BenchMD: A Benchmark for Unified Learning on Medical Images and Sensors
Authors:
Kathryn Wantlin,
Chenwei Wu,
Shih-Cheng Huang,
Oishi Banerjee,
Farah Dadabhoy,
Veeral Vipin Mehta,
Ryan Wonhee Han,
Fang Cao,
Raja R. Narayan,
Errol Colak,
Adewole Adamson,
Laura Heacock,
Geoffrey H. Tison,
Alex Tamkin,
Pranav Rajpurkar
Abstract:
Medical data poses a daunting challenge for AI algorithms: it exists in many different modalities, experiences frequent distribution shifts, and suffers from a scarcity of examples and labels. Recent advances, including transformers and self-supervised learning, promise a more universal approach that can be applied flexibly across these diverse conditions. To measure and drive progress in this dir…
▽ More
Medical data poses a daunting challenge for AI algorithms: it exists in many different modalities, experiences frequent distribution shifts, and suffers from a scarcity of examples and labels. Recent advances, including transformers and self-supervised learning, promise a more universal approach that can be applied flexibly across these diverse conditions. To measure and drive progress in this direction, we present BenchMD: a benchmark that tests how well unified, modality-agnostic methods, including architectures and training techniques (e.g. self-supervised learning, ImageNet pretraining),perform on a diverse array of clinically-relevant medical tasks. BenchMD combines 19 publicly available datasets for 7 medical modalities, including 1D sensor data, 2D images, and 3D volumetric scans. Our benchmark reflects real-world data constraints by evaluating methods across a range of dataset sizes, including challenging few-shot settings that incentivize the use of pretraining. Finally, we evaluate performance on out-of-distribution data collected at different hospitals than the training data, representing naturally-occurring distribution shifts that frequently degrade the performance of medical AI models. Our baseline results demonstrate that no unified learning technique achieves strong performance across all modalities, leaving ample room for improvement on the benchmark. Code is released at https://github.com/rajpurkarlab/BenchMD.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2023; v1 submitted 17 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
Changing Computer-Usage Behaviours: What Users Want, Use, and Experience
Authors:
Mina Khan,
Zeel Patel,
Kathryn Wantlin,
Elena Glassman,
Pattie Maes
Abstract:
Technology based screentime, the time an individual spends engaging with their computer or cell phone, has increased exponentially over the past decade, but perhaps most alarmingly amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Although many software based interventions exist to reduce screentime, users report a variety of issues relating to the timing of the intervention, the strictness of the tool, and its abili…
▽ More
Technology based screentime, the time an individual spends engaging with their computer or cell phone, has increased exponentially over the past decade, but perhaps most alarmingly amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Although many software based interventions exist to reduce screentime, users report a variety of issues relating to the timing of the intervention, the strictness of the tool, and its ability to encourage organic, long-term habit formation. We develop guidelines for the design of behaviour intervention software by conducting a survey to investigate three research questions and further inform the mechanisms of computer-related behaviour change applications. RQ1: What do people want to change and why/how? RQ2: What applications do people use or have used, why do they work or not, and what additional support is desired? RQ3: What are helpful/unhelpful computer breaks and why? Our survey had 68 participants and three key findings. First, time management is a primary concern, but emotional and physical side-effects are equally important. Second, site blockers, self-trackers, and timers are commonly used, but they are ineffective as they are easy-to-ignore and not personalized. Third, away-from-computer breaks, especially involving physical activity, are helpful, whereas on-screen breaks are unhelpful, especially when they are long, because they are not refreshing. We recommend personalized and closed-loop computer-usage behaviour change support and especially encouraging off-the-computer screentime breaks.
△ Less
Submitted 2 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
