-
Separately Convex and Separately Continuous Preferences: On Results of Schmeidler, Shafer, and Bergstrom-Parks-Rader
Authors:
Metin Uyanik,
Aniruddha Ghosh,
M. Ali Khan
Abstract:
We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a correspondence taking values in a finite-dimensional Euclidean space to be open so as to revisit the pioneering work of Schmeidler (1969), Shafer (1974), Shafer-Sonnenschein (1975) and Bergstrom-Rader-Parks (1976) to answer several questions they and their followers left open. We introduce the notion of separate convexity for a correspondence an…
▽ More
We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for a correspondence taking values in a finite-dimensional Euclidean space to be open so as to revisit the pioneering work of Schmeidler (1969), Shafer (1974), Shafer-Sonnenschein (1975) and Bergstrom-Rader-Parks (1976) to answer several questions they and their followers left open. We introduce the notion of separate convexity for a correspondence and use it to relate to classical notions of continuity while giving salience to the notion of separateness as in the interplay of separate continuity and separate convexity of binary relations. As such, we provide a consolidation of the convexity-continuity postulates from a broad inter-disciplinary perspective and comment on how the qualified notions proposed here have implications of substantive interest for choice theory.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Continuity Postulates and Solvability Axioms in Economic Theory and in Mathematical Psychology: A Consolidation of the Theory of Individual Choice
Authors:
Aniruddha Ghosh,
M. Ali Khan,
Metin Uyanik
Abstract:
This paper presents four theorems that connect continuity postulates in mathematical economics to solvability axioms in mathematical psychology, and ranks them under alternative supplementary assumptions. Theorem 1 connects notions of continuity (full, separate, Wold, weak Wold, Archimedean, mixture) with those of solvability (restricted, unrestricted) under the completeness and transitivity of a…
▽ More
This paper presents four theorems that connect continuity postulates in mathematical economics to solvability axioms in mathematical psychology, and ranks them under alternative supplementary assumptions. Theorem 1 connects notions of continuity (full, separate, Wold, weak Wold, Archimedean, mixture) with those of solvability (restricted, unrestricted) under the completeness and transitivity of a binary relation. Theorem 2 uses the primitive notion of a separately-continuous function to answer the question when an analogous property on a relation is fully continuous. Theorem 3 provides a portmanteau theorem on the equivalence between restricted solvability and various notions of continuity under weak monotonicity. Finally, Theorem 4 presents a variant of Theorem 3 that follows Theorem 1 in dispensing with the dimensionality requirement and in providing partial equivalences between solvability and continuity notions. These theorems are motivated for their potential use in representation theorems.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2022; v1 submitted 16 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
The Continuity Postulate in Economic Theory: A Deconstruction and an Integration
Authors:
Metin Uyanik,
M. Ali Khan
Abstract:
This paper presents six theorems and ten propositions that can be read as deconstructing and integrating the continuity postulate under the rubric of pioneering work of Eilenberg, Wold, von Neumann-Morgenstern, Herstein-Milnor and Debreu. Its point of departure is the fact that the adjective continuous applied to a function or a binary relation does not acknowledge the many meanings that can be gi…
▽ More
This paper presents six theorems and ten propositions that can be read as deconstructing and integrating the continuity postulate under the rubric of pioneering work of Eilenberg, Wold, von Neumann-Morgenstern, Herstein-Milnor and Debreu. Its point of departure is the fact that the adjective continuous applied to a function or a binary relation does not acknowledge the many meanings that can be given to the concept it names, and that under a variety of technical mathematical structures, its many meanings can be whittled down to novel and unexpected equivalences that have been missed in the theory of choice. Specifically, it provides a systematic investigation of the two-way relation between restricted and full continuity of a function and a binary relation that, under convex, monotonic and differentiable structures, draws out the behavioral implications of the postulate.
△ Less
Submitted 26 January, 2022; v1 submitted 26 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Binary Relations in Mathematical Economics: On the Continuity, Additivity and Monotonicity Postulates in Eilenberg, Villegas and DeGroot
Authors:
M. Ali Khan,
Metin Uyanik
Abstract:
This chapter examines how positivity and order play out in two important questions in mathematical economics, and in so doing, subjects the postulates of continuity, additivity and monotonicity to closer scrutiny. Two sets of results are offered: the first departs from Eilenberg's (1941) necessary and sufficient conditions on the topology under which an anti-symmetric, complete, transitive and con…
▽ More
This chapter examines how positivity and order play out in two important questions in mathematical economics, and in so doing, subjects the postulates of continuity, additivity and monotonicity to closer scrutiny. Two sets of results are offered: the first departs from Eilenberg's (1941) necessary and sufficient conditions on the topology under which an anti-symmetric, complete, transitive and continuous binary relation exists on a topologically connected space; and the second, from DeGroot's (1970) result concerning an additivity postulate that ensures a complete binary relation on a σ-algebra to be transitive. These results are framed in the registers of order, topology, algebra and measure-theory; and also beyond mathematics in economics: the exploitation of Villegas' notion of monotonic continuity by Arrow-Chichilnisky in the context of Savage's theorem in decision theory, and the extension of Diamond's impossibility result in social choice theory by Basu-Mitra. As such, this chapter has a synthetic and expository motivation, and can be read as a plea for inter-disciplinary conversations, connections and collaboration.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
The Yannelis-Prabhakar Theorem on Upper Semi-Continuous Selections in Paracompact Spaces: Extensions and Applications
Authors:
M. Ali Khan,
Metin Uyanik
Abstract:
In a 1983 paper, Yannelis-Prabhakar rely on Michael's selection theorem to guarantee a continuous selection in the context of the existence of maximal elements and equilibria in abstract economies. In this tribute to Nicholas Yannelis, we root this paper in Chapter II of Yannelis' 1983 Rochester Ph.D. dissertation, and identify its pioneering application of the paracompactness condition to current…
▽ More
In a 1983 paper, Yannelis-Prabhakar rely on Michael's selection theorem to guarantee a continuous selection in the context of the existence of maximal elements and equilibria in abstract economies. In this tribute to Nicholas Yannelis, we root this paper in Chapter II of Yannelis' 1983 Rochester Ph.D. dissertation, and identify its pioneering application of the paracompactness condition to current and ongoing work of Yannelis and his co-authors, and to mathematical economics more generally. We move beyond the literature to provide a necessary and sufficient condition for upper semi-continuous local and global selections of correspondences, and to provide application to five domains of Yannelis' interests: Berge's maximum theorem, the Gale-Nikaido-Debreu lemma, the Gale-McKenzie survival assumption, Shafer's non-transitive setting, and the Anderson-Khan-Rashid approximate existence theorem. The last resonates with Chapter VI of the Yannelis' dissertation.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
On an Extension of a Theorem of Eilenberg and a Characterization of Topological Connectedness
Authors:
M. Ali Khan,
Metin Uyanik
Abstract:
On taking a non-trivial and semi-transitive bi-relation constituted by two (hard and soft) binary relations, we report a (i) p-continuity assumption that guarantees the completeness and transitivity of its soft part, and a (ii) characterization of a connected topological space in terms of its attendant properties on the space. Our work generalizes antecedent results in applied mathematics, all fol…
▽ More
On taking a non-trivial and semi-transitive bi-relation constituted by two (hard and soft) binary relations, we report a (i) p-continuity assumption that guarantees the completeness and transitivity of its soft part, and a (ii) characterization of a connected topological space in terms of its attendant properties on the space. Our work generalizes antecedent results in applied mathematics, all following Eilenberg (1941), and now framed in the context of a parametrized-topological space. This re-framing is directly inspired by the continuity assumption in Wold (1943-44) and the mixture-space structure proposed in Herstein and Milnor (1953), and the unifying synthesis of these pioneering but neglected papers that it affords may have independent interest.
△ Less
Submitted 29 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Completeness and Transitivity of Preferences on Mixture Sets
Authors:
Tsogbadral Galaabaatar,
M. Ali Khan,
Metin Uyanık
Abstract:
In this paper, we show that the presence of the Archimedean and the mixture-continuity properties of a binary relation, both empirically non-falsifiable in principle, foreclose the possibility of consistency (transitivity) without decisiveness (completeness), or decisiveness without consistency, or in the presence of a weak consistency condition, neither. The basic result can be sharpened when spe…
▽ More
In this paper, we show that the presence of the Archimedean and the mixture-continuity properties of a binary relation, both empirically non-falsifiable in principle, foreclose the possibility of consistency (transitivity) without decisiveness (completeness), or decisiveness without consistency, or in the presence of a weak consistency condition, neither. The basic result can be sharpened when specialized from the context of a generalized mixture set to that of a mixture set in the sense of Herstein-Milnor (1953). We relate the results to the antecedent literature, and view them as part of an investigation into the interplay of the structure of the choice space and the behavioral assumptions on the binary relation defined on it; the ES research program due to Eilenberg (1941) and Sonnenschein (1965), and one to which Schmeidler (1971) is an especially influential contribution.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Topological Connectedness and Behavioral Assumptions on Preferences: A Two-Way Relationship
Authors:
M. Ali Khan,
Metin Uyanık
Abstract:
This paper offers a comprehensive treatment of the question as to whether a binary relation can be consistent (transitive) without being decisive (complete), or decisive without being consistent, or simultaneously inconsistent or indecisive, in the presence of a continuity hypothesis that is, in principle, non-testable. It identifies topological connectedness of the (choice) set over which the con…
▽ More
This paper offers a comprehensive treatment of the question as to whether a binary relation can be consistent (transitive) without being decisive (complete), or decisive without being consistent, or simultaneously inconsistent or indecisive, in the presence of a continuity hypothesis that is, in principle, non-testable. It identifies topological connectedness of the (choice) set over which the continuous binary relation is defined as being crucial to this question. Referring to the two-way relationship as the Eilenberg-Sonnenschein (ES) research program, it presents four synthetic, and complete, characterizations of connectedness, and its natural extensions; and two consequences that only stem from it. The six theorems are novel to both the economic and the mathematical literature: they generalize pioneering results of Eilenberg (1941), Sonnenschein (1965), Schmeidler (1971) and Sen (1969), and are relevant to several applied contexts, as well as to ongoing theoretical work.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2018; v1 submitted 3 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
