Showing 1–37 of 37 results for author: Weerts, H

Unlawful Proxy Discrimination: A Framework for Challenging Inherently Discriminatory Algorithms

Authors: Hilde Weerts, Aislinn Kelly-Lyth, Reuben Binns, Jeremias Adams-Prassl

Abstract: Emerging scholarship suggests that the EU legal concept of direct discrimination - where a person is given different treatment on grounds of a protected characteristic - may apply to various algorithmic decision-making contexts. This has important implications: unlike indirect discrimination, there is generally no 'objective justification' stage in the direct discrimination framework, which means… ▽ More Emerging scholarship suggests that the EU legal concept of direct discrimination - where a person is given different treatment on grounds of a protected characteristic - may apply to various algorithmic decision-making contexts. This has important implications: unlike indirect discrimination, there is generally no 'objective justification' stage in the direct discrimination framework, which means that the deployment of directly discriminatory algorithms will usually be unlawful per se. In this paper, we focus on the most likely candidate for direct discrimination in the algorithmic context, termed inherent direct discrimination, where a proxy is inextricably linked to a protected characteristic. We draw on computer science literature to suggest that, in the algorithmic context, 'treatment on the grounds of' needs to be understood in terms of two steps: proxy capacity and proxy use. Only where both elements can be made out can direct discrimination be said to be `on grounds of' a protected characteristic. We analyse the legal conditions of our proposed proxy capacity and proxy use tests. Based on this analysis, we discuss technical approaches and metrics that could be developed or applied to identify inherent direct discrimination in algorithmic decision-making. △ Less

Submitted 22 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Journal ref: 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '24)

The Neutrality Fallacy: When Algorithmic Fairness Interventions are (Not) Positive Action

Authors: Hilde Weerts, Raphaële Xenidis, Fabien Tarissan, Henrik Palmer Olsen, Mykola Pechenizkiy

Abstract: Various metrics and interventions have been developed to identify and mitigate unfair outputs of machine learning systems. While individuals and organizations have an obligation to avoid discrimination, the use of fairness-aware machine learning interventions has also been described as amounting to 'algorithmic positive action' under European Union (EU) non-discrimination law. As the Court of Just… ▽ More Various metrics and interventions have been developed to identify and mitigate unfair outputs of machine learning systems. While individuals and organizations have an obligation to avoid discrimination, the use of fairness-aware machine learning interventions has also been described as amounting to 'algorithmic positive action' under European Union (EU) non-discrimination law. As the Court of Justice of the European Union has been strict when it comes to assessing the lawfulness of positive action, this would impose a significant legal burden on those wishing to implement fair-ml interventions. In this paper, we propose that algorithmic fairness interventions often should be interpreted as a means to prevent discrimination, rather than a measure of positive action. Specifically, we suggest that this category mistake can often be attributed to neutrality fallacies: faulty assumptions regarding the neutrality of fairness-aware algorithmic decision-making. Our findings raise the question of whether a negative obligation to refrain from discrimination is sufficient in the context of algorithmic decision-making. Consequently, we suggest moving away from a duty to 'not do harm' towards a positive obligation to actively 'do no harm' as a more adequate framework for algorithmic decision-making and fair ml-interventions. △ Less

Submitted 18 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Journal ref: 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '24)

Algorithmic Unfairness through the Lens of EU Non-Discrimination Law: Or Why the Law is not a Decision Tree

Authors: Hilde Weerts, Raphaële Xenidis, Fabien Tarissan, Henrik Palmer Olsen, Mykola Pechenizkiy

Abstract: Concerns regarding unfairness and discrimination in the context of artificial intelligence (AI) systems have recently received increased attention from both legal and computer science scholars. Yet, the degree of overlap between notions of algorithmic bias and fairness on the one hand, and legal notions of discrimination and equality on the other, is often unclear, leading to misunderstandings bet… ▽ More Concerns regarding unfairness and discrimination in the context of artificial intelligence (AI) systems have recently received increased attention from both legal and computer science scholars. Yet, the degree of overlap between notions of algorithmic bias and fairness on the one hand, and legal notions of discrimination and equality on the other, is often unclear, leading to misunderstandings between computer science and law. What types of bias and unfairness does the law address when it prohibits discrimination? What role can fairness metrics play in establishing legal compliance? In this paper, we aim to illustrate to what extent European Union (EU) non-discrimination law coincides with notions of algorithmic fairness proposed in computer science literature and where they differ. The contributions of this paper are as follows. First, we analyse seminal examples of algorithmic unfairness through the lens of EU non-discrimination law, drawing parallels with EU case law. Second, we set out the normative underpinnings of fairness metrics and technical interventions and compare these to the legal reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU. Specifically, we show how normative assumptions often remain implicit in both disciplinary approaches and explain the ensuing limitations of current AI practice and non-discrimination law. We conclude with implications for AI practitioners and regulators. △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2023; v1 submitted 5 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Journal ref: 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '23)

Fairlearn: Assessing and Improving Fairness of AI Systems

Authors: Hilde Weerts, Miroslav Dudík, Richard Edgar, Adrin Jalali, Roman Lutz, Michael Madaio

Abstract: Fairlearn is an open source project to help practitioners assess and improve fairness of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The associated Python library, also named fairlearn, supports evaluation of a model's output across affected populations and includes several algorithms for mitigating fairness issues. Grounded in the understanding that fairness is a sociotechnical challenge, the project i… ▽ More Fairlearn is an open source project to help practitioners assess and improve fairness of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The associated Python library, also named fairlearn, supports evaluation of a model's output across affected populations and includes several algorithms for mitigating fairness issues. Grounded in the understanding that fairness is a sociotechnical challenge, the project integrates learning resources that aid practitioners in considering a system's broader societal context. △ Less

Submitted 29 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Can Fairness be Automated? Guidelines and Opportunities for Fairness-aware AutoML

Authors: Hilde Weerts, Florian Pfisterer, Matthias Feurer, Katharina Eggensperger, Edward Bergman, Noor Awad, Joaquin Vanschoren, Mykola Pechenizkiy, Bernd Bischl, Frank Hutter

Abstract: The field of automated machine learning (AutoML) introduces techniques that automate parts of the development of machine learning (ML) systems, accelerating the process and reducing barriers for novices. However, decisions derived from ML models can reproduce, amplify, or even introduce unfairness in our societies, causing harm to (groups of) individuals. In response, researchers have started to p… ▽ More The field of automated machine learning (AutoML) introduces techniques that automate parts of the development of machine learning (ML) systems, accelerating the process and reducing barriers for novices. However, decisions derived from ML models can reproduce, amplify, or even introduce unfairness in our societies, causing harm to (groups of) individuals. In response, researchers have started to propose AutoML systems that jointly optimize fairness and predictive performance to mitigate fairness-related harm. However, fairness is a complex and inherently interdisciplinary subject, and solely posing it as an optimization problem can have adverse side effects. With this work, we aim to raise awareness among developers of AutoML systems about such limitations of fairness-aware AutoML, while also calling attention to the potential of AutoML as a tool for fairness research. We present a comprehensive overview of different ways in which fairness-related harm can arise and the ensuing implications for the design of fairness-aware AutoML. We conclude that while fairness cannot be automated, fairness-aware AutoML can play an important role in the toolbox of ML practitioners. We highlight several open technical challenges for future work in this direction. Additionally, we advocate for the creation of more user-centered assistive systems designed to tackle challenges encountered in fairness work △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2024; v1 submitted 15 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Journal ref: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 79 (2024) 639-677

Are There Exceptions to Goodhart's Law? On the Moral Justification of Fairness-Aware Machine Learning

Authors: Hilde Weerts, Lambèr Royakkers, Mykola Pechenizkiy

Abstract: Fairness-aware machine learning (fair-ml) techniques are algorithmic interventions designed to ensure that individuals who are affected by the predictions of a machine learning model are treated fairly. The problem is often posed as an optimization problem, where the objective is to achieve high predictive performance under a quantitative fairness constraint. However, any attempt to design a fair-… ▽ More Fairness-aware machine learning (fair-ml) techniques are algorithmic interventions designed to ensure that individuals who are affected by the predictions of a machine learning model are treated fairly. The problem is often posed as an optimization problem, where the objective is to achieve high predictive performance under a quantitative fairness constraint. However, any attempt to design a fair-ml algorithm must assume a world where Goodhart's law has an exception: when a fairness measure becomes an optimization constraint, it does not cease to be a good measure. In this paper, we argue that fairness measures are particularly sensitive to Goodhart's law. Our main contributions are as follows. First, we present a framework for moral reasoning about the justification of fairness metrics. In contrast to existing work, our framework incorporates the belief that whether a distribution of outcomes is fair, depends not only on the cause of inequalities but also on what moral claims decision subjects have to receive a particular benefit or avoid a burden. We use the framework to distil moral and empirical assumptions under which particular fairness metrics correspond to a fair distribution of outcomes. Second, we explore the extent to which employing fairness metrics as a constraint in a fair-ml algorithm is morally justifiable, exemplified by the fair-ml algorithm introduced by Hardt et al. (2016). We illustrate that enforcing a fairness metric through a fair-ml algorithm often does not result in the fair distribution of outcomes that motivated its use and can even harm the individuals the intervention was intended to protect. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2024; v1 submitted 17 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

An Introduction to Algorithmic Fairness

Authors: Hilde J. P. Weerts

Abstract: In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of both the public and scientific community that algorithmic systems can reproduce, amplify, or even introduce unfairness in our societies. These lecture notes provide an introduction to some of the core concepts in algorithmic fairness research. We list different types of fairness-related harms, explain two main notions of algorithmic fairne… ▽ More In recent years, there has been an increasing awareness of both the public and scientific community that algorithmic systems can reproduce, amplify, or even introduce unfairness in our societies. These lecture notes provide an introduction to some of the core concepts in algorithmic fairness research. We list different types of fairness-related harms, explain two main notions of algorithmic fairness, and map the biases that underlie these harms upon the machine learning development process. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Physics Letters B, Physical Review Letters and arXiv publications. Correlating PLB, PRL and arXiv articles for nuclear, particle and astro-physics

Authors: Hendrik Weerts

Abstract: When analyzing the content of Physics Letter B (PLB) web pages, one goal was to separate articles from particle physics(HEP) and nuclear physics(NP). PLB contains information about the subject area of an article: Astrophysics and Cosmology, Experiments, Phenomenology or Theory. Those subject areas have been used since 2004. To extend those areas to earlier dates and try to separate HEP and NP publ… ▽ More When analyzing the content of Physics Letter B (PLB) web pages, one goal was to separate articles from particle physics(HEP) and nuclear physics(NP). PLB contains information about the subject area of an article: Astrophysics and Cosmology, Experiments, Phenomenology or Theory. Those subject areas have been used since 2004. To extend those areas to earlier dates and try to separate HEP and NP publications, the idea was to use the information on the arXiv to accomplish this, by correlating a publication in PLB with a publication in one of the different arXiv repositories for particle, nuclear or astrophysics. The arXiv articles go back to at least 1995. When building the correlation between an arXiv article and each PLB article, it was found that many PLB articles do not have an existing reference in an arXiv article. Given that, the same analysis was performed using particle, nuclear and astro physics publications in Physical Review Letters (PRL). A similar result was obtained, but for a much shorter period of time. Finally, a title match was performed between the two journals and the arXiv, to see whether the preprint version of the journal article existed on the arXiv at all. They do, but without a journal reference. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: 29 pages; 10 figures; 9 tables and 3 appendices

Importance of Tuning Hyperparameters of Machine Learning Algorithms

Authors: Hilde J. P. Weerts, Andreas C. Mueller, Joaquin Vanschoren

Abstract: The performance of many machine learning algorithms depends on their hyperparameter settings. The goal of this study is to determine whether it is important to tune a hyperparameter or whether it can be safely set to a default value. We present a methodology to determine the importance of tuning a hyperparameter based on a non-inferiority test and tuning risk: the performance loss that is incurred… ▽ More The performance of many machine learning algorithms depends on their hyperparameter settings. The goal of this study is to determine whether it is important to tune a hyperparameter or whether it can be safely set to a default value. We present a methodology to determine the importance of tuning a hyperparameter based on a non-inferiority test and tuning risk: the performance loss that is incurred when a hyperparameter is not tuned, but set to a default value. Because our methods require the notion of a default parameter, we present a simple procedure that can be used to determine reasonable default parameters. We apply our methods in a benchmark study using 59 datasets from OpenML. Our results show that leaving particular hyperparameters at their default value is non-inferior to tuning these hyperparameters. In some cases, leaving the hyperparameter at its default value even outperforms tuning it using a search procedure with a limited number of iterations. △ Less

Submitted 15 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Physics Letters B publications from 1967 to 2020. An analysis of the WEB page content of PLB

Authors: Hendrik Weerts

Abstract: Having been an editor for Physics Letters B (PLB) for many years I became interested in the history of publishing, especially in particle physics (HEP). Since PLB goes back to 1967 and an index of all PLB publications is available online, this information was used to look at the history of PLB publications over time. It should be noted that PLB publishes new results in particle physics or high ene… ▽ More Having been an editor for Physics Letters B (PLB) for many years I became interested in the history of publishing, especially in particle physics (HEP). Since PLB goes back to 1967 and an index of all PLB publications is available online, this information was used to look at the history of PLB publications over time. It should be noted that PLB publishes new results in particle physics or high energy physics, nuclear physics and also in astrophysics and cosmology. This is the start of an effort to look at all publishers that publish research from HEP. △ Less

Submitted 9 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Case-Based Reasoning for Assisting Domain Experts in Processing Fraud Alerts of Black-Box Machine Learning Models

Authors: Hilde J. P. Weerts, Werner van Ipenburg, Mykola Pechenizkiy

Abstract: In many contexts, it can be useful for domain experts to understand to what extent predictions made by a machine learning model can be trusted. In particular, estimates of trustworthiness can be useful for fraud analysts who process machine learning-generated alerts of fraudulent transactions. In this work, we present a case-based reasoning (CBR) approach that provides evidence on the trustworthin… ▽ More In many contexts, it can be useful for domain experts to understand to what extent predictions made by a machine learning model can be trusted. In particular, estimates of trustworthiness can be useful for fraud analysts who process machine learning-generated alerts of fraudulent transactions. In this work, we present a case-based reasoning (CBR) approach that provides evidence on the trustworthiness of a prediction in the form of a visualization of similar previous instances. Different from previous works, we consider similarity of local post-hoc explanations of predictions and show empirically that our visualization can be useful for processing alerts. Furthermore, our approach is perceived useful and easy to use by fraud analysts at a major Dutch bank. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: Will be published in proceedings of KDD workshop on Anomaly Detection in Finance 2019

A Human-Grounded Evaluation of SHAP for Alert Processing

Authors: Hilde J. P. Weerts, Werner van Ipenburg, Mykola Pechenizkiy

Abstract: In the past years, many new explanation methods have been proposed to achieve interpretability of machine learning predictions. However, the utility of these methods in practical applications has not been researched extensively. In this paper we present the results of a human-grounded evaluation of SHAP, an explanation method that has been well-received in the XAI and related communities. In parti… ▽ More In the past years, many new explanation methods have been proposed to achieve interpretability of machine learning predictions. However, the utility of these methods in practical applications has not been researched extensively. In this paper we present the results of a human-grounded evaluation of SHAP, an explanation method that has been well-received in the XAI and related communities. In particular, we study whether this local model-agnostic explanation method can be useful for real human domain experts to assess the correctness of positive predictions, i.e. alerts generated by a classifier. We performed experimentation with three different groups of participants (159 in total), who had basic knowledge of explainable machine learning. We performed a qualitative analysis of recorded reflections of experiment participants performing alert processing with and without SHAP information. The results suggest that the SHAP explanations do impact the decision-making process, although the model's confidence score remains to be a leading source of evidence. We statistically test whether there is a significant difference in task utility metrics between tasks for which an explanation was available and tasks in which it was not provided. As opposed to common intuitions, we did not find a significant difference in alert processing performance when a SHAP explanation is available compared to when it is not. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: Will be published in proceedings of KDD workshop on Explainable AI 2019 (KDD-XAI)

Abstractions of linear dynamic networks for input selection in local module identification

Authors: Harm H. M. Weerts, Jonas Linder, Martin Enqvist, Paul M. J. Van den Hof

Abstract: In abstractions of linear dynamic networks, selected node signals are removed from the network, while kee** the remaining node signals invariant. The topology and link dynamics, or modules, of an abstracted network will generally be changed compared to the original network. Abstractions of dynamic networks can be used to select an appropriate set of node signals that are to be measured, on the b… ▽ More In abstractions of linear dynamic networks, selected node signals are removed from the network, while kee** the remaining node signals invariant. The topology and link dynamics, or modules, of an abstracted network will generally be changed compared to the original network. Abstractions of dynamic networks can be used to select an appropriate set of node signals that are to be measured, on the basis of which a particular local module can be estimated. A method is introduced for network abstraction that generalizes previously introduced algorithms, as e.g. immersion and the method of indirect inputs. For this abstraction method it is shown under which conditions on the selected signals a particular module will remain invariant. This leads to sets of conditions on selected measured node variables that allow identification of the target module. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2020; v1 submitted 2 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Comments: 17 pages, 7 figures. Paper to appear in Automatica, Vol. 117, July 2020

The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - 2018 Summary Report

Authors: The CLIC, CLICdp collaborations, :, T. K. Charles, P. J. Giansiracusa, T. G. Lucas, R. P. Rassool, M. Volpi, C. Balazs, K. Afanaciev, V. Makarenko, A. Patapenka, I. Zhuk, C. Collette, M. J. Boland, A. C. Abusleme Hoffman, M. A. Diaz, F. Garay, Y. Chi, X. He, G. Pei, S. Pei, G. Shu, X. Wang, J. Zhang , et al. (671 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a TeV-scale high-luminosity linear $e^+e^-$ collider under development at CERN. Following the CLIC conceptual design published in 2012, this report provides an overview of the CLIC project, its current status, and future developments. It presents the CLIC physics potential and reports on design, technology, and implementation aspects of the accelerator and the… ▽ More The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a TeV-scale high-luminosity linear $e^+e^-$ collider under development at CERN. Following the CLIC conceptual design published in 2012, this report provides an overview of the CLIC project, its current status, and future developments. It presents the CLIC physics potential and reports on design, technology, and implementation aspects of the accelerator and the detector. CLIC is foreseen to be built and operated in stages, at centre-of-mass energies of 380 GeV, 1.5 TeV and 3 TeV, respectively. CLIC uses a two-beam acceleration scheme, in which 12 GHz accelerating structures are powered via a high-current drive beam. For the first stage, an alternative with X-band klystron powering is also considered. CLIC accelerator optimisation, technical developments and system tests have resulted in an increased energy efficiency (power around 170 MW) for the 380 GeV stage, together with a reduced cost estimate at the level of 6 billion CHF. The detector concept has been refined using improved software tools. Significant progress has been made on detector technology developments for the tracking and calorimetry systems. A wide range of CLIC physics studies has been conducted, both through full detector simulations and parametric studies, together providing a broad overview of the CLIC physics potential. Each of the three energy stages adds cornerstones of the full CLIC physics programme, such as Higgs width and couplings, top-quark properties, Higgs self-coupling, direct searches, and many precision electroweak measurements. The interpretation of the combined results gives crucial and accurate insight into new physics, largely complementary to LHC and HL-LHC. The construction of the first CLIC energy stage could start by 2026. First beams would be available by 2035, marking the beginning of a broad CLIC physics programme spanning 25-30 years. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2019; v1 submitted 14 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: 112 pages, 59 figures; published as CERN Yellow Report Monograph Vol. 2/2018; corresponding editors: Philip N. Burrows, Nuria Catalan Lasheras, Lucie Linssen, Marko Petrič, Aidan Robson, Daniel Schulte, Eva Sicking, Steinar Stapnes

Report number: CERN-2018-005-M

Top-Quark Physics at the CLIC Electron-Positron Linear Collider

Authors: H. Abramowicz, N. Alipour Tehrani, D. Arominski, Y. Benhammou, M. Benoit, J. -J. Blaising, M. Boronat, O. Borysov, R. R. Bosley, I. Božović Jelisavčić, I. Boyko, S. Brass, E. Brondolin, P. Bruckman de Renstrom, M. Buckland, P. N. Burrows, M. Chefdeville, S. Chekanov, T. Coates, D. Dannheim, M. Demarteau, H. Denizli, G. Durieux, G. Eigen, K. Elsener , et al. (92 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a proposed future high-luminosity linear electron-positron collider operating at three energy stages, with nominal centre-of-mass energies: 380 GeV, 1.5 TeV, and 3 TeV. Its aim is to explore the energy frontier, providing sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) and precision measurements of Standard Model processes with an emphasis on Higgs boso… ▽ More The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a proposed future high-luminosity linear electron-positron collider operating at three energy stages, with nominal centre-of-mass energies: 380 GeV, 1.5 TeV, and 3 TeV. Its aim is to explore the energy frontier, providing sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) and precision measurements of Standard Model processes with an emphasis on Higgs boson and top-quark physics. The opportunities for top-quark physics at CLIC are discussed in this paper. The initial stage of operation focuses on top-quark pair production measurements, as well as the search for rare flavour-changing neutral current (FCNC) top-quark decays. It also includes a top-quark pair production threshold scan around 350 GeV which provides a precise measurement of the top-quark mass in a well-defined theoretical framework. At the higher-energy stages, studies are made of top-quark pairs produced in association with other particles. A study of ttH production including the extraction of the top Yukawa coupling is presented as well as a study of vector boson fusion (VBF) production, which gives direct access to high-energy electroweak interactions. Operation above 1 TeV leads to more highly collimated jet environments where dedicated methods are used to analyse the jet constituents. These techniques enable studies of the top-quark pair production, and hence the sensitivity to BSM physics, to be extended to higher energies. This paper also includes phenomenological interpretations that may be performed using the results from the extensive top-quark physics programme at CLIC. △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2019; v1 submitted 6 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: 86 pages, accepted for publication in JHEP

Report number: CLICdp-Pub-2018-003

Journal ref: JHEP 11 (2019) 003

Quantum Sensing for High Energy Physics

Authors: Zeeshan Ahmed, Yuri Alexeev, Giorgio Apollinari, Asimina Arvanitaki, David Awschalom, Karl K. Berggren, Karl Van Bibber, Przemyslaw Bienias, Geoffrey Bodwin, Malcolm Boshier, Daniel Bowring, Davide Braga, Karen Byrum, Gustavo Cancelo, Gianpaolo Carosi, Tom Cecil, Clarence Chang, Mattia Checchin, Sergei Chekanov, Aaron Chou, Aashish Clerk, Ian Cloet, Michael Crisler, Marcel Demarteau, Ranjan Dharmapalan , et al. (91 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Report of the first workshop to identify approaches and techniques in the domain of quantum sensing that can be utilized by future High Energy Physics applications to further the scientific goals of High Energy Physics. Report of the first workshop to identify approaches and techniques in the domain of quantum sensing that can be utilized by future High Energy Physics applications to further the scientific goals of High Energy Physics. △ Less

Submitted 29 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Comments: 38 pages, report of the first workshop on Quantum Sensing for High Energy Physics, held at Argonne National Laboratory, December 12-14, 2017

Single module identifiability in linear dynamic networks

Authors: Harm Weerts, Paul M. J. Van den Hof, Arne Dankers

Abstract: A recent development in data-driven modelling addresses the problem of identifying dynamic models of interconnected systems, represented as linear dynamic networks. For these networks the notion network identifiability has been introduced recently, which reflects the property that different network models can be distinguished from each other. Network identifiability is extended to cover the unique… ▽ More A recent development in data-driven modelling addresses the problem of identifying dynamic models of interconnected systems, represented as linear dynamic networks. For these networks the notion network identifiability has been introduced recently, which reflects the property that different network models can be distinguished from each other. Network identifiability is extended to cover the uniqueness of a single module in the network model. Conditions for single module identifiability are derived and formulated in terms of path-based topological properties of the network models. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Comments: 6 pages, 2 figures, submitted to Control Systems Letters (L-CSS) and the 57th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)

Prediction error identification of linear dynamic networks with rank-reduced noise

Authors: Harm H. M. Weerts, Paul M. J. Van den Hof, Arne G. Dankers

Abstract: Dynamic networks are interconnected dynamic systems with measured node signals and dynamic modules reflecting the links between the nodes. We address the problem of \red{identifying a dynamic network with known topology, on the basis of measured signals}, for the situation of additive process noise on the node signals that is spatially correlated and that is allowed to have a spectral density that… ▽ More Dynamic networks are interconnected dynamic systems with measured node signals and dynamic modules reflecting the links between the nodes. We address the problem of \red{identifying a dynamic network with known topology, on the basis of measured signals}, for the situation of additive process noise on the node signals that is spatially correlated and that is allowed to have a spectral density that is singular. A prediction error approach is followed in which all node signals in the network are jointly predicted. The resulting joint-direct identification method, generalizes the classical direct method for closed-loop identification to handle situations of mutually correlated noise on inputs and outputs. When applied to general dynamic networks with rank-reduced noise, it appears that the natural identification criterion becomes a weighted LS criterion that is subject to a constraint. This constrained criterion is shown to lead to maximum likelihood estimates of the dynamic network and therefore to minimum variance properties, reaching the Cramer-Rao lower bound in the case of Gaussian noise. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2018; v1 submitted 16 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: 17 pages, 5 figures, revision submitted for publication in Automatica, 4 April 2018

Journal ref: Automatica, Vol. 98, pp. 256-268, December 2018

Identification in Dynamic Networks

Authors: Paul M. J. Van den Hof, Arne G. Dankers, Harm H. M. Weerts

Abstract: System identification is a common tool for estimating (linear) plant models as a basis for model-based predictive control and optimization. The current challenges in process industry, however, ask for data-driven modelling techniques that go beyond the single unit/plant models. While optimization and control problems become more and more structured in the form of decentralized and/or distributed s… ▽ More System identification is a common tool for estimating (linear) plant models as a basis for model-based predictive control and optimization. The current challenges in process industry, however, ask for data-driven modelling techniques that go beyond the single unit/plant models. While optimization and control problems become more and more structured in the form of decentralized and/or distributed solutions, the related modelling problems will need to address structured and interconnected systems. An introduction will be given to the current state of the art and related developments in the identification of linear dynamic networks. Starting from classical prediction error methods for open-loop and closed-loop systems, several consequences for the handling of network situations will be presented and new research questions will be highlighted. △ Less

Submitted 24 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Identifiability of linear dynamic networks

Authors: Harm H. M. Weerts, Paul M. J. Van den Hof, Arne G. Dankers

Abstract: Dynamic networks are structured interconnections of dynamical systems (modules) driven by external excitation and disturbance signals. In order to identify their dynamical properties and/or their topology consistently from measured data, we need to make sure that the network model set is identifiable. We introduce the notion of network identifiability, as a property of a parameterized model set, t… ▽ More Dynamic networks are structured interconnections of dynamical systems (modules) driven by external excitation and disturbance signals. In order to identify their dynamical properties and/or their topology consistently from measured data, we need to make sure that the network model set is identifiable. We introduce the notion of network identifiability, as a property of a parameterized model set, that ensures that different network models can be distinguished from each other when performing identification on the basis of measured data. Different from the classical notion of (parameter) identifiability, we focus on the distinction between network models in terms of their transfer functions. For a given structured model set with a pre-chosen topology, identifiability typically requires conditions on the presence and location of excitation signals, and on presence, location and correlation of disturbance signals. Because in a dynamic network, disturbances cannot always be considered to be of full-rank, the reduced-rank situation is also covered, meaning that the number of driving white noise processes can be strictly less than the number of disturbance variables. This includes the situation of having noise-free nodes. △ Less

Submitted 24 October, 2017; v1 submitted 3 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

Comments: Provisionally accepted for publication in Automatica

Journal ref: Automatica, Vol. 89, pp. 247-258, 2018

Higgs Physics at the CLIC Electron-Positron Linear Collider

Authors: H. Abramowicz, A. Abusleme, K. Afanaciev, N. Alipour Tehrani, C. Balázs, Y. Benhammou, M. Benoit, B. Bilki, J. -J. Blaising, M. J. Boland, M. Boronat, O. Borysov, I. Božović-Jelisavčić, M. Buckland, S. Bugiel, P. N. Burrows, T. K. Charles, W. Daniluk, D. Dannheim, R. Dasgupta, M. Demarteau, M. A. Díaz Gutierrez, G. Eigen, K. Elsener, U. Felzmann , et al. (99 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is an option for a future e+e- collider operating at centre-of-mass energies up to 3 TeV, providing sensitivity to a wide range of new physics phenomena and precision physics measurements at the energy frontier. This paper is the first comprehensive presentation of the Higgs physics reach of CLIC operating at three energy stages: sqrt(s) = 350 GeV, 1.4 TeV and 3… ▽ More The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is an option for a future e+e- collider operating at centre-of-mass energies up to 3 TeV, providing sensitivity to a wide range of new physics phenomena and precision physics measurements at the energy frontier. This paper is the first comprehensive presentation of the Higgs physics reach of CLIC operating at three energy stages: sqrt(s) = 350 GeV, 1.4 TeV and 3 TeV. The initial stage of operation allows the study of Higgs boson production in Higgsstrahlung (e+e- -> ZH) and WW-fusion (e+e- -> Hnunu), resulting in precise measurements of the production cross sections, the Higgs total decay width Gamma_H, and model-independent determinations of the Higgs couplings. Operation at sqrt(s) > 1 TeV provides high-statistics samples of Higgs bosons produced through WW-fusion, enabling tight constraints on the Higgs boson couplings. Studies of the rarer processes e+e- -> ttH and e+e- -> HHnunu allow measurements of the top Yukawa coupling and the Higgs boson self-coupling. This paper presents detailed studies of the precision achievable with Higgs measurements at CLIC and describes the interpretation of these measurements in a global fit. △ Less

Submitted 5 June, 2017; v1 submitted 26 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Comments: 42 pages, 29 figures, accepted for publication in the European Physical Journal C

Report number: CLICdp-Pub-2016-001

Journal ref: Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 475 (2017)

Updated baseline for a staged Compact Linear Collider

Authors: The CLIC, CLICdp collaborations, :, M. J. Boland, U. Felzmann, P. J. Giansiracusa, T. G. Lucas, R. P. Rassool, C. Balazs, T. K. Charles, K. Afanaciev, I. Emeliantchik, A. Ignatenko, V. Makarenko, N. Shumeiko, A. Patapenka, I. Zhuk, A. C. Abusleme Hoffman, M. A. Diaz Gutierrez, M. Vogel Gonzalez, Y. Chi, X. He, G. Pei, S. Pei, G. Shu , et al. (493 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a multi-TeV high-luminosity linear e+e- collider under development. For an optimal exploitation of its physics potential, CLIC is foreseen to be built and operated in a staged approach with three centre-of-mass energy stages ranging from a few hundred GeV up to 3 TeV. The first stage will focus on precision Standard Model physics, in particular Higgs and top-q… ▽ More The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a multi-TeV high-luminosity linear e+e- collider under development. For an optimal exploitation of its physics potential, CLIC is foreseen to be built and operated in a staged approach with three centre-of-mass energy stages ranging from a few hundred GeV up to 3 TeV. The first stage will focus on precision Standard Model physics, in particular Higgs and top-quark measurements. Subsequent stages will focus on measurements of rare Higgs processes, as well as searches for new physics processes and precision measurements of new states, e.g. states previously discovered at LHC or at CLIC itself. In the 2012 CLIC Conceptual Design Report, a fully optimised 3 TeV collider was presented, while the proposed lower energy stages were not studied to the same level of detail. This report presents an updated baseline staging scenario for CLIC. The scenario is the result of a comprehensive study addressing the performance, cost and power of the CLIC accelerator complex as a function of centre-of-mass energy and it targets optimal physics output based on the current physics landscape. The optimised staging scenario foresees three main centre-of-mass energy stages at 380 GeV, 1.5 TeV and 3 TeV for a full CLIC programme spanning 22 years. For the first stage, an alternative to the CLIC drive beam scheme is presented in which the main linac power is produced using X-band klystrons. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2017; v1 submitted 26 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Comments: 57 pages, 27 figures, 12 tables, published as CERN Yellow Report. Updated version: Minor layout changes for print version

Report number: CERN-2016-004

Planning the Future of U.S. Particle Physics (Snowmass 2013): Chapter 2: Intensity Frontier

Authors: J. L. Hewett, H. Weerts, K. S. Babu, J. Butler, B. Casey, A. de Gouvea, R. Essig, Y. Grossman, D. Hitlin, J. Jaros, E. Kearns, K. Kumar, Z. Ligeti, Z. -T. Lu, K. Pitts, M. Ramsey-Musolf, J. Ritchie, K. Scholberg, W. Wester, G. P. Zeller

Abstract: These reports present the results of the 2013 Community Summer Study of the APS Division of Particles and Fields ("Snowmass 2013") on the future program of particle physics in the U.S. Chapter 2, on the Intensity Frontier, discusses the program of research with high-intensity beams and rare processes. This area includes experiments on neutrinos, proton decay, charged-lepton and quark weak interact… ▽ More These reports present the results of the 2013 Community Summer Study of the APS Division of Particles and Fields ("Snowmass 2013") on the future program of particle physics in the U.S. Chapter 2, on the Intensity Frontier, discusses the program of research with high-intensity beams and rare processes. This area includes experiments on neutrinos, proton decay, charged-lepton and quark weak interactions, atomic and nuclear probes of fundamental symmetries, and searches for new, light, weakly-interacting particles. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

Comments: 50 pages

Planning the Future of U.S. Particle Physics (Snowmass 2013): Chapter 1: Summary

Authors: J. L. Rosner, M. Bardeen, W. Barletta, L. A. T. Bauerdick, R. H. Bernstein, R. Brock, D. Cronin-Hennessy, M. Demarteau, M. Dine, J. L. Feng, M. Gilchriese, S. Gottlieb, N. Graf, N. Hadley, J. L. Hewett, R. Lipton, P. McBride, H. Nicholson, M. E. Peskin, P. Ramond, S. Ritz, I. Shipsey, N. Varelas, H. Weerts, K. Yurkewicz

Abstract: These reports present the results of the 2013 Community Summer Study of the APS Division of Particles and Fields ("Snowmass 2013") on the future program of particle physics in the U.S. Chapter 1 contains the Executive Summary and the summaries of the reports of the nine working groups. These reports present the results of the 2013 Community Summer Study of the APS Division of Particles and Fields ("Snowmass 2013") on the future program of particle physics in the U.S. Chapter 1 contains the Executive Summary and the summaries of the reports of the nine working groups. △ Less

Submitted 23 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

Comments: 51 pages

Neutrinos

Authors: A. de Gouvea, K. Pitts, K. Scholberg, G. P. Zeller, J. Alonso, A. Bernstein, M. Bishai, S. Elliott, K. Heeger, K. Hoffman, P. Huber, L. J. Kaufman, B. Kayser, J. Link, C. Lunardini, B. Monreal, J. G. Morfin, H. Robertson, R. Tayloe, N. Tolich, K. Abazajian, T. Akiri, C. Albright, J. Asaadi, K. S Babu , et al. (142 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This document represents the response of the Intensity Frontier Neutrino Working Group to the Snowmass charge. We summarize the current status of neutrino physics and identify many exciting future opportunities for studying the properties of neutrinos and for addressing important physics and astrophysics questions with neutrinos. This document represents the response of the Intensity Frontier Neutrino Working Group to the Snowmass charge. We summarize the current status of neutrino physics and identify many exciting future opportunities for studying the properties of neutrinos and for addressing important physics and astrophysics questions with neutrinos. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2013; originally announced October 2013.

Comments: Report of the Community Summer Study 2013 (Snowmass) Intensity Frontier Neutrino Working Group

Physics at the CLIC e+e- Linear Collider -- Input to the Snowmass process 2013

Authors: Halina Abramowicz, Angel Abusleme, Konstatin Afanaciev, Gideon Alexander, Niloufar Alipour Tehrani, Oscar Alonso, Kristoffer K. Andersen, Samir Arfaoui, Csaba Balazs, Tim Barklow, Marco Battaglia, Mathieu Benoit, Burak Bilki, Jean-Jacques Blaising, Mark Boland, Marça Boronat, Ivanka Božović Jelisavčić, Philip Burrows, Maximilien Chefdeville, Roberto Contino, Dominik Dannheim, Marcel Demarteau, Marco Aurelio Diaz Gutierrez, Angel Diéguez, Jorge Duarte Campderros , et al. (98 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This paper summarizes the physics potential of the CLIC high-energy e+e- linear collider. It provides input to the Snowmass 2013 process for the energy-frontier working groups on The Higgs Boson (HE1), Precision Study of Electroweak Interactions (HE2), Fully Understanding the Top Quark (HE3), as well as The Path Beyond the Standard Model -- New Particles, Forces, and Dimensions (HE4). It is accomp… ▽ More This paper summarizes the physics potential of the CLIC high-energy e+e- linear collider. It provides input to the Snowmass 2013 process for the energy-frontier working groups on The Higgs Boson (HE1), Precision Study of Electroweak Interactions (HE2), Fully Understanding the Top Quark (HE3), as well as The Path Beyond the Standard Model -- New Particles, Forces, and Dimensions (HE4). It is accompanied by a paper describing the CLIC accelerator study, submitted to the Frontier Capabilities group of the Snowmass process. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2013; v1 submitted 19 July, 2013; originally announced July 2013.

Comments: Updated the author list, updated Higgs results and small changes in the text of the Higgs section, updated results on composite Higgs bosons, added and updated references. Final submission for the Snowmass proceedings

The International Linear Collider

Authors: Jim Brau, Paul Grannis, Mike Harrison, Michael Peskin, Marc Ross, Harry Weerts

Abstract: We present a brief summary of the International Linear Collider as documented in the 2013 Technical Design Report. The Technical Design Report has detailed descriptions of the accelerator baseline design for a 500 GeV e+e- linear collider, the R&D program that has demonstrated its feasibility, the physics goals and expected sensitivities, and the description of the ILD and SiD detectors and their… ▽ More We present a brief summary of the International Linear Collider as documented in the 2013 Technical Design Report. The Technical Design Report has detailed descriptions of the accelerator baseline design for a 500 GeV e+e- linear collider, the R&D program that has demonstrated its feasibility, the physics goals and expected sensitivities, and the description of the ILD and SiD detectors and their capabilities. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: 4 pages. This note is intended as a reference for the discussion of the U.S. High Energy Physics future program in the Community Summer Study (Snowmass on the Mississippi) in July 2013

The Physics Case for an e+e- Linear Collider

Authors: James E. Brau, Rohini M. Godbole, Francois R. Le Diberder, M. A. Thomson, Harry Weerts, Georg Weiglein, James D. Wells, Hitoshi Yamamoto

Abstract: This document presents an overview of the physics potential of a future electron-positron linear collider. It represents a common input from the CLIC and ILC communities. This document presents an overview of the physics potential of a future electron-positron linear collider. It represents a common input from the CLIC and ILC communities. △ Less

Submitted 12 October, 2012; v1 submitted 30 September, 2012; originally announced October 2012.

Comments: Submitted to the Open Symposium of the European Strategy Preparatory Group, 10-12 September 2012, Krakow, Poland, 15 page limit. v2: Fig 1 now in pdf

Report number: LC-REP-2012-071; ILC ESD-2012/4; CLIC-Note-949 (30 July 2012)

The CLIC Programme: Towards a Staged e+e- Linear Collider Exploring the Terascale : CLIC Conceptual Design Report

Authors: P. Lebrun, L. Linssen, A. Lucaci-Timoce, D. Schulte, F. Simon, S. Stapnes, N. Toge, H. Weerts, J. Wells

Abstract: This report describes the exploration of fundamental questions in particle physics at the energy frontier with a future TeV-scale e+e- linear collider based on the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) two-beam acceleration technology. A high-luminosity high-energy e+e- collider allows for the exploration of Standard Model physics, such as precise measurements of the Higgs, top and gauge sectors, as well… ▽ More This report describes the exploration of fundamental questions in particle physics at the energy frontier with a future TeV-scale e+e- linear collider based on the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) two-beam acceleration technology. A high-luminosity high-energy e+e- collider allows for the exploration of Standard Model physics, such as precise measurements of the Higgs, top and gauge sectors, as well as for a multitude of searches for New Physics, either through direct discovery or indirectly, via high-precision observables. Given the current state of knowledge, following the observation of a 125 GeV Higgs-like particle at the LHC, and pending further LHC results at 8 TeV and 14 TeV, a linear e+e- collider built and operated in centre-of-mass energy stages from a few-hundred GeV up to a few TeV will be an ideal physics exploration tool, complementing the LHC. In this document, an overview of the physics potential of CLIC is given. Two example scenarios are presented for a CLIC accelerator built in three main stages of 500 GeV, 1.4 (1.5) TeV, and 3 TeV, together with operating schemes that will make full use of the machine capacity to explore the physics. The accelerator design, construction, and performance are presented, as well as the layout and performance of the experiments. The proposed staging example is accompanied by cost estimates of the accelerator and detectors and by estimates of operating parameters, such as power consumption. The resulting physics potential and measurement precisions are illustrated through detector simulations under realistic beam conditions. △ Less

Submitted 12 September, 2012; originally announced September 2012.

Comments: 84 pages, published as CERN Yellow Report https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1475225

Report number: CERN-2012-005; ANL-HEP-TR-12-51; KEK-Report-2012-2; MPP-2012-115

CLIC e+e- Linear Collider Studies

Authors: Dominik Dannheim, Philippe Lebrun, Lucie Linssen, Daniel Schulte, Frank Simon, Steinar Stapnes, Nobukazu Toge, Harry Weerts, James Wells

Abstract: This document provides input from the CLIC e+e- linear collider studies to the update process of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. It is submitted on behalf of the CLIC/CTF3 collaboration and the CLIC physics and detector study. It describes the exploration of fundamental questions in particle physics at the energy frontier with a future TeV-scale e+e- linear collider based on the Compac… ▽ More This document provides input from the CLIC e+e- linear collider studies to the update process of the European Strategy for Particle Physics. It is submitted on behalf of the CLIC/CTF3 collaboration and the CLIC physics and detector study. It describes the exploration of fundamental questions in particle physics at the energy frontier with a future TeV-scale e+e- linear collider based on the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) two-beam acceleration technique. A high-luminosity high-energy e+e- collider allows for the exploration of Standard Model physics, such as precise measurements of the Higgs, top and gauge sectors, as well as for a multitude of searches for New Physics, either through direct discovery or indirectly, via high-precision observables. Given the current state of knowledge, following the observation of a \sim125 GeV Higgs-like particle at the LHC, and pending further LHC results at 8 TeV and 14 TeV, a linear e+e- collider built and operated in centre-of-mass energy stages from a few-hundred GeV up to a few TeV will be an ideal physics exploration tool, complementing the LHC. Two example scenarios are presented for a CLIC accelerator built in three main stages of 500 GeV, 1.4 (1.5) TeV, and 3 TeV, together with the layout and performance of the experiments and accompanied by cost estimates. The resulting CLIC physics potential and measurement precisions are illustrated through detector simulations under realistic beam conditions. △ Less

Submitted 7 August, 2012; originally announced August 2012.

Comments: Submitted to the European Strategy Preparatory Group

Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier

Authors: J. L. Hewett, H. Weerts, R. Brock, J. N. Butler, B. C. K. Casey, J. Collar, A. de Gouvea, R. Essig, Y. Grossman, W. Haxton, J. A. Jaros, C. K. Jung, Z. T. Lu, K. Pitts, Z. Ligeti, J. R. Patterson, M. Ramsey-Musolf, J. L. Ritchie, A. Roodman, K. Scholberg, C. E. M. Wagner, G. P. Zeller, S. Aefsky, A. Afanasev, K. Agashe , et al. (443 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The Proceedings of the 2011 workshop on Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier. Science opportunities at the intensity frontier are identified and described in the areas of heavy quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, proton decay, new light weakly-coupled particles, and nucleons, nuclei, and atoms. The Proceedings of the 2011 workshop on Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier. Science opportunities at the intensity frontier are identified and described in the areas of heavy quarks, charged leptons, neutrinos, proton decay, new light weakly-coupled particles, and nucleons, nuclei, and atoms. △ Less

Submitted 11 May, 2012; originally announced May 2012.

Comments: 229 pages

Report number: ANL-HEP-TR-12-25, SLAC-R-991

Physics and Detectors at CLIC: CLIC Conceptual Design Report

Authors: Lucie Linssen, Akiya Miyamoto, Marcel Stanitzki, Harry Weerts

Abstract: This report describes the physics potential and experiments at a future multi-TeV e+e- collider based on the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) technology. The physics scenarios considered include precision measurements of known quantities as well as the discovery potential of physics beyond the Standard Model. The report describes the detector performance required at CLIC, taking into account the i… ▽ More This report describes the physics potential and experiments at a future multi-TeV e+e- collider based on the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) technology. The physics scenarios considered include precision measurements of known quantities as well as the discovery potential of physics beyond the Standard Model. The report describes the detector performance required at CLIC, taking into account the interaction point environment and especially beaminduced backgrounds. Two detector concepts, designed around highly granular calorimeters and based on concepts studied for the International Linear Collider (ILC), are described and used to study the physics reach and potential of such a collider. Detector subsystems and the principal engineering challenges are illustrated. The overall performance of these CLIC detector concepts is demonstrated by studies of the performance of individual subdetector systems as well as complete simulation studies of six benchmark physics processes. These full detector simulation and reconstruction studies include beaminduced backgrounds and physics background processes. After optimisation of the detector concepts and adopting the reconstruction algorithms the results show very efficient background rejection and clearly demonstrate the physics potential at CLIC in terms of precision mass and cross section measurements. Finally, an overview of future plans of the CLIC detector and physics study is given and a list of key detector R&D topics needed for detectors at CLIC is presented. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2012; originally announced February 2012.

Comments: 257 p, published as CERN Yellow Report CERN-2012-003

Report number: CERN-2012-003 ; ANL-HEP-TR-12-01 ; DESY-12-008 ; KEK-Report-2011-7

Structure Function Subgroup Summary

Authors: D. Harris, F. I. Olness, S. Ritz, M. Albrow, E. Berger, T. Bolton, A. Caldwell, A. El-Khadra, B. Ermolaev, J. W. Gary, E. Hughes, J. Huston, D. Jansen, Y. -K. Kim, D. Krakauer, S. Kuhlmann, H. Lai, D. Naples, J. Qiu, D. Reeder, M. H. Reno, R. J. Scalise, B. Schumm, P. Spentzouris, C. Taylor , et al. (8 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We summarize the studies and discussions of the Structure Function subgroup of the QCD working group of the Snowmass 1996 Workshop: New Directions for High Energy Physics. We summarize the studies and discussions of the Structure Function subgroup of the QCD working group of the Snowmass 1996 Workshop: New Directions for High Energy Physics. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 1997; v1 submitted 23 June, 1997; originally announced June 1997.

Comments: 14 pages, LaTeX, 23 PostScript figures, uses epsf.sty and snowhack.cls. Contribution to Snowmass 96 Proceedings. Typographical errors corrected and minor changes made to text

Journal ref: ECONF C960625:QCD178,1996

Improved Parton Distributions from Global Analysis of Recent Deep Inelastic Scattering and Inclusive Jet Data

Authors: H. L. Lai, J. Huston, S. Kuhlmann, F. Olness, J. Owens, D. Soper, W. K. Tung, H. Weerts

Abstract: The impact of recent precision measurements of DIS structure functions and inclusive jet production at the Tevatron on the global QCD analysis of parton distribution functions is studied in detail. Particular emphasis is placed on exploring the range of variation of the gluon distribution $G(x,Q)$ allowed by these new data. The strong coupling of $G(x,Q)$ with $α_s$ is fully taken into account.… ▽ More The impact of recent precision measurements of DIS structure functions and inclusive jet production at the Tevatron on the global QCD analysis of parton distribution functions is studied in detail. Particular emphasis is placed on exploring the range of variation of the gluon distribution $G(x,Q)$ allowed by these new data. The strong coupling of $G(x,Q)$ with $α_s$ is fully taken into account. A new generation of CTEQ parton distributions, CTEQ4, is presented. It consists of the three standard sets (\mbox{\small {$\overline {\rm MS}$}}, {\protect \small DIS} and leading order), a series that gives a range of parton distributions with corresponding $α_s$'s, and a set with a low starting value of $Q$. Previously obtained gluon distributions that are consistent with the high $E_t$ jet cross-section are also discussed in the context of this new global analysis. △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 1996; v1 submitted 21 June, 1996; originally announced June 1996.

Comments: 39 pages, 21 figures; Web page address corrected; Mislabelled table rows corrected; Table for CTEQ4LQ added; reformatted for pub. in Phys.Rev

Report number: MSUHEP-60426 \\ CTEQ-604

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.D55:1280-1296,1997

Global QCD Analysis and the CTEQ Parton Distributions

Authors: H. L. Lai, J. Botts, J. Huston, J. G. Morfin, J. F. Owen, J. W. Qiu, W. K. Tung, H. Weerts

Abstract: The CTEQ program for the determination of parton distributions through a global QCD analysis of data for various hard scattering processes is fully described. A new set of distributions, CTEQ3, incorporating several new types of data is reported and compared to the two previous sets of CTEQ distributions. Comparison with current data is discussed in some detail. The remaining uncertainties in th… ▽ More The CTEQ program for the determination of parton distributions through a global QCD analysis of data for various hard scattering processes is fully described. A new set of distributions, CTEQ3, incorporating several new types of data is reported and compared to the two previous sets of CTEQ distributions. Comparison with current data is discussed in some detail. The remaining uncertainties in the parton distributions and methods to further reduce them are assessed. Comparisons with the results of other global analyses are also presented. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 1994; v1 submitted 28 October, 1994; originally announced October 1994.

Comments: (Change in Latex style only: 2up style removed since many don't have it.) 35 pages, 23 figures separately submitted as uuencoded compressed ps-file; Michigan State Report # MSU-HEP/41024 and CTEQ 404

Journal ref: Phys.Rev. D51 (1995) 4763-4782

Measuring Parton Densities in the Pomeron

Authors: John Collins, Joey Huston, Jon Pumplin, Harry Weerts, Jim Whitmore

Abstract: We present a program to measure the parton densities in the pomeron using diffractive deep inelastic scattering and diffractive photoproduction, and to test the resulting parton densities by applying them to other processes such as the diffractive production of jets in hadron-hadron collisions. Since QCD factorization has been predicted NOT to apply to hard diffractive scattering, this program o… ▽ More We present a program to measure the parton densities in the pomeron using diffractive deep inelastic scattering and diffractive photoproduction, and to test the resulting parton densities by applying them to other processes such as the diffractive production of jets in hadron-hadron collisions. Since QCD factorization has been predicted NOT to apply to hard diffractive scattering, this program of fitting and using parton densities might be expected to fail. Its success or failure will provide useful information on the space-time structure of the pomeron. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 1994; v1 submitted 8 June, 1994; originally announced June 1994.

Comments: Contains revisions based on Phys. Rev. D referee comments. RevTeX version 3, epsf, 31 pages. Uuencoded compressed postscript figures appended. Uncompressed postscript files available at ftp://ftp.phys.psu.edu/pub/preprint/psuth136/

Report number: CTEQ/PUB/02, psu/th/136

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.D51:3182-3196,1995

CTEQ Parton Distributions and Flavor Dependence of Sea Quarks

Authors: James Botts, Jorge G. Morfin, Joseph F. Owens, Jianwei Qiu, Wu-Ki Tung, Harry Weerts

Abstract: This paper describes salient features of new sets of parton distributions obtained by the CTEQ Collaboration based on a comprehensive QCD global analysis of all available data. The accuracy of the new data on deep inelastic scattering structure functions obtained by the very high statistics NMC and CCFR experiments provides unprecedented sensitivity to the flavor dependence of the sea-quark dist… ▽ More This paper describes salient features of new sets of parton distributions obtained by the CTEQ Collaboration based on a comprehensive QCD global analysis of all available data. The accuracy of the new data on deep inelastic scattering structure functions obtained by the very high statistics NMC and CCFR experiments provides unprecedented sensitivity to the flavor dependence of the sea-quark distributions. In addition to much better determination of the small x dependence of all parton distributions, we found: (i) the strange quark distribution is much softer than the non-strange sea quarks and rises above the latter at small-x; and (ii) the difference $\bar d-\bar u$ changes sign as a function of x. A few alternative sets of viable distributions with conventional assumptions are also discussed. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 1993; originally announced March 1993.

Comments: 13 pages with figures, MSUHEP-92-27, Fermilab-Pub-92/371, FSU-HEP-92-1225, ISU-NP-92-17

Journal ref: Phys.Lett. B304 (1993) 159-166