-
Proceedings Nineteenth conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge
Authors:
Rineke Verbrugge
Abstract:
The TARK conference (Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge) is a conference that aims to bring together researchers from a wide variety of fields, including computer science, artificial intelligence, game theory, decision theory, philosophy, logic, linguistics, and cognitive science. Its goal is to further our understanding of interdisciplinary issues involving reasoning about rationali…
▽ More
The TARK conference (Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge) is a conference that aims to bring together researchers from a wide variety of fields, including computer science, artificial intelligence, game theory, decision theory, philosophy, logic, linguistics, and cognitive science. Its goal is to further our understanding of interdisciplinary issues involving reasoning about rationality and knowledge.
Previous conferences have been held biennially around the world since 1986, on the initiative of Joe Halpern (Cornell University). Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, semantic models for knowledge, belief, awareness and uncertainty, bounded rationality and resource-bounded reasoning, commonsense epistemic reasoning, epistemic logic, epistemic game theory, knowledge and action, applications of reasoning about knowledge and other mental states, belief revision, computational social choice, algorithmic game theory, and foundations of multi-agent systems. Information about TARK, including conference proceedings, is available at http://www.tark.org/
These proceedings contain the papers that have been accepted for presentation at the Nineteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK 2023), held between June 28 and June 30, 2023, at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom. The conference website can be found at https://sites.google.com/view/tark-2023
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2023; v1 submitted 8 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Explain What You See: Open-Ended Segmentation and Recognition of Occluded 3D Objects
Authors:
H. Ayoobi,
H. Kasaei,
M. Cao,
R. Verbrugge,
B. Verheij
Abstract:
Local-HDP (for Local Hierarchical Dirichlet Process) is a hierarchical Bayesian method that has recently been used for open-ended 3D object category recognition. This method has been proven to be efficient in real-time robotic applications. However, the method is not robust to a high degree of occlusion. We address this limitation in two steps. First, we propose a novel semantic 3D object-parts se…
▽ More
Local-HDP (for Local Hierarchical Dirichlet Process) is a hierarchical Bayesian method that has recently been used for open-ended 3D object category recognition. This method has been proven to be efficient in real-time robotic applications. However, the method is not robust to a high degree of occlusion. We address this limitation in two steps. First, we propose a novel semantic 3D object-parts segmentation method that has the flexibility of Local-HDP. This method is shown to be suitable for open-ended scenarios where the number of 3D objects or object parts is not fixed and can grow over time. We show that the proposed method has a higher percentage of mean intersection over union, using a smaller number of learning instances. Second, we integrate this technique with a recently introduced argumentation-based online incremental learning method, thereby enabling the model to handle a high degree of occlusion. We show that the resulting model produces an explicit set of explanations for the 3D object category recognition task.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Empirically grounded agent-based policy evaluation of the adoption of sustainable lighting under the European Ecodesign Directive
Authors:
Gido H. Schoenmacker,
Wander Jager,
Rineke Verbrugge
Abstract:
Twelve years ago, the European Union began with the gradual phase-out of energy-inefficient incandescent light bulbs under the Ecodesign Directive. In this work, we implement an agent-based simulation to model the consumer behaviour in the EU lighting market with the goal to explain consumer behaviour and explore alternative policies. Agents are based on the Consumat II model, have individual pref…
▽ More
Twelve years ago, the European Union began with the gradual phase-out of energy-inefficient incandescent light bulbs under the Ecodesign Directive. In this work, we implement an agent-based simulation to model the consumer behaviour in the EU lighting market with the goal to explain consumer behaviour and explore alternative policies. Agents are based on the Consumat II model, have individual preferences based on empirical market research, gather experience from past actions, and socially interact with each other in a dynamic environment. Our findings suggest that the adoption of energy-friendly lighting alternatives was hindered by a low level of consumer interest combined with high-enough levels of satisfaction about incandescent bulbs and that information campaigns can partially address this. These findings offer insight into both individual-level driving forces of behaviour and society-level outcomes in a niche market. With this, our work demonstrates the strengths of agent-based models for policy generation and evaluation.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Zero-one laws for provability logic: Axiomatizing validity in almost all models and almost all frames
Authors:
Rineke Verbrugge
Abstract:
It has been shown in the late 1960s that each formula of first-order logic without constants and function symbols obeys a zero-one law: As the number of elements of finite models increases, every formula holds either in almost all or in almost no models of that size. Therefore, many properties of models, such as having an even number of elements, cannot be expressed in the language of first-order…
▽ More
It has been shown in the late 1960s that each formula of first-order logic without constants and function symbols obeys a zero-one law: As the number of elements of finite models increases, every formula holds either in almost all or in almost no models of that size. Therefore, many properties of models, such as having an even number of elements, cannot be expressed in the language of first-order logic. For modal logics, limit behavior for models and frames may differ. Halpern and Kapron proved zero-one laws for classes of models corresponding to the modal logics K, T, S4, and S5.
In this paper, we prove zero-one laws for provability logic with respect to both model and frame validity. Moreover, we axiomatize validity in almost all relevant finite models and in almost all relevant finite frames, leading to two different axiom systems. In the proofs, we use a combinatorial result by Kleitman and Rothschild about the structure of almost all finite partial orders. On the way, we also show that a previous result by Halpern and Kapron about the axiomatization of almost sure frame validity for S4 is not correct. Finally, we consider the complexity of deciding whether a given formula is almost surely valid in the relevant finite models and frames.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2021; v1 submitted 11 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Strong Admissibility for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks
Authors:
Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi,
Rineke Verbrugge,
Bart Verheij
Abstract:
Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as a formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation allowing general logical satisfaction conditions. Different criteria used to settle the acceptance of arguments are called semantics. Semantics of ADFs have so far mainly been defined based on the concept of admissibility. However, the notion of strongly admissible semantics studied…
▽ More
Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) have been introduced as a formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation allowing general logical satisfaction conditions. Different criteria used to settle the acceptance of arguments are called semantics. Semantics of ADFs have so far mainly been defined based on the concept of admissibility. However, the notion of strongly admissible semantics studied for abstract argumentation frameworks has not yet been introduced for ADFs. In the current work we present the concept of strong admissibility of interpretations for ADFs. Further, we show that strongly admissible interpretations of ADFs form a lattice with the grounded interpretation as top element.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Local-HDP: Interactive Open-Ended 3D Object Categorization in Real-Time Robotic Scenarios
Authors:
H. Ayoobi,
H. Kasaei,
M. Cao,
R. Verbrugge,
B. Verheij
Abstract:
We introduce a non-parametric hierarchical Bayesian approach for open-ended 3D object categorization, named the Local Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (Local-HDP). This method allows an agent to learn independent topics for each category incrementally and to adapt to the environment in time. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches like Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) can transform low-level features to h…
▽ More
We introduce a non-parametric hierarchical Bayesian approach for open-ended 3D object categorization, named the Local Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (Local-HDP). This method allows an agent to learn independent topics for each category incrementally and to adapt to the environment in time. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches like Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) can transform low-level features to high-level conceptual topics for 3D object categorization. However, the efficiency and accuracy of LDA-based approaches depend on the number of topics that is chosen manually. Moreover, fixing the number of topics for all categories can lead to overfitting or underfitting of the model. In contrast, the proposed Local-HDP can autonomously determine the number of topics for each category. Furthermore, the online variational inference method has been adapted for fast posterior approximation in the Local-HDP model. Experiments show that the proposed Local-HDP method outperforms other state-of-the-art approaches in terms of accuracy, scalability, and memory efficiency by a large margin. Moreover, two robotic experiments have been conducted to show the applicability of the proposed approach in real-time applications.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2021; v1 submitted 2 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Commonly Knowing Whether
Authors:
Jie Fan,
Davide Grossi,
Barteld Kooi,
Xingchi Su,
Rineke Verbrugge
Abstract:
This paper introduces the notion of `commonly knowing whether', a non-standard version of standard common knowledge which is defined on the basis of `knowing whether', instead of standard `knowing that'. After giving five possible definitions of this notion, we explore the logical relations among them in the single-agent and multi-agent cases. We propose a sound and complete axiomatization. We inv…
▽ More
This paper introduces the notion of `commonly knowing whether', a non-standard version of standard common knowledge which is defined on the basis of `knowing whether', instead of standard `knowing that'. After giving five possible definitions of this notion, we explore the logical relations among them in the single-agent and multi-agent cases. We propose a sound and complete axiomatization. We investigate one of the five definitions in terms of expressivity via a strategy of modal comparison games.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2021; v1 submitted 12 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?
Authors:
Sujata Ghosh,
Aviad Heifetz,
Rineke Verbrugge,
Harmen de Weerd
Abstract:
In an earlier experiment, participants played a perfect information game against a computer, which was programmed to deviate often from its backward induction strategy right at the beginning of the game. Participants knew that in each game, the computer was nevertheless optimizing against some belief about the participant's future strategy. In the aggregate, it appeared that participants applied f…
▽ More
In an earlier experiment, participants played a perfect information game against a computer, which was programmed to deviate often from its backward induction strategy right at the beginning of the game. Participants knew that in each game, the computer was nevertheless optimizing against some belief about the participant's future strategy. In the aggregate, it appeared that participants applied forward induction. However, cardinal effects seemed to play a role as well: a number of participants might have been trying to maximize expected utility.
In order to find out how people really reason in such a game, we designed centipede-like turn-taking games with new payoff structures in order to make such cardinal effects less likely. We ran a new experiment with 50 participants, based on marble drop visualizations of these revised payoff structures. After participants played 48 test games, we asked a number of questions to gauge the participants' reasoning about their own and the opponent's strategy at all decision nodes of a sample game. We also checked how the verbalized strategies fit to the actual choices they made at all their decision points in the 48 test games.
Even though in the aggregate, participants in the new experiment still tend to slightly favor the forward induction choice at their first decision node, their verbalized strategies most often depend on their own attitudes towards risk and those they assign to the computer opponent, sometimes in addition to considerations about cooperativeness and competitiveness.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
Do players reason by forward induction in dynamic perfect information games?
Authors:
Sujata Ghosh,
Aviad Heifetz,
Rineke Verbrugge
Abstract:
We conducted an experiment where participants played a perfect-information game against a computer, which was programmed to deviate often from its backward induction strategy right at the beginning of the game. Participants knew that in each game, the computer was nevertheless optimizing against some belief about the participant's future strategy.
It turned out that in the aggregate, participant…
▽ More
We conducted an experiment where participants played a perfect-information game against a computer, which was programmed to deviate often from its backward induction strategy right at the beginning of the game. Participants knew that in each game, the computer was nevertheless optimizing against some belief about the participant's future strategy.
It turned out that in the aggregate, participants were likely to respond in a way which is optimal with respect to their best-rationalization extensive form rationalizability conjecture - namely the conjecture that the computer is after a larger prize than the one it has foregone, even when this necessarily meant that the computer has attributed future irrationality to the participant when the computer made the first move in the game. Thus, it appeared that participants applied forward induction. However, there exist alternative explanations for the choices of most participants; for example, choices could be based on the extent of risk aversion that participants attributed to the computer in the remainder of the game, rather than to the sunk outside option that the computer has already foregone at the beginning of the game. For this reason, the results of the experiment do not yet provide conclusive evidence for Forward Induction reasoning on the part of the participants.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Logic in the Lab
Authors:
Rineke Verbrugge
Abstract:
This file summarizes the plenary talk on laboratory experiments on logic at the TARK 2013 - 14th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge.
This file summarizes the plenary talk on laboratory experiments on logic at the TARK 2013 - 14th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge.
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
