-
Noise robustness of a multiparty quantum summation protocol
Authors:
Antón Rodríguez Otero,
Niels M. P. Neumann,
Ward van der Schoot,
Robert Wezeman
Abstract:
Connecting quantum computers to a quantum network opens a wide array of new applications, such as securely performing computations on distributed data sets. Near-term quantum networks are noisy, however, and hence correctness and security of protocols are not guaranteed. To study the impact of noise, we consider a multiparty summation protocol with imperfect shared entangled states. We study analy…
▽ More
Connecting quantum computers to a quantum network opens a wide array of new applications, such as securely performing computations on distributed data sets. Near-term quantum networks are noisy, however, and hence correctness and security of protocols are not guaranteed. To study the impact of noise, we consider a multiparty summation protocol with imperfect shared entangled states. We study analytically the impact of both depolarising and dephasing noise on this protocol and the noise patterns arising in the probability distributions. We conclude by eliminating the need for a trusted third party in the protocol using Shamir's secret sharing.
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2024; v1 submitted 26 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Evaluating Three Levels of Quantum Metrics on Quantum-Inspire Hardware
Authors:
Ward van der Schoot,
Robert Wezeman,
Pieter Thijs Eendebak,
Niels M. P. Neumann,
Frank Phillipson
Abstract:
With the rise of quantum computing, many quantum devices have been developed and many more devices are being developed as we speak. This begs the question of which device excels at which tasks and how to compare these different quantum devices with one another. The answer is given by quantum metrics, of which many exist today already. Different metrics focus on different aspects of (quantum) devic…
▽ More
With the rise of quantum computing, many quantum devices have been developed and many more devices are being developed as we speak. This begs the question of which device excels at which tasks and how to compare these different quantum devices with one another. The answer is given by quantum metrics, of which many exist today already. Different metrics focus on different aspects of (quantum) devices and choosing the right metric to benchmark one device against another is a difficult choice. In this paper we aim to give an overview of this zoo of metrics by grou** established metrics in three levels: component level, system level and application level. With this characterisation we also mention what the merits and uses are for each of the different levels. In addition, we evaluate these metrics on the Starmon-5 device of Quantum-Inspire through the cloud access, giving the most complete benchmark of a quantum device from an user experience to date.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Q-score Max-Clique: The First Quantum Metric Evaluation on Multiple Computational Paradigms
Authors:
Ward van der Schoot,
Robert Wezeman,
Niels M. P. Neumann,
Frank Phillipson,
Rob Kooij
Abstract:
Evaluating the performance of quantum devices is an important step towards scaling quantum devices and eventually using them in practice. The great number of available quantum metrics and the different hardware technologies used to develop quantum computers complicate this evaluation. In addition, different computational paradigms implement quantum operations in different ways. We add to the lands…
▽ More
Evaluating the performance of quantum devices is an important step towards scaling quantum devices and eventually using them in practice. The great number of available quantum metrics and the different hardware technologies used to develop quantum computers complicate this evaluation. In addition, different computational paradigms implement quantum operations in different ways. We add to the landscape of quantum metrics by extending the Q-score metric of Atos to the Q-score Max-Clique. To our knowledge, this yields the first application-level metric which allows comparison of three different paradigms of quantum computing. This metric is evaluated on these computational quantum paradigms -- quantum annealing, gate-based quantum computing, and photonic quantum computing -- and the results are compared to those obtained by classical solvers.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2023; v1 submitted 1 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Classification of Hybrid Quantum-Classical Computing
Authors:
Frank Phillipson,
Niels Neumann,
Robert Wezeman
Abstract:
As quantum computers mature, the applicability in practice becomes more important. Many uses of quantum computers will be hybrid, with classical computers still playing an important role in operating and using the quantum computer. The term hybrid is however diffuse and multi-interpretable. In this work we define two classes of hybrid quantum-classical computing: vertical and horizontal. The first…
▽ More
As quantum computers mature, the applicability in practice becomes more important. Many uses of quantum computers will be hybrid, with classical computers still playing an important role in operating and using the quantum computer. The term hybrid is however diffuse and multi-interpretable. In this work we define two classes of hybrid quantum-classical computing: vertical and horizontal. The first is application-agnostic and concerns using quantum computers. The second is application-specific and concerns running an algorithm. For both, we give a further subdivision in different types of hybrid quantum-classical computing and we coin terms for them.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Distributed Quantum Machine Learning
Authors:
Niels M. P. Neumann,
Robert S. Wezeman
Abstract:
Quantum computers can solve specific complex tasks for which no reasonable-time classical algorithm is known. Quantum computers do however also offer inherent security of data, as measurements destroy quantum states. Using shared entangled states, multiple parties can collaborate and securely compute quantum algorithms. In this paper we propose an approach for distributed quantum machine learning,…
▽ More
Quantum computers can solve specific complex tasks for which no reasonable-time classical algorithm is known. Quantum computers do however also offer inherent security of data, as measurements destroy quantum states. Using shared entangled states, multiple parties can collaborate and securely compute quantum algorithms. In this paper we propose an approach for distributed quantum machine learning, which allows multiple parties to securely perform computations, without having to reveal their data. We will consider a distributed adder and a distributed distance-based classifier.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Evaluating the Q-score of Quantum Annealers
Authors:
Ward van der Schoot,
Daan Leermakers,
Robert Wezeman,
Niels Neumann,
Frank Phillipson
Abstract:
We report the Atos Q-score for D-Wave's quantum devices, classical algorithms and hybrid quantum-classical solver. Computing the Q-score entails solving the Max-Cut problem for increasingly large graphs. This work presents the first computation of the Q-score on a quantum device and shows how these quantum devices compare to classical devices at solving optimisation problems. We use D-Wave's stand…
▽ More
We report the Atos Q-score for D-Wave's quantum devices, classical algorithms and hybrid quantum-classical solver. Computing the Q-score entails solving the Max-Cut problem for increasingly large graphs. This work presents the first computation of the Q-score on a quantum device and shows how these quantum devices compare to classical devices at solving optimisation problems. We use D-Wave's standard methods out of the box with a time limit of 60 seconds. The Q-score for D-Wave's 2000Q and Advantage devices are 70 and 140, respectively. The Q-score for two of D-Wave's classical algorithms, based on tabu search and simulated annealing respectively, are 2,300 and 5,800. Finally, we report the out-of-the-box hybrid approach to have a Q-score of 12,500.
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
