Mg nanostructures with controlled dominant c-plane or m-plane facets by DC magnetron sputter deposition
Authors:
Michał A. Borysiewicz,
Patrycja Barańczyk,
Aleksandra Wójcicka,
Jakub Zawadzki,
Marek Wzorek,
Rafał Zybała
Abstract:
Magnesium nanostructures find increased use in applications for hydrogen storage, catalysis, waste treatment, and heat storage to name a few. Currently, most nanoparticles are made using a chemical synthesis approach, necessitating the use of organic solvents and yielding material covered in ligands. To apply these nanoparticles, one has to use them in paints or slurries for coating of surfaces, w…
▽ More
Magnesium nanostructures find increased use in applications for hydrogen storage, catalysis, waste treatment, and heat storage to name a few. Currently, most nanoparticles are made using a chemical synthesis approach, necessitating the use of organic solvents and yielding material covered in ligands. To apply these nanoparticles, one has to use them in paints or slurries for coating of surfaces, which again produces waste. In this communication we explore the possibilities of making magnesium nanostructures by a physical technique of magnetron sputtering and to control their crystallographic properties, i.e. the type of the dominating crystalline faces building up the external surface of the particle. We show that by applying different process parameters, it is possible to obtain dominating c-plane, mixed or dominating m-plane nanostructures. Since the surface-related adsorption processes are strongly related to the type of the crystalline plane, this report presents a clean, waste-free and large-scale approach to develop tailored nanostructured Mg coatings.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
Named Entity Recognition -- Is there a glass ceiling?
Authors:
Tomasz Stanislawek,
Anna Wróblewska,
Alicja Wójcicka,
Daniel Ziembicki,
Przemyslaw Biecek
Abstract:
Recent developments in Named Entity Recognition (NER) have resulted in better and better models. However, is there a glass ceiling? Do we know which types of errors are still hard or even impossible to correct? In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of the types of errors in state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods. Our study reveals the weak and strong points of the Stanford, CMU, FL…
▽ More
Recent developments in Named Entity Recognition (NER) have resulted in better and better models. However, is there a glass ceiling? Do we know which types of errors are still hard or even impossible to correct? In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of the types of errors in state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods. Our study reveals the weak and strong points of the Stanford, CMU, FLAIR, ELMO and BERT models, as well as their shared limitations. We also introduce new techniques for improving annotation, for training processes and for checking a model's quality and stability. Presented results are based on the CoNLL 2003 data set for the English language. A new enriched semantic annotation of errors for this data set and new diagnostic data sets are attached in the supplementary materials.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2019; v1 submitted 6 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
