Experimental and Computational Analysis of Energy Absorption Characteristics of Three Biomimetic Lattice Structures Under Compression
Authors:
Mahtab Vafaeefar,
Kevin M. Moerman,
Ted J. Vaughan
Abstract:
The objective of this study is to evaluate the mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics of the gyroid, dual-lattice and spinodoid structures, as biomimetic lattices, through finite element analysis and experimental characterisation. As part of the study, gyroid and dual-lattice structures at 10 percent volume fraction were 3D-printed using an elastic resin, and mechanically test…
▽ More
The objective of this study is to evaluate the mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics of the gyroid, dual-lattice and spinodoid structures, as biomimetic lattices, through finite element analysis and experimental characterisation. As part of the study, gyroid and dual-lattice structures at 10 percent volume fraction were 3D-printed using an elastic resin, and mechanically tested under uniaxial compression. Computational models were calibrated to the observed experimental data and the response of higher volume fraction structures were simulated in an explicit finite element solver. Stress-strain data of groups of lattices at different volume fractions were studied and energy absorption parameters including total energy absorbed per unit volume, energy absorption efficiency and onset of densification strain were calculated. Also, the structures were characterized into bending-dominant and stretch-dominant structures, according to their nodal connectivity and Gibson-and-Ashby's law. The results of the study showed that the dual-lattice is capable of absorbing more energy at each volume fraction cohort. However, gyroid structures showed higher energy absorption efficiency and the onset of densification at higher strains. The spinodoid structure was found to be the poorest structure in terms of energy absorption, specifically at low volume fractions. Also, the results showed that the dual-lattice was a stretch dominated structure, while the gyroid structure was a bending dominated structure, which may be a reason that it is a better candidate for energy absorption applications.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
A Morphological, Topological and Mechanical Investigation of Gyroid, Spinodoid and Dual-Lattice Algorithms as Structural Models of Trabecular Bone
Authors:
Mahtab Vafaeefar,
Kevin M. Moerman,
Majid Kavousi,
Ted J. Vaughan
Abstract:
In this study, we evaluate the performance of three algorithms as computational models of trabecular bone architecture, through systematic evaluation of morphometric, topological, and mechanical properties. Here, we consider the widely-used gyroid lattice structure, the recently-developed spinodoid structure and a structure similar to Voronoi lattices introduced here as the dual-lattice. While all…
▽ More
In this study, we evaluate the performance of three algorithms as computational models of trabecular bone architecture, through systematic evaluation of morphometric, topological, and mechanical properties. Here, we consider the widely-used gyroid lattice structure, the recently-developed spinodoid structure and a structure similar to Voronoi lattices introduced here as the dual-lattice. While all computational models were calibrated to recreate the trabecular tissue volume (e.g., BV/TV), it was found that both the gyroid- and spinodoid-based structures showed substantial differences in many other morphometric and topological parameters and, in turn, showed lower effective mechanical properties compared to trabecular bone. The newly-developed dual-lattice structures better captured both morphometric parameters and mechanical properties, despite certain differences being evident their topological configuration compared to trabecular bone. Still, these computational algorithms provide useful platforms to investigate trabecular bone mechanics and for designing biomimetic structures, which could be produced through additive manufacturing for applications that include bone substitutes, scaffolds and porous implants. Furthermore, the software for the creation of the structures has been added to the open source toolbox GIBBON and is therefore freely available to the community.
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
