-
A deep neural network to enhance prediction of 1-year mortality using echocardiographic videos of the heart
Authors:
Alvaro Ulloa,
Linyuan **g,
Christopher W Good,
David P vanMaanen,
Sushravya Raghunath,
Jonathan D Suever,
Christopher D Nevius,
Gregory J Wehner,
Dustin Hartzel,
Joseph B Leader,
Amro Alsaid,
Aalpen A Patel,
H Lester Kirchner,
Marios S Pattichis,
Christopher M Haggerty,
Brandon K Fornwalt
Abstract:
Predicting future clinical events helps physicians guide appropriate intervention. Machine learning has tremendous promise to assist physicians with predictions based on the discovery of complex patterns from historical data, such as large, longitudinal electronic health records (EHR). This study is a first attempt to demonstrate such capabilities using raw echocardiographic videos of the heart. W…
▽ More
Predicting future clinical events helps physicians guide appropriate intervention. Machine learning has tremendous promise to assist physicians with predictions based on the discovery of complex patterns from historical data, such as large, longitudinal electronic health records (EHR). This study is a first attempt to demonstrate such capabilities using raw echocardiographic videos of the heart. We show that a large dataset of 723,754 clinically-acquired echocardiographic videos (~45 million images) linked to longitudinal follow-up data in 27,028 patients can be used to train a deep neural network to predict 1-year mortality with good accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) in an independent test set = 0.839). Prediction accuracy was further improved by adding EHR data (AUC = 0.858). Finally, we demonstrate that the trained neural network was more accurate in mortality prediction than two expert cardiologists. These results highlight the potential of neural networks to add new power to clinical predictions.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2019; v1 submitted 26 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Approaches to Enhancing Cyber Resilience: Report of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Workshop IST-153
Authors:
Alexander Kott,
Benjamin Blakely,
Diane Henshel,
Gregory Wehner,
James Rowell,
Nathaniel Evans,
Luis Muñoz-González,
Nandi Leslie,
Donald W French,
Donald Woodard,
Kerry Krutilla,
Amanda Joyce,
Igor Linkov,
Carmen Mas-Machuca,
Janos Sztipanovits,
Hugh Harney,
Dennis Kergl,
Perri Nejib,
Edward Yakabovicz,
Steven Noel,
Tim Dudman,
Pierre Trepagnier,
Sowdagar Badesha,
Alfred Møller
Abstract:
This report summarizes the discussions and findings of the 2017 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Workshop, IST-153, on Cyber Resilience, held in Munich, Germany, on 23-25 October 2017, at the University of Bundeswehr. Despite continual progress in managing risks in the cyber domain, anticipation and prevention of all possible attacks and malfunctions are not feasible for the current or fu…
▽ More
This report summarizes the discussions and findings of the 2017 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Workshop, IST-153, on Cyber Resilience, held in Munich, Germany, on 23-25 October 2017, at the University of Bundeswehr. Despite continual progress in managing risks in the cyber domain, anticipation and prevention of all possible attacks and malfunctions are not feasible for the current or future systems comprising the cyber infrastructure. Therefore, interest in cyber resilience (as opposed to merely risk-based approaches) is increasing rapidly, in literature and in practice. Unlike concepts of risk or robustness - which are often and incorrectly conflated with resilience - resiliency refers to the system's ability to recover or regenerate its performance to a sufficient level after an unexpected impact produces a degradation of its performance. The exact relation among resilience, risk, and robustness has not been well articulated technically. The presentations and discussions at the workshop yielded this report. It focuses on the following topics that the participants of the workshop saw as particularly important: fundamental properties of cyber resilience; approaches to measuring and modeling cyber resilience; mission modeling for cyber resilience; systems engineering for cyber resilience, and dynamic defense as a path toward cyber resilience.
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
Toward Intelligent Autonomous Agents for Cyber Defense: Report of the 2017 Workshop by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Research Group IST-152-RTG
Authors:
Alexander Kott,
Ryan Thomas,
Martin Drašar,
Markus Kont,
Alex Poylisher,
Benjamin Blakely,
Paul Theron,
Nathaniel Evans,
Nandi Leslie,
Rajdeep Singh,
Maria Rigaki,
S Jay Yang,
Benoit LeBlanc,
Paul Losiewicz,
Sylvain Hourlier,
Misty Blowers,
Hugh Harney,
Gregory Wehner,
Alessandro Guarino,
Jana Komárková,
James Rowell
Abstract:
This report summarizes the discussions and findings of the Workshop on Intelligent Autonomous Agents for Cyber Defence and Resilience organized by the NATO research group IST-152-RTG. The workshop was held in Prague, Czech Republic, on 18-20 October 2017. There is a growing recognition that future cyber defense should involve extensive use of partially autonomous agents that actively patrol the fr…
▽ More
This report summarizes the discussions and findings of the Workshop on Intelligent Autonomous Agents for Cyber Defence and Resilience organized by the NATO research group IST-152-RTG. The workshop was held in Prague, Czech Republic, on 18-20 October 2017. There is a growing recognition that future cyber defense should involve extensive use of partially autonomous agents that actively patrol the friendly network, and detect and react to hostile activities rapidly (far faster than human reaction time), before the hostile malware is able to inflict major damage, evade friendly agents, or destroy friendly agents. This requires cyber-defense agents with a significant degree of intelligence, autonomy, self-learning, and adaptability. The report focuses on the following questions: In what computing and tactical environments would such an agent operate? What data would be available for the agent to observe or ingest? What actions would the agent be able to take? How would such an agent plan a complex course of actions? Would the agent learn from its experiences, and how? How would the agent collaborate with humans? How can we ensure that the agent will not take undesirable destructive actions? Is it possible to help envision such an agent with a simple example?
△ Less
Submitted 20 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
An Unsupervised Homogenization Pipeline for Clustering Similar Patients using Electronic Health Record Data
Authors:
Alvaro Ulloa,
Anna Basile,
Gregory J. Wehner,
Linyuan **g,
Marylyn D. Ritchie,
Brett Beaulieu-Jones,
Christopher M. Haggerty,
Brandon K. Fornwalt
Abstract:
Electronic health records (EHR) contain a large variety of information on the clinical history of patients such as vital signs, demographics, diagnostic codes and imaging data. The enormous potential for discovery in this rich dataset is hampered by its complexity and heterogeneity.
We present the first study to assess unsupervised homogenization pipelines designed for EHR clustering. To identif…
▽ More
Electronic health records (EHR) contain a large variety of information on the clinical history of patients such as vital signs, demographics, diagnostic codes and imaging data. The enormous potential for discovery in this rich dataset is hampered by its complexity and heterogeneity.
We present the first study to assess unsupervised homogenization pipelines designed for EHR clustering. To identify the optimal pipeline, we tested accuracy on simulated data with varying amounts of redundancy, heterogeneity, and missingness. We identified two optimal pipelines: 1) Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE) combined with Local Linear Embedding; and 2) MICE, Z-scoring, and Deep Autoencoders.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2018; v1 submitted 29 December, 2017;
originally announced January 2018.
