Showing 1–20 of 20 results for author: Weidenbach, C

SCL(FOL) Can Simulate Non-Redundant Superposition Clause Learning

Authors: Martin Bromberger, Chaahat Jain, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: We show that SCL(FOL) can simulate the derivation of non-redundant clauses by superposition for first-order logic without equality. Superposition-based reasoning is performed with respect to a fixed reduction ordering. The completeness proof of superposition relies on the grounding of the clause set. It builds a ground partial model according to the fixed ordering, where minimal false ground insta… ▽ More We show that SCL(FOL) can simulate the derivation of non-redundant clauses by superposition for first-order logic without equality. Superposition-based reasoning is performed with respect to a fixed reduction ordering. The completeness proof of superposition relies on the grounding of the clause set. It builds a ground partial model according to the fixed ordering, where minimal false ground instances of clauses then trigger non-redundant superposition inferences. We define a respective strategy for the SCL calculus such that clauses learned by SCL and superposition inferences coincide. From this perspective the SCL calculus can be viewed as a generalization of the superposition calculus. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

ACM Class: I.2.3

Symbolic Model Construction for Saturated Constrained Horn Clauses

Authors: Martin Bromberger, Lorenz Leutgeb, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: Clause sets saturated by hierarchic ordered resolution do not offer a model representation that can be effectively queried, in general. They only offer the guarantee of the existence of a model. We present an effective symbolic model construction for saturated constrained Horn clauses. Constraints are in linear arithmetic, the first-order part is restricted to a function-free language. The model i… ▽ More Clause sets saturated by hierarchic ordered resolution do not offer a model representation that can be effectively queried, in general. They only offer the guarantee of the existence of a model. We present an effective symbolic model construction for saturated constrained Horn clauses. Constraints are in linear arithmetic, the first-order part is restricted to a function-free language. The model is constructed in finite time, and non-ground clauses can be effectively evaluated with respect to the model. Furthermore, we prove that our model construction produces the least model. △ Less

Submitted 24 July, 2023; v1 submitted 8 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

SCL(FOL) Revisited

Authors: Martin Bromberger, Simon Schwarz, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: This paper presents an up-to-date and refined version of the SCL calculus for first-order logic without equality. The refinement mainly consists of the following two parts: First, we incorporate a stronger notion of regularity into SCL(FOL). Our regularity definition is adapted from the SCL(T) calculus. This adapted definition guarantees non-redundant clause learning during a run of SCL. However,… ▽ More This paper presents an up-to-date and refined version of the SCL calculus for first-order logic without equality. The refinement mainly consists of the following two parts: First, we incorporate a stronger notion of regularity into SCL(FOL). Our regularity definition is adapted from the SCL(T) calculus. This adapted definition guarantees non-redundant clause learning during a run of SCL. However, in contrast to the original presentation, it does not require exhaustive propagation. Second, we introduce trail and model bounding to achieve termination guarantees. In previous versions, no termination guarantees about SCL were achieved. Last, we give rigorous proofs for soundness, completeness and clause learning guarantees of SCL(FOL) and put SCL(FOL) into context of existing first-order calculi. △ Less

Submitted 19 March, 2024; v1 submitted 12 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Connection-minimal Abduction in EL via Translation to FOL -- Technical Report

Authors: Fajar Haifani, Patrick Koopmann, Sophie Tourret, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: Abduction in description logics finds extensions of a knowledge base to make it entail an observation. As such, it can be used to explain why the observation does not follow, to repair incomplete knowledge bases, and to provide possible explanations for unexpected observations. We consider TBox abduction in the lightweight description logic EL, where the observation is a concept inclusion and the… ▽ More Abduction in description logics finds extensions of a knowledge base to make it entail an observation. As such, it can be used to explain why the observation does not follow, to repair incomplete knowledge bases, and to provide possible explanations for unexpected observations. We consider TBox abduction in the lightweight description logic EL, where the observation is a concept inclusion and the background knowledge is a TBox, i.e., a set of concept inclusions. To avoid useless answers, such problems usually come with further restrictions on the solution space and/or minimality criteria that help sort the chaff from the grain. We argue that existing minimality notions are insufficient, and introduce connection minimality. This criterion follows Occam's razor by rejecting hypotheses that use concept inclusions unrelated to the problem at hand. We show how to compute a special class of connection-minimal hypotheses in a sound and complete way. Our technique is based on a translation to first-order logic, and constructs hypotheses based on prime implicates. We evaluate a prototype implementation of our approach on ontologies from the medical domain. △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2022; v1 submitted 17 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: This paper is the technical report version, including appendices, of an IJCAR 2022 paper (to appear)

SCL(EQ): SCL for First-Order Logic with Equality

Authors: Hendrik Leidinger, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: We propose a new calculus SCL(EQ) for first-order logic with equality that only learns non-redundant clauses. Following the idea of CDCL (Conflict Driven Clause Learning) and SCL (Clause Learning from Simple Models) a ground literal model assumption is used to guide inferences that are then guaranteed to be non-redundant. Redundancy is defined with respect to a dynamically changing ordering derive… ▽ More We propose a new calculus SCL(EQ) for first-order logic with equality that only learns non-redundant clauses. Following the idea of CDCL (Conflict Driven Clause Learning) and SCL (Clause Learning from Simple Models) a ground literal model assumption is used to guide inferences that are then guaranteed to be non-redundant. Redundancy is defined with respect to a dynamically changing ordering derived from the ground literal model assumption. We prove SCL(EQ) sound and complete and provide examples where our calculus improves on superposition. △ Less

Submitted 17 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

A Sorted Datalog Hammer for Supervisor Verification Conditions Modulo Simple Linear Arithmetic

Authors: Martin Bromberger, Irina Dragoste, Rasha Faqeh, Christof Fetzer, Larry González, Markus Krötzsch, Maximilian Marx, Harish K Murali, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: In a previous paper, we have shown that clause sets belonging to the Horn Bernays-Schönfinkel fragment over simple linear real arithmetic (HBS(SLR)) can be translated into HBS clause sets over a finite set of first-order constants. The translation preserves validity and satisfiability and it is still applicable if we extend our input with positive universally or existentially quantified verificati… ▽ More In a previous paper, we have shown that clause sets belonging to the Horn Bernays-Schönfinkel fragment over simple linear real arithmetic (HBS(SLR)) can be translated into HBS clause sets over a finite set of first-order constants. The translation preserves validity and satisfiability and it is still applicable if we extend our input with positive universally or existentially quantified verification conditions (conjectures). We call this translation a Datalog hammer. The combination of its implementation in SPASS-SPL with the Datalog reasoner VLog establishes an effective way of deciding verification conditions in the Horn fragment. We verify supervisor code for two examples: a lane change assistant in a car and an electronic control unit of a supercharged combustion engine. In this paper, we improve our Datalog hammer in several ways: we generalize it to mixed real-integer arithmetic and finite first-order sorts; we extend the class of acceptable inequalities beyond variable bounds and positively grounded inequalities; and we significantly reduce the size of the hammer output by a soft ty** discipline. We call the result the sorted Datalog hammer. It not only allows us to handle more complex supervisor code and to model already considered supervisor code more concisely, but it also improves our performance on real world benchmark examples. Finally, we replace the before file-based interface between SPASS-SPL and VLog by a close coupling resulting in a single executable binary. △ Less

Submitted 24 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: 34 pages, to be published in the proceedings for TACAS 2022. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2107.03189

A Datalog Hammer for Supervisor Verification Conditions Modulo Simple Linear Arithmetic

Authors: Martin Bromberger, Irina Dragoste, Rasha Faqeh, Christof Fetzer, Markus Krötzsch, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: The Bernays-Schönfinkel first-order logic fragment over simple linear real arithmetic constraints BS(SLR) is known to be decidable. We prove that BS(SLR) clause sets with both universally and existentially quantified verification conditions (conjectures) can be translated into BS(SLR) clause sets over a finite set of first-order constants. For the Horn case, we provide a Datalog hammer preserving… ▽ More The Bernays-Schönfinkel first-order logic fragment over simple linear real arithmetic constraints BS(SLR) is known to be decidable. We prove that BS(SLR) clause sets with both universally and existentially quantified verification conditions (conjectures) can be translated into BS(SLR) clause sets over a finite set of first-order constants. For the Horn case, we provide a Datalog hammer preserving validity and satisfiability. A toolchain from the BS(LRA) prover SPASS-SPL to the Datalog reasoner VLog establishes an effective way of deciding verification conditions in the Horn fragment. This is exemplified by the verification of supervisor code for a lane change assistant in a car and of an electronic control unit for a supercharged combustion engine. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 26 pages

SCL with Theory Constraints

Authors: Martin Bromberger, Alberto Fiori, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: We lift the SCL calculus for first-order logic without equality to the SCL(T) calculus for first-order logic without equality modulo a background theory. In a nutshell, the SCL(T) calculus describes a new way to guide hierarchic resolution inferences by a partial model assumption instead of an a priori fixed order as done for instance in hierarchic superposition. The model representation consists… ▽ More We lift the SCL calculus for first-order logic without equality to the SCL(T) calculus for first-order logic without equality modulo a background theory. In a nutshell, the SCL(T) calculus describes a new way to guide hierarchic resolution inferences by a partial model assumption instead of an a priori fixed order as done for instance in hierarchic superposition. The model representation consists of ground background theory literals and ground foreground first-order literals. One major advantage of the model guided approach is that clauses generated by SCL(T) enjoy a non-redundancy property that makes expensive testing for tautologies and forward subsumption completely obsolete. SCL(T) is a semi-decision procedure for pure clause sets that are clause sets without first-order function symbols ranging into the background theory sorts. Moreover, SCL(T) can be turned into a decision procedure if the considered combination of a first-order logic modulo a background theory enjoys an abstract finite model property. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2020; v1 submitted 10 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: 22 pages

ACM Class: F.0; F.3; I.1; I.2

The Challenge of Unifying Semantic and Syntactic Inference Restrictions

Authors: Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: While syntactic inference restrictions don't play an important role for SAT, they are an essential reasoning technique for more expressive logics, such as first-order logic, or fragments thereof. In particular, they can result in short proofs or model representations. On the other hand, semantically guided inference systems enjoy important properties, such as the generation of solely non-redundant… ▽ More While syntactic inference restrictions don't play an important role for SAT, they are an essential reasoning technique for more expressive logics, such as first-order logic, or fragments thereof. In particular, they can result in short proofs or model representations. On the other hand, semantically guided inference systems enjoy important properties, such as the generation of solely non-redundant clauses. I discuss to what extend the two paradigms may be unifiable. △ Less

Submitted 30 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Comments: In Proceedings ARCADE 2019, arXiv:1912.11786

Journal ref: EPTCS 311, 2019, pp. 5-10

On the Expressivity and Applicability of Model Representation Formalisms

Authors: Andreas Teucke, Marco Voigt, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: A number of first-order calculi employ an explicit model representation formalism for automated reasoning and for detecting satisfiability. Many of these formalisms can represent infinite Herbrand models. The first-order fragment of monadic, shallow, linear, Horn (MSLH) clauses, is such a formalism used in the approximation refinement calculus. Our first result is a finite model property for MSLH… ▽ More A number of first-order calculi employ an explicit model representation formalism for automated reasoning and for detecting satisfiability. Many of these formalisms can represent infinite Herbrand models. The first-order fragment of monadic, shallow, linear, Horn (MSLH) clauses, is such a formalism used in the approximation refinement calculus. Our first result is a finite model property for MSLH clause sets. Therefore, MSLH clause sets cannot represent models of clause sets with inherently infinite models. Through a translation to tree automata, we further show that this limitation also applies to the linear fragments of implicit generalizations, which is the formalism used in the model-evolution calculus, to atoms with disequality constraints, the formalisms used in the non-redundant clause learning calculus (NRCL), and to atoms with membership constraints, a formalism used for example in decision procedures for algebraic data types. Although these formalisms cannot represent models of clause sets with inherently infinite models, through an additional approximation step they can. This is our second main result. For clause sets including the definition of an equivalence relation with the help of an additional, novel approximation, called reflexive relation splitting, the approximation refinement calculus can automatically show satisfiability through the MSLH clause set formalism. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 15 pages

On the Combination of the Bernays-Schönfinkel-Ramsey Fragment with Simple Linear Integer Arithmetic

Authors: Matthias Horbach, Marco Voigt, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: In general, first-order predicate logic extended with linear integer arithmetic is undecidable. We show that the Bernays-Schönfinkel-Ramsey fragment ($\exists^* \forall^*$-sentences) extended with a restricted form of linear integer arithmetic is decidable via finite ground instantiation. The identified ground instances can be employed to restrict the search space of existing automated reasoning p… ▽ More In general, first-order predicate logic extended with linear integer arithmetic is undecidable. We show that the Bernays-Schönfinkel-Ramsey fragment ($\exists^* \forall^*$-sentences) extended with a restricted form of linear integer arithmetic is decidable via finite ground instantiation. The identified ground instances can be employed to restrict the search space of existing automated reasoning procedures considerably, e.g., when reasoning about quantified properties of array data structures formalized in Bradley, Manna, and Sipma's array property fragment. Typically, decision procedures for the array property fragment are based on an exhaustive instantiation of universally quantified array indices with all the ground index terms that occur in the formula at hand. Our results reveal that one can get along with significantly fewer instances. △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: Extended version of the CADE 2017 paper having the same title, 29 pages

Decidability of the Monadic Shallow Linear First-Order Fragment with Straight Dismatching Constraints

Authors: Andreas Teucke, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: The monadic shallow linear Horn fragment is well-known to be decidable and has many application, e.g., in security protocol analysis, tree automata, or abstraction refinement. It was a long standing open problem how to extend the fragment to the non-Horn case, preserving decidability, that would, e.g., enable to express non-determinism in protocols. We prove decidability of the non-Horn monadic sh… ▽ More The monadic shallow linear Horn fragment is well-known to be decidable and has many application, e.g., in security protocol analysis, tree automata, or abstraction refinement. It was a long standing open problem how to extend the fragment to the non-Horn case, preserving decidability, that would, e.g., enable to express non-determinism in protocols. We prove decidability of the non-Horn monadic shallow linear fragment via ordered resolution further extended with dismatching constraints and discuss some applications of the new decidable fragment. △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2017; v1 submitted 8 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 29 pages, long version of CADE-26 paper

The Universal Fragment of Presburger Arithmetic with Unary Uninterpreted Predicates is Undecidable

Authors: Matthias Horbach, Marco Voigt, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: The first-order theory of addition over the natural numbers, known as Presburger arithmetic, is decidable in double exponential time. Adding an uninterpreted unary predicate to the language leads to an undecidable theory. We sharpen the known boundary between decidable and undecidable in that we show that the purely universal fragment of the extended theory is already undecidable. Our proof is bas… ▽ More The first-order theory of addition over the natural numbers, known as Presburger arithmetic, is decidable in double exponential time. Adding an uninterpreted unary predicate to the language leads to an undecidable theory. We sharpen the known boundary between decidable and undecidable in that we show that the purely universal fragment of the extended theory is already undecidable. Our proof is based on a reduction of the halting problem for two-counter machines to unsatisfiability of sentences in the extended language of Presburger arithmetic that does not use existential quantification. On the other hand, we argue that a single $\forall\exists$ quantifier alternation turns the set of satisfiable sentences of the extended language into a $Σ^1_1$-complete set. Some of the mentioned results can be transfered to the realm of linear arithmetic over the ordered real numbers. This concerns the undecidability of the purely universal fragment and the $Σ^1_1$-hardness for sentences with at least one quantifier alternation. Finally, we discuss the relevance of our results to verification. In particular, we derive undecidability results for quantified fragments of separation logic, the theory of arrays, and combinations of the theory of equality over uninterpreted functions with restricted forms of integer arithmetic. In certain cases our results even imply the absence of sound and complete deductive calculi. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Comments: 22 pages

ACM Class: F.4.1

Deciding First-Order Satisfiability when Universal and Existential Variables are Separated

Authors: Thomas Sturm, Marco Voigt, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: We introduce a new decidable fragment of first-order logic with equality, which strictly generalizes two already well-known ones -- the Bernays-Schönfinkel-Ramsey (BSR) Fragment and the Monadic Fragment. The defining principle is the syntactic separation of universally quantified variables from existentially quantified ones at the level of atoms. Thus, our classification neither rests on restricti… ▽ More We introduce a new decidable fragment of first-order logic with equality, which strictly generalizes two already well-known ones -- the Bernays-Schönfinkel-Ramsey (BSR) Fragment and the Monadic Fragment. The defining principle is the syntactic separation of universally quantified variables from existentially quantified ones at the level of atoms. Thus, our classification neither rests on restrictions on quantifier prefixes (as in the BSR case) nor on restrictions on the arity of predicate symbols (as in the monadic case). We demonstrate that the new fragment exhibits the finite model property and derive a non-elementary upper bound on the computing time required for deciding satisfiability in the new fragment. For the subfragment of prenex sentences with the quantifier prefix $\exists^* \forall^* \exists^*$ the satisfiability problem is shown to be complete for NEXPTIME. Finally, we discuss how automated reasoning procedures can take advantage of our results. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2016; v1 submitted 29 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Comments: Extended version of our LICS 2016 conference paper, 23 pages

ACM Class: F.4.1; F.2.2

First-Order Logic Theorem Proving and Model Building via Approximation and Instantiation

Authors: Andreas Teucke, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: In this paper we consider first-order logic theorem proving and model building via approximation and instantiation. Given a clause set we propose its approximation into a simplified clause set where satisfiability is decidable. The approximation extends the signature and preserves unsatisfiability: if the simplified clause set is satisfiable in some model, so is the original clause set in the same… ▽ More In this paper we consider first-order logic theorem proving and model building via approximation and instantiation. Given a clause set we propose its approximation into a simplified clause set where satisfiability is decidable. The approximation extends the signature and preserves unsatisfiability: if the simplified clause set is satisfiable in some model, so is the original clause set in the same model interpreted in the original signature. A refutation generated by a decision procedure on the simplified clause set can then either be lifted to a refutation in the original clause set, or it guides a refinement excluding the previously found unliftable refutation. This way the approach is refutationally complete. We do not step-wise lift refutations but conflicting cores, finite unsatisfiable clause sets representing at least one refutation. The approach is dual to many existing approaches in the literature because our approximation preserves unsatisfiability. △ Less

Submitted 21 May, 2015; v1 submitted 10 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Linear Integer Arithmetic Revisited

Authors: Martin Bromberger, Thomas Sturm, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: We consider feasibility of linear integer programs in the context of verification systems such as SMT solvers or theorem provers. Although satisfiability of linear integer programs is decidable, many state-of-the-art solvers neglect termination in favor of efficiency. It is challenging to design a solver that is both terminating and practically efficient. Recent work by Jovanovic and de Moura cons… ▽ More We consider feasibility of linear integer programs in the context of verification systems such as SMT solvers or theorem provers. Although satisfiability of linear integer programs is decidable, many state-of-the-art solvers neglect termination in favor of efficiency. It is challenging to design a solver that is both terminating and practically efficient. Recent work by Jovanovic and de Moura constitutes an important step into this direction. Their algorithm CUTSAT is sound, but does not terminate, in general. In this paper we extend their CUTSAT algorithm by refined inference rules, a new type of conflicting core, and a dedicated rule application strategy. This leads to our algorithm CUTSAT++, which guarantees termination. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2020; v1 submitted 10 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Comments: Extended version of our CADE-25 conference paper, 15 pages

NRCL - A Model Building Approach to the Bernays-Schönfinkel Fragment (Full Paper)

Authors: Gábor Alagi, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: We combine constrained literals for model representation with key concepts from first-order superposition and propositional conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) to create the new calculus Non-Redundant Clause Learning (NRCL) deciding the Bernays-Schönfinkel fragment. Our calculus uses first-order literals constrained by disequations between tuples of terms for compact model representation. From… ▽ More We combine constrained literals for model representation with key concepts from first-order superposition and propositional conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) to create the new calculus Non-Redundant Clause Learning (NRCL) deciding the Bernays-Schönfinkel fragment. Our calculus uses first-order literals constrained by disequations between tuples of terms for compact model representation. From superposition, NRCL inherits the abstract redundancy criterion and the monotone model operator. CDCL adds the dynamic, conflict-driven search for an atom ordering inducing a model. As a result, in NRCL a false clause can be found effectively modulo the current model candidate. It guides the derivation of a first-order ordered resolvent that is never redundant. Similar to 1UIP-learning in CDCL, the learned resolvent induces backtracking and, by blocking the previous conflict state via propagation, it enforces progress towards finding a model or a refutation. The non-redundancy result also implies that only finitely many clauses can be generated by NRCL on the Bernays-Schönfinkel fragment, which serves as an argument for termination. △ Less

Submitted 19 July, 2015; v1 submitted 19 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Bernays-Schoenfinkel-Ramsey with Simple Bounds is NEXPTIME-complete

Authors: Marco Voigt, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: First-order predicate logic extended with linear arithmetic is undecidable, in general. We show that the Bernays-Schönfinkel-Ramsey (BSR) fragment extended with linear arithmetic restricted to simple bounds (SB) is decidable through finite ground instantiation. The identified ground instances can be employed to restrict the search space of existing automated reasoning procedures for BSR(SB). Satis… ▽ More First-order predicate logic extended with linear arithmetic is undecidable, in general. We show that the Bernays-Schönfinkel-Ramsey (BSR) fragment extended with linear arithmetic restricted to simple bounds (SB) is decidable through finite ground instantiation. The identified ground instances can be employed to restrict the search space of existing automated reasoning procedures for BSR(SB). Satisfiability of BSR(SB) compared to BSR remains NEXPTIME-complete. The decidability result is almost tight because BSR is undecidable if extended with linear difference inequations, simple additive inequations, quotient inequations and multiplicative inequations. △ Less

Submitted 6 January, 2020; v1 submitted 28 January, 2015; originally announced January 2015.

Comments: This is a revised version of the initial arXiv submission. Although submitted in 2020, the last update of its contents dates back to June 2015

Automated Verification of Interactive Rule-Based Configuration Systems (Additional Material)

Authors: Deepak Dhungana, Ching Hoo Tang, Christoph Weidenbach, Patrick Wischnewski

Abstract: Additional material for the original paper "Automated Verification of Interactive Rule-Based Configuration Systems". Additional material for the original paper "Automated Verification of Interactive Rule-Based Configuration Systems". △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2014; v1 submitted 31 August, 2013; originally announced September 2013.

Superposition for Fixed Domains

Authors: Matthias Horbach, Christoph Weidenbach

Abstract: Superposition is an established decision procedure for a variety of first-order logic theories represented by sets of clauses. A satisfiable theory, saturated by superposition, implicitly defines a minimal term-generated model for the theory. Proving universal properties with respect to a saturated theory directly leads to a modification of the minimal model's term-generated domain, as new Skole… ▽ More Superposition is an established decision procedure for a variety of first-order logic theories represented by sets of clauses. A satisfiable theory, saturated by superposition, implicitly defines a minimal term-generated model for the theory. Proving universal properties with respect to a saturated theory directly leads to a modification of the minimal model's term-generated domain, as new Skolem functions are introduced. For many applications, this is not desired. Therefore, we propose the first superposition calculus that can explicitly represent existentially quantified variables and can thus compute with respect to a given domain. This calculus is sound and refutationally complete in the limit for a first-order fixed domain semantics. For saturated Horn theories and classes of positive formulas, we can even employ the calculus to prove properties of the minimal model itself, going beyond the scope of known superposition-based approaches. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2009; v1 submitted 4 September, 2008; originally announced September 2008.

Comments: 34 pages; to appear in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

ACM Class: I.2.3; F.4.1