-
Tag that issue: Applying API-domain labels in issue tracking systems
Authors:
Fabio Santos,
Joseph Vargovich,
Bianca Trinkenreich,
Italo Santos,
Jacob Penney,
Ricardo Britto,
João Felipe Pimentel,
Igor Wiese,
Igor Steinmacher,
Anita Sarma,
Marco A. Gerosa
Abstract:
Labeling issues with the skills required to complete them can help contributors to choose tasks in Open Source Software projects. However, manually labeling issues is time-consuming and error-prone, and current automated approaches are mostly limited to classifying issues as bugs/non-bugs. We investigate the feasibility and relevance of automatically labeling issues with what we call "API-domains,…
▽ More
Labeling issues with the skills required to complete them can help contributors to choose tasks in Open Source Software projects. However, manually labeling issues is time-consuming and error-prone, and current automated approaches are mostly limited to classifying issues as bugs/non-bugs. We investigate the feasibility and relevance of automatically labeling issues with what we call "API-domains," which are high-level categories of APIs. Therefore, we posit that the APIs used in the source code affected by an issue can be a proxy for the type of skills (e.g., DB, security, UI) needed to work on the issue. We ran a user study (n=74) to assess API-domain labels' relevancy to potential contributors, leveraged the issues' descriptions and the project history to build prediction models, and validated the predictions with contributors (n=20) of the projects. Our results show that (i) newcomers to the project consider API-domain labels useful in choosing tasks, (ii) labels can be predicted with a precision of 84% and a recall of 78.6% on average, (iii) the results of the predictions reached up to 71.3% in precision and 52.5% in recall when training with a project and testing in another (transfer learning), and (iv) project contributors consider most of the predictions helpful in identifying needed skills. These findings suggest our approach can be applied in practice to automatically label issues, assisting developers in finding tasks that better match their skills.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
GiveMeLabeledIssues: An Open Source Issue Recommendation System
Authors:
Joseph Vargovich,
Fabio Santos,
Jacob Penney,
Marco A. Gerosa,
Igor Steinmacher
Abstract:
Developers often struggle to navigate an Open Source Software (OSS) project's issue-tracking system and find a suitable task. Proper issue labeling can aid task selection, but current tools are limited to classifying the issues according to their type (e.g., bug, question, good first issue, feature, etc.). In contrast, this paper presents a tool (GiveMeLabeledIssues) that mines project repositorie…
▽ More
Developers often struggle to navigate an Open Source Software (OSS) project's issue-tracking system and find a suitable task. Proper issue labeling can aid task selection, but current tools are limited to classifying the issues according to their type (e.g., bug, question, good first issue, feature, etc.). In contrast, this paper presents a tool (GiveMeLabeledIssues) that mines project repositories and labels issues based on the skills required to solve them. We leverage the domain of the APIs involved in the solution (e.g., User Interface (UI), Test, Databases (DB), etc.) as a proxy for the required skills. GiveMeLabeledIssues facilitates matching developers' skills to tasks, reducing the burden on project maintainers. The tool obtained a precision of 83.9% when predicting the API domains involved in the issues. The replication package contains instructions on executing the tool and including new projects. A demo video is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic2quUue7i8
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
Authors:
Mairieli Wessel,
Joseph Vargovich,
Marco A. Gerosa,
Christoph Treude
Abstract:
Software projects frequently use automation tools to perform repetitive activities in the distributed software development process. Recently, GitHub introduced GitHub Actions, a feature providing automated workflows for software projects. Understanding and anticipating the effects of adopting such technology is important for planning and management. Our research investigates how projects use GitHu…
▽ More
Software projects frequently use automation tools to perform repetitive activities in the distributed software development process. Recently, GitHub introduced GitHub Actions, a feature providing automated workflows for software projects. Understanding and anticipating the effects of adopting such technology is important for planning and management. Our research investigates how projects use GitHub Actions, what the developers discuss about them, and how project activity indicators change after their adoption. Our results indicate that 1,489 out of 5,000 most popular repositories (almost 30% of our sample) adopt GitHub Actions and that developers frequently ask for help implementing them. Our findings also suggest that the adoption of GitHub Actions leads to more rejections of pull requests (PRs), more communication in accepted PRs and less communication in rejected PRs, fewer commits in accepted PRs and more commits in rejected PRs, and more time to accept a PR. We found similar results when segmenting our results by categories of GitHub Actions. We suggest practitioners consider these effects when adopting GitHub Actions on their projects.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2023; v1 submitted 28 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Linear time dynamic programming for the exact path of optimal models selected from a finite set
Authors:
Toby Hocking,
Joseph Vargovich
Abstract:
Many learning algorithms are formulated in terms of finding model parameters which minimize a data-fitting loss function plus a regularizer. When the regularizer involves the l0 pseudo-norm, the resulting regularization path consists of a finite set of models. The fastest existing algorithm for computing the breakpoints in the regularization path is quadratic in the number of models, so it scales…
▽ More
Many learning algorithms are formulated in terms of finding model parameters which minimize a data-fitting loss function plus a regularizer. When the regularizer involves the l0 pseudo-norm, the resulting regularization path consists of a finite set of models. The fastest existing algorithm for computing the breakpoints in the regularization path is quadratic in the number of models, so it scales poorly to high dimensional problems. We provide new formal proofs that a dynamic programming algorithm can be used to compute the breakpoints in linear time. Empirical results on changepoint detection problems demonstrate the improved accuracy and speed relative to grid search and the previous quadratic time algorithm.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
