single number, called a balance or imbalance index, and several such indices exist in the literature. Here, we focus on the stairs2 balance index for rooted binary trees, which was first introduced in the context of viral phylogenetics but has not been fully analyzed from a mathematical viewpoint yet. While it is known that the caterpillar tree uniquely minimizes the stairs2 index for all leaf numbers and the fully balanced tree uniquely maximizes the stairs2 index for leaf numbers that are powers of two, understanding the maximum value and maximal trees for arbitrary leaf numbers is an open problem in the literature. In this note, we fill this gap by showing that for all leaf numbers, there is a unique rooted binary tree maximizing the stairs2 index. Additionally, we obtain recursive and closed expressions for the maximum value of the stairs2 index of a rooted binary tree with $n$ leaves.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Decks of rooted binary trees
Authors:
Ann Clifton,
Eva Czabarka,
Audace Dossou-Olory,
Kevin Liu,
Sarah Loeb,
Utku Okur,
Laszlo Szekely,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
We consider extremal problems related to decks and multidecks of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. rooted phylogenetic tree shapes). Here, the deck (resp. multideck) of a tree $T$ refers to the set (resp. multiset) of leaf induced binary subtrees of $T$. On the one hand, we consider the reconstruction of trees from their (multi)decks. We give lower and upper bounds on the minimum (multi)deck size requir…
▽ More
We consider extremal problems related to decks and multidecks of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. rooted phylogenetic tree shapes). Here, the deck (resp. multideck) of a tree $T$ refers to the set (resp. multiset) of leaf induced binary subtrees of $T$. On the one hand, we consider the reconstruction of trees from their (multi)decks. We give lower and upper bounds on the minimum (multi)deck size required to uniquely encode a rooted binary tree on $n$ leaves. On the other hand, we consider problems related to deck cardinalities. In particular, we characterize trees with minimum-size as well as maximum-size decks. Finally, we present some exhaustive computations for $k$-universal trees, i.e., rooted binary trees that contain all $k$-leaf rooted binary trees as induced subtrees.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Universal rooted phylogenetic tree shapes and universal tanglegrams
Authors:
Ann Clifton,
Eva Czabarka,
Kevin Liu,
Sarah Loeb,
Utku Okur,
Laszlo Szekely,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
We provide an $Ω(n\log n) $ lower bound and an $O(n^2)$ upper bound for the smallest size of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. phylogenetic tree shapes), which are universal for rooted binary trees with $n$ leaves, i.e., contain all of them as induced binary subtrees. We explicitly compute the smallest universal trees for $n\leq 11$. We also provide an $Ω(n^2) $ lower bound and an $O(n^4)$ upper bound f…
▽ More
We provide an $Ω(n\log n) $ lower bound and an $O(n^2)$ upper bound for the smallest size of rooted binary trees (a.k.a. phylogenetic tree shapes), which are universal for rooted binary trees with $n$ leaves, i.e., contain all of them as induced binary subtrees. We explicitly compute the smallest universal trees for $n\leq 11$. We also provide an $Ω(n^2) $ lower bound and an $O(n^4)$ upper bound for the smallest size of tanglegrams, which are universal for size $n$ tanglegrams, i.e., which contain all of them as induced subtanglegrams. Some of our results generalize to rooted $d$-ary trees and to $d$-ary tanglegrams.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
The weighted total cophenetic index: A novel balance index for phylogenetic networks
Authors:
Linda Knüver,
Mareike Fischer,
Marc Hellmuth,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Phylogenetic networks play an important role in evolutionary biology as, other than phylogenetic trees, they can be used to accommodate reticulate evolutionary events such as horizontal gene transfer and hybridization. Recent research has provided a lot of progress concerning the reconstruction of such networks from data as well as insight into their graph theoretical properties. However, methods…
▽ More
Phylogenetic networks play an important role in evolutionary biology as, other than phylogenetic trees, they can be used to accommodate reticulate evolutionary events such as horizontal gene transfer and hybridization. Recent research has provided a lot of progress concerning the reconstruction of such networks from data as well as insight into their graph theoretical properties. However, methods and tools to quantify structural properties of networks or differences between them are still very limited. For example, for phylogenetic trees, it is common to use balance indices to draw conclusions concerning the underlying evolutionary model, and more than twenty such indices have been proposed and are used for different purposes. One of the most frequently used balance index for trees is the so-called total cophenetic index, which has several mathematically and biologically desirable properties. For networks, on the other hand, balance indices are to-date still scarce.
In this contribution, we introduce the \textit{weighted} total cophenetic index as a generalization of the total cophenetic index for trees to make it applicable to general phylogenetic networks. As we shall see, this index can be determined efficiently and behaves in a mathematical sound way, i.e., it satisfies so-called locality and recursiveness conditions. In addition, we analyze its extremal properties and, in particular, we investigate its maxima and minima as well as the structure of networks that achieve these values within the space of so-called level-$1$ networks. We finally briefly compare this novel index to the two other network balance indices available so-far.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2024; v1 submitted 17 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Exploring spaces of semi-directed phylogenetic networks
Authors:
Simone Linz,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Semi-directed phylogenetic networks have recently emerged as a class of phylogenetic networks sitting between rooted (directed) and unrooted (undirected) phylogenetic networks as they contain both directed as well as undirected edges. While the spaces of rooted phylogenetic networks and unrooted phylogenetic networks have been analyzed in recent years and various rearrangement moves to traverse th…
▽ More
Semi-directed phylogenetic networks have recently emerged as a class of phylogenetic networks sitting between rooted (directed) and unrooted (undirected) phylogenetic networks as they contain both directed as well as undirected edges. While the spaces of rooted phylogenetic networks and unrooted phylogenetic networks have been analyzed in recent years and various rearrangement moves to traverse these spaces have been introduced, the results do not immediately carry over to semi-directed phylogenetic networks. Here, we propose a simple rearrangement move for semi-directed phylogenetic networks, called cut edge transfer (CET), and show that the space of semi-directed level-$1$ networks with precisely $k$ reticulations is connected under CET. This level-$1$ space is currently the predominantly used search space for most algorithms that reconstruct semi-directed phylogenetic networks. Hence, every semi-directed level-$1$ network with a fixed number of reticulations and leaf set can be reached from any other such network by a sequence of CETs. By introducing two additional moves, CET$^+$ and CET$^-$, that allow for the addition or deletion of reticulations, we then establish connectedness for the space of all semi-directed phylogenetic networks on a fixed leaf set. As a byproduct of our results for semi-directed phylogenetic networks, we also show that the space of rooted level-$1$ networks with a fixed number of reticulations and leaf set is connected under CET, when translated into the rooted setting.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
How far is my network from being edge-based? Proximity measures for edge-basedness of unrooted phylogenetic networks
Authors:
Mareike Fischer,
Tom Niklas Hamann,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Phylogenetic networks which are, as opposed to trees, suitable to describe processes like hybridization and horizontal gene transfer, play a substantial role in evolutionary research. However, while non-treelike events need to be taken into account, they are relatively rare, which implies that biologically relevant networks are often assumed to be similar to trees in the sense that they can be obt…
▽ More
Phylogenetic networks which are, as opposed to trees, suitable to describe processes like hybridization and horizontal gene transfer, play a substantial role in evolutionary research. However, while non-treelike events need to be taken into account, they are relatively rare, which implies that biologically relevant networks are often assumed to be similar to trees in the sense that they can be obtained by taking a tree and adding some additional edges. This observation led to the concept of so-called tree-based networks, which recently gained substantial interest in the literature. Unfortunately, though, identifying such networks in the unrooted case is an NP-complete problem. Therefore, classes of networks for which tree-basedness can be guaranteed are of the utmost interest.
The most prominent such class is formed by so-called edge-based networks, which have a close relationship to generalized series-parallel graphs known from graph theory. They can be identified in linear time and are in some regards biologically more plausible than general tree-based networks. While concerning the latter proximity measures for general networks have already been introduced, such measures are not yet available for edge-basedness. This means that for an arbitrary unrooted network, the "distance" to the nearest edge-based network could so far not be determined. The present manuscript fills this gap by introducing two classes of proximity measures for edge-basedness, one based on the given network itself and one based on its so-called leaf shrink graph (LS graph). Both classes contain four different proximity measures, whose similarities and differences we study subsequently.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2022; v1 submitted 4 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Effects of discordance between species and gene trees on phylogenetic diversity conservation
Authors:
Kristina Wicke,
Mareike Fischer,
Laura Kubatko
Abstract:
Phylogenetic diversity indices such as the Fair Proportion (FP) index are frequently discussed as prioritization criteria in biodiversity conservation. They rank species according to their contribution to overall diversity by taking into account the unique and shared evolutionary history of each species as indicated by its placement in an underlying phylogenetic tree. Traditionally, phylogenetic t…
▽ More
Phylogenetic diversity indices such as the Fair Proportion (FP) index are frequently discussed as prioritization criteria in biodiversity conservation. They rank species according to their contribution to overall diversity by taking into account the unique and shared evolutionary history of each species as indicated by its placement in an underlying phylogenetic tree. Traditionally, phylogenetic trees were inferred from single genes and the resulting gene trees were assumed to be a valid estimate for the species tree, i.e., the "true" evolutionary history of the species under consideration. However, nowadays it is common to sequence whole genomes of hundreds or thousands of genes, and it is often the case that conflicting genealogical histories exist in different genes throughout the genome, resulting in discordance between individual gene trees and the species tree. Here, we analyze the effects of gene and species tree discordance on prioritization decisions based on the FP index. In particular, we consider the ranking order of taxa induced by (i) the FP index on a species tree, and (ii) the expected FP index across all gene tree histories associated with the species tree. On one hand, we show that for particular tree shapes, the two rankings always coincide. On the other hand, we show that for all leaf numbers greater than or equal to five, there exist species trees for which the two rankings differ. Finally, we illustrate the variability in the rankings obtained from the FP index across different gene tree and species tree estimates for an empirical multilocus mammal data set.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2022; v1 submitted 20 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Tree balance indices: a comprehensive survey
Authors:
Mareike Fischer,
Lina Herbst,
Sophie Kersting,
Luise Kühn,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Tree balance plays an important role in phylogenetics and other research areas, which is why several indices to measure tree balance have been introduced over the years. Nevertheless, a formal definition of what a balance index actually is and what makes it a useful measure of balance (or, in other cases, imbalance), has so far not been introduced in the literature. While the established indices a…
▽ More
Tree balance plays an important role in phylogenetics and other research areas, which is why several indices to measure tree balance have been introduced over the years. Nevertheless, a formal definition of what a balance index actually is and what makes it a useful measure of balance (or, in other cases, imbalance), has so far not been introduced in the literature. While the established indices all summarize the (im)balance of a tree in a single number, they vary in their definitions and underlying principles. It is the aim of the present manuscript to introduce formal definitions of balance and imbalance indices that classify desirable properties of such indices and to analyze and categorize established indices accordingly. In this regard, we review 19 established (im)balance indices from the literature, summarize their general, statistical and combinatorial properties (where known), prove numerous additional results and indicate directions for future research by making explicit open questions and gaps in the literature. We also prove that a few tree shape statistics that have been used to measure tree balance in the literature do not fulfill our definition of an (im)balance index, which might indicate that their properties are not as useful for practical purposes. Moreover, we show that five additional tree shape statistics from other contexts actually are tree (im)balance indices according to our definition. The manuscript is accompanied by the website \url{treebalance.wordpress.com} containing fact sheets of the discussed indices. Moreover, we introduce the software package \verb|treebalance| implemented in $\mathsf{R}$ that can be used to calculate all indices discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2023; v1 submitted 25 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Classes of Explicit Phylogenetic Networks and their Biological and Mathematical Significance
Authors:
Sungsik Kong,
Joan Carles Pons,
Laura Kubatko,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
The evolutionary relationships among organisms have traditionally been represented using rooted phylogenetic trees. However, due to reticulate processes such as hybridization or lateral gene transfer, evolution cannot always be adequately represented by a phylogenetic tree, and rooted phylogenetic networks that describe such complex processes have been introduced as a generalization of rooted phyl…
▽ More
The evolutionary relationships among organisms have traditionally been represented using rooted phylogenetic trees. However, due to reticulate processes such as hybridization or lateral gene transfer, evolution cannot always be adequately represented by a phylogenetic tree, and rooted phylogenetic networks that describe such complex processes have been introduced as a generalization of rooted phylogenetic trees. In fact, estimating rooted phylogenetic networks from genomic sequence data and analyzing their structural properties is one of the most important tasks in contemporary phylogenetics. Over the last two decades, several subclasses of rooted phylogenetic networks (characterized by certain structural constraints) have been introduced in the literature, either to model specific biological phenomena or to enable tractable mathematical and computational analyses. In the present manuscript, we provide a thorough review of these network classes, as well as provide a biological interpretation of the structural constraints underlying these networks where possible. In addition, we discuss how imposing structural constraints on the network topology can be used to address the scalability and identifiability challenges faced in the estimation of phylogenetic networks from empirical data.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2022; v1 submitted 21 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
On the Complexity of Optimising Variants of Phylogenetic Diversity on Phylogenetic Networks
Authors:
Magnus Bordewich,
Charles Semple,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) is a prominent quantitative measure of the biodiversity of a collection of present-day species (taxa). This measure is based on the evolutionary distance among the species in the collection. Loosely speaking, if $\mathcal{T}$ is a rooted phylogenetic tree whose leaf set $X$ represents a set of species and whose edges have real-valued lengths (weights), then the PD score…
▽ More
Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) is a prominent quantitative measure of the biodiversity of a collection of present-day species (taxa). This measure is based on the evolutionary distance among the species in the collection. Loosely speaking, if $\mathcal{T}$ is a rooted phylogenetic tree whose leaf set $X$ represents a set of species and whose edges have real-valued lengths (weights), then the PD score of a subset $S$ of $X$ is the sum of the weights of the edges of the minimal subtree of $\mathcal{T}$ connecting the species in $S$. In this paper, we define several natural variants of the PD score for a subset of taxa which are related by a known rooted phylogenetic network. Under these variants, we explore, for a positive integer $k$, the computational complexity of determining the maximum PD score over all subsets of taxa of size $k$ when the input is restricted to different classes of rooted phylogenetic networks
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Phylogenetic Diversity Rankings in the Face of Extinctions: the Robustness of the Fair Proportion Index
Authors:
Mareike Fischer,
Andrew Francis,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Planning for the protection of species often involves difficult choices about which species to prioritize, given constrained resources. One way of prioritizing species is to consider their "evolutionary distinctiveness", i.e. their relative evolutionary isolation on a phylogenetic tree. Several evolutionary isolation metrics or phylogenetic diversity indices have been introduced in the literature,…
▽ More
Planning for the protection of species often involves difficult choices about which species to prioritize, given constrained resources. One way of prioritizing species is to consider their "evolutionary distinctiveness", i.e. their relative evolutionary isolation on a phylogenetic tree. Several evolutionary isolation metrics or phylogenetic diversity indices have been introduced in the literature, among them the so-called Fair Proportion index (also known as the "evolutionary distinctiveness" score). This index apportions the total diversity of a tree among all leaves, thereby providing a simple prioritization criterion for conservation.
Here, we focus on the prioritization order obtained from the Fair Proportion index and analyze the effects of species extinction on this ranking. More precisely, we analyze the extent to which the ranking order may change when some species go extinct and the Fair Proportion index is re-computed for the remaining taxa. We show that for each phylogenetic tree, there are edge lengths such that the extinction of one leaf per cherry completely reverses the ranking. Moreover, we show that even if only the lowest ranked species goes extinct, the ranking order may drastically change. We end by analyzing the effects of these two extinction scenarios (extinction of the lowest ranked species and extinction of one leaf per cherry) for a collection of empirical and simulated trees. In both cases, we can observe significant changes in the prioritization orders, highlighting the empirical relevance of our theoretical findings.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Combinatorial perspectives on Dollo-$k$ characters in phylogenetics
Authors:
Remco Bouckaert,
Mareike Fischer,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Recently, the perfect phylogeny model with persistent characters has attracted great attention in the literature. It is based on the assumption that complex traits or characters can only be gained once and lost once in the course of evolution. Here, we consider a generalization of this model, namely Dollo parsimony, that allows for multiple character losses. More precisely, we take a combinatorial…
▽ More
Recently, the perfect phylogeny model with persistent characters has attracted great attention in the literature. It is based on the assumption that complex traits or characters can only be gained once and lost once in the course of evolution. Here, we consider a generalization of this model, namely Dollo parsimony, that allows for multiple character losses. More precisely, we take a combinatorial perspective on the notion of Dollo-$k$ characters, i.e. traits that are gained at most once and lost precisely $k$ times throughout evolution. We first introduce an algorithm based on the notion of spanning subtrees for finding a Dollo-$k$ labeling for a given character and a given tree in linear time. We then compare persistent characters (consisting of the union of Dollo-0 and Dollo-1 characters) and general Dollo-$k$ characters. While it is known that there is a strong connection between Fitch parsimony and persistent characters, we show that Dollo parsimony and Fitch parsimony are in general very different. Moreover, while it is known that there is a direct relationship between the number of persistent characters and the Sackin index of a tree, a popular index of tree balance, we show that this relationship does not generalize to Dollo-$k$ characters. In fact, determining the number of Dollo-$k$ characters for a given tree is much more involved than counting persistent characters, and we end this manuscript by introducing a recursive approach for the former. This approach leads to a polynomial time algorithm for counting the number of Dollo-$k$ characters, and both this algorithm as well as the algorithm for computing Dollo-$k$ labelings are publicly available in the Babel package for BEAST 2.
△ Less
Submitted 6 June, 2021; v1 submitted 26 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
On the maximum agreement subtree conjecture for balanced trees
Authors:
Magnus Bordewich,
Simone Linz,
Megan Owen,
Katherine St. John,
Charles Semple,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
We give a counterexample to the conjecture of Martin and Thatte that two balanced rooted binary leaf-labelled trees on $n$ leaves have a maximum agreement subtree (MAST) of size at least $n^{\frac{1}{2}}$. In particular, we show that for any $c>0$, there exist two balanced rooted binary leaf-labelled trees on $n$ leaves such that any MAST for these two trees has size less than $c n^{\frac{1}{2}}$.…
▽ More
We give a counterexample to the conjecture of Martin and Thatte that two balanced rooted binary leaf-labelled trees on $n$ leaves have a maximum agreement subtree (MAST) of size at least $n^{\frac{1}{2}}$. In particular, we show that for any $c>0$, there exist two balanced rooted binary leaf-labelled trees on $n$ leaves such that any MAST for these two trees has size less than $c n^{\frac{1}{2}}$. We also improve the lower bound of the size of such a MAST to $n^{\frac{1}{6}}$.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Non-binary universal tree-based networks
Authors:
Mareike Fischer,
Michelle Galla,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
A tree-based network $N$ on $X$ is called universal if every phylogenetic tree on $X$ is a base tree for $N$. Recently, binary universal tree-based networks have attracted great attention in the literature and their existence has been analyzed in various studies. In this note, we extend the analysis to non-binary networks and show that there exist both a rooted and an unrooted non-binary universal…
▽ More
A tree-based network $N$ on $X$ is called universal if every phylogenetic tree on $X$ is a base tree for $N$. Recently, binary universal tree-based networks have attracted great attention in the literature and their existence has been analyzed in various studies. In this note, we extend the analysis to non-binary networks and show that there exist both a rooted and an unrooted non-binary universal tree-based network with $n$ leaves for all positive integers $n$.
△ Less
Submitted 14 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
On the minimum value of the Colless index and the bifurcating trees that achieve it
Authors:
Tomás M. Coronado,
Mareike Fischer,
Lina Herbst,
Francesc Rosselló,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Measures of tree balance play an important role in the analysis of phylogenetic trees. One of the oldest and most popular indices in this regard is the Colless index for rooted bifurcating trees, introduced by Colless (1982). While many of its statistical properties under different probabilistic models for phylogenetic trees have already been established, little is known about its minimum value an…
▽ More
Measures of tree balance play an important role in the analysis of phylogenetic trees. One of the oldest and most popular indices in this regard is the Colless index for rooted bifurcating trees, introduced by Colless (1982). While many of its statistical properties under different probabilistic models for phylogenetic trees have already been established, little is known about its minimum value and the trees that achieve it. In this manuscript, we fill this gap in the literature. To begin with, we derive both recursive and closed expressions for the minimum Colless index of a tree with $n$ leaves. Surprisingly, these expressions show a connection between the minimum Colless index and the so-called Blancmange curve, a fractal curve. We then fully characterize the tree shapes that achieve this minimum value and we introduce both an algorithm to generate them and a recurrence to count them. After focusing on two extremal classes of trees with minimum Colless index (the maximally balanced trees and the greedy from the bottom trees), we conclude by showing that all trees with minimum Colless index also have minimum Sackin index, another popular balance index.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2020; v1 submitted 11 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Extremal properties of the Colless balance index for rooted binary trees
Authors:
Mareike Fischer,
Lina Herbst,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Measures of tree balance play an important role in various research areas, for example in phylogenetics. There they are for instance used to test whether an observed phylogenetic tree differs significantly from a tree generated by the Yule model of speciation. One of the most popular indices in this regard is the Colless index, which measures the degree of balance for rooted binary trees. While ma…
▽ More
Measures of tree balance play an important role in various research areas, for example in phylogenetics. There they are for instance used to test whether an observed phylogenetic tree differs significantly from a tree generated by the Yule model of speciation. One of the most popular indices in this regard is the Colless index, which measures the degree of balance for rooted binary trees. While many statistical properties of the Colless index (e.g. asymptotic results for its mean and variance under different models of speciation) have already been discussed in different contexts, we focus on its extremal properties. While it is relatively straightforward to characterize trees with maximal Colless index, the analysis of the minimal value of the Colless index and the characterization of trees that achieve it, are much more involved. In this note, we therefore focus on the minimal value of the Colless index for any given number of leaves. We derive both a recursive formula for this minimal value, as well as an explicit expression, which shows a surprising connection between the Colless index and the so-called Blancmange curve, a fractal curve that is also known as the Takagi curve. Moreover, we characterize two classes of trees that have minimal Colless index, consisting of the set of so-called \emph{maximally balanced trees} and a class of trees that we call \emph{greedy from the bottom trees}. Furthermore, we derive an upper bound for the number of trees with minimal Colless index by relating these trees with trees with minimal Sackin index (another well-studied index of tree balance).
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2019; v1 submitted 22 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Combinatorial properties of phylogenetic diversity indices
Authors:
Kristina Wicke,
Mike Steel
Abstract:
Phylogenetic diversity indices provide a formal way to apportion 'evolutionary heritage' across species. Two natural diversity indices are Fair Proportion (FP) and Equal Splits (ES). FP is also called 'evolutionary distinctiveness' and, for rooted trees, is identical to the Shapley Value (SV), which arises from cooperative game theory. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which FP and ES ca…
▽ More
Phylogenetic diversity indices provide a formal way to apportion 'evolutionary heritage' across species. Two natural diversity indices are Fair Proportion (FP) and Equal Splits (ES). FP is also called 'evolutionary distinctiveness' and, for rooted trees, is identical to the Shapley Value (SV), which arises from cooperative game theory. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which FP and ES can differ, characterise tree shapes on which the indices are identical, and study the equivalence of FP and SV and its implications in more detail. We also define and investigate analogues of these indices on unrooted trees (where SV was originally defined), including an index that is closely related to the Pauplin representation of phylogenetic diversity.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2019; v1 submitted 6 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Unrooted non-binary tree-based phylogenetic networks
Authors:
Mareike Fischer,
Michelle Galla,
Lina Herbst,
Yang**g Long,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees allowing for the representation of non-treelike evolutionary events such as hybridization. Typically, such networks have been analyzed based on their `level', i.e. based on the complexity of their 2-edge-connected components. However, recently the question of how `treelike' a phylogenetic network is has become the center of attention…
▽ More
Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees allowing for the representation of non-treelike evolutionary events such as hybridization. Typically, such networks have been analyzed based on their `level', i.e. based on the complexity of their 2-edge-connected components. However, recently the question of how `treelike' a phylogenetic network is has become the center of attention in various studies. This led to the introduction of \emph{tree-based networks}, i.e. networks that can be constructed from a phylogenetic tree, called the \emph{base tree}, by adding additional edges. While the concept of tree-basedness was originally introduced for rooted phylogenetic networks, it has recently also been considered for unrooted networks. In the present study, we compare and contrast findings obtained for unrooted \emph{binary} tree-based networks to unrooted \emph{non-binary} networks. In particular, while it is known that up to level 4 all unrooted binary networks are tree-based, we show that in the case of non-binary networks, this result only holds up to level 3.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2020; v1 submitted 16 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Classes of treebased networks
Authors:
Mareike Fischer,
Michelle Galla,
Lina Herbst,
Yang**g Long,
Kristina Wicke
Abstract:
Recently, so-called treebased phylogenetic networks have gained considerable interest in the literature, where a treebased network is a network that can be constructed from a phylogenetic tree, called the base tree, by adding additional edges. The main aim of this manuscript is to provide some sufficient criteria for treebasedness by reducing phylogenetic networks to related graph structures. Whil…
▽ More
Recently, so-called treebased phylogenetic networks have gained considerable interest in the literature, where a treebased network is a network that can be constructed from a phylogenetic tree, called the base tree, by adding additional edges. The main aim of this manuscript is to provide some sufficient criteria for treebasedness by reducing phylogenetic networks to related graph structures. While it is generally known that deciding whether a network is treebased is NP-complete, one of these criteria, namely edgebasedness, can be verified in linear time. Surprisingly, the class of edgebased networks is closely related to a well-known family of graphs, namely the class of generalized series parallel graphs, and we will explore this relationship in full detail. Additionally, we introduce further classes of treebased networks and analyze their relationships.
△ Less
Submitted 27 November, 2019; v1 submitted 16 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Combinatorial views on persistent characters in phylogenetics
Authors:
Kristina Wicke,
Mareike Fischer
Abstract:
The so-called binary perfect phylogeny with persistent characters has recently been thoroughly studied in computational biology as it is less restrictive than the well known binary perfect phylogeny. Here, we focus on the notion of (binary) persistent characters, i.e. characters that can be realized on a phylogenetic tree by at most one $0 \rightarrow 1$ transition followed by at most one…
▽ More
The so-called binary perfect phylogeny with persistent characters has recently been thoroughly studied in computational biology as it is less restrictive than the well known binary perfect phylogeny. Here, we focus on the notion of (binary) persistent characters, i.e. characters that can be realized on a phylogenetic tree by at most one $0 \rightarrow 1$ transition followed by at most one $1 \rightarrow 0$ transition in the tree, and analyze these characters under different aspects. First, we illustrate the connection between persistent characters and Maximum Parsimony, where we characterize persistent characters in terms of the first phase of the famous Fitch algorithm. Afterwards we focus on the number of persistent characters for a given phylogenetic tree. We show that this number solely depends on the balance of the tree. To be precise, we develop a formula for counting the number of persistent characters for a given phylogenetic tree based on an index of tree balance, namely the Sackin index. Lastly, we consider the question of how many (carefully chosen) binary characters together with their persistence status are needed to uniquely determine a phylogenetic tree and provide an upper bound for the number of characters needed.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2020; v1 submitted 7 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
On the Shapley value of unrooted phylogenetic trees
Authors:
Kristina Wicke,
Mareike Fischer
Abstract:
The Shapley value, a solution concept from cooperative game theory, has recently been considered for both unrooted and rooted phylogenetic trees. Here, we focus on the Shapley value of unrooted trees and first revisit the so-called split counts of a phylogenetic tree and the Shapley transformation matrix that allows for the calculation of the Shapley value from the edge lengths of a tree. We show…
▽ More
The Shapley value, a solution concept from cooperative game theory, has recently been considered for both unrooted and rooted phylogenetic trees. Here, we focus on the Shapley value of unrooted trees and first revisit the so-called split counts of a phylogenetic tree and the Shapley transformation matrix that allows for the calculation of the Shapley value from the edge lengths of a tree. We show that non-isomorphic trees may have permutation-equivalent Shapley transformation matrices and permutation-equivalent null spaces. This implies that estimating the split counts associated with a tree or the Shapley values of its leaves does not suffice to reconstruct the correct tree topology. We then turn to the use of the Shapley value as a prioritization criterion in biodiversity conservation and compare it to a greedy solution concept. Here, we show that for certain phylogenetic trees, the Shapley value may fail as a prioritization criterion, meaning that the diversity spanned by the top $k$ species (ranked by their Shapley values) cannot approximate the total diversity of all $n$ species.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2018; v1 submitted 31 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
On the statistical inconsistency of Maximum Parsimony for $k$-tuple-site data
Authors:
Michelle Galla,
Kristina Wicke,
Mareike Fischer
Abstract:
One of the main aims of phylogenetics is to reconstruct the \enquote{Tree of Life}. In this respect, different methods and criteria are used to analyze DNA sequences of different species and to compare them in order to derive the evolutionary relationships of these species. Maximum Parsimony is one such criterion for tree reconstruction and, it is the one which we will use in this paper. However,…
▽ More
One of the main aims of phylogenetics is to reconstruct the \enquote{Tree of Life}. In this respect, different methods and criteria are used to analyze DNA sequences of different species and to compare them in order to derive the evolutionary relationships of these species. Maximum Parsimony is one such criterion for tree reconstruction and, it is the one which we will use in this paper. However, it is well-known that tree reconstruction methods can lead to wrong relationship estimates. One typical problem of Maximum Parsimony is long branch attraction, which can lead to statistical inconsistency. In this work, we will consider a blockwise approach to alignment analysis, namely so-called $k$-tuple analyses. For four taxa it has already been shown that $k$-tuple-based analyses are statistically inconsistent if and only if the standard character-based (site-based) analyses are statistically inconsistent. So, in the four-taxon case, going from individual sites to $k$-tuples does not lead to any improvement. However, real biological analyses often consider more than only four taxa. Therefore, we analyze the case of five taxa for $2$- and $3$-tuple-site data and consider alphabets with two and four elements. We show that the equivalence of single-site data and $k$-tuple-site data then no longer holds. Even so, we can show that Maximum Parsimony is statistically inconsistent for $k$-tuple site data and five taxa.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2018; v1 submitted 17 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
Phylogenetic diversity and biodiversity indices on phylogenetic networks
Authors:
Kristina Wicke,
Mareike Fischer
Abstract:
In biodiversity conservation it is often necessary to prioritize the species to conserve. Existing approaches to prioritization, e.g. the Fair Proportion Index and the Shapley Value, are based on phylogenetic trees and rank species according to their contribution to overall phylogenetic diversity. However, in many cases evolution is not treelike and thus, phylogenetic networks have come to the for…
▽ More
In biodiversity conservation it is often necessary to prioritize the species to conserve. Existing approaches to prioritization, e.g. the Fair Proportion Index and the Shapley Value, are based on phylogenetic trees and rank species according to their contribution to overall phylogenetic diversity. However, in many cases evolution is not treelike and thus, phylogenetic networks have come to the fore as a generalization of phylogenetic trees, allowing for the representation of non-treelike evolutionary events, such as horizontal gene transfer or hybridization. Here, we extend the concepts of phylogenetic diversity and phylogenetic diversity indices from phylogenetic trees to phylogenetic networks. On the one hand, we consider the treelike content of a phylogenetic network, e.g. the (multi)set of phylogenetic trees displayed by a network and the LSA tree associated with it. On the other hand, we derive the phylogenetic diversity of subsets of taxa and biodiversity indices directly from the internal structure of the network. Furthermore, we introduce our software package NetDiversity, which was implemented in Perl and allows for the calculation of all generalized measures of phylogenetic diversity and generalized phylogenetic diversity indices established in this note that are independent of inheritance probabilities. We apply our methods to a phylogentic network representing the evolutionary relationships among swordtails and platyfishes (Xiphophorus: Poeciliidae), a group of species characterized by widespread hybridization.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2018; v1 submitted 16 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
Comparing the rankings obtained from two biodiversity indices: the Fair Proportion Index and the Shapley Value
Authors:
Kristina Wicke,
Mareike Fischer
Abstract:
The Shapley Value and the Fair Proportion Index of phylogenetic trees have been frequently discussed as prioritization tools in conservation biology. Both indices rank species according to their contribution to total phylogenetic diversity, allowing for a simple conservation criterion. While both indices have their specific advantages and drawbacks, it has recently been shown that both values are…
▽ More
The Shapley Value and the Fair Proportion Index of phylogenetic trees have been frequently discussed as prioritization tools in conservation biology. Both indices rank species according to their contribution to total phylogenetic diversity, allowing for a simple conservation criterion. While both indices have their specific advantages and drawbacks, it has recently been shown that both values are closely related. However, as different authors use different definitions of the Shapley Value, the specific degree of relatedness depends on the specific version of the Shapley Value - it ranges from a high correlation index to equality of the indices. In this note, we first give an overview of the different indices. Then we turn our attention to the mere ranking order provided by either of the indices. We compare the rankings obtained from different versions of the Shapley Value for a phylogenetic tree of European amphibians and illustrate their differences. We then undertake further analyses on simulated data and show that even though the chance of two rankings being exactly identical (when obtained from different versions of the Shapley Value) decreases with an increasing number of taxa, the distance between the two rankings converges to zero, i.e., the rankings are becoming more and more alike. Moreover, we introduce our freely available software package FairShapley, which was implemented in Perl and with which all calculations have been performed.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2017; v1 submitted 30 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
