-
Unifying nonlinearly constrained nonconvex optimization
Authors:
Charlie Vanaret,
Sven Leyffer
Abstract:
Derivative-based iterative methods for nonlinearly constrained nonconvex optimization usually share common algorithmic components, such as strategies for computing a descent direction and mechanisms that promote global convergence. Based on this observation, we introduce an abstract framework based on four common ingredients that describes most derivative-based iterative methods and unifies their…
▽ More
Derivative-based iterative methods for nonlinearly constrained nonconvex optimization usually share common algorithmic components, such as strategies for computing a descent direction and mechanisms that promote global convergence. Based on this observation, we introduce an abstract framework based on four common ingredients that describes most derivative-based iterative methods and unifies their workflows. We then present Uno, a modular C++ solver that implements our abstract framework and allows the automatic generation of various strategy combinations with no programming effort from the user. Uno is meant to (1) organize mathematical optimization strategies into a coherent hierarchy; (2) offer a wide range of efficient and robust methods that can be compared for a given instance; (3) enable researchers to experiment with novel optimization strategies; and (4) reduce the cost of development and maintenance of multiple optimization solvers. Uno's software design allows user to compose new customized solvers for emerging optimization areas such as robust optimization or optimization problems with complementarity constraints, while building on reliable nonlinear optimization techniques. We demonstrate that Uno is highly competitive against state-of-the-art solvers filterSQP, IPOPT, SNOPT, MINOS, LANCELOT, LOQO, and CONOPT on a subset of 429 small problems from the CUTEst collection. Uno is available as open-source software under the MIT license at https://github.com/cvanaret/Uno .
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
An Almost Feasible Sequential Linear Programming Algorithm
Authors:
David Kiessling,
Charlie Vanaret,
Alejandro Astudillo,
Wilm Decre,
Jan Swevers
Abstract:
This paper proposes an almost feasible Sequential Linear Programming (afSLP) algorithm. In the first part, the practical limitations of previously proposed Feasible Sequential Linear Programming (FSLP) methods are discussed along with illustrative examples. Then, we present a generalization of FSLP based on a tolerance-tube method that addresses the shortcomings of FSLP. The proposed algorithm afS…
▽ More
This paper proposes an almost feasible Sequential Linear Programming (afSLP) algorithm. In the first part, the practical limitations of previously proposed Feasible Sequential Linear Programming (FSLP) methods are discussed along with illustrative examples. Then, we present a generalization of FSLP based on a tolerance-tube method that addresses the shortcomings of FSLP. The proposed algorithm afSLP consists of two phases. Phase I starts from random infeasible points and iterates towards a relaxation of the feasible set. Once the tolerance-tube around the feasible set is reached, phase II is started and all future iterates are kept within the tolerance-tube. The novel method includes enhancements to the originally proposed tolerance-tube method that are necessary for global convergence. afSLP is shown to outperform FSLP and the state-of-the-art solver IPOPT on a SCARA robot optimization problem.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Progress in Mathematical Programming Solvers from 2001 to 2020
Authors:
Thorsten Koch,
Timo Berthold,
Jaap Pedersen,
Charlie Vanaret
Abstract:
This study investigates the progress made in LP and MILP solver performance during the last two decades by comparing the solver software from the beginning of the millennium with the codes available today. On average, we found out that for solving LP/MILP, computer hardware got about 20 times faster, and the algorithms improved by a factor of about nine for LP and around 50 for MILP, which gives a…
▽ More
This study investigates the progress made in LP and MILP solver performance during the last two decades by comparing the solver software from the beginning of the millennium with the codes available today. On average, we found out that for solving LP/MILP, computer hardware got about 20 times faster, and the algorithms improved by a factor of about nine for LP and around 50 for MILP, which gives a total speed-up of about 180 and 1,000 times, respectively. However, these numbers have a very high variance and they considerably underestimate the progress made on the algorithmic side: many problem instances can nowadays be solved within seconds, which the old codes are not able to solve within any reasonable time.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2022; v1 submitted 20 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Interval constraint programming for globally solving catalog-based categorical optimization
Authors:
Charlie Vanaret
Abstract:
In this article, we propose an interval constraint programming method for globally solving catalog-based categorical optimization problems. It supports catalogs of arbitrary size and properties of arbitrary dimension, and does not require any modeling effort from the user. A novel catalog-based contractor (or filtering operator) guarantees consistency between the categorical properties and the exi…
▽ More
In this article, we propose an interval constraint programming method for globally solving catalog-based categorical optimization problems. It supports catalogs of arbitrary size and properties of arbitrary dimension, and does not require any modeling effort from the user. A novel catalog-based contractor (or filtering operator) guarantees consistency between the categorical properties and the existing catalog items. This results in an intuitive and generic approach that is exact, rigorous (robust to roundoff errors) and can be easily implemented in an off-the-shelf interval-based continuous solver that interleaves branching and constraint propagation. We demonstrate the validity of the approach on a numerical problem in which a categorical variable is described by a two-dimensional property space. A Julia prototype is available as open-source software under the MIT license at https://github.com/cvanaret/CateGOrical.jl
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2024; v1 submitted 8 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Two-phase approaches to optimal model-based design of experiments: how many experiments and which ones?
Authors:
Charlie Vanaret,
Philipp Seufert,
Jan Schwientek,
Gleb Karpov,
Gleb Ryzhakov,
Ivan Oseledets,
Norbert Asprion,
Michael Bortz
Abstract:
Model-based experimental design is attracting increasing attention in chemical process engineering. Typically, an iterative procedure is pursued: an approximate model is devised, prescribed experiments are then performed and the resulting data is exploited to refine the model. To help to reduce the cost of trial-and-error approaches, strategies for model-based design of experiments suggest experim…
▽ More
Model-based experimental design is attracting increasing attention in chemical process engineering. Typically, an iterative procedure is pursued: an approximate model is devised, prescribed experiments are then performed and the resulting data is exploited to refine the model. To help to reduce the cost of trial-and-error approaches, strategies for model-based design of experiments suggest experimental points where the expected gain in information for the model is the largest. It requires the resolution of a large nonlinear, generally nonconvex, optimization problem, whose solution may greatly depend on the starting point. We present two discretization strategies that can assist the experimenter in setting the number of relevant experiments and performing an optimal selection, and we compare them against two pattern-based strategies that are independent of the problem. The validity of the approaches is demonstrated on an academic example and two test problems from chemical engineering including a vapor liquid equilibrium and reaction kinetics.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Certified Global Minima for a Benchmark of Difficult Optimization Problems
Authors:
Charlie Vanaret,
Jean-Baptiste Gotteland,
Nicolas Durand,
Jean-Marc Alliot
Abstract:
We provide the global optimization community with new optimality proofs for six deceptive benchmark functions (five bound-constrained functions and one nonlinearly constrained problem). These highly multimodal nonlinear test problems are among the most challenging benchmark functions for global optimization solvers; some have not been solved even with approximate methods. The global optima that we…
▽ More
We provide the global optimization community with new optimality proofs for six deceptive benchmark functions (five bound-constrained functions and one nonlinearly constrained problem). These highly multimodal nonlinear test problems are among the most challenging benchmark functions for global optimization solvers; some have not been solved even with approximate methods. The global optima that we report have been numerically certified using Charibde (Vanaret et al., 2013), a hybrid algorithm that combines an evolutionary algorithm and interval-based methods. While metaheuristics generally solve large problems and provide sufficiently good solutions with limited computation capacity, exact methods are deemed unsuitable for difficult multimodal optimization problems. The achievement of new optimality results by Charibde demonstrates that reconciling stochastic algorithms and numerical analysis methods is a step forward into handling problems that were up to now considered unsolvable. We also provide a comparison with state-of-the-art solvers based on mathematical programming methods and population-based metaheuristics, and show that Charibde, in addition to being reliable, is highly competitive with the best solvers on the given test functions.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Hybridization of interval methods and evolutionary algorithms for solving difficult optimization problems
Authors:
Charlie Vanaret
Abstract:
Reliable global optimization is dedicated to finding a global minimum in the presence of rounding errors. The only approaches for achieving a numerical proof of global optimality are interval branch and bound methods that interleave branching of the search-space and pruning of the subdomains that cannot contain an optimal solution. It is of the utmost importance: i) to compute sharp enclosures of…
▽ More
Reliable global optimization is dedicated to finding a global minimum in the presence of rounding errors. The only approaches for achieving a numerical proof of global optimality are interval branch and bound methods that interleave branching of the search-space and pruning of the subdomains that cannot contain an optimal solution. It is of the utmost importance: i) to compute sharp enclosures of the objective function and the constraints on a given subdomain; ii) to find a good approximation (an upper bound) of the global minimum.
State-of-the-art solvers are generally integrative methods, that is they embed local optimization algorithms to compute a good upper bound of the global minimum over each subspace. In this document, we propose a cooperative framework in which interval methods cooperate with evolutionary algorithms. The latter are stochastic algorithms in which a population of candidate solutions iteratively evolves in the search-space to reach satisfactory solutions. Evolutionary algorithms, endowed with operators that help individuals escape from local minima, are particularly suited for difficult problems on which traditional methods struggle to converge.
Within our cooperative solver Charibde, the evolutionary algorithm and the interval-based algorithm run in parallel and exchange bounds, solutions and search-space via message passing. A novel strategy prevents premature convergence toward local minima. A comparison of Charibde with state-of-the-art solvers (GlobSol, IBBA, Ibex) on a benchmark of difficult problems shows that Charibde converges faster by an order of magnitude. New optimality results are provided for five multimodal problems, for which few solutions were available in the literature. Finally, we provide the first numerical proof of optimality for the open Lennard-Jones cluster problem with five atoms.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Hybridization of Interval CP and Evolutionary Algorithms for Optimizing Difficult Problems
Authors:
Charlie Vanaret,
Jean-Baptiste Gotteland,
Nicolas Durand,
Jean-Marc Alliot
Abstract:
The only rigorous approaches for achieving a numerical proof of optimality in global optimization are interval-based methods that interleave branching of the search-space and pruning of the subdomains that cannot contain an optimal solution. State-of-the-art solvers generally integrate local optimization algorithms to compute a good upper bound of the global minimum over each subspace. In this doc…
▽ More
The only rigorous approaches for achieving a numerical proof of optimality in global optimization are interval-based methods that interleave branching of the search-space and pruning of the subdomains that cannot contain an optimal solution. State-of-the-art solvers generally integrate local optimization algorithms to compute a good upper bound of the global minimum over each subspace. In this document, we propose a cooperative framework in which interval methods cooperate with evolutionary algorithms. The latter are stochastic algorithms in which a population of candidate solutions iteratively evolves in the search-space to reach satisfactory solutions.
Within our cooperative solver Charibde, the evolutionary algorithm and the interval-based algorithm run in parallel and exchange bounds, solutions and search-space in an advanced manner via message passing. A comparison of Charibde with state-of-the-art interval-based solvers (GlobSol, IBBA, Ibex) and NLP solvers (Couenne, BARON) on a benchmark of difficult COCONUT problems shows that Charibde is highly competitive against non-rigorous solvers and converges faster than rigorous solvers by an order of magnitude.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
