-
Using simulation to quantify the performance of automotive perception systems
Authors:
Zhenyi Liu,
Devesh Shah,
Alireza Rahimpour,
Devesh Upadhyay,
Joyce Farrell,
Brian A Wandell
Abstract:
The design and evaluation of complex systems can benefit from a software simulation - sometimes called a digital twin. The simulation can be used to characterize system performance or to test its performance under conditions that are difficult to measure (e.g., nighttime for automotive perception systems). We describe the image system simulation software tools that we use to evaluate the performan…
▽ More
The design and evaluation of complex systems can benefit from a software simulation - sometimes called a digital twin. The simulation can be used to characterize system performance or to test its performance under conditions that are difficult to measure (e.g., nighttime for automotive perception systems). We describe the image system simulation software tools that we use to evaluate the performance of image systems for object (automobile) detection. We describe experiments with 13 different cameras with a variety of optics and pixel sizes. To measure the impact of camera spatial resolution, we designed a collection of driving scenes that had cars at many different distances. We quantified system performance by measuring average precision and we report a trend relating system resolution and object detection performance. We also quantified the large performance degradation under nighttime conditions, compared to daytime, for all cameras and a COCO pre-trained network.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2023; v1 submitted 2 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
A convolutional neural network reaches optimal sensitivity for detecting some, but not all, patterns
Authors:
Fabian H. Reith,
Brian A. Wandell
Abstract:
We investigate the performance of modern convolutional neural networks (CNN) and a linear support vector machine (SVM) with respect to spatial contrast sensitivity. Specifically, we compare CNN sensitivity to that of a Bayesian ideal observer (IO) with the signal-known-exactly and noise known statistically. A ResNet-18 reaches optimal performance for harmonic patterns, as well as several classes o…
▽ More
We investigate the performance of modern convolutional neural networks (CNN) and a linear support vector machine (SVM) with respect to spatial contrast sensitivity. Specifically, we compare CNN sensitivity to that of a Bayesian ideal observer (IO) with the signal-known-exactly and noise known statistically. A ResNet-18 reaches optimal performance for harmonic patterns, as well as several classes of real world signals including faces. For these stimuli the CNN substantially outperforms the SVM. We further analyzed the case in which the signal might appear in one of multiple locations and found that CNN spatial sensitivity continues to match the IO. However, the CNN sensitivity was far below optimal at detecting certain complex texture patterns. These measurements show that CNNs can have very large performance differences when detecting the presence of spatial patterns. These differences may have a significant impact on the performance of an imaging system designed to detect low contrast spatial patterns.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2020; v1 submitted 12 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Data management to support reproducible research
Authors:
B. A. Wandell,
A. Rokem,
L. M. Perry,
G. Schaefer,
R. F. Dougherty
Abstract:
We describe the current state and future plans for a set of tools for scientific data management (SDM) designed to support scientific transparency and reproducible research. SDM has been in active use at our MRI Center for more than two years. We designed the system to be used from the beginning of a research project, which contrasts with conventional end-state databases that accept data as a proj…
▽ More
We describe the current state and future plans for a set of tools for scientific data management (SDM) designed to support scientific transparency and reproducible research. SDM has been in active use at our MRI Center for more than two years. We designed the system to be used from the beginning of a research project, which contrasts with conventional end-state databases that accept data as a project concludes. A number of benefits accrue from using scientific data management tools early and throughout the project, including data integrity as well as reuse of the data and of computational methods.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
-
Evaluating the accuracy of diffusion MRI models in white matter
Authors:
Ariel Rokem,
Jason D. Yeatman,
Franco Pestilli,
Kendrick N. Kay,
Aviv Mezer,
Stefan van der Walt,
Brian A. Wandell
Abstract:
Models of diffusion MRI within a voxel are useful for making inferences about the properties of the tissue and inferring fiber orientation distribution used by tractography algorithms. A useful model must fit the data accurately. However, evaluations of model-accuracy of some of the models that are commonly used in analyzing human white matter have not been published before. Here, we evaluate mode…
▽ More
Models of diffusion MRI within a voxel are useful for making inferences about the properties of the tissue and inferring fiber orientation distribution used by tractography algorithms. A useful model must fit the data accurately. However, evaluations of model-accuracy of some of the models that are commonly used in analyzing human white matter have not been published before. Here, we evaluate model-accuracy of the two main classes of diffusion MRI models. The diffusion tensor model (DTM) summarizes diffusion as a 3-dimensional Gaussian distribution. Sparse fascicle models (SFM) summarize the signal as a linear sum of signals originating from a collection of fascicles oriented in different directions. We use cross-validation to assess model-accuracy at different gradient amplitudes (b-values) throughout the white matter. Specifically, we fit each model to all the white matter voxels in one data set and then use the model to predict a second, independent data set. This is the first evaluation of model-accuracy of these models. In most of the white matter the DTM predicts the data more accurately than test-retest reliability; SFM model-accuracy is higher than test-retest reliability and also higher than the DTM, particularly for measurements with (a) a b-value above 1000 in locations containing fiber crossings, and (b) in the regions of the brain surrounding the optic radiations. The SFM also has better parameter-validity: it more accurately estimates the fiber orientation distribution function (fODF) in each voxel, which is useful for fiber tracking.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2015; v1 submitted 3 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
