-
A Lossless Deamortization for Dynamic Greedy Set Cover
Authors:
Shay Solomon,
Amitai Uzrad,
Tianyi Zhang
Abstract:
The dynamic set cover problem has been subject to growing research attention in recent years. In this problem, we are given as input a dynamic universe of at most $n$ elements and a fixed collection of $m$ sets, where each element appears in a most $f$ sets and the cost of each set is in $[1/C, 1]$, and the goal is to efficiently maintain an approximate minimum set cover under element updates.
T…
▽ More
The dynamic set cover problem has been subject to growing research attention in recent years. In this problem, we are given as input a dynamic universe of at most $n$ elements and a fixed collection of $m$ sets, where each element appears in a most $f$ sets and the cost of each set is in $[1/C, 1]$, and the goal is to efficiently maintain an approximate minimum set cover under element updates.
Two algorithms that dynamize the classic greedy algorithm are known, providing $O(\log n)$ and $((1+ε)\ln n)$-approximation with amortized update times $O(f \log n)$ and $O(\frac{f \log n}{ε^5})$, respectively [GKKP (STOC'17); SU (STOC'23)]. The question of whether one can get approximation $O(\log n)$ (or even worse) with low worst-case update time has remained open -- only the naive $O(f \cdot n)$ time bound is known, even for unweighted instances.
In this work we devise the first amortized greedy algorithm that is amenable to an efficient deamortization, and also develop a lossless deamortization approach suitable for the set cover problem, the combination of which yields a $((1+ε)\ln n)$-approximation algorithm with a worst-case update time of $O(\frac{f\log n}{ε^2})$. Our worst-case time bound -- the first to break the naive $O(f \cdot n)$ bound -- matches the previous best amortized bound, and actually improves its $ε$-dependence.
Further, to demonstrate the applicability of our deamortization approach, we employ it, in conjunction with the primal-dual amortized algorithm of [BHN (FOCS'19)], to obtain a $((1+ε)f)$-approximation algorithm with a worst-case update time of $O(\frac{f\log n}{ε^2})$, improving over the previous best bound of $O(\frac{f \cdot \log^2(Cn)}{ε^3})$ [BHNW (SODA'21)].
Finally, as direct implications of our results for set cover, we [...]
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Dynamic $((1+ε)\ln n)$-Approximation Algorithms for Minimum Set Cover and Dominating Set
Authors:
Shay Solomon,
Amitai Uzrad
Abstract:
The minimum set cover (MSC) problem admits two classic algorithms: a greedy $\ln n$-approximation and a primal-dual $f$-approximation, where $n$ is the universe size and $f$ is the maximum frequency of an element. Both algorithms are simple and efficient, and remarkably -- one cannot improve these approximations under hardness results by more than a factor of $(1+ε)$, for any constant $ε> 0$.
In…
▽ More
The minimum set cover (MSC) problem admits two classic algorithms: a greedy $\ln n$-approximation and a primal-dual $f$-approximation, where $n$ is the universe size and $f$ is the maximum frequency of an element. Both algorithms are simple and efficient, and remarkably -- one cannot improve these approximations under hardness results by more than a factor of $(1+ε)$, for any constant $ε> 0$.
In their pioneering work, Gupta et al. [STOC'17] showed that the greedy algorithm can be dynamized to achieve $O(\log n)$-approximation with update time $O(f \log n)$. Building on this result, Hjuler et al. [STACS'18] dynamized the greedy minimum dominating set (MDS) algorithm, achieving a similar approximation with update time $O(Δ\log n)$ (the analog of $O(f \log n)$), albeit for unweighted instances. The approximations of both algorithms, which are the state-of-the-art, exceed the static $\ln n$-approximation by a rather large constant factor. In sharp contrast, the current best dynamic primal-dual MSC algorithms achieve fast update times together with an approximation that exceeds the static $f$-approximation by a factor of (at most) $1+ε$, for any $ε> 0$.
This paper aims to bridge the gap between the best approximation factor of the dynamic greedy MSC and MDS algorithms and the static $\ln n$ bound. We present dynamic algorithms for weighted greedy MSC and MDS with approximation $(1+ε)\ln n$ for any $ε> 0$, while achieving the same update time (ignoring dependencies on $ε$) of the best previous algorithms (with approximation significantly larger than $\ln n$). Moreover, [...]
△ Less
Submitted 29 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Maintaining an EDCS in General Graphs: Simpler, Density-Sensitive and with Worst-Case Time Bounds
Authors:
Fabrizio Grandoni,
Chris Schwiegelshohn,
Shay Solomon,
Amitai Uzrad
Abstract:
In their breakthrough ICALP'15 paper, Bernstein and Stein presented an algorithm for maintaining a $(3/2+ε)$-approximate maximum matching in fully dynamic {\em bipartite} graphs with a {\em worst-case} update time of $O_ε(m^{1/4})$; we use the $O_ε$ notation to suppress the $ε$-dependence. Their main technical contribution was in presenting a new type of bounded-degree subgraph, which they named a…
▽ More
In their breakthrough ICALP'15 paper, Bernstein and Stein presented an algorithm for maintaining a $(3/2+ε)$-approximate maximum matching in fully dynamic {\em bipartite} graphs with a {\em worst-case} update time of $O_ε(m^{1/4})$; we use the $O_ε$ notation to suppress the $ε$-dependence. Their main technical contribution was in presenting a new type of bounded-degree subgraph, which they named an {\em edge degree constrained subgraph (EDCS)}, which contains a large matching -- of size that is smaller than the maximum matching size of the entire graph by at most a factor of $3/2+ε$. They demonstrate that the EDCS can be maintained with a worst-case update time of $O_ε(m^{1/4})$, and their main result follows as a direct corollary. In their followup SODA'16 paper, Bernstein and Stein generalized their result for general graphs, achieving the same update time of $O_ε(m^{1/4})$, albeit with an amortized rather than worst-case bound. To date, the best {\em deterministic} worst-case update time bound for {\em any} better-than-2 approximate matching is $O(\sqrt{m})$ [Neiman and Solomon, STOC'13], [Gupta and Peng, FOCS'13]; allowing randomization (against an oblivious adversary) one can achieve a much better (still polynomial) update time for approximation slightly below 2 [Behnezhad, Lacki and Mirrokni, SODA'20].
In this work we\footnote{\em quasi nanos, gigantium humeris insidentes} simplify the approach of Bernstein and Stein for bipartite graphs, which allows us to generalize it for general graphs while maintaining the same bound of $O_ε(m^{1/4})$ on the {\em worst-case} update time. Moreover, our approach is {\em density-sensitive}: If the {\em arboricity} of the dynamic graph is bounded by $α$ at all times, then the worst-case update time of the algorithm is $O_ε(\sqrtα)$.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
